GI Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems GI Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. 2193-0864 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/gi-1-197-2012 Optimization of CPMG sequences to measure NMR transverse relaxation time <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> in borehole applications Ronczka M. 1 Müller-Petke M. 1 Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics, Hannover, Germany 21 11 2012 1 2 197 208 Copyright: © 2012 M. Ronczka 2012 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/1/197/2012/gi-1-197-2012.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/1/197/2012/gi-1-197-2012.pdf

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) can provide key information such as porosity and permeability for hydrological characterization of geological material. In particular the NMR transverse relaxation time <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> is used to estimate permeability since it reflects a pore-size dependent relaxation process. The measurement sequence (CPMG) usually consists of several thousands of electromagnetic pulses to densely record the relaxation process and to avoid relaxation processes that are due to diffusion. These pulses are equidistantly spaced by a time constant <i>t</i><sub>E</sub>. <br><br> In NMR borehole applications the use of CPMG sequences for measuring the transverse relaxation time <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> is limited due to requirements on energy consumption. For measuring <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>, it is state-of-the-art to conduct at least two sequences with different echo spacings (<i>t</i><sub>E</sub>) for recording fast and slow relaxing processes that correspond to different pore-sizes. We focus on conducting only a single CPMG sequence and reducing the amount of energy while obtaining both slow and fast decaying components and minimizing the influence of relaxation due to diffusion. Therefore, we tested the usage of CPMG sequences with an increasing <i>t</i><sub>E</sub> and a decreasing number of pulses. <br><br> A synthetic study as well as laboratory measurements on samples of glass beads and granulate material of different grain size spectra were conducted to evaluate the effects of an increasing <i>t</i><sub>E</sub>. We show that <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> distributions are broadened if the number of pulses is decreasing and the mean grain size is increasing, which is mostly an effect of a significantly shortened acquisition time. The shift of <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> distributions to small decay times as a function of <i>t</i><sub>E</sub> and the mean grain size distribution is observed. <br><br> We found that it is possible to conduct CPMG sequences with an increased <i>t</i><sub>E</sub>. According to the acquisition time and increasing influence of relaxation due to diffusion, the sequence parameters need to be chosen carefully to avoid misinterpretations.

 References Aster, R., Borchers, B., and Thurber, C.: {P}arameter {E}stimation and {I}nverse {P}roblems, Elsevier Academic Press, 2005. Bloch, F., Hansen, W.&nbsp;W., and Packard, M.: {T}he {N}uclear {I}nduction {E}xperiment, Phys. Rev., 70, 474–485, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.70.474">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.70.474</a>, 1946. Brown, R. and Gamson, B.: {N}uclear, magnetism logging, J. Petrol. Technol., 12, 199–207, 1960. Brownstein, K.&nbsp;R. and Tarr, C.&nbsp;E.: I}mportance of classical diffusion in {NMR studies of water in biological cells, Phys. Rev.&nbsp;A, 19, 2446–2453, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.19.2446">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.19.2446</a>, 1979. Carr, H.&nbsp;Y. and Purcell, E.&nbsp;M.: {E}ffects of {D}iffusion on {F}ree {P}recession in {N}uclear {M}agnetic {R}esonance {E}xperiments, Phys. Rev., 94, 630–638, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.94.630">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.94.630</a>, 1954. Coates, G., Xiao, L., and Prammer, M.: NMR {L}ogging {P}rinciples and {A}pplication, Halliburton Energy Services, Houston, 1999. Dunn, K.&nbsp;J., Bergman, D.&nbsp;J., and Latorraca, G.&nbsp;A.: {N}uclear magnetic resonance, 1st&nbsp;Edn., Pergamon, 2002. Godefroy, S., Fleury, M., Deflandre, F., and Korb, J.-P.: T}emperature effect on {NMR surface relaxation, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30&nbsp;September–3&nbsp;October&nbsp;2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71700-MS">https://doi.org/10.2118/71700-MS</a>, 2001. Hahn, E.&nbsp;L.: {S}pin {E}choes, Phys. Rev., 80, 580–594, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.580">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.580</a>, 1950. Hürlimann, M.&nbsp;D. and Venkataramanan, L.: {Q}uantitative {M}easurement of {T}wo-{D}imensional {D}istribution {F}unctions of {D}iffusion and {R}elaxation in {F}rossly {I}nhomogeneous {F}ields, J. Magnet. Reson., 157, 31–42, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2002.2567">https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2002.2567</a>, 2002. Kenyon, W.&nbsp;E.: P}etrophysical {P}rinciples of {A}pplications of {NMR {L}ogging, Log Analyst, 38, 21–43, 1997. Kleinberg, R. L.: {P}ore size distributions, pore coupling, and transverse relaxation spectra of porous rocks, Proceedings of the Second International Meeting on Recent Advances in MR&nbsp;Applications to Porous Media, Magnet. Reson. Imaging, 12, 271–274, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(94)91534-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(94)91534-2</a>, 1994. Kleinberg, R.&nbsp;L. and Horsfield, M.&nbsp;A.: {T}ransverse relaxation processes in porous sedimentary rock, J. Magnet. Reson., 88, 9–19, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(90)90104-H">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(90)90104-H</a>, 1990. Kruspe, T., Thern, H.&nbsp;F., Kurz, G., Blanz, M., Akkurt, R., Ruwaili, S., Seifert, D., and Marsala, A.&nbsp;F.: {S}limhole {A}pplication of {M}agnetic {R}esonance {W}hile {D}rilling, in: SPWLA 50th&nbsp;Annual Logging Symposium, 21–24&nbsp;June&nbsp;2009, The Woodlands, Texas, p.&nbsp;15, 2009. Meiboom, S. and Gill, D.: {M}odified {S}pin-{E}cho {M}ethod for {M}easuring {N}uclear {R}elaxation {T}imes, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 29, 688–691, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1716296">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1716296</a>, 1958. Miller, M., Paltiel, Z., Gillen, M., Granot, J., and Bouton, J.: {S}pin {E}cho {M}agnetic {R}esonance {L}ogging: {P}orosity and {F}ree {F}luid {I}ndex {D}etermination, SPE paper&nbsp;20561, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1990. Mohnke, O. and Yaramanci, U.: {P}ore size distributions and hydraulic conductivities of rocks derived from {M}agnetic {R}esonance {S}ounding relaxation data using multi-exponential decay time inversion, J. Appl. Geophys., 66, 73–81, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.05.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.05.002</a>, 2008. Purcell, E.&nbsp;M., Torrey, H.&nbsp;C., and Pound, R.&nbsp;V.: {R}esonance {A}bsorption by {N}uclear {M}agnetic {M}oments in a {S}olid, Phys. Rev., 69, 37–38, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.37">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.69.37</a>, 1946. Seevers, D.: A nuclear magnetic method for determining the permeability of sandstones, Paper&nbsp;L, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts Transactions, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1–14, 1966. Song, Y.-Q.: {U}sing internal magnetic fields to obtain pore size distributions of porous media, Concept. Magnet. Reson.&nbsp;A, 18, 97–110, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.10072">https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.a.10072</a>, 2003. Torrey, H.&nbsp;C.: Bloch Equations with Diffusion Terms, Phys. Rev., 104, 563–565, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.104.563">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.104.563</a>, 1956. Vista&nbsp;Clara, I.: {J}avelin – {M}anual and {D}ocumentation, 1.2&nbsp;Edn., Vista Clara, Inc., Mukilteo, USA, 2011.