<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GI</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GI</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2193-0864</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gi-10-35-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Autonomous-underwater-vehicle-based marine multicomponent self-potential
method: observation scheme and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> navigational correction</article-title><alt-title>Autonomous underwater vehicle</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Autonomous underwater vehicle}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z.~Zhu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Zhongmin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Jinsong</given-names></name>
          <email>shenjinsongcup@163.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>Chunhui</given-names></name>
          <email>taochunhuimail@163.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Xianming</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Tao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nie</surname><given-names>Zuofu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Wenyi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>Zhaoyang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-5156</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China
University of Petroleum (Beijing),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Beijing 102249, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources,
Zhejiang, Hangzhou 310012, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai
200030, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jinsong Shen (shenjinsongcup@163.com) and Chunhui Tao (taochunhuimail@163.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>35</fpage><lpage>43</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e163">Marine self-potential (SP) investigation is an effective method to study
deep-sea hydrothermal vents and seafloor sulfide deposits. At present, one
of the commonly used marine self-potential systems is a towed array of
electrodes. Large noises are recorded when great changes in electrode
distance and array attitude occur due to the complex seafloor topography. In
this paper, a new multicomponent electrical field observation system based on an
autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) was introduced for the
measurement of seafloor self-potential signals. The system was tested in a
lake, and the multicomponent self-potential data were collected from there. Observed
data involve the navigational information of the AUV, which could be corrected
using a rotation transform. After navigational correction, measured data can
recover the location of the artificial source using self-potential
tomography. The experimental results showed that the new SP system can be
applied to marine SP observations, providing an efficient and low-noise SP
acquisition method for marine resources and environmental investigations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e175">The self-potential (SP) method has a long history on land and plays an important
role in the delineation and resource evaluation of metal sulfide ore bodies
(Fox, 1830). It is generally believed that the negative anomaly of SP is
related to the metal sulfide ore bodies (Sato and Mooney, 1960; Corry, 1985;
Naudet and Revil, 2005; Komori et al., 2017). In view of the great
difference between the marine and the land environments, geophysical methods
are still not economical and efficient enough, which limits the exploration
of marine resources. With the development of electronic instruments and better understanding of the mechanism of SP response, the application
of SP exploration has been gradually developed from land prospecting to
shallow water and deep-sea exploration of polymetallic sulfide (Corwin,
1973; Corwin, 1976; Tao et al., 2013). In addition to mineral exploration,
the underground water flow driven by seafloor thermal activity and thermal
gradients will also produce detectable SP anomalies. The SP measurement method
has also been applied to the study of geothermal and hydrothermal activity of the
deep seafloor (Heinson, 1999). Eppelbaum (2019) introduced a new
parameter into SP interpretation, i.e., the “self-potential moment”, and this method
has been effectively applied at several ore deposits in the southern Caucasus.</p>
      <p id="d1e178">In 1973, Corwin (1973) began to develop the marine SP detection
system, and in 1976 an SP anomaly around 300 mV was discovered that
was related to the offshore extensions of sulfide deposits (Corwin, 1976). In
2000, Sudarikov and Roumiantsev conducted SP and Eh (electric potential half cells, oxidation reduction
potential) survey at the Logatchev hydrothermal vent in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and
inferred<?pagebreak page36?> the spatial distribution characteristics of the hydrothermal plume near
the vent (Sudarikov and Roumiantsev, 2000). Cherkashev et al. (2013) used a deep-sea towed SP instrument to locate seafloor sulfide deposits
associated with hydrothermal vents near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Kawada and
Kasaya (2017, 2018) also observed negative SP anomalies
and associated hydrothermal sulfide deposits in the Izena hydrothermal field
of the Okinawa Trough in Japan by using the deep-sea towed SP array.
Safipour et al. (2017) mounted SP electrodes on transient
electromagnetic equipment and detected negative SP anomaly over inactive
sulfide in the Tyrrhenian Sea.</p>
      <p id="d1e181">The configuration described above connects the electrode array via a cable or
insulated elastic rod and is easy to operate in a marine environment.
However, there are also several inconveniences relating to soft connected towed SP
arrays. The towed array is susceptible to being distorted by ocean currents,
and the distance between the soft connected electrodes changes greatly. Both of these factors will affect the precision of the measured SP amplitude, especially
in mid-ocean ridges, where the seafloor topography varies greatly (Constable
et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e184">To improve the stability and efficiency of marine SP configuration used in
the deep-sea environment, combined with the ideas of Constable et al. (2018), the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) was modified with four
channel electrical field sensors in its tail to detect the marine SP responses
(hereafter referred to as an AUV-SP), which was expected to be helpful for seafloor sulfide
exploration. To test the stability and determine the influencing factors,
two AUV experiments were conducted during July 2019 at Qiandao Lake
in eastern China. The water depth was about 40 m, and there was little
artificial interference around the test site, making it an ideal place to
test the new system and analyze the electrical field noise. The main purposes
of the AUV-SP system test were (i) to investigate the optimized position of
SP electrode on the AUV to minimize the interference of noises from the AUV and (ii) to verify the developed system of the developed system by using the known artificial
current source. In addition, measured multicomponent data were inverted
using self-potential tomography (Jardani et al., 2008; Revil et al., 2008;
Rittgers et al., 2013) to verify the capability of multicomponent
self-potential detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>AUV-based SP system</title>
      <p id="d1e195">The SP measurement system mainly consists of two parts, i.e., electrical field sensors
(Ag/AgCl non-polarizing electrodes) and a data logger chamber. The electronic
circuit of the data logger was encapsulated in the pressure chamber, which
was mounted on the back of an AUV with a diving capacity of 4500 m. The
electrical field sensors and two orthogonal extension rods of 2 m were
arranged horizontally and vertically at the tail of the AUV (Fig. 1). Electrodes 1 and 2 were fixed at the end of the horizontal extension rod along
the moving direction of the AUV to measure the inline component of the electrical
field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Electrodes 5 and 6 were attached on the end of vertical
extension rod to measure the vertical component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Electrodes 3 and
4 were mounted on the left and right sides of the abdomen of the AUV to measure
the horizontal component orthogonal to the AUV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data for the
electrodes on the surface of the AUV were affected by the propulsion motor and low
electrode space (less than 30 cm), leading a larger noise level than the rear
electrodes. The component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was greatly distorted; thus, the
following data processing and analysis will focus on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e278">Layout of each channel electrode on the AUV. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the inline
horizontal component of the electrical field recorded by channels 1 and 2. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the crossline horizontal component of the electrical field recorded by channels 3 and 4. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical component of the electrical field recorded by
channels 5 and 6.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/10/35/2021/gi-10-35-2021-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e320">The installation of the SP receivers did not affect the data flow or
function of other sensors mounted on the AUV, including the magnetic field sensor,
sonar, underwater cameras and other plume-detecting sensors. Navigation
system consists ultra-short baseline, depth sensor and attitude orientation
(Wu et al., 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Lake test design and data acquisition of the AUV-based SP system</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Noise levels and observation design</title>
      <p id="d1e338">There are different disturbances appearing in the SP detection, including
natural noises and artificial noises (Eppelbaum, 2020). The electrodes are
calibrated in the laboratory, and the potential difference between the
electrode pairs is less than 0.1 mV. Therefore, the main factors affecting
the SP signal on the AUV were as follows: electrode dipole length, the stability
of the observation system and the<?pagebreak page37?> interference affecting the electrodes from the
AUV body (batteries, thrusters, etc.). The signal of the natural electrical field
in deep seawater was very weak, and the measured magnitude of electric
potential difference was in direct proportion to the electrode dipole
length. Large dipole length should be used for the weak signal, and the
electrode dipole length should be increased as much as possible without
affecting the normal navigation of the AUV. The dipole length in the lake test
was preset to 2 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e341">Considering the interference affecting the electrode from the AUV power supply
device, a pair of electrodes were placed on the surface of the AUV, and the
other two groups of electrodes were installed at the tail of the AUV with
the hard connecting rod as a bracket, as far away as possible from the AUV
body. The reason for choosing the hard connecting rod was to keep the
electrode distance constant when the submersible moves underwater, which is
very important in marine SP detection because a softer rod would
be distorted by the bottom current of seawater when the AUV moves near the seafloor
and therefore would not be suitable. Changes in the electrode distance will
introduce attitude deformation noise and strongly affect the recorded
signals, especially when the electrode distance is small.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Equipments used for the test</title>
      <p id="d1e352">As for the materials of the hard connecting rod used to connect the electrodes, on
the one hand, non-magnetic materials should be used to minimize the
influence on the fluxgate magnetometer at the tail of the submersible. On
the other hand, the connecting rod should be insulated from electrical currents
to minimize the induced electrical field generated by cutting the Earth's
magnetic field during the movement of the AUV. The electrode bracket used in the
lake test was made of PVC material without magnetic components and fully
insulated. These conditions meet the above requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Layout of artificial SP source</title>
      <p id="d1e363">The test of the AUV-based SP system was conducted at a testing platform in
the center of Qiandao Lake. According to the classic geobattery model (Sato
and Mooney, 1960), SP anomalies generated by the geobattery mechanism are
expected to be dipolar in nature, and the SP source can be equivalent to the
electric dipole source (see also Naudet and Revil, 2005, for
bio-geobatteries). To verify the effectiveness of the AUV-SP system, an
artificial diploe source was set up as shown in Fig. 2. Firstly, a 100 m
nylon rope was mounted on an insulating float for a fixed test platform, and
four buoys were attached to the rope to make it float on the surface of the
water. Positive and negative electrodes were extended by wires, which were
fixed along the rope into the lake. The distance between the positive and
negative poles was about 56 m. The 36 V DC power generator was placed in the
platform. Copper plates were attached to the positive and negative
terminals to reduce the voltage attenuation and increase the
conductive area of the current electrodes, respectively. The power supply provides a
constant voltage about 36 V, the electric potentials on the positive pole and
the negative pole are 18 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 V, respectively, when the
difference between the copper plates is ignored. These electric potentials are also used in the
subsequent numerical simulations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e375">Layout of the artificial SP source. <bold>(a)</bold> Location of Qiandao Lake
(© Google Earth, 2019). <bold>(b)</bold> Position of the artificial source in the water
(plan view) (© Google Earth, 2019). <bold>(c)</bold> Zoomed in location of the artificial
source. Red plus and black minus signs denote the positive and negative poles of
the DC power, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/10/35/2021/gi-10-35-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Data acquisition</title>
      <p id="d1e401">Before the AUV entered the water, all electrodes were placed on the AUV
system (as shown in Fig. 1). The AUV first dove to an 8 m depth at a constant
speed and performed repeated measurements surrounding the positive and
negative poles. The average speed of the AUV was about 1 kn (0.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
the sampling frequency of the electrical field sensors was 150 Hz. Other
tests, including repeatedly switching the power on and off manually and changing the
navigation speed and steering, were also conducted to determine the influence
of the AUV body on the electrical field signal during navigation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Noise analysis of the lake test</title>
      <p id="d1e432">Sensors mounted on the AUV do not move with waves, but we detect obvious anomalies
around active sources, and noises from the AUV are analyzed in this section.
Figure 3 shows the three-component electrical field in water. The artificial
source produced a stable electrical field similar to an electric dipole source
in water. At the beginning of the test, the system was far away from the
negative pole, and the collected electrical field was approximately equal to
the background field. The amplitude fluctuated around 0 mV. When passing
near the location of the artificial current source, the electrical field
sensor could detect that the potential changed up to 30 mV. Because the
system was always close to the negative electrode during the measurement
process, the recorded electrical field was less affected by the positive
pole or electrode.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e437">The planar distribution of the three components of the electrical
field measured by the AUV-based SP system (planar view in the upper panels, 3D view
in the lower panels): <bold>(a)</bold> inline component of the electrical field, <bold>(b)</bold> crossline
component of the electrical field, <bold>(c)</bold> vertical component of the electrical field. Red
and blue dots represent the positive and negative poles of the artificial
source, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/10/35/2021/gi-10-35-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e455">In order to analyze the influence of the AUV body on the electrical field sensor,
the frequency spectrum of the electrical field time series measured by the
artificial current source was analyzed (we calculate the power spectrum of
time series and convert the unit into d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by using log10(power)). Figure 4
shows the time series data of the three-component electrical field over a period of 15 min.
The overall noise level was related to the position of the electrode.
Results of power spectrum calculation showed the following characteristics:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e467">the effective signal was mainly concentrated at low frequencies, and the
noise level decreased with the increase in frequency,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e471">the electrodes far from the AUV body had lower noise,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e475">the noise of vertical component was lower than that of horizontal component,</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e479">except for the 50 Hz industrial interference, the peak values of the power
spectrum were basically consistent with the rotation speed of propellers
(1.4 Hz corresponds to a speed of 85 rpm, and peaks of 3.5–4.5 Hz correspond to a speed from 210 to 285 rpm).</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e483">In addition, the noise of 2.1 Hz corresponding to the vertical component was
mainly caused by the vibration of the connecting rod in the water. The
camera attached to the head of the connecting rod recorded the corresponding
vibration image, providing a reference for improving the material and
installation mode of the connecting rod.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e488">Time series of the three components of the electrical field and the frequency
analysis of the recorded data. <bold>(a)</bold> Spectrum of the three components of the electrical
field with the histogram of propeller speed. The frequency components of 1.4
and 3.5–4.5 Hz are caused by the speed of propellers. The lower three panels show <bold>(b)</bold> the time series of the
inline component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> the time series of the crossline component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <bold>(d)</bold> the time series of the vertical component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/10/35/2021/gi-10-35-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page38?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>AUV navigation attitude impact and correction</title>
      <p id="d1e551">The attitude of the AUV has a significant impact on the SP data and therefore
should be considered and corrected during field data processing and
interpretation. The attitude angle in the local coordinate system is usually
used to describe the attitude and spatial position of the AUV, including azimuth
angle (heading), pitch angle and roll angle. The global reference coordinate
system was determined according to the<?pagebreak page39?> geodetic coordinates and the position
of the survey lines. Following this, the relative relationship between the two
coordinates was determined by the rotation of the coordinate system, as shown
in Fig. 5c. The coordinate axis of the reference coordinate system is
assumed to be (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The local
coordinate system of the first rotation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is obtained by rotating the azimuth angle H clockwise
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the rotation axis, then (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is obtained by rotating the pitch angle
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> clockwise with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the rotation axis, and
finally (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is obtained
by rotating the roll angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> clockwise along the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
axis. The above procedure can be represented by three rotation matrices
below. The electrical field that is supposed to be rotated in the reference coordinate
system is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the measured
electrical field in the local coordinate system after the rotation is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which gives us <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and in component form we have the following coordinates.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center center center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center center center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center center center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The corresponding inverse transformation is as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M44" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The AUV avoids obstacles and steers according to
changes in bathymetry when navigating over the seafloor. The electrical
field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recorded by the sensors attached to the AUV
contains information about the navigation attitude. By ignoring acquisition
noise and positioning errors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recorded by the AUV should be
consistent with the rotated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Whether
the measured electrical field of the AUV is consistent with the electrical field
generated by dipoles in uniform space is verifiable through numerical simulation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1193">Rotation relationship between the global electrical field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>and rotated electrical field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a)</bold> The projection of
the global and rotated electrical fields in a Cartesian coordinate system. <bold>(b)</bold> The path of the AUV in the water; arrows denote the direction of AUV movement and the vector
direction of the total electrical field in a geodetic coordinate system. Plus signs denote
the position of positive pole, and minus signs denote the position of negative pole.
<bold>(c)</bold> Definition of the different attitude angles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/10/35/2021/gi-10-35-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1233">Based on the situation of the lake test, a three-dimensional (3D) model of
100 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m was established in the Cartesian coordinate
system, where positive and negative poles of the dipole were located at (3,
75, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1) and (54, 80, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5), respectively. The 3D model was discretized into
unstructured grids, the Poisson equation of the steady-state current field was
solved by the finite-element method, and boundary conditions of the first
kind were used at the bottom of the lake. The global electrical field
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was extracted according to
AUV location data, and then the electrical field in the local coordinate
system along the direction of profile was denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and calculated using Eq. (1). Field data measured by
the AUV were denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The relationship between global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
shown in Fig. 5b. When the AUV is moving from south to north, the observation
field is in the same direction as the reference field and vice versa when the AUV is
moving from north to south.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1486">Comparison of the measured data and numerical simulation: <bold>(a)</bold> navigation attitude of the AUV in the water; <bold>(b)</bold> time series of modeled and
observed horizontal components with different travel directions; and <bold>(c)</bold> modeling
and observed vertical component for SW, NE, and SW profiles. Minus signs correspond to
the location of negative pole of the artificial source.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/10/35/2021/gi-10-35-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1504">The attitude of the AUV is shown in Fig. 6a. The AUV navigated stably in the lake,
and the roll angle was less than 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The pitch changed when the vehicle
was rising or falling, and the overall pitching angle was less than
20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the measured range shown in Fig. 6a, the vehicle
changed direction twice at 02:11 and 02:14 GMT, respectively. The measured and
simulation results in Fig. 6b and c showed that the attitude of
the AUV has different impacts on each component of the electrical field.
Specifically, the azimuth has significant influence on the horizontal
component of the electrical field but has little influence on the vertical
component. When the survey line went along the SW direction, the variation trend of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along the survey line (solid red line in Fig. 6b) and
global component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were opposite; when the survey line
went along the NE direction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changed in the same direction. After rotation correction, the observation
data of the submersible were basically consistent with the simulation
results. The position where the gradient of the horizontal electrical field
component changed the most significantly corresponded to the negative pole
of the artificial source. Azimuth has little effect on the vertical
component because the AUV was always below the negative source and the
electrical field direction pointed up. Therefore, the change in azimuth angle
will not change the direction of the vertical component. In addition,
because the pitch angle was very small and the attached electrode was
basically maintained in the vertical state, the vertical component of the
measured electrical field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was approximately equal to that of
the global component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Inversion scheme of the AUV-based self-potential data</title>
      <p id="d1e1602">The forward problem of SP can be expressed by a Poisson equation of potential
(Jardani et al., 2008):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M81" display="block"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℑ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℑ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volumetric current density (A m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the current density vector (A m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the conductivity
(S m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the electrical field vector and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the SP
field.</p>
      <p id="d1e1735">By changing the source term of Eq. (3), the SP response to various effects
can be calculated, such as the flow potential related to groundwater flow
(Ahmed et al., 2013) or the geobattery model related to polymetallic
deposits (Rittgers et al., 2013).</p>
      <?pagebreak page41?><p id="d1e1738">In order to investigate the reliability and interpretability of electrical field data measured by the AUV-SP system, the regularized least-squares
method was applied for the inversion of the artificial SP source. Assuming
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the bulk current density model vector and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference model, the inversion can be
expressed as the minimization of the following objective function:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="∥" open="∥"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="∥" open="∥"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the data-weighting matrix and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the difference between the data <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained by forward modeling
and the observed data <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, also known as data residual. Here,
the measured electrical field component is selected as the observation data,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the model-weighted diagonal matrix, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the regularization
factor. The regularization factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to balance the model
constraints and data-fitting function in the process of solving the model.
It can be determined by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-curve criterion (or generalized cross-validation method) or by experience.
Because the electrical field decays rapidly with distance, the inversion of
the seafloor SP data only gives a shallow current density distribution, which
cannot accurately reflect the situation of the space current dipole source under
the seafloor. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a depth-weighting
function to enhance the sensitivity of  the grid element far from the observation
point. The depth-weighting function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should be
placed in the model constraints as follows (Biswas and Sharma, 2017;
Portniaguine and Zhdanov, 1999):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th element on the main diagonal of matrix
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sensitivity matrix (or Jacobian
matrix). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of model vector elements, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of the
observation point. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is constant and generally equal to 1. The extent of depth
weighting can be adjusted by the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For multicomponent inversion,
the full three-component electrical field were used and the total amount of observation
data became <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2039">In application, the SP data can be inverted in many ways to determine the
flow direction of the fluid or the location of the self-potential source.
When the source location is to be solved, it was usually assumed that the
conductivity distribution in the space is known or determined by other
electrical exploration methods (DC conductivity or induction-based
electromagnetic methods), and thus the SP source is equivalent to the
external current source. Therefore, this study used the inverted volumetric
current density distribution to locate the simulated artificial source. On
land, the SP method usually directly measures the electric potential between the
roll electrode and a fixed electrode; therefore, the potential data <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are
directly chosen for inversion. However, in the marine environment, it is
impossible to fix a reference electrode on the seafloor when the ship or AUV
is moving. Therefore, the SP method conducted in the marine environment
usually measures the gradient of electric potential, i.e., the electrical field, and the potential is calculated indirectly by numerical integration.
In the case of this study, the measured electrical field
components were directly inverted.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2052">Volumetric current density inversion results of different
components of observed data, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show the inversion results of volumetric current density of horizontal components
of electrical field data (magnitude and direction). Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show the inversion
results of the charge density of the vertical component of observed data (magnitude
and direction). Panels <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> the inversion results of the charge density of both
components of the observed data (magnitude and direction). The arrow direction
indicates the diffusion direction of the current density. The intersection
of the vertical section is the position of the negative pole of the
artificial source. Although the anomaly recovery for a single component can
also localize the negative pole, the two-component inversion returns a single compact current density. The notation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the location of
the positive pole of the artificial source. The notation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the
location of the negative pole.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/10/35/2021/gi-10-35-2021-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2118">Owing to the limited observation data collected by the AUV-SP system near the
artificial source, the inversion result is nonunique. Therefore, the
constraints of known information, such as the lake water conductivity (1 S m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
measured with the environment sensor from the AUV) and lake bottom sediment
conductivity (assumed to be 0.1 S m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), were added to the inversion. To
investigate the advantages of multicomponent inversion, single-component
and two-component observation data were used for the inversion and the inversion
results were compared. Figure 7 shows the results obtained by inversion of
electrical field data of a single component (horizontal component and vertical
component, Fig. 7a and b, respectively) and two components (horizontal component and
vertical component, Fig. 7c) under the same constraint conditions. Negative charge
density was recovered surrounding the negative pole of the artificial source
in all results, which preliminarily revealed the reliability of the system
and the effectiveness of the inversion method. Indeed, because the AUV-SP
system's navigation path in the lake is mainly near the negative pole of the
artificial source, the negative pole position of the artificial source can
be precisely located, while positive pole is not easily located due to the lack
of observation data of the surrounding area, although some positive charge
density is retrieved along the survey line. By comparing the inversion
results between a single component (Fig. 7a and b)
and multiple components (Fig. 7c), it was observed
that the inversion results of the two horizontal components of the electrical field were more focused, and the negative charge intensity was concentrated,
while the negative charge density obtained from the inversion results of the
single vertical component of the electrical field was accompanied by positive
charge anomaly, which dispersed the negative charge energy and deviated
from the actual situation. Combinations of vertical and horizontal components
of electrical field data restrict the horizontal distribution of charge
density and make the inversion more consistent with the actual artificial
source. In addition, the current flow direction (Fig. 7b, d, f) also
shows that the inversion of only a single component will produce the wrong
current direction and that additional constraints (e.g., boundary limits,
heterogeneous distribution of conductivity) were required to obtain
reasonable inversion results. Therefore, multicomponent detection of
electrical field is necessary when addressing complex geological structure,
especially involving flow of fluids.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page42?><sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2154">A seafloor SP measurement system that consisted of three pairs of
perpendicular electrodes attached to the AUV (Qianlong 2) was introduced. By
deploying an artificial current source, the multicomponent electrical field
responses in the water were measured by the AUV in Qiandao Lake. The observed
results were consistent with the numerical simulation, which verifies the
feasibility of the AUV-SP system for multicomponent SP exploration. At
present, the AUV-SP system can work in water for about 40 h and
complete the SP measurement of a high-resolution area of about 20 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2166">The test results of two surveys showed that the AUV-SP system has good
consistency and repeatability and that the overall noise level of the measured
data is relatively low, which meets the requirements of near-seafloor SP
exploration at a large scale. The inversion of the test data of the AUV-SP system
demonstrated that the position and intensity of the inverted current source
were basically consistent with the actual position and intensity of the
artificial current source. Therefore, the SP response measured by the AUV-SP
system can be used to locate the seafloor SP source to achieve an accurate
exploration and evaluation of seafloor sulfide deposits. In the case of
simple geoelectric structure, a single vertical component measurement would be
sufficient to locate the SP source, but in solving complex problems such
as hydrothermal or fluid flow, a three-component SP measurement is crucial.</p>
      <p id="d1e2169">In view of the vibration noise of the connecting rod presented in this test,
our next step will be to select a more suitable material and design a
bracket with better rigidity to reduce the vibration noise. The experience
and data accumulated in this experiment also provide a reference for the
future research of active-source electromagnetic detectors on AUVs.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2176">The code for the processing is available upon request (591149254@qq.com).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2182">The raw data from the experiments are available upon request
(591149254@qq.com).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2188">ZZ processed the data and wrote the paper. JS was the project leader. CT
provided ideas and designed the AUV-SP system,. XD, TW, ZN and WW
tested the system together. ZS proofread the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2194">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2201">The authors thank the China University of Geosciences (Beijing) for
providing the data acquisition device and electrodes.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2206">This work was supported by National Key R&amp;D Program of China
(contract nos. 2018YFC0309901, 2017YFC0306803) and China Ocean Mineral
Resources R&amp;D Association (COMRA; contract nos. DY135-S1-1-01, DY135-S1-1-07).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2213">This paper was edited by Lev Eppelbaum and reviewed by Kai Chen and two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ahmed, A. S., Jardani, A., Revil, A., and Dupont, J. P.: SP2DINV: A 2D
forward and inverse code for streaming potential problems. Comput. Geosci., 59, 9–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2013.05.008</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Biswas, A. and Sharma, S. P.: Interpretation of self-potential anomaly over
2-D inclined thick sheet structures and analysis of uncertainty using very
fast simulated annealing global optimization, Acta Geod. Geophys.,
52, 439–455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0176-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s40328-016-0176-2</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cherkashev, G. A., Ivanov, V. N., Bel Tenev, V. I., Lazareva, L.
I.,Rozhdestvenskaya, I. I., Samovarov, M. L., Poroshina, I. M., Sergeev, M.
B., Stepanova, T. V., and Dobretsova, I. G.,: Massive sulfide ores of the
northern equatorial Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Oceanol., 53, 607–619,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437013050032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S0001437013050032</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Constable, S., Kowalczyk, P., and Bloomer, S., Measuring marine
self-potential using an autonomous underwater vehicle, Geophys. J.
Int., 215, 49–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy263" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggy263</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Corry, C. E.: Spontaneous polarization associated with porphyry sulfide
mineralization, Geophysics, 50, 1020–1034,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441967" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1441967</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Corwin, R. F.: Offshore Application of Self-potential Prospecting, Scripps
Institution of Oceanography Library, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Corwin, R. F.: Offshore use of the self-potential method, Geophys.
Prospect., 24, 79–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1976.tb00386.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2478.1976.tb00386.x</ext-link>,
1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eppelbaum, L. V.: Advanced analysis of self-potential field analysis in ore
deposits of the South Caucasus, Proceedings of the National Azerbaijan
Academy of Sciences, 2, 21–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.33677/ggianas20190200029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.33677/ggianas20190200029</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eppelbaum, L. V.: Quantitative analysis of self-potential anomalies in
archaeological sites of Israel: an overview, Environ. Earth Sci.,
79, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09117-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12665-020-09117-w</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fox, R. W.: On the electromagnetic properties of metalliferous veins in the mines of Cornwall, Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond., 120, 399–414, 1830.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heinson, G.: Marine self potential exploration, Expl. Geophys., 30,
1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EG999001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EG999001</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jardani, A., Revil, A., Bolève, A., and Dupont, J. P.: Three-dimensional
inversion of self-potential data used to constrain th<?pagebreak page43?>e pattern of
groundwater flow in geothermal fields, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
B09204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JB005302</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kawada, Y., Kasaya, T.: Marine self-potential survey for exploring seafloor
hydrothermal ore deposits, Sci. Rep.-UK 7, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13920-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-13920-0</ext-link>, 2017</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kawada, Y., and Kasaya, T.: Self-potential mapping using an autonomous
underwater vehicle for the Sunrise deposit, Izu-Ogasawara arc, southern
Japan, Earth, Planets and Space, 70, 142,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0913-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-018-0913-6</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Komori, S., Masaki, Y., Tanikawa, W., Torimoto, J., Ohta, Y., Makio, M.,
Maeda, L., Ishibashi, J., Nozaki, T., Tadai, O., and Kumagai, H.: Depth
profiles of resistivity and spectral IP for active modern submarine
hydrothermal deposits: a case study from the Iheya North Knoll and the Iheya
Minor Ridge in Okinawa Trough, Japan, Earth Planet Space, 69, 114
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0691-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-017-0691-6</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Naudet, V. and Revil, A.: A sandbox experiment to investigate
bacteria-mediated redox processes on self-potential signals, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L11405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022735</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Portniaguine, O. and Zhdanov, M. S.: Focusing geophysical inversion images,
Geophysics, 64, 874–887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444596" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1444596</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Revil, A., Finizola, A., Piscitelli, S., Rizzo, E., Ricci, T., Crespy, A.,
Angeletti, B., Balasco, M., Barde Cabusson, S., Bennati, L., Bolève, A.,
Byrdina, S., Carzaniga, N., Di Gangi, F., Morin, J., Perrone, A., Rossi, M.,
Roulleau, E.,and Suski, B,: Inner structure of La Fossa di Vulcano (Vulcano
Island, southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy) revealed by high-resolution
electric resistivity tomography coupled with self-potential, temperature,
and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diffuse degassing measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 113, B07207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JB005394</ext-link>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rittgers, J. B., Revil, A., Karaoulis, M., Mooney, M. A., Slater, L. D., and
Atekwana, E. A.: Self-potential signals generated by the corrosion of buried
metallic objects with application to contaminant plumes, Geophysics, 78,
EN65-EN82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0033.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2013-0033.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Safipour, R., Hölz, S., Halbach, J., Jegen, M., Petersen, S., and
Swidinsky, A.: A self-potential investigation of submarine massive sulfides,
Palinuro Seamount, Tyrrhenian Sea, Geophysics, 82, A51–A56,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0237.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/geo2017-0237.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sato, M. and Mooney, H. M.: The electrochemical mechanism of sulfide
self-potentials, Geophysics, 25, 226–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1190/1.1438689</ext-link>,
1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sudarikov, S. M. and Roumiantsev, A. B.: Structure of hydrothermal plumes
at the Logatchev vent field, 14 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge: evidence
from geochemical and geophysical data, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 101, 245–252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(00)00174-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0377-0273(00)00174-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tao, C., Xiong, W., Xi, Z., Deng, X., and Xu, Y.: TEM investigations of
South Atlantic Ridge 13.2 S hydrothermal area, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 32,
68–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-013-0392-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13131-013-0392-3</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, T., Tao, C., Zhang, J., Wang, A., Zhang, G., Zhou, J., and Deng, X.: A
hydrothermal investigation system for the Qianlong-II autonomous underwater
vehicle, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 38, 159–165,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1408-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13131-019-1408-4</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Autonomous-underwater-vehicle-based marine multicomponent self-potential method: observation scheme and navigational correction</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Marine self-potential (SP) investigation is an effective method to study
deep-sea hydrothermal vents and seafloor sulfide deposits. At present, one
of the commonly used marine self-potential systems is a towed array of
electrodes. Large noises are recorded when great changes in electrode
distance and array attitude occur due to the complex seafloor topography. In
this paper, a new multicomponent electrical field observation system based on an
autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) was introduced for the
measurement of seafloor self-potential signals. The system was tested in a
lake, and the multicomponent self-potential data were collected from there. Observed
data involve the navigational information of the AUV, which could be corrected
using a rotation transform. After navigational correction, measured data can
recover the location of the artificial source using self-potential
tomography. The experimental results showed that the new SP system can be
applied to marine SP observations, providing an efficient and low-noise SP
acquisition method for marine resources and environmental investigations.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmed, A. S., Jardani, A., Revil, A., and Dupont, J. P.: SP2DINV: A 2D
forward and inverse code for streaming potential problems. Comput. Geosci., 59, 9–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.05.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.05.008</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Biswas, A. and Sharma, S. P.: Interpretation of self-potential anomaly over
2-D inclined thick sheet structures and analysis of uncertainty using very
fast simulated annealing global optimization, Acta Geod. Geophys.,
52, 439–455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0176-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0176-2</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Cherkashev, G. A., Ivanov, V. N., Bel Tenev, V. I., Lazareva, L.
I.,Rozhdestvenskaya, I. I., Samovarov, M. L., Poroshina, I. M., Sergeev, M.
B., Stepanova, T. V., and Dobretsova, I. G.,: Massive sulfide ores of the
northern equatorial Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Oceanol., 53, 607–619,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437013050032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437013050032</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Constable, S., Kowalczyk, P., and Bloomer, S., Measuring marine
self-potential using an autonomous underwater vehicle, Geophys. J.
Int., 215, 49–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy263" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy263</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Corry, C. E.: Spontaneous polarization associated with porphyry sulfide
mineralization, Geophysics, 50, 1020–1034,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441967" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441967</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Corwin, R. F.: Offshore Application of Self-potential Prospecting, Scripps
Institution of Oceanography Library, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Corwin, R. F.: Offshore use of the self-potential method, Geophys.
Prospect., 24, 79–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1976.tb00386.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1976.tb00386.x</a>,
1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Eppelbaum, L. V.: Advanced analysis of self-potential field analysis in ore
deposits of the South Caucasus, Proceedings of the National Azerbaijan
Academy of Sciences, 2, 21–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.33677/ggianas20190200029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.33677/ggianas20190200029</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Eppelbaum, L. V.: Quantitative analysis of self-potential anomalies in
archaeological sites of Israel: an overview, Environ. Earth Sci.,
79, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09117-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09117-w</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Fox, R. W.: On the electromagnetic properties of metalliferous veins in the mines of Cornwall, Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond., 120, 399–414, 1830.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Heinson, G.: Marine self potential exploration, Expl. Geophys., 30,
1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EG999001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EG999001</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Jardani, A., Revil, A., Bolève, A., and Dupont, J. P.: Three-dimensional
inversion of self-potential data used to constrain the pattern of
groundwater flow in geothermal fields, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
B09204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005302</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Kawada, Y., Kasaya, T.: Marine self-potential survey for exploring seafloor
hydrothermal ore deposits, Sci. Rep.-UK 7, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13920-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13920-0</a>, 2017
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Kawada, Y., and Kasaya, T.: Self-potential mapping using an autonomous
underwater vehicle for the Sunrise deposit, Izu-Ogasawara arc, southern
Japan, Earth, Planets and Space, 70, 142,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0913-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0913-6</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Komori, S., Masaki, Y., Tanikawa, W., Torimoto, J., Ohta, Y., Makio, M.,
Maeda, L., Ishibashi, J., Nozaki, T., Tadai, O., and Kumagai, H.: Depth
profiles of resistivity and spectral IP for active modern submarine
hydrothermal deposits: a case study from the Iheya North Knoll and the Iheya
Minor Ridge in Okinawa Trough, Japan, Earth Planet Space, 69, 114
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0691-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0691-6</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Naudet, V. and Revil, A.: A sandbox experiment to investigate
bacteria-mediated redox processes on self-potential signals, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L11405, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022735</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Portniaguine, O. and Zhdanov, M. S.: Focusing geophysical inversion images,
Geophysics, 64, 874–887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444596" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444596</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Revil, A., Finizola, A., Piscitelli, S., Rizzo, E., Ricci, T., Crespy, A.,
Angeletti, B., Balasco, M., Barde Cabusson, S., Bennati, L., Bolève, A.,
Byrdina, S., Carzaniga, N., Di Gangi, F., Morin, J., Perrone, A., Rossi, M.,
Roulleau, E.,and Suski, B,: Inner structure of La Fossa di Vulcano (Vulcano
Island, southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy) revealed by high-resolution
electric resistivity tomography coupled with self-potential, temperature,
and CO<sub>2</sub> diffuse degassing measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 113, B07207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005394</a>, 2008.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Rittgers, J. B., Revil, A., Karaoulis, M., Mooney, M. A., Slater, L. D., and
Atekwana, E. A.: Self-potential signals generated by the corrosion of buried
metallic objects with application to contaminant plumes, Geophysics, 78,
EN65-EN82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0033.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0033.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Safipour, R., Hölz, S., Halbach, J., Jegen, M., Petersen, S., and
Swidinsky, A.: A self-potential investigation of submarine massive sulfides,
Palinuro Seamount, Tyrrhenian Sea, Geophysics, 82, A51–A56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0237.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0237.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Sato, M. and Mooney, H. M.: The electrochemical mechanism of sulfide
self-potentials, Geophysics, 25, 226–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438689</a>,
1960.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Sudarikov, S. M. and Roumiantsev, A. B.: Structure of hydrothermal plumes
at the Logatchev vent field, 14 45′ N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge: evidence
from geochemical and geophysical data, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 101, 245–252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(00)00174-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(00)00174-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Tao, C., Xiong, W., Xi, Z., Deng, X., and Xu, Y.: TEM investigations of
South Atlantic Ridge 13.2 S hydrothermal area, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 32,
68–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-013-0392-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-013-0392-3</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, T., Tao, C., Zhang, J., Wang, A., Zhang, G., Zhou, J., and Deng, X.: A
hydrothermal investigation system for the Qianlong-II autonomous underwater
vehicle, Acta Oceanol. Sin., 38, 159–165,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1408-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1408-4</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
