<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GI</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GI</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2193-0864</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gi-11-149-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Swarm Langmuir probes' data quality validation<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> and future improvements</article-title><alt-title>Swarm LP data quality</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Swarm LP data quality}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{F.~Catapano~et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Catapano</surname><given-names>Filomena</given-names></name>
          <email>filomena.catapano@unical.it</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2802-3920</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Buchert</surname><given-names>Stephan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-6074</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qamili</surname><given-names>Enkelejda</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Nilsson</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-6377</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Bouffard</surname><given-names>Jerome</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Siemes</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8316-1130</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Coco</surname><given-names>Igino</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-6828</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>D'Amicis</surname><given-names>Raffaella</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-117X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Tøffner-Clausen</surname><given-names>Lars</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Trenchi</surname><given-names>Lorenzo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1726-6038</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Holmdahl Olsen</surname><given-names>Poul Erik</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Stromme</surname><given-names>Anja</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Serco c/o ESA, ESRIN, Earth Observation Directorate, Frascati, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>European Space Agency (ESA), Earth Observation Directorate, Frascati, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Rome, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>National Institute for Astrophysics, Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology, Rome, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>DTU Space, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Filomena Catapano (filomena.catapano@unical.it)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>149</fpage><lpage>162</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e225">Swarm is the European Space Agency (ESA)'s first Earth observation constellation mission, which was launched in 2013 to study the geomagnetic field and its temporal
evolution. Two Langmuir probes aboard each of the three Swarm satellites provide in situ measurements of plasma parameters, which contribute to
the study of the ionospheric plasma dynamics. To maintain a high data quality for scientific and technical applications, the Swarm products are
continuously monitored and validated via science-oriented diagnostics. This paper presents an overview of the data quality of the Swarm Langmuir
probes' measurements. The data quality is assessed by analysing short and long data segments, where the latter are selected to be sufficiently long enough to
consider the impact of the solar activity. Langmuir probe data have been validated through comparison with numerical models, other satellite
missions, and ground observations. Based on the outcomes from quality control and validation activities conducted by ESA, as well as scientific
analysis and feedback provided by the user community, the Swarm products are regularly upgraded. In this paper, we discuss the data quality
improvements introduced with the latest baseline, and how the data quality is influenced by the solar cycle. In particular, plasma measurements are
more accurate in day-side regions during high solar activity, while electron temperature measurements are more reliable during night side at middle
and low latitudes during low solar activity. The main anomalies affecting the Langmuir probe measurements are described, as well as possible
improvements in the derived plasma parameters to be implemented in future baselines.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e237">Swarm is an Earth Observation mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) with the primary objective to measure Earth's magnetic field and its temporal
variations, which enables investigations of, e.g. the core dynamics, geodynamo processes, and core–mantle interactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.1"/>. Further,
the Swarm mission is devoted to characterize the ionospheric electric fields, currents, and other ionospheric plasma processes. The space segment
consists of three identical satellites, which carry a diverse set of instruments to achieve the ambitious mission objectives: a vector field
magnetometer (VFM) and an absolute scalar magnetometer (ASM) for collecting high-resolution magnetic field measurements, three star trackers for
accurate attitude determination, a dual-frequency GPS receiver for precise orbit determination, an accelerometer to retrieve measurements of the
satellite's non-gravitational acceleration, and an electric field instrument (EFI) composed of two Langmuir probes (LPs) and two thermal ion imagers
(TIIs) for the plasma and electric field-related measurements. The three satellites were launched in 2013 into the same near-polar orbits. Shortly
after launch, the satellites were manoeuvred into a constellation in which two satellites, Swarm A and Swarm C, fly side by side with 1.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
separation in longitude at the Equator at an altitude of 462 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (initial altitude), and the third satellite, Swarm B, flies at a higher
altitude of 511 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (initial altitude). Due to the difference in altitude, the orbital planes precess at different rates such that the angle
between Swarm B's orbital plane and those of the other two satellites slowly change over time. In 2018, Swarm B's orbital plane was perpendicular to
those of Swarm A and Swarm C, while by the end of 2021, Swarm B will be counter-rotating with respect to the lower-flying pair, which will result in a
conjunction every 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e276">With its plasma instrumentation (LP and TII, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="altparen.2"/>), Swarm is an excellent mission to investigate and survey the ionosphere, its
structure and dynamics. Recently, Swarm measurements brought more understanding of the space weather.</p>
      <p id="d1e282">As reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.3"/>, Swarm EFI measurements helped to advance the understanding of the auroral phenomenon known as “Steve”, which is
visible as subauroral purple emission. By using Swarm LP electron density and temperature measurements this study demonstrates that Steve events are
not only associated with intense subauroral ion drifts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.4"/> but also with peaks of plasma temperatures and extremely low densities
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.5"/>. The results presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.6"/> provided additional understanding of the Steve phenomena, expanding the knowledge
needed for proper numerical simulations. More recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.7"/> discussed the possibility to use electron density measurements
collected by LPs aboard Swarm, to derive a proxy for the ionospheric turbulence. This work suggests that, looking at the scaling features of the
density fluctuations for different locations and geomagnetic activity levels, it is possible to distinguish two families of density fluctuations, one
of which is most probably related to turbulent processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.8"/>. Furthermore, the long time coverage of the Swarm mission offers the
possibility to perform extended statistical analysis on the climatology of plasma irregularities via plasma-related measurements, as the in situ
electron density data from the Swarm LP. The first global statistics obtained by in situ measurements of plasma variations observed by Swarm mission,
confirmed the presence of three main regions of strong ionospheric irregularities: the magnetic Equator extending from post-sunset to early morning,
the auroral ovals, and the polar caps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.9"/>. The long-term behaviour of density gradients and fluctuations has been studied by using Swarm
data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.10"/>, where LP density measurements are used to catch ionospheric structures and irregularities. This new statistical study describes
phenomena already explored by past missions, but also reveals a new anomaly that is the persistence of strong density fluctuations in the southern
polar cap during local summer (December solstice) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.11"/>. The morning overshoot consists in a rapid increase of electron temperature in the
early morning hours at low latitudes. Its dependence on geographic regions, local time, seasons and geomagnetic activity has been presented by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.12"/>, by using electron temperature and density LP data at two different altitudes of the Swarm satellites, and ISS/FPMU (International
Space Station/Floating Potential Measurement Unit) measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.13"/>. Plasma density and temperature hemispherical asymmetries have been
extensively investigated in ionospheric physics, and recently discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.14"/>. In their study plasma density from both Swarm and CHAMP
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.15"/> measurements is used, demonstrating the importance of multi mission synergies and long mission life-time to statistically
investigate ionospheric phenomena. For a comprehensive list of scientific results obtained with the support of the Swarm data, we refer to the Swarm
webpage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.16"/>. It is worth to emphasize the role of LP plasma measurements in the recent ionospheric research field. As discussed above,
LP data contributed to many scientific results advantaged by Swarm long-time mission coverage, multi-point in situ measurements as per Swarm
spacecraft constellation, and continuously improved LP data quality. These studies demonstrated the scientific valence of LP measurements, and thus,
the importance of an accurate monitoring of LP data with the scope to maintain high instrument performance and data processing accuracy.</p>
      <p id="d1e329">The LPs are relatively simple instruments which are immersed into a plasma to measure electron density, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and electron temperature,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Owing to their simplicity, relatively small weight and low power consumption, LPs have been used on many satellite missions
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.17"/>. Examples are Demeter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.18"/>, Rosetta <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.19"/>, and Swarm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.20"/>. The science data
derived from LPs aboard Swarm are part of the Level 1B (L1B) products and are obtained from the PLASMA operational processor. The LP data are
available at both 2 and 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cadence. The algorithm of the PLASMA processor is described in the L1b Plasma Algorithm document
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.21"/>. To support the scientific research, the Swarm data products are continuously monitored for quality control (QC) and improved by
the ESA/ESRIN Swarm Data Innovation and Science Cluster (DISC) data quality team. Also, users community feedback are essentials to improve the Swarm
data product quality. Most of the feedback actually results in recommendations which are the drivers to elaborate and introduce improvements in the
data processing algorithms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.22"/>. It is worth to specify that data quality is here intended as the goodness of the data product as
output of a processing process. The data quality can be qualified by comparison with other dataset (in situ or ground measurement), validation with
numerical or empirical models, or derived by statistical data analysis of the product itself. In our definition of data quality, if the data product
is subject to a low level of errors as derived from statistical analysis or known issues, or/and has a high agreement with other dataset (model or
spacecraft observations), then the quality of the data is considered good. In this paper the EFI-LP L1B data quality evolution introduced in the
current baseline is described and the data quality status is statistically investigated. Known issues and future perspectives are discussed as well.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>The Swarm Langmuir probes</title>
      <p id="d1e389">The Swarm LPs have been described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.23"/> including its “harmonic mode” with the sinusoidally modulated probe bias, in which the
instrument is operated most of the times. Also the model equations that are assumed to determine the plasma density, the electron temperature and the
spacecraft potential from the currents and admittances (which are the reciprocal of impedance) computed on board for given biases, are therein
included. Complementing the description in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.24"/>, we add here a detailed description of the LP instruments' functionalities and
operational settings.</p>
      <p id="d1e398">The two probes are mounted on the earthward edge of the ram panel as illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. They are separated by 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
located relatively close to the faceplate of the TII, which is also mounted on the ram panel. The LPs are expected to provide accurate and independent
estimates of the spacecraft potential, which is in principle needed to process the TII data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e413">Location of the LPs below the ram panel. Image credits: ESA/ATG medialab.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e423">The probes are also expected to provide plasma densities and electron temperatures over the entire range of signal magnitudes encountered along the
orbit. Experimental results demonstrated that when the probes are immersed in the satellite plasma sheath, the estimation of spacecraft potential me
by effected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.25"/>, but so far the accuracy of current and density estimation from Swarm LP is not effected by this issue. The Swarm orbits
will cover a limited range of altitudes from about 520 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shortly after launch to 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> close to re-entry. But they sample
practically all latitudes and local times, which results in a relatively large and dynamic signal range. Densities ranging from few
hundreds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to several millions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can occur, representing more than 4 orders of magnitude. Avoiding an automatic gain
control, which would potentially interfere with reliable and accurate current measurements, both probes are typically operated with fixed but
different gains, called low and high gain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.26"/>. By electronically coupling a second shunt resistor in parallel, the mode is low gain
which allows higher probe currents to be measured without ADC (analogue-to-digital converter) overflows. The term “gain” should be understood here rather
as a sensitivity of the current measurement than an amplification. The ratio between high and low gain is about 50.  High or low gain can be set by a
telecommand from ground and usually one of the probes is in high and the other in low gain. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> summarizes the differences between the
probes and their gain operations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e482">List of differences between the two LPs on each Swarm satellite. The probe position is defined with respect to the spacecraft coordinate system, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is along the fly direction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontally crosses the satellite toward local dusk, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> points toward the Earth.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Probe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Surface</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Position</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">High up to Dec 2019–low onward</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Low up to Dec 2019–high onward</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Au</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e614">The surface material of one of the probes is titanium nitride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which had previously been used in several space missions, for example,
Rosetta <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.27"/> and Demeter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.28"/>. Out of concern of the aggressive chemical reactivity of ionospheric
oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the other probe surface is made of gold-plated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Au</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) titanium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which is a novelty in space. It is known that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is very difficult to electroplate (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="altparen.29"/>); however, a small company with
experience in gold-plating jewellery made of titanium was given the contract. Testing before launch did not reveal any problems with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Au</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
probes even after baking with temperatures of up to 300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and after exposure to ultrasound. Both the nitration to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the gold-plating are supposed to prevent strong oxidation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surface. Probably this would negatively affect the performance of the
probe, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TiO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a relatively poor conductor. Presently, after more than 7 years in an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated atmosphere, there are no
conclusive indications in the in-orbit data that degradation in the form of serious oxidation of any of the probes has occurred, or that either of the two
methods is preferable compared to the other one.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>LP data processing</title>
      <p id="d1e729">The L1B PLASMA processor, which is used to generate the LP data products, is organized according to the simple flowchart reported in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. It uses as inputs the L1B products, containing position and velocity of the satellite, auxiliary data, and EFI-LP Level 0 (L0)
data, to obtain three L1B and one Level 1A (L1A) data products. The auxiliary data contain information that support the Swarm data processing, such
as physical constants, or instrumental calibration parameters obtained during ground tests. The L0 data contain raw measurements from each Swarm
instrument and are essential to generate the L1 products. The EFI-LP L1A product (EFIX_LP_1A) contains information about the LP configuration, ion
and electron currents in different regimes, and bias voltages. The L1B product LP_X_CA_1B delivers the LP calibration parameters derived for each
probe by the L1B PLASMA processor. Finally, the EFIX_LP_1B and EFIXLPI_1B products provide the plasma parameters as density, electron temperature,
plasma potential, together with the spacecraft position and the flags indicating a possible source of error for each data point.  The EFIX_LP_1B are
available at a 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample rate. By simple linear interpolation of these products at full UTC second, the EFIXLPI_1B data product is obtained
at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample rate. Also, the LPs operate in different modes. The “harmonic mode” (HM) consists of sinusoidal varying biases applied to the
LPs. Each HM cycle lasts for 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and during this time the HM currents and admittances are measured. To our knowledge, this method to obtain the
current–voltage (I–V) characteristic of the space plasma is being used in orbit for the first time. The HM operates most of the time, while the
classical “sweep mode” occurs every 128 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lasts for 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In sweep mode, the I–V curve is measured traditionally by scanning the
probe bias over a range that stretches from a dominant ion current (at negative bias) to a saturated electron current (positive bias). Sweep mode data
are not used in the L1B PLASMA processor but are separately analysed and provided as an additional “advanced” product. Furthermore, every 6 h,
a calibration mode is activated and a calibration data packet is generated on board. These data are used for calibration purposes, and during the
calibration mode, short data gaps are registered in L1B PLASMA products. The EFI-LP data products, and the other Swarm L1B products, are provided in
daily files with a latency of 4 d. Detailed information on Swarm L1B processors and data products is provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx11" id="text.30"/>. The Swarm products are freely accessible through the ESA dissemination server <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.31"/>. The next two sections describe the
recent data products evolution and data quality characterization.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e783">Schema of the L1B PLASMA operational processor. The blue boxes on the left side represent the input files, the central yellow box represents the PLASMA processor, and the right-side boxes represent the processor outputs. In particular, the green box contains the EFI-LP L1B data products.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e795">Main differences between baseline 04 and baseline 05.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="60mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="60mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Update</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baseline 04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Baseline 05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time coverage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">From December 2013 to September 2018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">From December 2013 to present, this baseline is currently used for daily data production</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Processor dependence</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MAGNET and ORBATT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ORBATT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ion density</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">From low gain (in high-density regions) and high gain (in low-density regions)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">From low gain</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Electron temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">From high gain (in high-density regions) and low gain (in low-density regions)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">From high gain</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Evolution from product baseline 04 to 05</title>
      <p id="d1e883">The product baseline is a number identifying the data that were generated in a consistent way, i.e. using the same algorithms and input parameters,
and thus constitute a dataset. The product baseline is incremented when algorithm or input parameter upgrades lead to significant improvements in
the data quality of the related products. The first PLASMA baseline went into operation in 2015 with the number 04. Before baseline 04, LP data were
processed with a provisional processor by the Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.32"/>. When the final version of the PLASMA
processor was ready to be transferred into operation, it was deployed directly with baseline number 04 to be aligned with the other Swarm processor
baselines. Thus, baselines lower than 04 are not available for EFI data products. Since September 2018, the PLASMA baseline has used the number 05. An
updated version of this processor has been deployed in operation in February 2020 containing only minor evolution; thus, the baseline number remained
unchanged. A complete description of all the evolution introduced with these processors is reported in the related technical notes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.33"/>. In the following, we will discuss the major differences in PLASMA products between  baselines 04 and 05, consisting
of an updated electron temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) computation from a high-gain probe, and the decoupling of the PLASMA processor from the MAGNET
processor. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> reports the main updates introduced in baseline 05, in comparison with baseline 04.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Electron temperature computation from the high-gain probe</title>
      <p id="d1e912">Each of the two LPs aboard the Swarm satellites can be commanded to high or low gain. Typically, one probe is set to the low gain and the other one
to the high gain. The LP product parameters can be estimated from each probe. In practice, the values often differ, which we suspect is because of the
different probe gains. Many investigations are being carried out by the data quality team, in order to understand the nature of the difference between
high- and low-gain measurements. Yet, a real conclusion has not been reached; thus we shelve the description of these studies for future work where a
clear explanation may be reported.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e917">Difference between electron temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> computed from baseline 04 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">04</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 05 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of quasi-dipole latitude, measured by Swarm A from 7 to 13 September 2018. Blue squares are the daily averages of each 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> bin in latitude, while vertical bars represent the standard deviation. The figure shows the difference during <bold>(a)</bold> day-side, <bold>(b)</bold> night-side, and <bold>(c)</bold> full orbits.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e986">The first analysis, preceding baseline 04, estimated the electron density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and electron temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the high-gain
probe for low densities or probe  currents, from the low-gain probes for high densities or probe currents, and by blending the results from both probes for
an intermediate range of density or probe current. This avoided sudden jumps which would be caused by switching the probes at threshold values. Typically
the low-gain probe needs to be used at the dayside magnetic Equator because of very high density in the ionization anomaly, and the high-gain probe is
more appropriate for other regions. In the commissioning phase, it became clear that the regularly occurring transition between probes produced
unphysical variations of the estimated parameters even when smoothed by the intermediate blending. Therefore, the algorithm to estimate the density was
changed to use the weaker ion current instead of the retarded and saturated electron currents. The ion current and admittance are always and very
reliably measured by the high-gain probe. The density product is therefore rather an ion density product, though often designated still
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At Swarm altitudes, in the thermosphere and F region, the ion and electron densities are expected to be equal (only in the mesosphere
and D region negatively charged ions and dust particles could cause <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to be lower than the positive ion density). Also for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
the blending of high- and low-gain estimates was eventually abandoned in order to avoid producing unphysical variations at transitions. This, however,
has the drawback that especially in the ionization anomaly ADC overflow occurs in the high-gain-saturated electron current. This approach increased
the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data with a flag for ADC overflow but with the benefit to have a dataset that can be better calibrated.  The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the low-gain probe is dropped in, with a flag value as warning. This modification has been introduced with baseline 05. The
regions characterized by large plasma density are generally observed at equatorial and low latitudes. In particular, in correspondence to day-side
equatorial crossings, it is possible to observe the typical double peak of the plasma density. This feature is related to the equatorial fountain
effect characterizing the equatorial ionization anomaly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.34"/>. Also, the ADC overflows are frequently observed at equatorial latitudes. Thus,
to compare the measurements from baseline 04 (where high- and low-gain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were blended together) and baseline 05 (where only
high-gain measurements are used), it is worth considering the latitudinal variation. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
obtained from baseline 04 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">04</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and baseline 05 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a function of quasi-dipole (QD) latitude. The analysis is
shown separately for day-side (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a), night-side (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b), and full (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c) Swarm A orbits during 1 week in September 2018. The different phases of the orbits have been selected with respect to the magnetic local
time (MLT). The analysis is limited to the latitudinal range to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> because at higher latitudes the electron temperature has a level of
fluctuation too strong to obtain a meaningful comparison between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">04</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> demonstrates
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">04</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is on average larger that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at higher latitudes. On the day side, the two baselines are comparable at
equatorial latitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a), while the differences in this region are larger on the
night side (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b). In particular, the night side presents a negative peak between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10
and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of QD latitude. Also, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, we note a negative peak in correspondence to equatorial latitudes and a decrease for
higher latitudes. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> reports the average relative differences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
MLT range, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">04</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results demonstrate that, on average, baseline 05 measures
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is 5 %–10 % larger for the lower pair (Swarm A and C). This is a very good improvement, because it has been shown that
the LP measurements of baseline 04, on average, underestimate the electron temperature with respect to ground measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.35"/>. Thus,
the larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements obtained with baseline 05 represent a better agreement with ground observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Decoupling between PLASMA and MAGNET processors</title>
      <p id="d1e1343">In the previous configuration related to baseline 04, the PLASMA processor had a dependence on the MAGNET and ORBATT processors. The ORBATT processor
is fundamental for the L1B processing chain because it generates the L1B satellite ephemeris and attitude products, which are inputs for all the other
processors. The MAGNET processor generates L1B magnetic measurement data products, which also contain the satellite position and attitude for
convenience. The PLASMA processor needs as inputs the spacecraft position and velocity expressed in the Earth-fixed reference frame. In baseline 04,
the spacecraft velocity was retrieved from the ORBATT processor, while the spacecraft position was retrieved from the MAGNET processor. Also, in
baseline 04, magnetic measurements from MAGNET processor were needed to compute electrical field from TII measurements. This dependence on other
processors implies that if one of those has a partial or total failure in producing the data products, then also the PLASMA processor fails. However,
it was observed that the dependence on the MAGNET processor was not necessary, since the generation of the electrical field from TII measurements were
removed from the PLASMA processor in baseline 05. Therefore, in the latest baseline, satellite position and attitude data can be directly retrieved
from the ORBATT data products. As a consequence, with baseline 05, the PLASMA processor is decoupled from MAGNET, and it is now depending only on the
ORBATT processor. This decoupling offered the opportunity to recover past data gaps that occurred because of MAGNET failures. In particular, with
baseline 05, it was possible to recover the production of 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Swarm A, 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Swarm B, and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Swarm C. A full list
of recovered data products is available in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.36"/>. Even if it is a very small portion of data that has been recovered over more than
7 years of Swarm measurements, this still represents an improvement introduced with respect to the older baseline 04. Finally, we note that the
decoupling of PLASMA from the MAGNET processor has no impact on the LP data quality.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1376">Average relative difference between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">04</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all the Swarm spacecraft for different MLT ranges. The results are obtained considering 1 week of data from 7 to 13 September 2018.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Swarm A [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Swarm B [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Swarm C [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">MLT</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ALL</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(8–16) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(20–4) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1583">Plasma density <bold>(a)</bold> and electron temperature <bold>(b)</bold> measured aboard Swarm B between 8 and 15 March 2018, as a function of latitude in quasi-dipole coordinate and time. The vertical lateral panel shows the average (squares) and standard deviation (vertical bars) for each degree in latitude. During this period, the spacecraft was performing a noon–midnight orbit.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Baseline 05</title>
      <p id="d1e1607">Baseline 05 covers the data products from December 2013 to the present (this baseline is currently used for daily data production, and data coverage
with baseline 05 will increase until a new baseline will be released). The LPs aboard Swarm can well capture the ionospheric variability in shorter
intervals of time. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the variation of plasma density and electron temperature as measured by Swarm B. Invalid
measurements are removed in this figure. The missing data at equatorial latitudes in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b are mainly due to ADC overflows,
which generate invalid measurements. An interesting feature, that is worth  noticing, is the typical double peak of the electron density at
equatorial latitudes. This effect is related to the equatorial electrojet fountain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.37"/>, and it is well visible in the Swarm
measurements. In fact, at mid–low latitudes the density is higher, showing two peaks at around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of QD latitude and slightly lower
values at around 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. At higher latitudes, the density is lower again. The electron temperature instead presents a different feature showing
lower values at midlatitudes and low latitudes, and higher values at higher latitudes. This is another typical characteristic of ionospheric plasma
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.38"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1648">Overview of F10.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Kp indices over the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 years of Swarm in orbit. The top panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the 10.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radio flux; the panel below <bold>(b)</bold> shows the Kp index. The bottom panels <bold>(c)</bold> show, with a logarithmic colour scale, the plasma density measured by Swarm A in ascending orbits for two representative time intervals of 1-year duration, July 2014–June 2015 and July 2020–July 2021. Time is on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis; the quasi-dipole latitude is on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis. The highest densities occur typically near the magnetic Equator on the day side, associated with the equatorial ionization anomaly. Very low densities are typically seen in the night-side midlatitude trough and around the winter polar cap.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1706">Orbital averages of the electron density variation (red squares) with standard deviations (vertical bars) during <bold>(a)</bold> ascending and <bold>(b)</bold> descending orbit phases, observed by Swarm A from December 2013 to July 2020. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> displays the F10.7 index in solar flux units for the same period. Similar results are obtained also for Swarm B and C (not shown).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1725">During more than 7 years in orbit, the Swarm measurements span more than half of a solar cycle. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the F10.7 index as an indicator of
the solar activity, and the Kp index as an indicator of geomagnetic activity. The regions highlighted in orange represent the years when Swarm is in
orbit. Such a long temporal coverage with Swarm measurements opens the opportunity to study the impact of solar activity on the ionosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.39"/> and to perform a long-term analysis of the ionospheric variations as well as multi-mission studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.40"/>. Here,
we discuss the data quality variation of Swarm LP measurements with respect to the last solar cycle. The F10.7 index is used as reference for the
solar activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.41"/>. The F10.7 index is a proxy for the solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) flux, which is the dominating source of
ionization, molecular dissociation, and heat in the thermosphere–ionosphere (see, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.42"/>). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>
shows the average plasma density variation from December 2013 to July 2020 as measured by Swarm A, separately for the ascending and descending orbit
phases in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b, respectively. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c shows the F10.7 index for the same interval of time. The density profile
shows a high correlation with the F10.7 index. The solar radiation is the fundamental driver of density and temperature variations in the ionosphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.43"/>. An example is the different characteristics of ionospheric plasma on the day and night sides, the latter having lower densities
and higher temperatures (see, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="altparen.44"/>, and references therein). Thus, the strong correlation between the F10.7 index and Swarm density
measurements reported in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, which is related to the ionospheric processes driven by the solar activity, represents additional
evidence of the quality of the Swarm data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1759">Daily (black lines) and monthly (red lines) percentage of invalid measurements (right axis) of <bold>(a)</bold> plasma density and <bold>(b)</bold> electron temperature measured by Swarm C from February 2015 to July 2020. The grey area in the panels represents the F10.7 index (left axis) in solar flux units in the same interval of time.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1774">Each LP data point is associated with a flag indicating the instrument performance and settings, together with the source of possible errors. For more
information on the flag, we refer the reader to Sect. 6.8 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.45"/>. The percentage of measurements that are flagged as invalid
is a useful proxy for the data quality and instrument performance. A larger percentage of invalid measurements obviously indicates a poorer data
quality. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> reports the daily and monthly percentages of invalid measurements from the beginning of the mission up to July 2020, for
Swarm C. The results are reported for the plasma density and electron temperature in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a and b, respectively. The shadowed area in the
panels represents the F10.7 index variation in the same period. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b, we observe a common trend in the percentage of invalid
measurements of electron temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the F10.7 index, whereas the opposite trend is visible for the percentage of invalid
measurements of plasma density in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a. These trends are similarly observed for all three Swarm satellites. During the solar minimum,
the plasma density decreases, as also shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. In particular, the LP-derived plasma density is negative more frequently during
the solar minimum. This feature is reflected in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a by a larger number of invalid derived density data at lower F10.7 index
values. During periods of stronger solar activity, we observe ADC overflows more frequently, which generate invalid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. This
feature is represented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b by a larger number of invalid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements at a lower F10.7 index. The geographical
location and temporal variation in the occurrence of the invalid measurements are very useful to the Swarm EFI-LP team to study the instrument
performance and to detect possible anomalies in the LP measurements.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1830">Comparison of the plasma density derived from the LP and FP on the <bold>(a)</bold> day side and the <bold>(b)</bold> night side as measured by Swarm C in February 2020. The black lines represent the linear fit obtained for the two datasets.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1845">The plasma density can also be derived from the faceplate (FP) aboard Swarm as part of the TII instrument. The FP, similarly to a planar Langmuir
probe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.46"/>, measures the current with a cadence of 16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The electron density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is derived from FP current
measurements only for certain orbits per day, namely when the TII is not active. The FP data and relative technical notes are available for all Swarm
users (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.47"/>). A validation of LP density measurements can be performed by comparing the LP- and FP-derived
densities. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> shows a scatter plot between density as measured by the LP and FP separately for the day (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a) and
night (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). We observe a very high correlation of 0.98 between the two datasets for the
day side and a moderate correlation of 0.47 for the night side. The relative difference between the FP and LP density measurements, defined as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mtext>FP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mtext>LP</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mtext>LP</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is 19 % for the day side and 34 % for the night side,
noting that the FP density measurements are generally higher than the LP density measurements. These results are in agreement with the recent study by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.48"/>. In this context, it is worthwhile to emphasize that the LP processor algorithm needs to assume a certain ion composition. This
assumption is that ionospheric plasma at Swarm height only contains <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions. The FP data processing is done independently of the plasma
composition. However, a contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the plasma composition would cause thermal effects, because for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the satellite
velocity is not much larger than the thermal velocity. This is so far not taken into account in the data processing. Thus, the discrepancy between the
FP and LP measurements could be caused not only by noise at low densities but also by a contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the composition, in particular
for the night side. Indeed, the electron density in nocturnal regions is lower compared to the day side, which is due to the weaker Sun illumination
and consequently lower ionization on the night side and a larger number of molecular ions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.49"/>. The comparison between the FP and
LP density measurements demonstrates that the two datasets are in good agreement in day-side regions. The results also show that the L1b PLASMA
algorithm can be further improved by taking the difference in the ion composition between the day and night sides into account. Possible ways to
improve the plasma density computation are under investigation and will be included in future baselines.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Known issues and future plans</title>
      <p id="d1e1978">The Swarm LP measurements have a high value for scientific investigations. However, few anomalies affect the LP measurements which are continuously
monitored and investigated by the ESA data quality team and the scientific community. The source of these anomalies is only partially understood,
which leaves open questions in both physical and instrumental domains. This section is dedicated to the description of the occurrence of one of these
anomalies, namely the occurrence of extremely high values in the electron temperature measurements, which has a large impact on the data quality
and scientific investigations. In addition, we describe the calibration of LP measurements, which will be introduced in the next baseline (06).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1983">Electron temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) extreme values as a function of solar elevation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and azimuth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) angles as observed by Swarm C in 2019. Measurements located at latitudes between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in QD coordinates are represented with green circles (EQ). Measurements at latitudes smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are represented by using blue (SH) circles. Purple circles (NH) denote measurements at latitudes larger than 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/11/149/2022/gi-11-149-2022-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Extreme $T_{\mathrm{e}}$ values}?><title>Extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values</title>
      <p id="d1e2081">The ionospheric electron temperature typically ranges from a few hundred Kelvin during quiet periods at lower latitudes to a few thousand Kelvin
during extreme events such as Steve auroral emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.50"/>, during which peaks of 8000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed. However, the LP aboard
Swarm satellites occasionally measures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values up to more than 20 000 K, which have to be considered
“extreme”. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> reports the extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that occurred in 2019 as a function of the solar elevation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and azimuth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) angles with respect to the spacecraft. The extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values represent around 0.1 % of the data in 2019. In
particular, about 19 % of the extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are located between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of QD latitude (green circles denoted EQ in the
legend), 15 % are located at latitudes higher than 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (purple circles, NH in the legend), and 65 % are observed at latitudes below
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue circles, SH in the legend). It is worthwhile to notice that the distribution is more scattered for positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values,
i.e. when the Sun illuminates the spacecraft from the rear (anti-flight direction). On the opposite, we observe a more ordered distribution for
negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, i.e. when the Sun shines on the front of the satellite. Similar results are obtained for all three Swarm satellites (not
shown). This peculiar behaviour suggests that part of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extreme values are probably related to instrumental disturbances possibly
triggered by the Sun illumination. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> reports some statistics on the occurrence of extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at different latitudes,
which were observed in 2019. Numerous investigations are ongoing in order to identify the source of these extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, which are
more frequently observed in the Southern Hemisphere, as reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>, and occur at specific angles of the solar illumination of the
spacecraft. The extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are currently flagged as valid measurements. The next baseline will introduce a dedicated flag value to
highlight this anomaly.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2261">Percentage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extreme values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observed during 2019 at different latitudinal locations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="center">% of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> extreme values </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Swarm A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Swarm B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Swarm C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">QD lat</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">All</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50 50]<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">65.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">71.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">78.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>LP calibration against ground measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2471">The Swarm LP data have been extensively compared with other datasets during past years. For example, LP data have been compared with Digisonde
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.51"/>, other missions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.52"/>, and with the International Reference Ionosphere model (IRI, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="altparen.53"/>) during quiet as well
as disturbance periods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.54"/>. Swarm LP measurements also contributed to ionospheric modelling, as described in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.55"/>. Furthermore, Swarm measurements have been statistically validated as presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.56"/>, by comparing LP data
from December 2013 to June 2016 with nearly coincident measurements from low- and midlatitude incoherent scatter radars (ISRs). The ISR measures
altitude profiles of ionospheric plasma and temperature. The ISR measurements usually extend beyond the altitude of the Swarm satellites, thus making
them well suited for validation studies. The results demonstrate that Swarm LP measurements underestimate the plasma density by approximately 20 %
and overestimate the electron temperature by approximately 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.57"/> allow us to calibrate the Swarm LP density
and electron temperature measurements. The calibration parameters represent the correction to LP data to obtain a better agreement with ground
measurements. As discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>, the comparison between LP and FP data revealed a difference of the 18 % in the plasma measurements
on the day side. At the present stage of the development, the calibration of the LP measurements yields a much better agreement between LP and FP density,
where the remaining difference is only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 %. The calibrated LP measurements will be very useful for future studies dedicated to the
comparison of the Swarm LP data with other datasets. The calibration of the LP measurements will be implemented in the future baseline (06), where the
difference between measured and calibrated LP data, obtained using calibration parameter presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.58"/>, will be stored in a new
variable in the L1B EFI-LP data products.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2526">The quality control and validation activities performed by the data quality team in the frame of the ESA Swarm DISC reveal the good quality and
instrument performance of the Langmuir probes aboard the Swarm satellites. The analysis demonstrated that the current baseline 05 plasma data
products are substantially improved with respect to the previous baseline (04). In particular, the electron temperature measurements are more stable and, on
average, smaller with respect to the older baseline. The changes introduced in the current baseline lead to the recovery of past data gaps, increasing
the data coverage and reducing the possibility of future failures for generating the data. The LP measurements have captured the ionospheric plasma
variability over more than half of a solar cycle, which revealed that the data quality depends on the solar activity, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. In
particular, plasma density measurements are more accurate during higher solar activity. On the contrary, electron temperature measurements are more
stable during low solar activity. These results are highly related to the LP instrumental settings and are well tracked by the monitoring of the data
quality. Plasma density LP data have good agreement with TII faceplate measurements, particularly on the day side. However, the comparison between the
two datasets demonstrates a weaker correlation on the night side. The disagreement in nocturnal regions is partially related to the fact that the LP
processing algorithm assumes that the plasma is composed of singly ionized oxygen only. Investigations are ongoing in order to include molecular ions
in the plasma algorithm and to improve the quality of the plasma density computation in future baselines. The next release of the L1B LP data products
will include the calibration parameters for plasma density and electron temperature, which are statistically derived from a comparison with ground
measurements. Furthermore, a dedicated flag will be introduced to identify the extreme values of electron temperature. These changes will further
improve the quality of the Swarm LP L1B data products and will further promote their application to a broad range of ionospheric studies.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2535">In accordance with ESA Earth Observation Data Policy, all Swarm Level 1b and Level 2 products are freely accessible to all users at  <uri>https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.59"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2547">This study was led and coordinated by FC and SB with contributions and internal review by all named authors. In particular, FC and SB performed the analyses and wrote the manuscript. EQ, TN, JB, CS, IC, RD'A, LTC, LT, PEHO and AS participated in scientific discussions and contributed in achieving the scientific results and the review of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2553">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e2559">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2565">This research has been supported by the
Swarm DISC project funded by ESA (grant no.
4000109587/13/I-NB).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2571">This paper was edited by Håkan Svedhem and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Abe and Oyama(2013)}}?><label>Abe and Oyama(2013)</label><?label abe2013?><mixed-citation>Abe, T. and Oyama, K.-i.:
Langmuir Probe,
in: An Introduction to Space Instrumentation,
edited by: Oyama, K. and Cheng, C. Z.,
TERRAPUB, Japan, 63–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5047/aisi.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5047/aisi.010</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Archer et al.(2019)Archer, Gallardo-Lacourt, Perry, St.-Maurice, Buchert, and Donovan}}?><label>Archer et al.(2019)Archer, Gallardo-Lacourt, Perry, St.-Maurice, Buchert, and Donovan</label><?label Archer2019?><mixed-citation>Archer, W. E., Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Perry, G. W., St.-Maurice, J. P., Buchert, S. C., and Donovan, E.:
Steve: The Optical Signature of Intense Subauroral Ion Drifts,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
46, 6279–6286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082687" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL082687</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bilitza(2018)}}?><label>Bilitza(2018)</label><?label IRI2018?><mixed-citation>Bilitza, D.: IRI the International Standard for the Ionosphere, Adv. Radio Sci., 16, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-16-1-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ars-16-1-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Boyd(1965)}}?><label>Boyd(1965)</label><?label boyd1965?><mixed-citation>Boyd, R. L. F.:
An Introduction to Langmuir Probes for Space Research,
in: Introduction to Solar Terrestrial Relations,
edited by: Ortner, J. and Maseland, H.,
Astrophysics and Space Science Library,
Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3590-3_39" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-010-3590-3_39</ext-link>, pp. 455–465, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Buchert and Nilsson(2018)}}?><label>Buchert and Nilsson(2018)</label><?label PlasmaAlgo?><mixed-citation>Buchert, S. and Nilsson, T.:
Swarm level 1b Plasma processor algorithm, ESA,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-level-1b-plasma-processor-algorithm.pdf/bae64759-b901-d961-4d18-0a5b317f8c12</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),
, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Coffey} et al.(2008){Coffey}, {Wright}, {Minow}, {Schneider}, {Vaughn}, {Craven}, {Chandler}, {Koontz}, {Parker}, and {Bui}}}?><label>Coffey et al.(2008)Coffey, Wright, Minow, Schneider, Vaughn, Craven, Chandler, Koontz, Parker, and Bui</label><?label Coffey2008?><mixed-citation>Coffey, V. N., Wright, K. H., Minow, J. I., Schneider, T. A., Vaughn, J. A., Craven, P. D., Chandler, M. O., Koontz, S. L., Parker, L. N., and Bui, T. H.:
Validation of the Plasma Densities and Temperatures From the ISS Floating Potential Measurement Unit,
IEEE T. Plasma Sci.,
36, 2301–2308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2008.2004271" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TPS.2008.2004271</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Covington(1947)}}?><label>Covington(1947)</label><?label Covington1947?><mixed-citation>Covington, A.:
Micro-Wave Solar Noise Observations During the Partial Eclipse of November 23, 1946,
Nature,
159, 405–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/159405a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/159405a0</ext-link>, 1947.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Covington}(1948)}}?><label>Covington(1948)</label><?label Covington1948?><mixed-citation>Covington, A. E.:
Solar Noise Observations on 10.7 Centimeters,
Proceedings of the IRE,
36, 454–457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1948.234598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JRPROC.1948.234598</ext-link>, 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{De Michelis et al.(2021)De Michelis, Consolini, Pignalberi, Tozzi, Coco, Giannattasio, Pezzopane, and Balasis}}?><label>De Michelis et al.(2021)De Michelis, Consolini, Pignalberi, Tozzi, Coco, Giannattasio, Pezzopane, and Balasis</label><?label DeMichelis2021?><mixed-citation>De Michelis, P., Consolini, G., Pignalberi, A., Tozzi, R., Coco, I., Giannattasio, F., Pezzopane, M., and Balasis, G.:
Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
11, 2045–2322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84985-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-84985-1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{DTU(2019{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>DTU(2019a)</label><?label SwarmOP1B?><mixed-citation>DTU:
Swarm L1B processor algorithms,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-level-1b-processor-algorithms.pdf/e0606842-41ca-fa48-0a40-05a0d4824501?version=1.0</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),
National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{DTU(2019{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>DTU(2019b)</label><?label SwarmPDD?><mixed-citation>DTU:
Swarm L1B product definition,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-level-1b-product-definition-specification.pdf/12995649-fbcb-6ae2-5302-2269fecf5a08</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),
National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{ENS-Technology(2022)}}?><label>ENS-Technology(2022)</label><?label TiProbe?><mixed-citation>ENS-Technology:
On Titanium Plating, ENS Technology,
<uri>https://www.enstechnology.com/specialty-plating/exotic-metal/titanium-plating</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),
2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eriksson et al.(2007)Eriksson, Bostr{\"{o}}m, Gill, {\AA}hl{\'{e}}n, Jansson, Wahlund, Andr{\'{e}}, M{\"{a}}lkki, Holtet, Lybekk, Pedersen, Blomberg, and {The LAP Team}}}?><label>Eriksson et al.(2007)Eriksson, Boström, Gill, Åhlén, Jansson, Wahlund, André, Mälkki, Holtet, Lybekk, Pedersen, Blomberg, and The LAP Team</label><?label eriksson2007?><mixed-citation>Eriksson, A. I., Boström, R., Gill, R., Åhlén, L., Jansson, S.-E., Wahlund, J.-E., André, M., Mälkki, A., Holtet, J. A., Lybekk, B., Pedersen, A., Blomberg, L. G., and The LAP Team:
RPC-LAP: The Rosetta Langmuir Probe Instrument,
Space Sci. Rev.,
128, 729–744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9003-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-006-9003-3</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{European Space Agency(2021{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>European Space Agency(2021a)</label><?label SwarmData?><mixed-citation>European Space Agency:
Swarm Data Access, ESA [data set],
<uri>http://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),
2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{European Space Agency(2021{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>European Space Agency(2021b)</label><?label SwarmPub?><mixed-citation>European Space Agency:
Swarm Publications, ESA,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/missions/swarm/publications</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),
2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{ESA(2015)}}?><label>ESA(2015)</label><?label SwarmPPDUN?><mixed-citation>ESA:
Swarm preliminary plasma dataset user note, ESA,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-preliminary-plasma-dataset-user-note.pdf/6e8c356f-16d9-5145-1cc9-a9c5736653ab</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{ESA(2018)}}?><label>ESA(2018)</label><?label SwarmL1Bevo?><mixed-citation>ESA:
Swarm L1B baseline evolution, ESA,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/documents/10174/1514862/Swarm-Level-1B-baseline-evolutions</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{ESA(2019)}}?><label>ESA(2019)</label><?label SwarmDQWRep?><mixed-citation>ESA:
Summary and recommendations report, ESA,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/1479677/Swarm-DQW9-Summary-Recommendations-Report.pdf</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{ESA(2020{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>ESA(2020a)</label><?label SwarmDataGaps?><mixed-citation>ESA:
Swarm data gaps recovered, ESA,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/documents/10174/1583357/Swarm-data-gaps-recovered.pdf</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021), 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{ESA(2020{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>ESA(2020b)</label><?label SwarmOP_TN?><mixed-citation>ESA:
Swarm L1B and L2 operational processors, ESA,
<uri>https://earth.esa.int/documents/10174/1514862/Swarm-L1B-and-L2-operational-processors.pdf</uri> (last access: 31 July 2021), 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Flury et al.(2006)Flury, Rummel, Reigber, Rothacher, Boedecker, and Schreiber}}?><label>Flury et al.(2006)Flury, Rummel, Reigber, Rothacher, Boedecker, and Schreiber</label><?label Reigber2006?><mixed-citation>
Flury, J., Rummel, R., Reigber, C., Rothacher, M., Boedecker, G., and Schreiber, U.:
CHAMP Mission 5 Years in Orbit,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hatch et al.(2020)Hatch, Haaland, Laundal, Moretto, Yau, Bjoland, Reistad, Ohma, and Oksavik}}?><label>Hatch et al.(2020)Hatch, Haaland, Laundal, Moretto, Yau, Bjoland, Reistad, Ohma, and Oksavik</label><?label Hatch2020?><mixed-citation>Hatch, S. M., Haaland, S., Laundal, K. M., Moretto, T., Yau, A. W., Bjoland, L., Reistad, J. P., Ohma, A., and Oksavik, K.:
Seasonal and Hemispheric Asymmetries of F Region Polar Cap Plasma Density: Swarm and CHAMP Observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2020JA028084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JA028084</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Heelis and Maute(2020)}}?><label>Heelis and Maute(2020)</label><?label Heelis2020?><mixed-citation>Heelis, R. A. and Maute, A.:
Challenges to Understanding the Earth's Ionosphere and Thermosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2019JA027497, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027497" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JA027497</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{IRF(2017)}}?><label>IRF(2017)</label><?label SwarmFP?><mixed-citation>IRF:
Faceplate plasma density, ESA,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_plasma_density">https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/</ext-link><?xmltex \hack{\break}?><ext-link xlink:href="https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_plasma_density">#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_</ext-link><?xmltex \hack{\break}?><ext-link xlink:href="https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_plasma_density">plasma_density</ext-link> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jin and Xiong(2020)}}?><label>Jin and Xiong(2020)</label><?label Jin2020b?><mixed-citation>Jin, Y. and Xiong, C.:
Interhemispheric Asymmetry of Large-Scale Electron Density Gradients in the Polar Cap Ionosphere: UT and Seasonal Variations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2019JA027601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JA027601</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jin et al.(2020)Jin, Xiong, Clausen, Spicher, Kotova, Brask, Kervalishvili, Stolle, and Miloch}}?><label>Jin et al.(2020)Jin, Xiong, Clausen, Spicher, Kotova, Brask, Kervalishvili, Stolle, and Miloch</label><?label Jin2020?><mixed-citation>Jin, Y., Xiong, C., Clausen, L., Spicher, A., Kotova, D., Brask, S., Kervalishvili, G., Stolle, C., and Miloch, W.:
Ionospheric Plasma Irregularities Based on In Situ Measurements From the Swarm Satellites,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2020JA028103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JA028103</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Kelley(2009)}}?><label>Kelley(2009)</label><?label Kelley?><mixed-citation>
Kelley, M.:
The Earth's ionosphere, International Geophysics Series vol 96,
Elsevier,  Academic Press, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Knudsen et al.(2017)Knudsen, Burchill, Buchert, Eriksson, Gill, Wahlund, {\AA}hlen, Smith, and Moffat}}?><label>Knudsen et al.(2017)Knudsen, Burchill, Buchert, Eriksson, Gill, Wahlund, Åhlen, Smith, and Moffat</label><?label knudsen2017?><mixed-citation>Knudsen, D. J., Burchill, J. K., Buchert, S. C., Eriksson, A. I., Gill, R., Wahlund, J.-E., Åhlen, L., Smith, M., and Moffat, B.:
Thermal ion imagers and Langmuir probes in the Swarm electric field instruments,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
122, 2655–2673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022571" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA022571</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lebreton et al.(2006)Lebreton, Stverak, Travnicek, Maksimovic, Klinge, Merikallio, Lagoutte, Poirier, Blelly, Kozacek, and Salaquarda}}?><label>Lebreton et al.(2006)Lebreton, Stverak, Travnicek, Maksimovic, Klinge, Merikallio, Lagoutte, Poirier, Blelly, Kozacek, and Salaquarda</label><?label lebreton2006?><mixed-citation>Lebreton, J. P., Stverak, S., Travnicek, P., Maksimovic, M., Klinge, D., Merikallio, S., Lagoutte, D., Poirier, B., Blelly, P. L., Kozacek, Z., and Salaquarda, M.:
The ISL Langmuir Probe Experiment Processing Onboard DEMETER: Scientific Objectives, Description and First Results,
Planet. Space Sci.,
54, 472–486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.017</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu et al.(2020)Liu, Guan, Zhang, and Shen}}?><label>Liu et al.(2020)Liu, Guan, Zhang, and Shen</label><?label Liu2020?><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Guan, Y., Zhang, X., and Shen, X.:
The data comparison of electron density between CSES and DEMETER satellite, Swarm constellation and IRI model,
Earth and Space Science,
8, e2020EA001475, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020EA001475</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Liu and Chen(2009)}}?><label>Liu and Chen(2009)</label><?label Liu2009?><mixed-citation>Liu, L. and Chen, Y.:
Statistical analysis of solar activity variations of total electron content derived at Jet Propulsion Laboratory from GPS observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JA014533</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lomidze et al.(2018)Lomidze, Knudsen, Burchill, Kouznetsov, and Buchert}}?><label>Lomidze et al.(2018)Lomidze, Knudsen, Burchill, Kouznetsov, and Buchert</label><?label Lomidze2018?><mixed-citation>Lomidze, L., Knudsen, D. J., Burchill, J., Kouznetsov, A., and Buchert, S. C.:
Calibration and Validation of Swarm Plasma Densities and Electron Temperatures Using Ground-Based Radars and Satellite Radio Occultation Measurements,
Radio Sci.,
53, 15–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017RS006415</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{MacDonald et al.(2018)MacDonald, Donovan, Nishimura, Case, Gillies, Gallardo-Lacourt, Archer, Spanswick, Bourassa, Connors, Heavner, Jackel, Kosar, Knudsen, Ratzlaff, and Schofield}}?><label>MacDonald et al.(2018)MacDonald, Donovan, Nishimura, Case, Gillies, Gallardo-Lacourt, Archer, Spanswick, Bourassa, Connors, Heavner, Jackel, Kosar, Knudsen, Ratzlaff, and Schofield</label><?label MacDonald2018?><mixed-citation>MacDonald, E. A., Donovan, E., Nishimura, Y., Case, N. A., Gillies, D. M., Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Archer, W. E., Spanswick, E. L., Bourassa, N., Connors, M., Heavner, M., Jackel, B., Kosar, B., Knudsen, D. J., Ratzlaff, C., and Schofield, I.:
New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere,
Science Advances,
4, 3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aaq0030</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Noja et al.(2013)Noja, Stolle, Park, and L\"{u}hr}}?><label>Noja et al.(2013)Noja, Stolle, Park, and Lühr</label><?label Noja2013?><mixed-citation>Noja, M., Stolle, C., Park, J., and Lühr, H.:
Long-term analysis of ionospheric polar patches based on CHAMP TEC data,
Radio Sci.,
48, 289–301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rds.20033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rds.20033</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Olsen et al.(2013)Olsen, Friis-Christensen, Floberghagen, Alken, Beggan, Chulliat, Doornbos, da Encarna\c{c}\~{a}o, Hamilton, Hulot, van den IJssel, Kuvshinov, Lesur, L\"{u}hr, Macmillan, Maus, Noja, Olsen, Park, Plank, P\"{u}the, Rauberg, Ritter, Rother, Sabaka, Schachtschneider, Sirol, Stolle, Th\'{e}bault, Thomson, T{\o}ffner-Clausen, Vel{\'{\i}}msk\'{y}, Vigneron, and Visser}}?><label>Olsen et al.(2013)Olsen, Friis-Christensen, Floberghagen, Alken, Beggan, Chulliat, Doornbos, da Encarnação, Hamilton, Hulot, van den IJssel, Kuvshinov, Lesur, Lühr, Macmillan, Maus, Noja, Olsen, Park, Plank, Püthe, Rauberg, Ritter, Rother, Sabaka, Schachtschneider, Sirol, Stolle, Thébault, Thomson, Tøffner-Clausen, Velímský, Vigneron, and Visser</label><?label Olsen2013?><mixed-citation>Olsen, N., Friis-Christensen, E., Floberghagen, R., Alken, P., Beggan, C. D., Chulliat, A., Doornbos, E., da Encarnação, J. T., Hamilton, B., Hulot, G., van den IJssel, J., Kuvshinov, A., Lesur, V., Lühr, H., Macmillan, S., Maus, S., Noja, M., Olsen, P. E. H., Park, J., Plank, G., Püthe, C., Rauberg, J., Ritter, P., Rother, M., Sabaka, T. J., Schachtschneider, R., Sirol, O., Stolle, C., Thébault, E., Thomson, A. W. P., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Velímský, J., Vigneron, P., and Visser, P. N.:
The Swarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility (SCARF) and Swarm data products,
Earth Planets Space,
65, 1880–5981, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2013.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5047/eps.2013.07.001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Oyama(2015)}}?><label>Oyama(2015)</label><?label Oyama2015?><mixed-citation>Oyama, K.:
DC Langmuir Probe for Measurement of Space Plasma: A Brief Review,
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences,
32, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.3.167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5140/JASS.2015.32.3.167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pezzopane and Pignalberi(2019)}}?><label>Pezzopane and Pignalberi(2019)</label><?label Pezzopane2019?><mixed-citation>Pezzopane, M. and Pignalberi, A.:
The ESA Swarm mission to help ionospheric modeling: a new NeQuick topside formulation for mid-latitude regions,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
9,  12253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48440-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-48440-6</ext-link>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pignalberi et al.(2016)Pignalberi, Pezzopane, Tozzi, De Michelis, and Coco}}?><label>Pignalberi et al.(2016)Pignalberi, Pezzopane, Tozzi, De Michelis, and Coco</label><?label Pignalberi2016?><mixed-citation>Pignalberi, A., Pezzopane, M., Tozzi, R., De Michelis, P., and Coco, I.:
Comparison between IRI and preliminary Swarm Langmuir probe measurements during the St. Patrick storm period,
Earth Planets Space,
68, 93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0466-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-016-0466-5</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pr\"{o}lss(2004)}}?><label>Prölss(2004)</label><?label Prolss?><mixed-citation>
Prölss, G.:
Physics of the Earth's Space Environment,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Singh et al.(2021)Singh, Haralambous, Oikonomou, and Leontiou}}?><label>Singh et al.(2021)Singh, Haralambous, Oikonomou, and Leontiou</label><?label Singh2021?><mixed-citation>Singh, A. K., Haralambous, H., Oikonomou, C., and Leontiou, T.:
A topside investigation over a mid-latitude digisonde station in Cyprus,
Adv. Space Res.,
67, 739–748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.009</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Smirnov et al.(2021)Smirnov, Shprits, Zhelavskaya, L\"{u}hr, Xiong, Goss, Prol, Schmidt, Hoque, Pedatella, and Szab\'{o}-Roberts}}?><label>Smirnov et al.(2021)Smirnov, Shprits, Zhelavskaya, Lühr, Xiong, Goss, Prol, Schmidt, Hoque, Pedatella, and Szabó-Roberts</label><?label Smirnov2021?><mixed-citation>Smirnov, A., Shprits, Y., Zhelavskaya, I., Lühr, H., Xiong, C., Goss, A., Prol, F. S., Schmidt, M., Hoque, M., Pedatella, N., and Szabó-Roberts, M.:
Intercalibration of the Plasma Density Measurements in Earth's Topside Ionosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
126, e2021JA029334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029334" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JA029334</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tapping(2013)}}?><label>Tapping(2013)</label><?label Tapping2013?><mixed-citation>Tapping, K. F.:
The 10.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solar radio flux (F10.7),
Space Weather,
11, 394–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/swe.20064</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Vaishnav et al.(2019)Vaishnav, Jacobi, and Berdermann}}?><label>Vaishnav et al.(2019)Vaishnav, Jacobi, and Berdermann</label><?label Vaishnav2019?><mixed-citation>Vaishnav, R., Jacobi, C., and Berdermann, J.: Long-term trends in the ionospheric response to solar extreme-ultraviolet variations, Ann. Geophys., 37, 1141–1159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1141-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-37-1141-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wang et al.(2015)Wang, Hsu, and Hor\'{a}nyi}}?><label>Wang et al.(2015)Wang, Hsu, and Horányi</label><?label Wang2015?><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Hsu, H.-W., and Horányi, M.:
Identification of when a Langmuir probe is in the sheath of a spacecraft: The effects of secondary electron emission from the probe,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
120, 2428–2437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020624" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JA020624</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xiong et al.(2010)Xiong, Park, L\"{u}hr, Stolle, and Ma}}?><label>Xiong et al.(2010)Xiong, Park, Lühr, Stolle, and Ma</label><?label Xiong2010?><mixed-citation>Xiong, C., Park, J., Lühr, H., Stolle, C., and Ma, S. Y.: Comparing plasma bubble occurrence rates at CHAMP and GRACE altitudes during high and low solar activity, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1647–1658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1647-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-28-1647-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Xiong et al.(2020)Xiong, Xu, Stolle, van den Ijssel, Yin, Kervalishvili, and Zangerl}}?><label>Xiong et al.(2020)Xiong, Xu, Stolle, van den Ijssel, Yin, Kervalishvili, and Zangerl</label><?label Xiong2020?><mixed-citation>Xiong, C., Xu, J.-S., Stolle, C., van den Ijssel, J., Yin, F., Kervalishvili, G. N., and Zangerl, F.:
On the Occurrence of GPS Signal Amplitude Degradation for Receivers on Board LEO Satellites,
Space Weather,
18, e2019SW002398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019SW002398</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yang et al.(2020)Yang, Park, Kwak, Oyama, Minow, and Lee}}?><label>Yang et al.(2020)Yang, Park, Kwak, Oyama, Minow, and Lee</label><?label Yang2020?><mixed-citation>Yang, T.-Y., Park, J., Kwak, Y.-S., Oyama, K.-I., Minow, J. I., and Lee, J.:
Morning Overshoot of Electron Temperature as Observed by the Swarm Constellation and the International Space Station,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2019JA027299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JA027299</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Swarm Langmuir probes' data quality validation and future improvements</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abe and Oyama(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Abe, T. and Oyama, K.-i.:
Langmuir Probe,
in: An Introduction to Space Instrumentation,
edited by: Oyama, K. and Cheng, C. Z.,
TERRAPUB, Japan, 63–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5047/aisi.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5047/aisi.010</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Archer et al.(2019)Archer, Gallardo-Lacourt, Perry, St.-Maurice, Buchert, and Donovan</label><mixed-citation>
Archer, W. E., Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Perry, G. W., St.-Maurice, J. P., Buchert, S. C., and Donovan, E.:
Steve: The Optical Signature of Intense Subauroral Ion Drifts,
Geophys. Res. Lett.,
46, 6279–6286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082687" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082687</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bilitza(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Bilitza, D.: IRI the International Standard for the Ionosphere, Adv. Radio Sci., 16, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-16-1-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-16-1-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Boyd(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, R. L. F.:
An Introduction to Langmuir Probes for Space Research,
in: Introduction to Solar Terrestrial Relations,
edited by: Ortner, J. and Maseland, H.,
Astrophysics and Space Science Library,
Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3590-3_39" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3590-3_39</a>, pp. 455–465, 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Buchert and Nilsson(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Buchert, S. and Nilsson, T.:
Swarm level 1b Plasma processor algorithm, ESA,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-level-1b-plasma-processor-algorithm.pdf/bae64759-b901-d961-4d18-0a5b317f8c12" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),
, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Coffey et al.(2008)Coffey, Wright, Minow, Schneider, Vaughn, Craven, Chandler, Koontz, Parker, and Bui</label><mixed-citation>
Coffey, V. N., Wright, K. H., Minow, J. I., Schneider, T. A., Vaughn, J. A., Craven, P. D., Chandler, M. O., Koontz, S. L., Parker, L. N., and Bui, T. H.:
Validation of the Plasma Densities and Temperatures From the ISS Floating Potential Measurement Unit,
IEEE T. Plasma Sci.,
36, 2301–2308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2008.2004271" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2008.2004271</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Covington(1947)</label><mixed-citation>
Covington, A.:
Micro-Wave Solar Noise Observations During the Partial Eclipse of November 23, 1946,
Nature,
159, 405–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/159405a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/159405a0</a>, 1947.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Covington(1948)</label><mixed-citation>
Covington, A. E.:
Solar Noise Observations on 10.7&thinsp;Centimeters,
Proceedings of the IRE,
36, 454–457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1948.234598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1948.234598</a>, 1948.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>De Michelis et al.(2021)De Michelis, Consolini, Pignalberi, Tozzi, Coco, Giannattasio, Pezzopane, and Balasis</label><mixed-citation>
De Michelis, P., Consolini, G., Pignalberi, A., Tozzi, R., Coco, I., Giannattasio, F., Pezzopane, M., and Balasis, G.:
Looking for a proxy of the ionospheric turbulence with Swarm data,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
11, 2045–2322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84985-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84985-1</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>DTU(2019a)</label><mixed-citation>
DTU:
Swarm L1B processor algorithms,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-level-1b-processor-algorithms.pdf/e0606842-41ca-fa48-0a40-05a0d4824501?version=1.0" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),
National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>DTU(2019b)</label><mixed-citation>
DTU:
Swarm L1B product definition,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-level-1b-product-definition-specification.pdf/12995649-fbcb-6ae2-5302-2269fecf5a08" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),
National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>ENS-Technology(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
ENS-Technology:
On Titanium Plating, ENS Technology,
<a href="https://www.enstechnology.com/specialty-plating/exotic-metal/titanium-plating" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),
2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Eriksson et al.(2007)Eriksson, Boström, Gill, Åhlén, Jansson, Wahlund, André, Mälkki, Holtet, Lybekk, Pedersen, Blomberg, and The LAP Team</label><mixed-citation>
Eriksson, A. I., Boström, R., Gill, R., Åhlén, L., Jansson, S.-E., Wahlund, J.-E., André, M., Mälkki, A., Holtet, J. A., Lybekk, B., Pedersen, A., Blomberg, L. G., and The LAP Team:
RPC-LAP: The Rosetta Langmuir Probe Instrument,
Space Sci. Rev.,
128, 729–744, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9003-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9003-3</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>European Space Agency(2021a)</label><mixed-citation>
European Space Agency:
Swarm Data Access, ESA [data set],
<a href="http://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),
2021a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>European Space Agency(2021b)</label><mixed-citation>
European Space Agency:
Swarm Publications, ESA,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/missions/swarm/publications" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),
2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>ESA(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA:
Swarm preliminary plasma dataset user note, ESA,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/37627/swarm-preliminary-plasma-dataset-user-note.pdf/6e8c356f-16d9-5145-1cc9-a9c5736653ab" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>ESA(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA:
Swarm L1B baseline evolution, ESA,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/documents/10174/1514862/Swarm-Level-1B-baseline-evolutions" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>ESA(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA:
Summary and recommendations report, ESA,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/documents/20142/1479677/Swarm-DQW9-Summary-Recommendations-Report.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>ESA(2020a)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA:
Swarm data gaps recovered, ESA,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/documents/10174/1583357/Swarm-data-gaps-recovered.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021), 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>ESA(2020b)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA:
Swarm L1B and L2 operational processors, ESA,
<a href="https://earth.esa.int/documents/10174/1514862/Swarm-L1B-and-L2-operational-processors.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 July 2021), 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Flury et al.(2006)Flury, Rummel, Reigber, Rothacher, Boedecker, and Schreiber</label><mixed-citation>
Flury, J., Rummel, R., Reigber, C., Rothacher, M., Boedecker, G., and Schreiber, U.:
CHAMP Mission 5 Years in Orbit,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hatch et al.(2020)Hatch, Haaland, Laundal, Moretto, Yau, Bjoland, Reistad, Ohma, and Oksavik</label><mixed-citation>
Hatch, S. M., Haaland, S., Laundal, K. M., Moretto, T., Yau, A. W., Bjoland, L., Reistad, J. P., Ohma, A., and Oksavik, K.:
Seasonal and Hemispheric Asymmetries of F Region Polar Cap Plasma Density: Swarm and CHAMP Observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2020JA028084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028084" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028084</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Heelis and Maute(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Heelis, R. A. and Maute, A.:
Challenges to Understanding the Earth's Ionosphere and Thermosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2019JA027497, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027497" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027497</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>IRF(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
IRF:
Faceplate plasma density, ESA,
<a href="https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_plasma_density" target="_blank">https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/</a><a href="https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_plasma_density" target="_blank">#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_</a><a href="https://swarm-diss.eo.esa.int/#swarm%2FAdvanced%2FPlasma_Data%2F16_Hz_Faceplate_plasma_density" target="_blank">plasma_density</a> (last access: 31 July 2021),  2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Jin and Xiong(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, Y. and Xiong, C.:
Interhemispheric Asymmetry of Large-Scale Electron Density Gradients in the Polar Cap Ionosphere: UT and Seasonal Variations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2019JA027601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027601</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Jin et al.(2020)Jin, Xiong, Clausen, Spicher, Kotova, Brask, Kervalishvili, Stolle, and Miloch</label><mixed-citation>
Jin, Y., Xiong, C., Clausen, L., Spicher, A., Kotova, D., Brask, S., Kervalishvili, G., Stolle, C., and Miloch, W.:
Ionospheric Plasma Irregularities Based on In Situ Measurements From the Swarm Satellites,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2020JA028103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028103</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kelley(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Kelley, M.:
The Earth's ionosphere, International Geophysics Series vol 96,
Elsevier,  Academic Press, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Knudsen et al.(2017)Knudsen, Burchill, Buchert, Eriksson, Gill, Wahlund, Åhlen, Smith, and Moffat</label><mixed-citation>
Knudsen, D. J., Burchill, J. K., Buchert, S. C., Eriksson, A. I., Gill, R., Wahlund, J.-E., Åhlen, L., Smith, M., and Moffat, B.:
Thermal ion imagers and Langmuir probes in the Swarm electric field instruments,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
122, 2655–2673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022571" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022571</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Lebreton et al.(2006)Lebreton, Stverak, Travnicek, Maksimovic, Klinge, Merikallio, Lagoutte, Poirier, Blelly, Kozacek, and Salaquarda</label><mixed-citation>
Lebreton, J. P., Stverak, S., Travnicek, P., Maksimovic, M., Klinge, D., Merikallio, S., Lagoutte, D., Poirier, B., Blelly, P. L., Kozacek, Z., and Salaquarda, M.:
The ISL Langmuir Probe Experiment Processing Onboard DEMETER: Scientific Objectives, Description and First Results,
Planet. Space Sci.,
54, 472–486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2005.10.017</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Liu et al.(2020)Liu, Guan, Zhang, and Shen</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, J., Guan, Y., Zhang, X., and Shen, X.:
The data comparison of electron density between CSES and DEMETER satellite, Swarm constellation and IRI model,
Earth and Space Science,
8, e2020EA001475, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001475</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Liu and Chen(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, L. and Chen, Y.:
Statistical analysis of solar activity variations of total electron content derived at Jet Propulsion Laboratory from GPS observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014533" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014533</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Lomidze et al.(2018)Lomidze, Knudsen, Burchill, Kouznetsov, and Buchert</label><mixed-citation>
Lomidze, L., Knudsen, D. J., Burchill, J., Kouznetsov, A., and Buchert, S. C.:
Calibration and Validation of Swarm Plasma Densities and Electron Temperatures Using Ground-Based Radars and Satellite Radio Occultation Measurements,
Radio Sci.,
53, 15–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006415</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>MacDonald et al.(2018)MacDonald, Donovan, Nishimura, Case, Gillies, Gallardo-Lacourt, Archer, Spanswick, Bourassa, Connors, Heavner, Jackel, Kosar, Knudsen, Ratzlaff, and Schofield</label><mixed-citation>
MacDonald, E. A., Donovan, E., Nishimura, Y., Case, N. A., Gillies, D. M., Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Archer, W. E., Spanswick, E. L., Bourassa, N., Connors, M., Heavner, M., Jackel, B., Kosar, B., Knudsen, D. J., Ratzlaff, C., and Schofield, I.:
New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere,
Science Advances,
4, 3, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaq0030</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Noja et al.(2013)Noja, Stolle, Park, and Lühr</label><mixed-citation>
Noja, M., Stolle, C., Park, J., and Lühr, H.:
Long-term analysis of ionospheric polar patches based on CHAMP TEC data,
Radio Sci.,
48, 289–301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rds.20033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rds.20033</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Olsen et al.(2013)Olsen, Friis-Christensen, Floberghagen, Alken, Beggan, Chulliat, Doornbos, da Encarnação, Hamilton, Hulot, van den IJssel, Kuvshinov, Lesur, Lühr, Macmillan, Maus, Noja, Olsen, Park, Plank, Püthe, Rauberg, Ritter, Rother, Sabaka, Schachtschneider, Sirol, Stolle, Thébault, Thomson, Tøffner-Clausen, Velímský, Vigneron, and Visser</label><mixed-citation>
Olsen, N., Friis-Christensen, E., Floberghagen, R., Alken, P., Beggan, C. D., Chulliat, A., Doornbos, E., da Encarnação, J. T., Hamilton, B., Hulot, G., van den IJssel, J., Kuvshinov, A., Lesur, V., Lühr, H., Macmillan, S., Maus, S., Noja, M., Olsen, P. E. H., Park, J., Plank, G., Püthe, C., Rauberg, J., Ritter, P., Rother, M., Sabaka, T. J., Schachtschneider, R., Sirol, O., Stolle, C., Thébault, E., Thomson, A. W. P., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Velímský, J., Vigneron, P., and Visser, P. N.:
The Swarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility (SCARF) and Swarm data products,
Earth Planets Space,
65, 1880–5981, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2013.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2013.07.001</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Oyama(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Oyama, K.:
DC Langmuir Probe for Measurement of Space Plasma: A Brief Review,
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences,
32, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.3.167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.3.167</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Pezzopane and Pignalberi(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Pezzopane, M. and Pignalberi, A.:
The ESA Swarm mission to help ionospheric modeling: a new NeQuick topside formulation for mid-latitude regions,
Sci. Rep.-UK,
9,  12253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48440-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48440-6</a>, 2019.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Pignalberi et al.(2016)Pignalberi, Pezzopane, Tozzi, De Michelis, and Coco</label><mixed-citation>
Pignalberi, A., Pezzopane, M., Tozzi, R., De Michelis, P., and Coco, I.:
Comparison between IRI and preliminary Swarm Langmuir probe measurements during the St. Patrick storm period,
Earth Planets Space,
68, 93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0466-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0466-5</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Prölss(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Prölss, G.:
Physics of the Earth's Space Environment,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Singh et al.(2021)Singh, Haralambous, Oikonomou, and Leontiou</label><mixed-citation>
Singh, A. K., Haralambous, H., Oikonomou, C., and Leontiou, T.:
A topside investigation over a mid-latitude digisonde station in Cyprus,
Adv. Space Res.,
67, 739–748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.009</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Smirnov et al.(2021)Smirnov, Shprits, Zhelavskaya, Lühr, Xiong, Goss, Prol, Schmidt, Hoque, Pedatella, and Szabó-Roberts</label><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Shprits, Y., Zhelavskaya, I., Lühr, H., Xiong, C., Goss, A., Prol, F. S., Schmidt, M., Hoque, M., Pedatella, N., and Szabó-Roberts, M.:
Intercalibration of the Plasma Density Measurements in Earth's Topside Ionosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
126, e2021JA029334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029334" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029334</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Tapping(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Tapping, K. F.:
The 10.7&thinsp;cm solar radio flux (F10.7),
Space Weather,
11, 394–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20064</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Vaishnav et al.(2019)Vaishnav, Jacobi, and Berdermann</label><mixed-citation>
Vaishnav, R., Jacobi, C., and Berdermann, J.: Long-term trends in the ionospheric response to solar extreme-ultraviolet variations, Ann. Geophys., 37, 1141–1159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1141-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-1141-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Wang et al.(2015)Wang, Hsu, and Horányi</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Hsu, H.-W., and Horányi, M.:
Identification of when a Langmuir probe is in the sheath of a spacecraft: The effects of secondary electron emission from the probe,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
120, 2428–2437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020624" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020624</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Xiong et al.(2010)Xiong, Park, Lühr, Stolle, and Ma</label><mixed-citation>
Xiong, C., Park, J., Lühr, H., Stolle, C., and Ma, S. Y.: Comparing plasma bubble occurrence rates at CHAMP and GRACE altitudes during high and low solar activity, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1647–1658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1647-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-1647-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Xiong et al.(2020)Xiong, Xu, Stolle, van den Ijssel, Yin, Kervalishvili, and Zangerl</label><mixed-citation>
Xiong, C., Xu, J.-S., Stolle, C., van den Ijssel, J., Yin, F., Kervalishvili, G. N., and Zangerl, F.:
On the Occurrence of GPS Signal Amplitude Degradation for Receivers on Board LEO Satellites,
Space Weather,
18, e2019SW002398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002398" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002398</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Yang et al.(2020)Yang, Park, Kwak, Oyama, Minow, and Lee</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, T.-Y., Park, J., Kwak, Y.-S., Oyama, K.-I., Minow, J. I., and Lee, J.:
Morning Overshoot of Electron Temperature as Observed by the Swarm Constellation and the International Space Station,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
125, e2019JA027299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027299</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
