<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GI</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GI</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2193-0864</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gi-14-263-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Analysis of SAMA interference on Pc3 pulsations using data from conjugate stations: a case study</article-title><alt-title>SAMA interference on Pc3 pulsations</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Camacho</surname><given-names>Edwin</given-names></name>
          <email>edwincmch@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9089-9085</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Benyosef</surname><given-names>Luiz</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>COGEO, National Observatory – ON. R. Gen. J. Cristino, 77, Rio de Janeiro, 20921-400, Rj, Brazil</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Edwin Camacho (edwincmch@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>263</fpage><lpage>275</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>25</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>July</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Edwin Camacho</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025.html">This article is available from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e86">Based on a case study, we analyzed Pc3 pulsation data from pairs of conjugate stations located at low latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2). One pair of stations is situated in the Americas under the influence area of the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA). As a reference, we selected a pair of stations located at a distant longitude in the Asia-Pacific region. This choice of regions facilitates meaningful comparisons. We conducted a signal spectral analysis using the fast Fourier transform (FFT), the continuous wavelet transform (CWT), and wavelet coherence to characterize the dynamics of Pc3 pulsations at conjugate stations in the time–frequency domain. In this case study, the Pc3 pulsations exhibited similar waveforms and occurred simultaneously at the conjugate stations in both regions. Spectral power plots and wavelet scalograms revealed notable similarities between the stations. However, we observed an increase in pulsation amplitude and wavelet coefficients at the station located near the SAMA center. Additionally, high coherence and in-phase signals were observed in the Asia-Pacific region, while moderate to high coherence signals were observed at the station in the SAMA region. We suggest that the observed differences at the SAMA station may result from the unique characteristics of the region. The presence of the SAMA facilitates the precipitation of energetic particles from the inner radiation belt, thereby enhancing ionospheric conductivity.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior</funding-source>
<award-id>301114/2024-2</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e112">The South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) is the most significant and largest magnetic anomaly on Earth, a region that spans the Pacific Ocean over southwestern Africa, covering latitudes between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>° N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>° S <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.1"/>. In this region, the main magnetic field experiences a substantial reduction, decreasing by about 22 000 nT, which is roughly one-third of its maximum value, compared to other longitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.2"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.3"/> identified the current minimum value of the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) in northern Argentina, noting that its center has historically shifted from southern Africa to South America over the past 300 years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.4"/>. Due to the reduced magnetic field intensity over the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) region, energetic particles trapped in the inner radiation belt and drifting azimuthally undergo deep precipitation into the ionosphere and atmosphere, thereby creating a region of high radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.5"/>. The particle precipitation results in the enhanced ionospheric conductivity at the altitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> layers due to an increase in ionization during both the quiet and disturbed periods in this region compared to other places and suggested by observations of the ionosondes, radiometer, and very low frequency (VLF) radio propagation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.6"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.7"/> pointed out that ionospheric conductivity is generally higher during disturbed periods compared to quiet ones. The increase in energetic particles in this region can impact objects orbiting Earth, such as satellites and the International Space Station (ISS). On the Earth's surface, this can lead to disruptions in communications and GPS, the creation of no-fly zones, and the induction of currents in pipelines and transmission lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.8"/>. Recently, a secondary minimum within the SAMA has been observed near southwestern Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.9"/>, raising speculation that the expansion of the SAMA might signal an impending geomagnetic reversal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx84" id="paren.10"/>. Finally, it must be remembered that, although this magnetic anomaly is the most significant and largest, relatively few studies have been conducted in this region compared to other parts of the world.</p>
      <p id="d2e175">Magnetic pulsations are the ground manifestation of ultra low frequency (ULF) hydromagnetic waves propagating in the magnetosphere. Frequencies typically range between about 1 mHz and 10 Hz; ground amplitudes range from less than 0.1 nT to tens or hundreds of nT and generally increase with latitude up to auroral regions. In this work, we focus on Pc3 magnetic pulsations (20–100 mHz) because some studies have shown that Pc3 magnetic pulsations play a crucial role in transferring solar wind energy into the inner magnetosphere and the dynamic coupling of the magnetosphere and the ionosphere. This process is essential for comprehending key aspects of the solar wind–magnetosphere interaction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.11"/>. Besides, Pc3 geomagnetic pulsations can be generated either externally or internally with respect to the magnetosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.12"/>. Pc3 pulsations are primarily associated with the transfer of upstream interplanetary waves into the magnetosphere, generated by ion cyclotron instability. This instability occurs when solar wind protons are reflected from the bow shock along the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.13"/>. Previous studies have suggested that Kelvin–Helmholtz instability (KHI) at the magnetopause's flanks plays a significant role in generating and amplifying Pc3 pulsations (Yagova et al., 2017; Yumoto et al., 1986; Santarelli et al., 2003). Furthermore, Pc3 pulsations observed at low latitudes have been attributed to cavity or waveguide mode oscillations within the plasmasphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.14"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.15"/> proposed that the magnetospheric cavity or waveguide mode acts as a resonator for these pulsations. However, some studies suggest that the wave structure can also be influenced by cavity or waveguide modes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.16"/>. Field line resonance (FLR) is another proposed mechanism and energy source for Pc3 pulsations observed on Earth, particularly at higher latitudes. FLRs, which resemble vibrating strings fixed at both ends, are widely accepted as the cause of Pc3 pulsations at high and middle latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.17"/>. However, some Pc3 pulsations, especially those observed at very low latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2), are better explained by cavity mode oscillations in the plasmasphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx87 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.18"/>. Lastly, it is worth noting that, while most research on Pc3 pulsations has focused on high and middle latitudes, the SAMA region remains less explored.</p>
      <p id="d2e217">This case study includes data from conjugate stations, where two points on Earth's surface are geomagnetically conjugate if they lie at opposite ends of the same geomagnetic field line, located in opposite hemispheres <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.19"/>. Conjugate phenomena refer to events that occur symmetrically and simultaneously in conjugate regions, facilitated by the direct connection of magnetic field lines between the hemispheres <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.20"/>. While much of the research on conjugate points has focused on high and middle latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.21"/>, studies at low latitudes remain less common <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.22"/>. Few studies have examined conjugate station data at low latitudes, with notable examples including <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.23"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.24"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.25"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.26"/>, which investigated the characteristics of Pc3 magnetic pulsations. Finally, examining Pc3 pulsation characteristics using data from geomagnetically conjugate stations offers valuable insights into the role of the ionosphere and plasmasphere in the energy transfer and propagation of these pulsations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx83" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e248">The aim of this work is to compare Pc3 pulsation patterns between conjugate stations, investigate their electrodynamic behavior, and evaluate the influence of the SAMA on these pulsations. The motivation for this study is to address the following fundamental question: are there differences in the characteristics of Pc3 pulsations recorded at conjugate stations influenced by the SAMA? Magnetic data were simultaneously recorded at two conjugate station pairs, one in the America–SAMA region and the other in the Asia-Pacific region, allowing a comparative analysis of Pc3 pulsation characteristics. Data were collected near the equinox period to ensure better conditions of interhemispheric symmetry. To characterize the behavior of Pc3 pulsations at conjugate stations, we employ a three-step signal analysis approach. Firstly, we apply the fast Fourier transform (FFT) with Welch's power spectral method to provide a global overview of the dataset, highlighting the frequency characteristics of the pulsations between conjugate stations. This helps us to understand how the pulsations are generated and propagated. Secondly, the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) is used to observe timescale variability and non-stationary features. Finally, wavelet coherence analysis is used to identify consistent scales and assess local similarities in Pc3 pulsations between stations. To our knowledge, this integrated methodology has not previously been applied to study Pc3 pulsations and their relationship with the SAMA.</p>
      <p id="d2e252">The structure of this work is as follows: Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> presents the data, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> describes the signal analysis methodology, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> presents and discusses the results, and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> provides the conclusions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d2e271">In this section, we provide an overview of the dataset used for this investigation, detail the ground-based stations considered, and describe the space environment conditions relevant to the case study.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Geomagnetic dataset</title>
      <p id="d2e281">In this work, we use the geomagnetic horizontal “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” component, which exhibits a maximum amplitude and is more susceptible to magnetosphere–ionosphere modulation effects. Consequently, it is more suitable for studying pulsations in conjugate points <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.28"/>. The data were sampled at a rate of 1 s for all stations, allowing us to effectively analyze Pc3 pulsations.</p>
      <p id="d2e294">We focus on a case study covering the period from 01:00 to 04:00 UT on 25 October 2016, which corresponds to a quiet to moderately disturbed geomagnetic environment (3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Kp <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5; Dst <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT). More information about the space environment conditions for the selected data period is presented and discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.29"/>. Previous studies have shown that some Pc3 pulsations occur in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kp</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during quiet to disturbed periods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx82" id="paren.30"/>. A storm sudden commencement (SSC) was recorded at 09:22 UT on the same day, after the selected period. This time period  was chosen for the analysis of Pc3 pulsations because it is the only period with data from all four stations, where the amplitudes exceed 0.5 nT and the wave packet contains at least three wave cycles.</p>
      <p id="d2e351">Fortunately, the chosen period occurred near the September equinox, ensuring nearly equal solar illumination of both hemispheres. This condition results in interhemispheric symmetry, with similarities in conductivity and atmospheric electric current systems at conjugate points <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.31"/>. Such atmospheric characteristics simplify the physical system, as conjugate ionospheres during winter or summer would exhibit significantly different conductivities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.32"/>. Additionally, the moderately disturbed period, characterized by variations in solar wind pressure, offers a unique opportunity to investigate the electrodynamical coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere–ionosphere system at low latitudes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Ground-based stations</title>
      <p id="d2e368">The selected stations are located at low latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2) and are positioned near conjugate points, theoretically placing them close to the feet of the same magnetic field line. Specifically, the Kakioka (KAK) station in Japan is roughly  conjugate to Alice Springs (ASP) station in Australia, while San Juan (SJG) station in the United States is roughly conjugate to São Martinho da Serra (SMS) station in Brazil. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> illustrates the locations of the conjugate stations. Additionally, the surface area of the SAMA is highlighted on the map by the closed blue line, which corresponds to the 32 000 nT magnitude isoline at the Earth's surface, as calculated using the IGRF-13 model.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e389">The map shows the locations of the conjugate stations, indicated by circles. The red line represents the dip magnetic Equator, while the closed blue line surrounds the SAMA region.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e398">The conjugate coordinates were determined using the altitude-adjusted corrected geomagnetic (AACGM) model, which utilizes the full-resolution IGRF-13 magnetic field model, including its non-dipolar components, to trace magnetic field lines between the hemispheres. The tracing process begins by numerically following the magnetic field line from the geographic starting position to the dipole magnetic equatorial plane, defined by the best-fit Earth-centered dipole. From that point, a dipole field line is traced back to the Earth's surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.33"/>. These steps provide a more physically meaningful mapping between conjugate locations.</p>
      <p id="d2e405">We utilized a Python-based wrapper tool<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d2e408"><uri>https://pypi.org/project/aacgmv2/</uri> (last access: February 2025)</p></fn> implementing the AACGM coordinate system for this purpose. It is well known that the AACGM model includes so-called “forbidden regions”, where coordinate values cannot be defined, particularly near the dip magnetic Equator and in some areas of the South Atlantic Ocean. This issue has been addressed in previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.34"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.35"/>, who present figures illustrating the forbidden regions. However, recent updates to Shepherd's original code now enable coordinate estimation within these regions using interpolation and fitting techniques. Importantly, the software alerts users when a location falls within a forbidden  region where coordinate calculations are invalid by returning an NaN value, indicating that the conjugate point could not be determined. Using this Python wrapper, we verified that none of the stations in this study fall within the forbidden regions. As a result, valid conjugate points could be computed for all stations used in this study, including the one located within the SAMA.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e423">Coordinates of the magnetic stations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center" colsep="0">Coordinates </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center" colsep="1">Geographic </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="left">Conjugate </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Code</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">UN<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Lat (°)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Long (°)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Lat (°)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Long (°)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (nT)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (km)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kakioka</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KAK</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">JP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">140.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">138.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">46 737</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2417</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alice Springs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ASP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">AU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">133.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">138.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">53 139</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">San Juan (Puerto Rico)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SJG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">US</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>66.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37 284</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">São Martinho da Serra</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">BR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>53.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22 460</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e426">UN<sup>a</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Country, JP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Japan, AU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Australia, US <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> The United States, BR <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Brazil.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e807">The AACGM model also provides the maximum altitude (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the magnetic flux line linking the stations. All stations are part of the INTERMAGNET and EMBRACE MagNet networks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.36"/>. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> lists the geographic and conjugate coordinates, magnetic field intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-shell values for each station.</p>
      <p id="d2e840">It is important to acknowledge the limitations of the model employed in this study, including potential model errors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.37"/>. Although the stations are not located exactly at geomagnetically conjugate points, they are positioned sufficiently close to the conjugate areas (or conjugate regions) to support the intended analysis. This spatial proximity enables the application of our methodology, consistent with previous studies that have utilized the concept of conjugate points between stations, even when not specifically focused on magnetic pulsations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.38"/>. It is also important to note that, currently, there are few stations situated exactly at conjugate points with the temporal resolution required for detailed analysis of Pc3 pulsations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methodology</title>
      <p id="d2e858">The spectral analysis of Pc3 pulsation variations involved several steps. Initially, the raw geomagnetic H-component data were bandpass-filtered using an infinite impulse response (IIR) filter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.39"/>, with a unit response in the period range of 20–100 mHz, in order to extract Pc3 signals.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Spectral analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e871">In this work, we applied two techniques for spectral analysis: time–frequency analysis, which utilizes the Fourier transform, and timescale analysis, based on the continuous wavelet transform.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Time–frequency analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e882">The Fourier transform decomposes a waveform into a sum of sinusoids with varying frequencies. It essentially represents the same information as the original waveform but in the frequency domain instead of the time domain. The Fourier transform is commonly used for stationary signal analysis, where all frequencies exhibit infinite coherence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.40"/>. This spectral analysis provides a comprehensive description of the frequency components within a given time series. The equation below represents the continuous-time Fourier transform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.41"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M39" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ı</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the record length, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the frequency, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time series from which we extract a record of length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in this case, a Pc3 pulsation time series.</p>
      <p id="d2e982">In this analysis, we used Welch's power spectral density (PSD) method with fast Fourier transform (FFT) to eliminate low-frequency variations, allowing the spectral features within the frequency range of interest to be more clearly identified. A Hanning window with a length of 512 s was applied to the data in the time domain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Timescale analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e993">Our timescale analysis involves calculating wavelet coefficients using the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) of the filtered signal (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Pc3 pulsations). The CWT is a powerful tool for analyzing both stationary and non-stationary time series, including geophysical signals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.42"/>. It provides insights into the central frequencies (the inverse of central periods) of the events and their timing. The wavelet coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generated by the CWT are defined as follows:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is scale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes translation, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the analyzing wavelet function, which is defined on the open-time and real-scale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) half-plane. The analyzing wavelet function used in this work is the Morlet function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1166">Our goal is to distinguish the distribution of signal energy across different scales over time. This distribution is visualized in a scalogram, which highlights the maximum energy values and their temporal occurrences. In essence, the scalogram represents the distribution of signal energy with respect to both time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Global wavelet spectrum</title>
      <p id="d2e1192">The global wavelet spectrum (GWS) is a mathematical tool that provides an unbiased and consistent estimation of the true power spectrum of a time series signal. By using wavelet transforms, the GWS evaluates how the energy (or power) of the signal is distributed across different timescales, offering both temporal and frequency information. This method is particularly useful for analyzing non-stationary signals, such as geomagnetic pulsations (e.g., Pc3), where the signal characteristics change over time. Unlike traditional Fourier methods, the GWS does not assume stationarity, allowing it to detect transient high-frequency events more accurately <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.44"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Coherence analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1207">Coherence analysis can quantify the correlation between signals or similarity between them in the frequency domain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.45"/>, helping to determine whether pulsations come from the same source region in the frequency domain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.46"/>. Differences in observations may indicate disturbances from local processes or asymmetrical effects from external sources. The cross-wavelet transform is a tool used to examine timescale dependencies between two time series, defined as follows:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1283">Based on this cross-transform, we can compute the wavelet coherence and a phase measure. They provide linear-quantitative estimators of the degree to which the relationship scales between the two signals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.47"/>. Here, the wavelet coherence is computed using the following expression:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1429">Wavelet coherence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values, ranging from 0 to 1, indicate the degree of linear relationship between two signals. Values close to 1 suggest a strong correlation, implying the signals likely come from the same source. Values near 0 indicate weak or no correlation, suggesting the signals originate from different sources. The operator “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”  is a smoothing function applied in the timescale domain, implemented via convolution of transform coefficients with a Gaussian moving average in both time and scale directions. This smoothing reduces noise introduced by amplification effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.48"/>. The wavelet coherence phase, denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is derived from the real and imaginary components of the coefficients. This measurement yields information on the delay of one signal considering the other as a function of time and scale. Implementation of the CWT and wavelet coherence were based on a library of MATLAB functions provided by  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.49"/>. A detailed explanation of the methodology can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.50"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e1497">Our case study focuses on the spectral analysis of Pc3 pulsations from terrestrial magnetic stations located at conjugate points in two global regions. The objectives include identifying Pc3 events, analyzing power spectral density, performing wavelet analysis to examine process dynamics, conducting coherence analysis between conjugate stations, and comparing behaviors influenced by the SAMA.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Pc3 event identification</title>
      <p id="d2e1507">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> shows the Pc3 pulsations for each conjugate pair (with each pair indicated by red and blue). We initially selected two time intervals representing simultaneous wave packets of Pc3 pulsations. Both intervals have the same duration of 10 min. The time intervals were chosen based on the presence of significant Pc3 pulsation amplitudes in both regions and the significant wavelet coefficients (as seen in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>  and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>, which are described later).</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1518">Filtered Pc3 pulsations at conjugate stations on 25 October 2026. <bold>(a)</bold> KAK–ASP and <bold>(b)</bold> SJG–SMS.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1533">Through visual inspection, the plots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> show consistent propagation patterns of Pc3 wave packets that are simultaneous and similar between the conjugate stations, particularly between KAK and ASP in the Asia-Pacific region. That is, the occurrence of the Pc3 pulsation was essentially identical, and relative amplitudes were similar. This observation is consistent with some previous investigations at conjugate stations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx86" id="paren.51"/>. Additionally, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b shows that Pc3 wave packets in the Southern Hemisphere generally exhibit higher-amplitude intensities compared to those in the Northern Hemisphere for conjugate station pairs. At the SMS station, an enhancement in Pc3 pulsation amplitudes is observed near the center of the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA). During quiet to moderately disturbed geomagnetic conditions, the SAMA region experiences an increase in Pc3 pulsation amplitudes, which may be associated with electron precipitation in the ionospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> layers. The SMS station, located near the center of the SAMA, recorded the highest amplitudes of these pulsations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Pc3 power spectral density analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1565">We employ a power spectral method (explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1"/>) to analyze the significant peaks and evaluate the similarity between the conjugate station pairs. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> displays Welch's power spectral density (PSD) of the filtered time series, calculated using the FFT, for the selected intervals. It also shows the frequency contributions to the Pc3 pulsations across all intervals for the conjugate pairs. In interval 1, two significant discrete spectral peaks are observed for each conjugate pair at 23.4 and 29.2 mHz in both regions. In interval 2, a significant peak is observed at 27.3 mHz in all stations. Furthermore, the amplitudes of the peaks in both intervals are similar in the Asia-Pacific region. In contrast, the amplitudes of the peaks at the SMS station are considerably higher than those at its conjugate station. This result may indicate that the SMS station is influenced by an altered upper atmosphere in the SAMA region, primarily due to the ionosphere. It is important to note that some authors have observed spectra similar to Pc3 pulsations at low latitudes and/or over a wide range of latitudes on the Earth's surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.52"/>. However, this would be the first time that similar spectra have been observed at conjugate points and at low latitudes, particularly when considering the SAMA region.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1577">Welch's power spectral density of the Pc3 pulsations from conjugate stations in the Asia-Pacific region: time interval 1 <bold>(a, c)</bold> and time interval 2 <bold>(b, d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1592">The dominant frequencies (23.4, 29.2, and 27.3 mHz) are consistent with some of the discrete frequencies observed in the 20–30 mHz range, as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.53"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.54"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.55"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.56"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.57"/>. Several studies have reported the manifestation of pulsations and fluctuations at discrete frequencies, often interpreted in terms of field line resonances (FLRs) associated with large-scale waveguide/cavity modes in the Earth's magnetosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.58"/>. However, this topic is not the primary focus of the current work, though it could be explored in future studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Wavelet analysis of Pc3 dynamics</title>
      <p id="d2e1622">In this section, we analyze the signal energy across different scales over time. Scalograms are used to visualize the location of maximum values and their temporal occurrence, offering an effective way to examine pulsation details and highlight similarities.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1627">Pc3 pulsations <bold>(a–b)</bold>, squared wavelet coefficient scalograms <bold>(c–d)</bold>, and global wavelet spectrum <bold>(e–f)</bold>. Asia-Pacific region.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1645">For the Asia-Pacific region, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> shows the Pc3 pulsation signal (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a and b), the corresponding scalograms (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c and d), and plots of the global wavelet spectrum (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>e and f), each corresponding to the conjugate stations. Panels in the same vertical column correspond to the KAK station in the Northern Hemisphere (on the left) and the ASP station in the Southern Hemisphere (on the right), while panels at the same horizontal position refer to the conjugate station pair. In wavelet scalograms, the horizontal axis represents the time in hours, while the vertical axis represents the signal intensity (in nT) and wavelet scale (in mHz), respectively. The magnitudes of the wavelet coefficients are indicated by the color bar, which has the same range (nT<sup>2</sup> mHz<sup>−1</sup>) for the signal analysis of each station.</p>
      <p id="d2e1679">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c and d highlight the characteristics of the Pc3 pulsations. The maximum values of the wavelet coefficients (indicated in yellow) coincide with the most intense Pc3 wave packets observed at each station (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a and b). In the two selected time intervals (1 and 2), the scalograms show higher-intensity spectrum values in the frequency range of 20 to 40 mHz. An inspection of the scalograms reveals similar features in energy amplitude, duration, and scale (converted to central frequency) for the conjugate pairs. The global wavelet spectrum plots highlight two peaks that are similar between the conjugate stations, coinciding with the Pc3 pulsation wave packets observed at each station. However, it can be noted that the peak powers at the ASP station are slightly more intense. Based on the observed similarity in energy patterns, we conclude that the conjugate pairs in the Asia-Pacific region are subject to nearly identical conditions in the magnetosphere–ionosphere system.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1688">Pc3 pulsations <bold>(a–b)</bold>, squared wavelet coefficient scalograms <bold>(c–d)</bold>, and global wavelet spectrum <bold>(e–f)</bold>. America–SAMA region.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1706">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> presents the Pc3 pulsation data (top panels), scalogram (middle panels), and plots of the global wavelet spectrum (bottom panels) for the conjugate station, following a format similar to the previous figure but focusing on the America–SAMA region.</p>
      <p id="d2e1711">Initially, the scalograms show similar and simultaneous energy patterns, with the more intense wavelet coefficients corresponding to the Pc3 pulsation wave packets. However, the coefficients at the SMS station show a slight increase in intensity, particularly during time interval 2. Additionally, the more intense wavelet coefficient values in the scalograms are observed between 20 and 40 mHz. The global wavelet spectrum plots (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e and f) reveal two peaks at the conjugate stations, which align with the Pc3 pulsation wave packets detected at each location. However, it is noted that the peak powers at the SMS station are more intense than at its conjugate. Finally, the results suggest that the SAMA influences the energy of Pc3 pulsations due to ionization in the SAMA region. The use of the CWT technique to investigate timescale characteristics has significantly contributed to this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Coherence analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1725">To complete the investigation, we employ coherence analysis to address the following question: for a pair of signals from conjugate stations, how similar are their power spectra?</p>
      <p id="d2e1728">The wavelet coherence for each conjugate pair in both global regions, calculated using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>), is used to create color map plots (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). These plots represent the coherence values of Pc3 pulsations between the conjugate pairs, with yellow indicating maximum coherence (close to 1). Arrows indicate the phase relationship between signals: right arrows for in-phase, left arrows for anti-phase, and inclined arrows for intermediate values. Arrows are shown only where the coherence is 0.8 or higher for better visualization.</p>

      <fig id="F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e1737">Wavelet coherence representations for Pc3 pulsations between the conjugate pair stations. The color map indicates the amplitude, and arrows indicate the phase where the amplitude is larger than 0.8. <bold>(a)</bold> KAK–ASP and <bold>(b)</bold> SJG–SMS.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/14/263/2025/gi-14-263-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1753">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> shows the wavelet coherence results for the conjugate stations in both the Asia-Pacific and America–SAMA regions. As seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a, the time intervals for the KAK–ASP stations exhibit very high coherence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in-phase signals for pulsations at the conjugate stations. Coherence in the 20 to 100 mHz band is consistently high between this conjugate pair. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.59"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.60"/> also observed high-coherence Pc3–5 pulsations (using FFT) between conjugate stations, recorded in the Asia-Pacific region. Finally, the high coherence in this region suggests that the Pc3 pulsations observed at the conjugate stations likely originated from the same source in the magnetosphere. These results may indicate that the stations are subject to similar effects and undergo similar processes of energy transfer between the magnetosphere and ionosphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e1781">In contrast, when examining the time intervals in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b, there are generally moderate to high signal coherence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and in-phase signals between the conjugate stations. The SJG–SMS pair shows lower coherence than the KAK–ASP pair, with moderate to high coherence observed in the 20–60 mHz band. This reduced coherence for SJG–SMS may be linked to the station's proximity to the SAMA center, where enhanced electrical conductivity, due to particle precipitation, alters pulsations and impacts the plasmasphere–ionosphere system, thereby modifying the structure of Pc3 pulsations along the magnetic field lines connecting conjugate stations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Summary of the comparative analysis of Pc3 pulsations inside and outside the SAMA</title>
      <p id="d2e1813">In summary, the observations from our case study demonstrate a striking similarity and simultaneity of Pc3 pulsations recorded at conjugate stations in low-latitude regions and across two distinct geographic areas. These pulsations occurred near the time of interhemispheric illumination symmetry, coinciding with the September equinox.</p>
      <p id="d2e1816">In the Asia-Pacific region, nearly symmetric conditions at the magnetopause, plasmasphere, and ionosphere result in similar and simultaneous Pc3 pulsation amplitudes. Spectral analyses (PSD) and scalograms show significant similarities between conjugate stations, with high coherence and in-phase signals in this region. In contrast, in the America–SAMA region, an enhancement in the amplitude of Pc3 pulsations was observed at the SMS station.</p>
      <p id="d2e1819">Previous studies have reported similar observations. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.61"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.62"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.63"/> observed that magnetic pulsations at conjugate stations outside the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) typically exhibit comparable amplitude and phase characteristics. In contrast, studies focused on the SAMA region (though not necessarily at conjugate stations) have shown that Pc3 pulsation amplitudes are often enhanced in this area <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.64"/>. Furthermore, research on Pc5 pulsations has also reported amplitude enhancement within the SAMA region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx88" id="paren.65"/>. Thus, our case study aligns with previous findings and supports the interpretation that the enhancement of pulsation amplitudes in the SAMA region is a persistent feature.</p>
      <p id="d2e1837">While spectral analyses and scalograms showed similarities, the SMS station displayed more intense power spectral density and wavelet coefficients. Notably, the discrete spectral frequencies (PSD) were identical in both regions. Moderate to high coherence and in-phase signals were also observed in this region. These differences arise from the asymmetric conditions between the America–SAMA stations. Although both stations experience similar magnetopause conditions, they differ in particle precipitation and plasmasphere–ionosphere dynamics, with the SMS station exhibiting an ionization anomaly. This suggests that the SAMA region influences the characteristics and structure of Pc3 pulsations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1841">The high coherence observed in both regions suggests that the Pc3 pulsations likely originate from the same external source in the magnetosphere, propagating along magnetic flux lines linking the conjugate stations. However, at the SMS station, the Pc3 pulsations may also be influenced by factors such as the ionization in the SAMA, particle precipitation, and variations in electrical conductivity during slightly perturbed periods. These asymmetries in plasmasphere–ionosphere conditions alter the Pc3 pulsations along the magnetic flux lines in the America–SAMA region, contrasting with the Asia-Pacific region, which is under more symmetric conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e1844">The observations from this case study support the conclusion that the SAMA region influences the characteristics of Pc3 pulsations. This study does not address the sources of the pulsations or the internal mechanisms driving the modifications in the magnetic pulsations. Exploring these aspects would necessitate the use of additional methodologies and comprehensive data from ground-based instruments to examine the ionosphere and from satellites to probe the plasmasphere.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e1857">This study analyzed Pc3 pulsation data from two conjugate station pairs at low latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2), located in the Asia-Pacific and America–SAMA regions. The aim was to compare the Pc3 pulsation patterns between these stations, investigate their electrodynamic behavior at conjugate locations, and assess the influence of the SAMA region. Fourier and wavelet transform techniques were applied to analyze the pulsations, allowing the visualization of spectral and coherence characteristics. To simplify the geophysical and electromagnetic processes in the magnetosphere–ionosphere system, data were analyzed during a period of conditions near interhemispherical illumination symmetry. The main results observed from the Pc3 pulsation data, based on our case study, are summarized as follows: 
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1878">The Pc3 pulsations exhibited similar waveforms and occurred simultaneously at conjugate stations in both regions. Under the influence of the SAMA, these pulsations showed an enhancement in amplitude.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1882">The dominant frequencies identified (1.9, 2.1, 2.6, and 2.8 mHz) were identical in both regions. However, the SMS station, located near the SAMA center, exhibited a general amplification of spectral power (PSD) compared to its conjugate station.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1886">A high degree of similarity in the scalograms was observed at all conjugate stations in both regions. However, at the station influenced by the SAMA, the wavelet coefficients were more intense.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1890">In the Asia-Pacific region, the signals between conjugate pairs exhibited high coherence and in-phase behavior. In contrast, in the America–SAMA region, the Pc3 pulsations showed moderate to high coherence, also remaining in phase.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e1893">In summary, while the Pc3 wave structures likely originate from the same external source, possibly within the magnetosphere, and propagate to lower latitudes via magnetic flux lines to the conjugate stations, certain characteristics of the pulsations might be modified in the SAMA-influenced region. The observed differences in this region, such as the enhanced amplitudes of Pc3 pulsations and more pronounced wavelet and PSD coefficients, may be attributed to the unique features of this sector. These include significant longitudinal variation in the magnetic field and the precipitation of energetic particles from the inner Van Allen belts, which alter the ionospheric conductivity.</p>
      <p id="d2e1896">These represent the first direct observations of Pc3 pulsations at conjugate points in the SAMA-influenced region and the first comparative analysis between conjugate stations, highlighting how the electrodynamics of the pulsations may be influenced by the largest anomaly of the Earth. This study provides new insights into the effects of the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly on geomagnetic pulsations recorded at ground stations located at conjugate points. A valuable direction for future research is to investigate the role of internal factors, such as field line resonance and cavity/waveguide modes, in influencing magnetic pulsations, an objective that lies beyond the scope of the present study.</p>
      <p id="d2e1899">Finally, we emphasize that our study utilizes 1 s resolution data from conjugate stations, an uncommon and valuable dataset in this field. The limited availability of such high-resolution conjugate data currently constrains our ability to perform a more statistically comprehensive analysis. For this reason, we opted to focus on a case study, supported by a robust methodological framework that integrates three complementary techniques to address the proposed objective and yields unpublished results. Nevertheless, we intend to conduct a statistical analysis in future work.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e1907">The software code used in this study was developed in-house and is based on predefined functions in MATLAB (<uri>https://www.mathworks.com/help/wavelet/ref/cwt.html</uri>, last access: February 2025).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e1916">Data are available from the international repositories INTERMAGNET <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.66"/> and from INPE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.67"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e1928">EC: writing (manuscript draft), visualization, data, methodology, analysis of the results. LB: writing (review and editing), analysis of the results, supervision.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e1934">The contact author has declared that neither of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e1940">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d2e1946">This article is part of the special issue “Geomagnetic observatories, their data, and the application of their data”. It is a result of the XXth IAGA Workshop on Geomagnetic Observatory Instruments, Data Acquisition, and Processing, Vassouras, Brazil, 30 October–6 November 2024.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e1952">This study was financed by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), PCI/ON/MCTI grant no. 301114/2024-2. The authors would like to thank INTERMAGNET (<uri>https://www.intermagnet.org</uri>, last access: February 2025) and EMBRACE MagNet (<uri>http://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/en/</uri>, last access: February 2025) for the datasets used in this work. The authors also thank Odim Mendes and Margarete Domingues (INPE) for their collaboration on this work.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e1963">This research has been supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), PCI/ON/MCTI (grant no. 301114/2024-2).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e1969">This paper was edited by Emmanuel Nahayo and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Abdu et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Abdu, M., Batista, I., Carrasco, A., and Brum, C.: South Atlantic magnetic anomaly ionization: A review and a new focus on electrodynamic effects in the equatorial ionosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.  Phy., 67, 1643–1657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.014</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Addison(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Addison, P.: The illustrated wavelet transform handbook. Introductory theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and finance, CRC press, ISBN 9780750306928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420033397" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/9781420033397</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Antoine et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Antoine, J., Murenzi, R., Vandergheynst, P., and Ali, S. (Eds.): Two-Dimensional Wavelets and their Relatives, Cambridge University, Cambridge, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511543395</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bortel and Sovka(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Bortel, R. and Sovka, P.: Approximation of statistical distribution of magnitude squared coherence estimated with segment overlapping, Signal Process., 87, 1100–1117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2006.10.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.sigpro.2006.10.003</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Brigham(1988)</label><mixed-citation> Brigham, O.: The fast Fourier transform and its applications, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ISBN 0-13-307505-2, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Camacho et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Camacho, E., Benyosef, L., Mendes, O., and Domingues, M.: Pc5 Pulsations in the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly, Braz. J. Phys., 53, 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-022-01229-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13538-022-01229-x</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Caraballo(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Caraballo, R.: The South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly Phenomena: Its impact on the technological infrastructure, Master's thesis, University of the Republic Uruguay, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4345.5600" ext-link-type="DOI">10.13140/RG.2.1.4345.5600</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Daubechies(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Daubechies, I.: Ten lectures on wavelets, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, ISBN 978-0-89871-274-2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1137/1.9781611970104</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Denardini et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Denardini, C. M., Chen, S. S., Resende, L. C. A., Moro, J., Bilibio, A. V., Fagundes, P. R., Gende, M. A., Cabrera, M. A., Bolzan, M. J. A., Padilha, A. L., Schuch, N. J., Hormaechea, J. L., Alves, L. R., Barbosa Neto, P. F., Nogueira, P. A. B., Picanço, G. A. S., and Bertollotto, T. O.: The Embrace magnetometer network for South America: Network description and its qualification, Radio Sci., 53, 288–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006477" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017RS006477</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>de Paula et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>de Paula, E. R., Muella, M. T. A. H., Sobral, J. H. A., Abdu, M. A., Batista, I. S., Beach, T. L., and Groves, K. M.: Magnetic conjugate point observations of kilometer and hundred-meter scale irregularities and zonal drifts, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, 288–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JA015383</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Domingos et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Domingos, J., Jault, D., Pais, M. A., and Mandea, M.: The South Atlantic Anomaly throughout the solar cycle, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 473, 154–163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.004</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Domingues et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Domingues, M. O., Mendes, O., and da Costa, A. M.: On wavelet techniques in atmospheric sciences, Adv. Space Res., 35, 831–842, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.097</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Engebretson et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Engebretson, M. J., Cobian, R. K., Posch, J. L., and Arnoldy, R. L.: A conjugate study of Pc3–4 pulsations at cusp latitudes: Is there a clock angle effect?, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 15965–15980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA000328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JA000328</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Eriksson et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Eriksson, P. T. I., Blomberg, L. G., Schaefer, S., and Glassmeier, K.-H.: On the excitation of ULF waves by solar wind pressure enhancements, Ann. Geophys., 24, 3161–3172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-3161-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-24-3161-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Feng et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation> Feng, Q., Fraser, B. J., Menk, F. W., Ziesolleck, C. W. S., Saka, O., and Kitamura, T.: Pc 3-4 geomagnetic pulsations observed at very low latitude conjugate stations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 100, 19287–19298, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Finlay et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Finlay, C., Kloss, C., Olsen, N., Hammer, M., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Grayver, A., and Kuvshinov, A.: The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly, Earth Planets Space, 72, 1–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Francia et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Francia, P., De Lauretis, M., Vellante, M., Villante, U., and Piancatelli, A.: ULF geomagnetic pulsations at different latitudes in Antarctica, Ann. Geophys., 27, 3621–3629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3621-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-27-3621-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Francia et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Francia, P., Regi, M., De Lauretis, M., Villante, U., and Pilipenko, V. A.: A case study of upstream wave transmission to the ground at polar and low latitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 117, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JA016751</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Frick et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Frick, P., Grossmann, A., and Tchamitchian, P.: Wavelet analysis of signals with gaps, J. Math. Phys., 39, 4091–4107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.532485</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Fukushima et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Fukushima, D., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Kubota, M., Yokoyama, T., Nishioka, M., Komonjinda, S., and Yatini, C.: Geomagnetically conjugate observations of ionospheric and thermospheric variations accompanied by a midnight brightness wave at low latitudes, Earth Planets Space, 69, 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0698-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-017-0698-z</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Greenstadt et al.(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Greenstadt, E. W., McPherron, R. L., and Takahashi, K.: Solar Wind Control of Daytime, Midperiod Geomagnetic Pulsations, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 89–110, ISBN 978-94-009-8426-4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8426-4_6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-009-8426-4_6</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Grinsted et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11, 561–566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Hagen and Azevedo(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Hagen, M. and Azevedo, A.: Investigation of Potential Factors on South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly, Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 15, 207–221, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2024.131001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4236/ojer.2024.131001</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Hajkowicz(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Hajkowicz, L. A.: Magnetoconjugate phenomena in Alaska and Macquarie Is., Australia in 2003: position of the global maximum iso-aurorae, Ann. Geophys., 24, 2611–2617, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-2611-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-24-2611-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hartinger et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Hartinger, M. D., Xu, Z., Clauer, C. R., Yu, Y., Weimer, D. R., Kim, H., Pilipenko, V., Welling, D. T., Behlke, R., and Willer, A. N.: Associating ground magnetometer observations with current or voltage generators, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 7130–7141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024140" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JA024140</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hartmann and Pacca(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Hartmann, G. A. and Pacca, I. G.: Time evolution of the South Atlantic agnetic Anomaly, An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc., 81, 243–255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652009000200010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1590/S0001-37652009000200010</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Haykin and Van Veen(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Haykin, S. and Van Veen, B.: Signals and Systems, Wiley, ISBN 9780471138204, <uri>https://books.google.com.br/books?id=uOE-ngEACAAJ</uri> (last access: February 2025), 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, INPE [data set], <uri>https://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/embracedatasobre/</uri>, last access: 1 February 2025, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>International Real-time Magnetic Observatory Network(2025)</label><mixed-citation>International Real-time Magnetic Observatory Network: INTERMAGNET [data set], <uri>https://intermagnet.org/data_download.html</uri>, last access: 1 February 2025, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Jun et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Jun, C. W., Shiokawa, K., Connors, M., Schofield, I., Poddelsky, I., and Shevtsov, B.: Study of Pc1 pearl structures observed at multi-point ground stations in Russia, Japan, and Canada, Earth Planets Space, 66, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-014-0140-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-014-0140-8</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Jun et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Jun, C. W., Shiokawa, K., Connors, M., Schofield, I., Poddelsky, I., and Shevtsov, B.: Possible generation mechanisms for Pc1 pearl structures in the ionosphere based on 6 years of ground observations in Canada, Russia, and Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 4409–4424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JA022123</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kamide and Chian(2007)</label><mixed-citation> Kamide, Y. and Chian, A. (Eds.): Handbook of the solar-terrestrial environment, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-540-46314-6, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Kivelson and Southwood(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Kivelson, M. G. and Southwood, D. J.: Resonant ULF waves: A new interpretation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12, 49–52, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i001p00049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL012i001p00049</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Kleimenova et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Kleimenova, N., Kozyreva, O., Malysheva, L., Soloviev, A., Bogoutdinov, S., and Zelinsky, N.: Storm-associated equatorial Pc3 geomagnetic pulsations based on the one-second INTERMAGNET multi-station measurements, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference “Problems of Geocosmos”, 8–12 October 2012, St. Petersburg, Russia, p. 261, <uri>https://geo.phys.spbu.ru/materials_of_a_conference_2012/STP2012/Kleimenova_%20et_all_Geocosmos2012proceedings.pdf</uri>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kumar and Foufoula-Georgiou(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Kumar, P. and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: Wavelet Analysis for Geophysical Application, Rev. Geophys., 35, 385–412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00427" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97RG00427</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Labat(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Labat, D.: Recent advances in wavelet analyses: Part 1. a review of concepts, J. Hydrol., 314, 275–288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.003</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Laundal and Richmond(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Laundal, K. and Richmond, A. D.: Magnetic coordinate systems, Space Sci. Rev., 206, 27–59, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0275-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-016-0275-y</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Liu et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Fraser, B., Liu, R., and Ponomarenko, P.: Conjugate phase studies of ULF waves in the Pc5 band near the cusp, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1274–1290, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009336" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JA009336</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Matsuoka et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Matsuoka, H., Takahashi, K., Kokubun, S., Yumoto, K., Yamamoto, T., Solovyev, S., and Vershinin, E.: Phase and amplitude structure of Pc 3 magnetic pulsations as determined from multipoint observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 102, 2391–2403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA02918" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JA02918</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>McPherron(2005)</label><mixed-citation>McPherron, R.: Magnetic pulsations: their sources and relation to solar wind and geomagnetic activity, Surv. Geophys., 26, 545–592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-005-1758-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-005-1758-7</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Mendes da Costa et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Mendes da Costa, A., Oliveira Domingues, M., Mendes, O., and Marques Brum, C. G.: Interplanetary medium condition effects in the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly: A case study, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 73, 1478–1491, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.010</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Menk and Waters(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Menk, F. and Waters, C.: Field line resonances and waveguide modes at low latitudes: 2. A model, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 7763–7774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JA900267</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Menk et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Menk, F. W., Fraser, B. J., Waters, C. L., Ziesolleck, C. W. S., Feng, Q., Lee, S. H., and Mcnabb, P. W.: Ground Measurements of Low Latitude Magnetospheric Field Line Resonances, in: Solar Wind Sources of Magnetospheric Ultra-Low-Frequency Waves, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, vol. 81, 299–310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM081p0299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM081p0299</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Menk et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Menk, F. W., Clilverd, M. A., Yearby, K. H., Milinevski, G., Thomson, N. R., and Rose, M. C.: ULF Doppler oscillations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux tubes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A07205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JA011192</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Momani(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Momani, M. A.: GPS observations at quasi-conjugate points during solar minimum, Radio Sci., 47, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011RS004826</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Motoba et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Motoba, T., Ebihara, Y., Kadokura, A., Engebretson, M. J., Lessard, M. R., Weatherwax, A. T., and Gerrard, A. J.: Fast-moving diffuse auroral patches: A new aspect of daytime Pc3 auroral pulsations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 1542–1554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA023285</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Nagata(1967)</label><mixed-citation>Nagata, T.: Geomagnetic conjugacy between the antarctic and the arctic, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pacific Antarctic Sciences Pacific, 11th Pacific Science Congress, National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Tokyo, Japan,  23–27 August 1966, 65–80, <uri>https://core.ac.uk/download/51479527.pdf</uri> (last access: February 2025), 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Nagata et al.(1962)</label><mixed-citation>Nagata, T., Kokubun, S., and Fukushima, N.: Similarity and simultaneity of magnetic disturbance in the northern and southern hemispheres, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 17, 17–35, <uri>http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962JPSJS..17A..35N</uri> (last access: February 2025), 1962.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Nasuddin et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Nasuddin, K. A., Abdullah, M., and Abdul Hamid, N. S.: Characterization of the South Atlantic Anomaly, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 26, 25–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-25-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-26-25-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Ndiitwani and Sutcliffe(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Ndiitwani, D. C. and Sutcliffe, P. R.: The structure of low-latitude Pc3 pulsations observed by CHAMP and on the ground, Ann. Geophys., 27, 1267–1277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1267-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-27-1267-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Obana et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Obana, Y., Yoshikawa, A., Olson, J.and Morris, R., Fraser, B., and Yumoto, K.: North-south asymmetry of the amplitude of high-latitude Pc3-5 pulsations: Observations at conjugate stations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110, A10214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010242" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JA010242</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Odera et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation> Odera, T., Van Swol, D., and Russell, C.: Simultaneous observation of Pc 3, 4 pulsations in the magnetosphere and at multiple ground stations, Geoph. Monog. Series, 81, 311–323, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Oliva et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Oliva, D., Meirelles, M., and Papa, A.: A study of Pc4-5 geomagnetic pulsations in the Brazilian sector, Physics Space, arXiv [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.4321" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/arXiv.1404.4321</ext-link>, 16 April 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Pavón-Carrasco and De Santis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Pavón-Carrasco, F. J. and De Santis, A.: The South Atlantic Anomaly: The Key for a Possible Geomagnetic Reversal, Front. Earth Sci., 4, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2016.00040</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Pilipenko et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Pilipenko, V., Fedorov, E., Heilig, B., and Engebretson, M. J.: Structure of ULF Pc3 waves at low altitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JA013243</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Ponomarenko et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Ponomarenko, P. V., Waters, C. L., and St-Maurice, J.-P.: Upstream Pc3-4 waves: Experimental evidence of propagation to the nightside plasmapause/plasmatrough, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL045416</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Sanchez et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Sanchez, S., Wicht, J., and Baerenzung, J.: Predictions of the geomagnetic secular variation based on the ensemble sequential assimilation of geomagnetic field models by dynamo simulations, Earth Planets Space, 72, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01279-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-020-01279-y</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Santarelli et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Santarelli, L., Lepidi, S., Palangio, P., and Cafarella, L.: Pc3–Pc4 pulsations at Terra Nova Bay (Antarctica): seasonal dependence of the power and its relationship with solar wind parameters, Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana, ISBN 1274183774, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Shaofeng(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Shaofeng, Y.: Digital filter technology and its application to geomagnetic pulsations in Antarctica, Advances in Polar Science, 11, 67–73, <uri>http://library.arcticportal.org/id/eprint/2199</uri> (last access: February 2025), 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Shepherd(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Shepherd, S.: Altitude-adjusted corrected geomagnetic coordinates: Definition and functional approximations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 7501–752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020264" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JA020264</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Shi et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Shi, X., Hartinger, M. D., Baker, J. B. H., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Lin, D., Xu, Z., Coyle, S., Kunduri, B. S. R., Kilcommons, L. M., and Willer, A.: Multipoint Conjugate Observations of Dayside ULF Waves During an Extended Period of Radial IMF, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JA028364</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Silva et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Silva, G. B. D., Padilha, A. L., and Alves, L. R.: Latitudinal variation of Pc3–Pc5 geomagnetic pulsation amplitude across the dip equator in central South America, Ann. Geophys., 38, 35–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-35-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-38-35-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Stearns and Hush(2016)</label><mixed-citation> Stearns, S. D. and Hush, D. R.: Digital signal processing with examples in MATLAB, CRC press, ISBN-13 978-1439837825, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Sutcliffe et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Sutcliffe, P. R., Heilig, B., and Lotz, S.: Spectral structure of Pc3–4 pulsations: possible signatures of cavity modes, Ann. Geophys., 31, 725–743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-725-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-31-725-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Takahashi et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Takahashi, K., Anderson, B., Newell, P., Yamamoto, T., and Sato, N.: Propagation of compressional Pc3 pulsations from space to the ground: A case study using multipoint measurements, in: Solar Wind Sources of Magnetospheric Ultra-Low-Frequency Waves, vol. 81 of Geophysical Monograph, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 355–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM081p0355" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM081p0355</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Takasaki et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Takasaki, S., Sato, N., Kadokura, A., Yamagishi, H., Kawano, H., Ebihara, Y., and Tanaka, Y.: Interhemispheric observations of field line resonance frequencies as a continuous function of ground latitude in the auroral zones, Polar Sci., 2, 73–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2008.05.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.polar.2008.05.003</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Tanaka et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Tanaka, Y.-M., Yumoto, K., Yoshikawa, A., Shinohara, M., Kawano, H., and Kitamura, T.-I.: Longitudinal structure of Pc3 pulsations on the ground near the magnetic equator, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 109, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JA009903</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Terra-Nova et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Terra-Nova, F., Amit, H., and Choblet, G.: Preferred locations of weak surface field in numerical dynamos with heterogeneous core-mantle boundary heat flux: Consequences for the South Atlantic Anomaly, Geophys. J. Int., 217, 1179–1199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy519" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggy519</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Timoçin et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Timoçin, E., Ünal, I., Tulunay, Y., and Göker, U. D.: The effect of geomagnetic activity changes on the ionospheric critical frequencies (foF2) at magnetic conjugate points, Adv. Space Res., 62, 821–828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.035</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Torrence and Compo(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 61–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Trivedi et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>Trivedi, N., Abdu, M., Pathan, B., Dutra, S., Schuch, N., Santos, J., and Barreto, L.: Amplitude enhancement of SC(H) events in the South Atlantic anomaly region, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 67, 1751–1760, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2005.03.010</ext-link>, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Trivedi et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>Trivedi, N., Pathan, B., Schuch, N. J., Barreto, M., and Dutra, L.: Geomagnetic phenomena in the South Atlantic anomaly region in Brazil, Adv. Space Res., 36, 2021–2024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.020</ext-link>, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Villante et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Villante, U., Recchiuti, D., and Di Matteo, S.: The Transmission of ULF Waves From the Solar Wind to the Magnetosphere: An Analysis of Some Critical Aspects, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.835539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fspas.2022.835539</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Waters et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Waters, C., Harrold, B., Menk, F., Samson, J., and Fraser, B.: Field line resonances and waveguide modes at low latitudes: 2. A model, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 7763–7774, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JA900267</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Waters and Menk(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Waters, C. L. and Menk, F. W.: Magnetoseismology: ground-based remote sensing of earth's magnetosphere, Wiley-VCH, ISBN 9783527652075, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Waters et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Waters, C. L., Menk, F. W., and Fraser, B. J.: The resonance structure of low latitude Pc3 geomagnetic pulsations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2293–2296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL02550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91GL02550</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Wescott(1961)</label><mixed-citation>Wescott, E.: Magnetic variations at conjugate points, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 1789–1792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i006p01789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JZ066i006p01789</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Wescott(1966)</label><mixed-citation>Wescott, E.: Magnetoconjugate phenomena, Space Sci. Rev., 5, 507–561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240576" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00240576</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Wescott and Mather(1965a)</label><mixed-citation>Wescott, E. and Mather, K.: Magnetic conjugacy at very high latitude; shepherd bay-scott base relationship, Planet. Space Sci., 13, 303–324, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(65)90005-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0032-0633(65)90005-X</ext-link>, 1965a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Wescott and Mather(1965b)</label><mixed-citation>Wescott, E. and Mather, K.: Magnetic conjugacy from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 1. auroral zone: Conjugate area, seasonal variations, and magnetic coherence, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 29–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i001p00029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JZ070i001p00029</ext-link>, 1965b. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Wolfe et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation> Wolfe, A., Venkatesan, D., Slawinski, R., and Maclennan, C.: A conjugate area study of Pc 3 pulsations near cusp latitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 95, 10695–10698, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Yagova et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Yagova, N., Heilig, B., and Fedorov, E.: Pc2-3 geomagnetic pulsations on the ground, in the ionosphere, and in the magnetosphere: MM100, CHAMP, and THEMIS observations, Ann. Geophys., 33, 117–128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-117-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-33-117-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Yagova et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Yagova, N., Heilig, B., Pilipenko, V., Yoshikawa, A., Nosikova, N., Yumoto, K., and Reda, J.: Nighttime Pc3 pulsations: MM100 and MAGDAS observations, Earth Planets Space, 69, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0647-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-017-0647-x</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Yue et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Yue, Y., Gao, J., He, F., Wei, Y., Cai, S., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Rong, Z., Yao, Z., Lin, W., and Pan, Y.: Evolution and disappearance of the paleo-West Pacific Anomaly: Implications to the future of South Atlantic Anomaly, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 353, 107214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2024.107214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pepi.2024.107214</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Yumoto and Saito(1983)</label><mixed-citation> Yumoto, K. and Saito, T.: Relation of compressional HM waves at GOES 2 to low-latitude Pc 3 magnetic pulsations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 88, 10041–10052, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Yumoto et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>Yumoto, K., Saito, T., and Tanaka, Y.: Low-latitude Pc3 magnetic pulsations observed at conjugate stations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 90, 12201–12207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA12p12201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA090iA12p12201</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Yumoto(1986)</label><mixed-citation> Yumoto, K.: Generation and propagation mechanisms of low-latitude magnetic pulsations – A review, J. Geophys., 60, 79–105, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Zanandrea et al.(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>Zanandrea, A., Da Costa, J., Dutra, S., Rosa, R., and Saotome, O.: Spectral and polarization analysis of geomagnetic pulsations data using a multitaper method, Comput. Geosci., 30, 797–808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.016</ext-link>, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Zanandrea et al.(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>Zanandrea, A., Da Costa, J., Dutra, S., Trivedi, N., Kitamura, T., Yumoto, K., and Saotome, O.: Pc3-4 geomagnetic pulsations at very low latitude in Brazil, Planet. Space Sci., 52, 1209–1215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2004.08.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pss.2004.08.001</ext-link>, 2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Analysis of SAMA interference on Pc3 pulsations using data from conjugate stations: a case study</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abdu et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abdu, M., Batista, I., Carrasco, A., and Brum, C.: South Atlantic magnetic anomaly ionization: A review and a new focus on electrodynamic effects in the equatorial ionosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.  Phy., 67, 1643–1657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.014</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Addison(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Addison, P.: The illustrated wavelet transform handbook. Introductory theory and applications in science, engineering, medicine and finance, CRC press,
ISBN 9780750306928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420033397" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420033397</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Antoine et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Antoine, J., Murenzi, R., Vandergheynst, P., and Ali, S. (Eds.): Two-Dimensional Wavelets and their Relatives, Cambridge University, Cambridge, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543395</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bortel and Sovka(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bortel, R. and Sovka, P.: Approximation of statistical distribution of magnitude squared coherence estimated with segment overlapping, Signal Process., 87, 1100–1117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2006.10.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2006.10.003</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Brigham(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brigham, O.: The fast Fourier transform and its applications, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ISBN 0-13-307505-2, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Camacho et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Camacho, E., Benyosef, L., Mendes, O., and Domingues, M.: Pc5 Pulsations in the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly, Braz. J. Phys., 53, 16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-022-01229-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-022-01229-x</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Caraballo(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caraballo, R.: The South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly Phenomena: Its impact on the technological infrastructure, Master's thesis, University of the Republic Uruguay, <a href="https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4345.5600" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4345.5600</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Daubechies(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Daubechies, I.: Ten lectures on wavelets, Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics, Philadelphia, ISBN 978-0-89871-274-2,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970104</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Denardini et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Denardini, C. M., Chen, S. S., Resende, L. C. A., Moro, J., Bilibio, A. V., Fagundes, P. R., Gende, M. A., Cabrera, M. A., Bolzan, M. J. A., Padilha, A. L., Schuch, N. J., Hormaechea, J. L., Alves, L. R., Barbosa Neto, P. F., Nogueira, P. A. B., Picanço, G. A. S., and Bertollotto, T. O.: The Embrace magnetometer network for South America: Network description and its qualification, Radio Sci., 53, 288–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006477" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006477</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>de Paula et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
de Paula, E. R., Muella, M. T. A. H., Sobral, J. H. A., Abdu, M. A., Batista, I. S., Beach, T. L., and Groves, K. M.: Magnetic conjugate point observations of kilometer and hundred-meter scale irregularities and zonal drifts, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 115, 288–302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015383</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Domingos et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Domingos, J., Jault, D., Pais, M. A., and Mandea, M.: The South Atlantic Anomaly throughout the solar cycle, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 473, 154–163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.004</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Domingues et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Domingues, M. O., Mendes, O., and da Costa, A. M.: On wavelet techniques in atmospheric sciences, Adv. Space Res., 35, 831–842, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.097" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.097</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Engebretson et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Engebretson, M. J., Cobian, R. K., Posch, J. L., and Arnoldy, R. L.: A conjugate study of Pc3–4 pulsations at cusp latitudes: Is there a clock angle effect?, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 15965–15980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA000328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA000328</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Eriksson et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eriksson, P. T. I., Blomberg, L. G., Schaefer, S., and Glassmeier, K.-H.: On the excitation of ULF waves by solar wind pressure enhancements, Ann. Geophys., 24, 3161–3172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-3161-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-3161-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Feng et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, Q., Fraser, B. J., Menk, F. W., Ziesolleck, C. W. S., Saka, O., and Kitamura, T.: Pc 3-4 geomagnetic pulsations observed at very low latitude conjugate stations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 100, 19287–19298, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Finlay et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Finlay, C., Kloss, C., Olsen, N., Hammer, M., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Grayver, A., and Kuvshinov, A.: The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly, Earth Planets Space, 72, 1–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Francia et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Francia, P., De Lauretis, M., Vellante, M., Villante, U., and Piancatelli, A.: ULF geomagnetic pulsations at different latitudes in Antarctica, Ann. Geophys., 27, 3621–3629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3621-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3621-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Francia et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Francia, P., Regi, M., De Lauretis, M., Villante, U., and Pilipenko, V. A.: A case study of upstream wave transmission to the ground at polar and low latitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 117, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016751</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Frick et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frick, P., Grossmann, A., and Tchamitchian, P.: Wavelet analysis of signals with gaps, J. Math. Phys., 39, 4091–4107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532485" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532485</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fukushima et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fukushima, D., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Kubota, M., Yokoyama, T., Nishioka, M., Komonjinda, S., and Yatini, C.: Geomagnetically conjugate observations of ionospheric and thermospheric variations accompanied by a midnight brightness wave at low latitudes, Earth Planets Space, 69, 112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0698-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0698-z</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Greenstadt et al.(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Greenstadt, E. W., McPherron, R. L., and Takahashi, K.: Solar Wind Control of Daytime, Midperiod Geomagnetic Pulsations, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 89–110, ISBN 978-94-009-8426-4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8426-4_6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8426-4_6</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Grinsted et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11, 561–566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Hagen and Azevedo(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hagen, M. and Azevedo, A.: Investigation of Potential Factors on South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly, Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 15, 207–221,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2024.131001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2024.131001</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hajkowicz(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hajkowicz, L. A.: Magnetoconjugate phenomena in Alaska and Macquarie Is., Australia in 2003: position of the global maximum iso-aurorae, Ann. Geophys., 24, 2611–2617, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-2611-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-2611-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hartinger et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hartinger, M. D., Xu, Z., Clauer, C. R., Yu, Y., Weimer, D. R., Kim, H., Pilipenko, V., Welling, D. T., Behlke, R., and Willer, A. N.: Associating ground magnetometer observations with current or voltage generators, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 7130–7141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024140" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024140</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hartmann and Pacca(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hartmann, G. A. and Pacca, I. G.: Time evolution of the South Atlantic agnetic Anomaly, An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc., 81, 243–255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652009000200010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652009000200010</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Haykin and Van Veen(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haykin, S. and Van Veen, B.: Signals and Systems, Wiley, ISBN 9780471138204, <a href="https://books.google.com.br/books?id=uOE-ngEACAAJ" target="_blank"/> (last access: February 2025), 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, INPE [data set], <a href="https://www2.inpe.br/climaespacial/portal/embracedatasobre/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 February 2025, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>International Real-time Magnetic Observatory Network(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
International Real-time Magnetic Observatory Network: INTERMAGNET [data set], <a href="https://intermagnet.org/data_download.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 February 2025, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Jun et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jun, C. W., Shiokawa, K., Connors, M., Schofield, I., Poddelsky, I., and Shevtsov, B.: Study of Pc1 pearl structures observed at multi-point ground stations in Russia, Japan, and Canada, Earth Planets Space, 66, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-014-0140-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-014-0140-8</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jun et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jun, C. W., Shiokawa, K., Connors, M., Schofield, I., Poddelsky, I., and Shevtsov, B.: Possible generation mechanisms for Pc1 pearl structures in the
ionosphere based on 6 years of ground observations in Canada, Russia, and
Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 4409–4424,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022123</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kamide and Chian(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kamide, Y. and Chian, A. (Eds.): Handbook of the solar-terrestrial environment, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-540-46314-6, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kivelson and Southwood(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kivelson, M. G. and Southwood, D. J.: Resonant ULF waves: A new interpretation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 12, 49–52,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i001p00049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i001p00049</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kleimenova et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kleimenova, N., Kozyreva, O., Malysheva, L., Soloviev, A., Bogoutdinov, S., and Zelinsky, N.: Storm-associated equatorial Pc3 geomagnetic pulsations based on the one-second INTERMAGNET multi-station measurements, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference “Problems of Geocosmos”, 8–12 October 2012, St. Petersburg, Russia, p. 261, <a href="https://geo.phys.spbu.ru/materials_of_a_conference_2012/STP2012/Kleimenova_%20et_all_Geocosmos2012proceedings.pdf" target="_blank"/>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kumar and Foufoula-Georgiou(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kumar, P. and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: Wavelet Analysis for Geophysical Application, Rev. Geophys., 35, 385–412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00427" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00427</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Labat(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Labat, D.: Recent advances in wavelet analyses: Part 1. a review of concepts, J. Hydrol., 314, 275–288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.003</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Laundal and Richmond(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laundal, K. and Richmond, A. D.: Magnetic coordinate systems, Space Sci. Rev., 206, 27–59, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0275-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0275-y</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Liu et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y., Fraser, B., Liu, R., and Ponomarenko, P.: Conjugate phase studies of ULF waves in the Pc5 band near the cusp, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1274–1290, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009336" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009336</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Matsuoka et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsuoka, H., Takahashi, K., Kokubun, S., Yumoto, K., Yamamoto, T., Solovyev, S., and Vershinin, E.: Phase and amplitude structure of Pc 3 magnetic pulsations as determined from multipoint observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 102, 2391–2403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA02918" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA02918</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>McPherron(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
McPherron, R.: Magnetic pulsations: their sources and relation to solar wind and geomagnetic activity, Surv. Geophys., 26, 545–592,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-005-1758-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-005-1758-7</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mendes da Costa et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mendes da Costa, A., Oliveira Domingues, M., Mendes, O., and Marques Brum, C. G.: Interplanetary medium condition effects in the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly: A case study, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 73, 1478–1491, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.01.010</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Menk and Waters(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menk, F. and Waters, C.: Field line resonances and waveguide modes at low latitudes: 2. A model, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 7763–7774, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900267</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Menk et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menk, F. W., Fraser, B. J., Waters, C. L., Ziesolleck, C. W. S., Feng, Q., Lee, S. H., and Mcnabb, P. W.: Ground Measurements of Low Latitude Magnetospheric Field Line Resonances, in: Solar Wind Sources of Magnetospheric Ultra-Low-Frequency Waves, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, vol. 81, 299–310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM081p0299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM081p0299</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Menk et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menk, F. W., Clilverd, M. A., Yearby, K. H., Milinevski, G., Thomson, N. R., and Rose, M. C.: ULF Doppler oscillations of <i>L</i> = 2.5 flux tubes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A07205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011192</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Momani(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Momani, M. A.: GPS observations at quasi-conjugate points during solar minimum, Radio Sci., 47, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004826</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Motoba et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Motoba, T., Ebihara, Y., Kadokura, A., Engebretson, M. J., Lessard, M. R., Weatherwax, A. T., and Gerrard, A. J.: Fast-moving diffuse auroral patches: A new aspect of daytime Pc3 auroral pulsations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 1542–1554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023285</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Nagata(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nagata, T.: Geomagnetic conjugacy between the antarctic and the arctic, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pacific Antarctic Sciences Pacific, 11th Pacific Science Congress, National Institute of Polar Research Repository, Tokyo, Japan,  23–27 August 1966, 65–80, <a href="https://core.ac.uk/download/51479527.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: February 2025), 1967.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Nagata et al.(1962)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nagata, T., Kokubun, S., and Fukushima, N.: Similarity and simultaneity of magnetic disturbance in the northern and southern hemispheres, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 17, 17–35, <a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962JPSJS..17A..35N" target="_blank"/> (last access: February 2025), 1962.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Nasuddin et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nasuddin, K. A., Abdullah, M., and Abdul Hamid, N. S.: Characterization of the South Atlantic Anomaly, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 26, 25–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-25-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-25-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Ndiitwani and Sutcliffe(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ndiitwani, D. C. and Sutcliffe, P. R.: The structure of low-latitude Pc3 pulsations observed by CHAMP and on the ground, Ann. Geophys., 27, 1267–1277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1267-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1267-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Obana et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Obana, Y., Yoshikawa, A., Olson, J.and Morris, R., Fraser, B., and Yumoto, K.: North-south asymmetry of the amplitude of high-latitude Pc3-5 pulsations: Observations at conjugate stations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110, A10214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010242" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010242</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Odera et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Odera, T., Van Swol, D., and Russell, C.: Simultaneous observation of Pc 3, 4 pulsations in the magnetosphere and at multiple ground stations, Geoph. Monog. Series, 81, 311–323, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Oliva et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oliva, D., Meirelles, M., and Papa, A.: A study of Pc4-5 geomagnetic pulsations in the Brazilian sector, Physics Space, arXiv [preprint],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.4321" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.4321</a>, 16 April 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Pavón-Carrasco and De Santis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pavón-Carrasco, F. J. and De Santis, A.: The South Atlantic Anomaly: The Key for a Possible Geomagnetic Reversal, Front. Earth Sci., 4,
1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00040</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Pilipenko et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pilipenko, V., Fedorov, E., Heilig, B., and Engebretson, M. J.: Structure of ULF Pc3 waves at low altitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013243</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Ponomarenko et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ponomarenko, P. V., Waters, C. L., and St-Maurice, J.-P.: Upstream Pc3-4 waves: Experimental evidence of propagation to the nightside plasmapause/plasmatrough, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, 1–4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045416</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Sanchez et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sanchez, S., Wicht, J., and Baerenzung, J.: Predictions of the geomagnetic secular variation based on the ensemble sequential assimilation of geomagnetic field models by dynamo simulations, Earth Planets Space,
72, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01279-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01279-y</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Santarelli et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Santarelli, L., Lepidi, S., Palangio, P., and Cafarella, L.: Pc3–Pc4 pulsations at Terra Nova Bay (Antarctica): seasonal dependence of the power and its relationship with solar wind parameters, Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana, ISBN 1274183774, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Shaofeng(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shaofeng, Y.: Digital filter technology and its application to geomagnetic pulsations in Antarctica, Advances in Polar Science, 11, 67–73, <a href="http://library.arcticportal.org/id/eprint/2199" target="_blank"/> (last access: February 2025), 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Shepherd(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shepherd, S.: Altitude-adjusted corrected geomagnetic coordinates: Definition and functional approximations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 7501–752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020264" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020264</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Shi et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, X., Hartinger, M. D., Baker, J. B. H., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Lin, D., Xu, Z., Coyle, S., Kunduri, B. S. R., Kilcommons, L. M., and Willer, A.: Multipoint Conjugate Observations of Dayside ULF Waves During an Extended Period of Radial IMF, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028364</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Silva et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Silva, G. B. D., Padilha, A. L., and Alves, L. R.: Latitudinal variation of Pc3–Pc5 geomagnetic pulsation amplitude across the dip equator in central South America, Ann. Geophys., 38, 35–49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-35-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-35-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Stearns and Hush(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stearns, S. D. and Hush, D. R.: Digital signal processing with examples in
MATLAB, CRC press, ISBN-13 978-1439837825, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Sutcliffe et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sutcliffe, P. R., Heilig, B., and Lotz, S.: Spectral structure of Pc3–4 pulsations: possible signatures of cavity modes, Ann. Geophys., 31, 725–743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-725-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-725-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Takahashi et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takahashi, K., Anderson, B., Newell, P., Yamamoto, T., and Sato, N.: Propagation of compressional Pc3 pulsations from space to the ground: A case study using multipoint measurements, in: Solar Wind Sources of Magnetospheric Ultra-Low-Frequency Waves, vol. 81 of
Geophysical Monograph, American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 355–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM081p0355" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM081p0355</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Takasaki et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takasaki, S., Sato, N., Kadokura, A., Yamagishi, H., Kawano, H., Ebihara, Y., and Tanaka, Y.: Interhemispheric observations of field line resonance frequencies as a continuous function of ground latitude in the auroral zones,
Polar Sci., 2, 73–86, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2008.05.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2008.05.003</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Tanaka et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tanaka, Y.-M., Yumoto, K., Yoshikawa, A., Shinohara, M., Kawano, H., and Kitamura, T.-I.: Longitudinal structure of Pc3 pulsations on the ground near the magnetic equator, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 109, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009903" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009903</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Terra-Nova et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Terra-Nova, F., Amit, H., and Choblet, G.: Preferred locations of weak surface field in numerical dynamos with heterogeneous core-mantle boundary heat flux: Consequences for the South Atlantic Anomaly, Geophys. J. Int., 217, 1179–1199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy519" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy519</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Timoçin et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Timoçin, E., Ünal, I., Tulunay, Y., and Göker, U. D.: The effect of geomagnetic activity changes on the ionospheric critical frequencies (foF2) at magnetic conjugate points, Adv. Space Res., 62, 821–828,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.05.035</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Torrence and Compo(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 79, 61–78, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079&lt;0061:APGTWA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Trivedi et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trivedi, N., Abdu, M., Pathan, B., Dutra, S., Schuch, N., Santos, J., and Barreto, L.: Amplitude enhancement of SC(H) events in the South Atlantic anomaly region, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 67, 1751–1760, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.03.010</a>, 2005a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Trivedi et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trivedi, N., Pathan, B., Schuch, N. J., Barreto, M., and Dutra, L.: Geomagnetic phenomena in the South Atlantic anomaly region in Brazil, Adv. Space Res., 36, 2021–2024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.09.020</a>, 2005b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Villante et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Villante, U., Recchiuti, D., and Di Matteo, S.: The Transmission of ULF Waves From the Solar Wind to the Magnetosphere: An Analysis of Some Critical Aspects, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.835539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.835539</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Waters et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Waters, C., Harrold, B., Menk, F., Samson, J., and Fraser, B.: Field line resonances and waveguide modes at low latitudes: 2. A model, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 7763–7774, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900267</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Waters and Menk(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Waters, C. L. and Menk, F. W.: Magnetoseismology: ground-based remote sensing of earth's magnetosphere, Wiley-VCH, ISBN 9783527652075, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Waters et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Waters, C. L., Menk, F. W., and Fraser, B. J.: The resonance structure of low latitude Pc3 geomagnetic pulsations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 2293–2296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL02550" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL02550</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Wescott(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wescott, E.: Magnetic variations at conjugate points, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 1789–1792, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i006p01789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i006p01789</a>, 1961.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Wescott(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wescott, E.: Magnetoconjugate phenomena, Space Sci. Rev., 5, 507–561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240576" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240576</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wescott and Mather(1965a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wescott, E. and Mather, K.: Magnetic conjugacy at very high latitude; shepherd bay-scott base relationship, Planet. Space Sci., 13, 303–324,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(65)90005-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(65)90005-X</a>, 1965a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Wescott and Mather(1965b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wescott, E. and Mather, K.: Magnetic conjugacy from <i>L</i> = 6 to <i>L</i> = 1.4: 1. auroral zone: Conjugate area, seasonal variations, and magnetic coherence, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 29–42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i001p00029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i001p00029</a>, 1965b.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Wolfe et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wolfe, A., Venkatesan, D., Slawinski, R., and Maclennan, C.: A conjugate area study of Pc 3 pulsations near cusp latitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 95, 10695–10698, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Yagova et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yagova, N., Heilig, B., and Fedorov, E.: Pc2-3 geomagnetic pulsations on the ground, in the ionosphere, and in the magnetosphere: MM100, CHAMP, and THEMIS observations, Ann. Geophys., 33, 117–128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-117-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-117-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Yagova et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yagova, N., Heilig, B., Pilipenko, V., Yoshikawa, A., Nosikova, N., Yumoto, K., and Reda, J.: Nighttime Pc3 pulsations: MM100 and MAGDAS observations, Earth Planets Space, 69, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0647-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0647-x</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Yue et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yue, Y., Gao, J., He, F., Wei, Y., Cai, S., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Rong, Z., Yao, Z., Lin, W., and Pan, Y.: Evolution and disappearance of the paleo-West Pacific Anomaly: Implications to the future of South Atlantic Anomaly, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 353, 107214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2024.107214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2024.107214</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Yumoto and Saito(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yumoto, K. and Saito, T.: Relation of compressional HM waves at GOES 2 to low-latitude Pc 3 magnetic pulsations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 88, 10041–10052, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Yumoto et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yumoto, K., Saito, T., and Tanaka, Y.: Low-latitude Pc3 magnetic pulsations observed at conjugate stations (<i>L</i> ∼ 1.5), J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 90, 12201–12207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA12p12201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA12p12201</a>, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Yumoto(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yumoto, K.: Generation and propagation mechanisms of low-latitude magnetic pulsations – A review, J. Geophys., 60, 79–105, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Zanandrea et al.(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zanandrea, A., Da Costa, J., Dutra, S., Rosa, R., and Saotome, O.: Spectral and polarization analysis of geomagnetic pulsations data using a multitaper method, Comput. Geosci., 30, 797–808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.016</a>, 2004a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Zanandrea et al.(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zanandrea, A., Da Costa, J., Dutra, S., Trivedi, N., Kitamura, T., Yumoto, K., and Saotome, O.: Pc3-4 geomagnetic pulsations at very low latitude in Brazil, Planet. Space Sci., 52, 1209–1215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2004.08.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2004.08.001</a>, 2004b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
