HF performance of electric field sensors aboard the RESONANCE satellite

HF performance of electric field sensors aboard the RESONANCE satellite M. Sampl, W. Macher, C. Gruber, T. Oswald, M. Kapper, H. O. Rucker, and M. Mogilevsky Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia now at: KATHREIN-Werke KG, Rosenheim, Germany now at: Karl Franzens University Graz, Institute of Physics, Graz, Austria now at: Thomas Oswald Aerospace Software, Weinitzen, Austria now at: Austrian Academy of Sciences, Commission for Astronomy, Graz, Austria


The RESONANCE project
The RESONANCE project is dedicated to the investigation of properties and features of Earth's auroral acceleration zone as well as near equatorial phenomena.The missions overarching goal is to study wave-particle interactions in the inner magnetosphere.Features to be observed include the energy transfer between energetic particle species, particle precipitation, the magnetospheric cyclotron maser and the generation of planetary radio emissions (Demekhov et al., 2003) such as the auroral kilometric radiation (AKR).Comprised of four satellites and flying a magneto-synchronous formation, the mission seems ideal for the investigation of effects and processes which are occurring along the geomagnetic flux tubes.Of particular interest is the energy exchange between the ionospheric and magnetospheric layers of Earth's atmosphere.Compared to previous radio science missions (cf.Full provides the unique feature of sampling the same physical parameters in two space regions belonging to the same magnetic flux tube.The mission features, as well as the proposed spacecraft design, have already been described in Mogilevsky et al. (2002Mogilevsky et al. ( , 2013)).The measurement of electric field parameters in space-borne radioastronomy poses a substantial challenge, since the observed values range from several Hz to several 10's of MHz (in case of RESONANCE 10 MHz) and often comprises a large dynamic range.Gurnett (1998) gives a good overview and shows the large range that instruments usually have to cover in frequency, power, time and spatial scale.This is caused by the desire of the mission planers for acquiring a maximized data set, spanning as many phenomena as possible, but also by the fact that the satellite trajectories often pass through regions of different ambient conditions.The scientific instrumentation aboard the RESONANCE spacecraft will include a particle and wave complex, amongst them low-and high frequency electric field sensors (quasi-DC to HF).The high frequency analyzer sensors (HFA) ranging from (10 Hz-10 MHz) and their supporting booms are analyzed in this project.The block diagram shown in Fig. 1 provides an overview of the instruments layout.HFA consists of cylindrical sensors (so-called B antennas, labeled as ED1-ED4 in Fig. 1) mounted on the tip of four boom rods (so-called A antennas) extruded from the central body of the spacecraft.Furthermore, the boom rods themselves are used together with the cylindrical sensors for mutual impedance measurements of the ambient plasma environment.The exact configuration is not yet fixed completely due to open questions about the optimum arrangement, including electromagnetic, as well as mechanical considerations.

Previous work and methods
In a companion paper, Sampl et al. (2012), we already described the properties of the antenna system in the quasi-static frequency range, which were acquired by rheometry measurements and numerical computations.The herein presented computer simula-Introduction

Conclusions References
Tables Figures

Back Close
Full tions provide the characteristics of the antenna system from the quasi-static border up to 40 MHz, containing the proposed instruments operational range (up to about 10 MHz).Numerical analysis of the sensor system for frequencies above the quasi-static regime provide the sought characteristics, where experimental techniques such as rheometry (Rucker et al., 1996;Oswald et al., 2009) or in-flight calibration (Vogl et al., 2004;Cecconi and Zarka, 2005) are practically unfeasible.In the evaluation of spaceborne radio astronomy observations the preferred quantity to describe the antenna is the effective length vector h e .However, around and above the first antenna resonance, this vector is intricate and cumbersome to use, because it becomes a complexvalued, direction-dependent quantity above the quasi-static frequency range (above some MHz).
The presented calculations are based on solving the underlying integral equations using the well-known numerical programs ASAP (McCormack, 1974) and CONCEPT-II (TU Hamburg-Harburg, 2010).In the course of the project a larger number of configuration options was investigated, from simple wire-grid models up to full patch models, as well as different options for satellite configuration details.The applied spherical spacecraft coordinate system definition is shown in Fig. 2. We already outlined in Sampl et al. (2012) that wire-grid representations of the simulation model are inappropriate, since they result in significant inaccuracies, especially for the small cylindrical sensors.So the final results, shown in this contribution were calculated with CONCEPT-II and our numerical reference model (Figs. 3 and 4), which is fully composed of surface patches.All other analyzed configurations can be found in Macher et al. (2009).CONCEPT-II solves the underlying electric field integral equation (EFIE) (Balanis, 2005) by applying the "Method of Moments" (MoM) (Mader, 1992).Using this method the EFIE is rewritten by expansion with a finite number of weighted basis function into a system of linear equations, which can then can be solved by linear algebra.More detailed solution approaches can be found in Harrington (1968), Wang (1990), Schroth (1985) and respective literature.Introduction

Conclusions References
Tables Figures

Back Close
Full 3 Quantities for the characterization of the system Above the quasi-static range the effective length vector changes with wave incident direction and frequency.Furthermore, the sensor system is generally not purely capacitive anymore, so the impedance matrix cannot be represented in the form Z = (j ωC) −1 in terms of a real capacitance matrix C. We therefore have to consider other parameters to quantify and illustrate the reception properties.For that purpose we use the antenna effective area and the elements of the impedance matrix Z.The former is always a real value, whereas the latter is generally complex (with a purely imaginary limit for ω → 0).We define the effective area A of an antenna as where V is the received voltage and E the electric field strength of the incident plane wave.Polarization matching is assumed, i.e. the conjugate of E is proportional to the effective length vector h e , as defined by Macher et al. (2009).This definition of A is slightly different from the usual text book definition (Balanis, 2005)   The first illustrated frequency is 300 kHz (Fig. 5, left panel), which is representative for the quasi-static range.We can clearly recognize the torus-like form of the patterns.The symmetry axes of the tori coincide with the directions of the respective quasi-static effective length vectors as shown in our companion paper (Sampl et al., 2012).The maximum effective areas of the B antennas is smaller than those of the A antennas.
We can verify this for the n-th antenna boom by calculating the ratio of the squares of the effective length vectors h B n and This formula can be derived from the fact that the effective area is connected with the effective length vector via A = |e × h| 2 , with e being the unit vector pointing in the direction where the incident plane wave comes from.For instance, with n = 1 we get the ratio max(A B 1 )/max(A A 1 ) = 0.31 in the quasi-static range, using values from Table I in Sampl et al. (2012), which means a difference of about −5 dB between A and B antennas appearing in the color scale of the patterns.To show the antenna systems mutual impedances only one half of the off-diagonal elements of impedance matrix Z need be depicted.Z is symmetrical due to the antenna systems reciprocity Macher (2012Macher ( , 2014) ) and the other half gives the same curves again -apart from numerical inaccuracies.Many curves overlap due to the symmetry of the satellite geometry; they are plotted in the same color.

Sensor impedances
In the impedance plots we recognize resonances at 14 and 28 MHz (q.v.Figs. 5  and 6), best visible as maxima in the real part in Fig. 7.They are very pronounced for the antennas A1-A3 and B1-B3, but very faint if only A4 and B4 are involved (Z A4,A4 , Z B4,B4 , and Z A4,B4 ).These two resonances appear at the frequencies where the boom length agrees with the half-wavelength (λ/2-resonance) and the full wavelength (λ-resonance), respectively.Therefore the λ/2-resonance associated with the short boom (antennas A4/B4) can be expected at about 300 2•3.3 ≈ 45 MHz, where 3.3 m is the full boom length including mounting.It is approached at the end of the exhibited frequency interval.The λ/4-resonance associated with the long booms is to be expected at about 300 4•10.3 ≈ 7 MHz, that of the short boom at 300 4•3.3 ≈ 22 MHz.The displayed frequency interval contains only the first resonance (λ/4) for the short boom, but all up to the fifth (at ≈ 35 MHz) of the long booms.The third and fourth resonance (≈ 21 MHz and ≈ 28 MHz) of antennas associated with the long booms are more pronounced in the admittance plots.They are identifiable as zeros of (Z) in Fig. 7.The reason for the deviation of the patterns from the respective ideal dipole characteristic is the radiation coupling with the satellite body and also between the antennas.With the same reasoning we can make plausible why the λ/2 resonance of the long booms is split in two impedance maxima.
In the mutual impedance (q.v.
In contrast to that the real parts of the self-impedances are always positive as they are representative of the power input to the antennas when operated in particular transmission modes.

Effective area pattern
Having identified the resonance frequencies, we can utilize this knowledge for a better understanding of the effective area patterns as shown in Figs. 5 and 6.
In the plots the principal axes are drawn red (Y axis parallel to A1 and B1), green (Z axis) and blue (X axis parallel to A4 and B4), respectively.The panels show an oblique view, with the +X axis pointing upwards, the +Y axis to the right and towards the observer, and the +Z axis to the right and away from the observer.
When we increase the frequency above the quasi-static range the toroidal shapes of the antenna patterns change.However, there is nearly no change of the shape up to 5 MHz, only the magnitudes increase.At 10 MHz the patterns get dented, but are still of toroidal shape.First we consider the antennas A1/B1-A3/B3.The closer the frequency gets to the λ/2 resonance at 14 MHz (Fig. 5, right panel) the more their pattern is changed, finally taking a completely different form at the resonance frequency.Above the λ/2-resonance a pattern composed of two toroids develops (similar to an aircraft wheel), which remains up to the λ-resonance, where again a complete pattern change occurs.Above the λ-resonance a transition region follows where the pattern transforms into a shape composed of three toroidal lobes.
At the λ/2 and λ-resonance the antennas perform best in the sense that they provide highest gain in transmission mode and highest sensitivity (with largest effective area) when receiving.But the quite irregular patterns at these resonances do not admit an accurate prediction of the reception dependence on the direction of incidence, so direction finding is practically impossible at these frequencies.Off the resonance frequencies gain and effective area are smaller but we can reckon with a rather regular pattern (as mentioned above a simple toroid or a shape composed of two or three All investigations in this project are done for open ports, so it is assumed that the preamplifiers or receivers connected to the antennas have very high input impedances.If these impedances are not sufficiently high (of the order of 10 MΩ or higher) or cable capacitances are significant, one cannot speak of open port operation anymore.In such a case the base impedances have to be taken into account.This can change the results significantly, in particular near the resonance frequencies, as Gurnett et al. (2004), Macher et al. (2007) and Bale et al. (2008) have already shown in the context of former spaceborne antennas.

Conclusions
In this contribution we outline the properties above the quasi-static range of the spaceborne electric field sensors as planned for the science mission "RESONANCE".The reception patterns, self-and mutual impedances of boom antennas (A1-A4) and short cylindrical sensors (B1-B4) are calculated from the results of numerical computations, covering the whole instrument's frequency range (from near DC to 40 MHz) with 100 kHz step size.Provided effective area patterns are of the typical toroidal shape in the quasi-static frequency range.The toroids get more and more distorted when increasing the frequency and adopt completely different, quite peculiar, shapes around the resonances.The provided reception patterns give a visual estimate of the overall reception properties, in particular how the effective areas, and the receiving sensitivity, of the antennas depend on the frequency and the direction of wave incidence.

Conclusions References
Tables Figures

Back Close
Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | and adapted to the measurement techniques and data evaluation methods applied in the present context, which rely on open port voltages instead of power values.The usual definition refers to the received power per incident power flux (assuming polarization and impedance matching), which is of no use in the present context, it is even invalid for open ports.The following Figs. 5 and 6 are dedicated to effective area patterns A for frequencies around the antenna resonances.The color scale is logarithmic, with 0 dB at 500 m 2 for the upper three patterns (A1-A3, B1-B3) and 0 dB at 50 m 2 for the lowest pattern (A4 and B4).With this normalization the maximum effective area in the frequency range 0-40 MHz maps approximately to the same color index (dark red) for all sensor types.This is plausible since the length of the fourth boom (A4) is approximately a third of the long booms (A1-A3), so the ratio of the respective effective areas is about a tenth, which explains the difference in the dB-reference values (50 vs. 500 m 2 ).
Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper |

Figures 7
Figures 7 and 8 contain impedance curves, exhibiting the dependence of the elements of the impedance matrix Z on frequency.Figure 7 presents the (self-) impedances, i.e. the diagonal elements of the respective matrix, of the A and B antennas (A n − A n and B n − B n for n = 1• • •4).Figure 8, left panel, is dedicated to the mutual impedances of A antennas with other A antennas

Figure 7
Figures 7 and 8 contain impedance curves, exhibiting the dependence of the elements of the impedance matrix Z on frequency.Figure 7 presents the (self-) impedances, i.e. the diagonal elements of the respective matrix, of the A and B antennas (A n − A n and B n − B n for n = 1• • •4).Figure 8, left panel, is dedicated to the mutual impedances of A antennas with other A antennas Figures 7 and 8 contain impedance curves, exhibiting the dependence of the elements of the impedance matrix Z on frequency.Figure 7 presents the (self-) impedances, i.e. the diagonal elements of the respective matrix, of the A and B antennas (A n − A n and B n − B n for n = 1• • •4).Figure 8, left panel, is dedicated to the mutual impedances of A antennas with other A antennas (A n − A m for n, m = 1• • •4 with n = m).Figure 8, right panel, shows the corresponding curves for B antennas (B n −B m for n, m = 1• • •4; n = m).All other combinations of mutual impedances/admittances of A antennas with B antennas on the same boom (A n − B n ) Figure 8, right panel, shows the corresponding curves for B antennas (B n −B m for n, m = 1• • •4; n = m).All other combinations of mutual impedances/admittances of A antennas with B antennas on the same boom (A n − B n ) Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | and on different booms (A n − B m ; n, m = 1• • •4; n = m) are not shown, but can be found in Macher et al. (2009).
Fig. 8) and mutual admittance curves the resonances of both correlated antennas have their effect, so these curves are generally rather intricate.Even more since the real parts of the mutual impedances may be negative; actually they typically change sign close to the λ/2 and λ-resonances (except for Z Ai Bi ; Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | toroids in the frequency range of interest).The mentioned λ/2 and λ-resonances are also visible in the effective area patterns of A4 and B4, causing a distortion of the toroidal form.The own λ/2-resonance of A4/B4 antennas (≈ 45 MHz) distorts their pattern at the end of the investigated frequency interval (40 MHz, Fig. 6, right panel), but is too far away to deform the toroid completely.
Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper |

Figure 2 .Figure 4 .
Figure 2. Definition of spherical coordinates θ (colatitude) and φ (azimuth) in the spacecraftfixed reference frame as used for the representation of antenna axes.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Self impedances of the boom antennas A1-A4 (left panels) and the short cylindrical sensors B1-B4 (right panels).The shown quantities are the diagonal elements of the impedance matrix Z as a function of frequency.Upper panels contain the real parts, lower panels the imaginary parts.The curves for the boom antennas A1-A3 and sensor B1-B3 are nearly identical, which is due to the high symmetry of their deployment on the satellite.

Table 1 .
Overview of selected science missions and instruments associated to auroral radio emissions.