<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GI</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GI</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2193-0864</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gi-4-99-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Simple, affordable, and sustainable borehole observatories for complex
monitoring objectives</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Complex monitoring objectives}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Kopf et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kopf</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          <email>akopf@marum.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Freudenthal</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ratmeyer</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bergenthal</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lange</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fleischmann</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hammerschmidt</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Seiter</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wefer</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">A. Kopf (akopf@marum.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>99</fpage><lpage>109</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>September</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015.html">This article is available from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Seafloor drill rigs are remotely operated systems that provide a cost-effective means to recover sedimentary records of the upper sub-seafloor
deposits. Recent increases in their payload included downhole logging tools
or autoclave coring systems. Here we report on another milestone in using
seafloor rigs: the development and installation of shallow borehole
observatories.</p>
    <p>Three different systems have been developed for the MARUM-MeBo (<bold>Me</bold>eresboden-<bold>Bo</bold>hrgerät) seafloor drill, which is operated
by MARUM, University of Bremen, Germany. A simple design, the MeBoPLUG,
separates the inner borehole from the overlying ocean by using o-ring seals
at the conical threads of the drill pipe. The systems are self-contained and
include data loggers, batteries, thermistors and a differential pressure
sensor. A second design, the so-called MeBoCORK (<bold>C</bold>irculation
<bold>O</bold>bviation <bold>R</bold>etrofit <bold>K</bold>it), is more
sophisticated and also hosts an acoustic modem for data transfer and, if
desired, fluid sampling capability using osmotic pumps. In these MeBoCORKs,
two systems have to be distinguished: the CORK-A (A stands for <bold>a</bold>utonomous)
can be installed by the MeBo alone and monitors pressure and
temperature inside and above the borehole (the latter for reference); the
CORK-B (B stands for <bold>b</bold>ottom) has a higher payload and can additionally
be equipped with geochemical, biological or other physical components. Owing
to its larger size, it is installed by a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) and utilises a hot-stab connection
in the upper portion of the drill string. Either design relies on a hot-stab
connection from beneath in which coiled tubing with a conical drop weight is
lowered to couple to the formation. These tubes are fluid-saturated and
either serve to transmit pore pressure signals or collect porewater in the
osmo-sampler. The third design, the MeBoPUPPI (<bold>P</bold>op-<bold>U</bold>p
<bold>P</bold>ore <bold>P</bold>ressure <bold>I</bold>nstrument), is
similar to the MeBoCORK-A and monitors pore pressure and temperature in a
self-contained manner. Instead of transferring data on command using an
acoustic modem, the MeBoPUPPI contains a pop-up telemetry with iridium link.
After a predefined period, the data unit with satellite link is released,
ascends to the sea surface, and remains there for up to 2 weeks while
sending the long-term data sets to shore.</p>
    <p>In summer 2012, two MeBoPLUGs, one MeBoCORK-A and one MeBoCORK-B were
installed with MeBo on RV <italic>Sonne</italic>, Germany, in the Nankai Trough area, Japan. We
have successfully downloaded data from the CORKs, attesting that coupling to
the formation worked, and pressure records were elevated relative to the
seafloor reference. In the near future, we will further deploy the first two
MeBoPUPPIs. Recovery of all monitoring systems by a ROV is planned for 2016.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Around 20 years ago, the scientific community started to use borehole
observatories, so-called CORKs, which were installed inside submarine
boreholes, and which allowed the re-establishment and monitoring of in situ
conditions (see summary in Davis and Becker, 2001). The key principle as
well as the main objective is to provide a hydraulic seal between the
borehole environment and the overlying body of water body (ocean) (Fig. 1).
Based on this principle, various types of instruments with different
capabilities have been developed over the past decades, the majority of
those with scientific purposes within the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) and
the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP; see review by Becker and Davis,
2005).</p>
      <p>From the first CORKs, which allowed only rudimentary fluid pressure and
temperature measurements, the instruments evolved to multi-functional and
multi-level sub-seafloor laboratories including, for example, hydrologically
isolated zones with casing screens (e.g. Davis et al., 2006), thermistor
strings (e.g. Davis and Villinger, 2006), long-term fluid sampling devices
(Solomon et al., 2009), in situ microbiological experiments (Orcutt et al., 2010), or
strainmeter (Kopf et al., 2011a). The advantages of long-term monitoring are
the ability to obtain (1) a reliable measurement of ambient pore pressure
(this measurement often requires significant time after drilling to
re-equilibrate to original in situ conditions and usually cannot be obtained by
downhole tools); (2) formation elastic and hydrologic properties determined
from the response to tidal and seismic loading (e.g. Wang and Davis, 1996;
Davis et al., 2006); (3) records of hydraulic transients associated
with, e.g. seismic and aseismic slip, fluid flow events, and possible
precursory phenomena, over a wide range of timescales and rates (e.g. Davis
and Becker, 2001; Davis et al., 2006); (4) temperature anomalies associated with fluid flow
episodes (Davis and Villinger, 2006) or as precursors to earthquakes
(Johnson et al., 2000); and (5) transient changes in the chemical composition
or the
seepage rate (Brown et al., 2005). The phenomena have in common that they
are episodic in nature, and time series data are the only feasible way of
increasing our understanding of them.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Schematic of a CORK observatory's main components: Here an
example in sediment-laden oceanic crust and a simple CORK head with seal and
P transducers (green unit with light-blue sensors) plus a thermistor string
(self-contained; see yellow circles). From Becker and Davis (2005).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Nonetheless, most boreholes are still left uninstrumented, which is a major
loss for the scientific community. Installation of CORKs usually requires a
drillship, which is a major logistic and financial effort. Moreover, the
increasing complexity of the CORK systems not only increased the expenses
but also led to longer installation times and a higher sensitivity of the
instruments to environmental constraints.</p>
      <p>An affordable alternative to the drill ships is currently seen in the
seafloor drills, which are tethered, remotely controlled devices that can be
run from ships of opportunity provided they offer sufficient space and a
strong enough A-frame. One such seafloor drill is the MARUM-MeBo  (<bold>Me</bold>eresboden-<bold>Bo</bold>hrgerät, the German term
for seafloor drill rig),
which has recently been developed
at MARUM, University of Bremen (Germany) (see details in Freudenthal and
Wefer, 2013). The MeBo70 can be operated from any large research vessel and
allows for coring to a depth of 70 m in either push coring mode for soft
sediments or rotary coring mode for hard rock drilling. A second device,
MARUM-MeBo200, is currently under implementation and will core to 200 m
below seafloor (b.s.f.) with the majority of the other parameters similar to the
first one (see below).</p>
      <p>In this paper we describe our main objectives for implementing
observatories into MeBo boreholes. Foremost, this is the efficiency of a
single round trip of the seafloor drill and observatory unit (whereas drill
ships always need a second round trip by pipe or wire in order to deploy the
borehole instrument). Second, the rather generic and modular design is the
second objective whereby a wealth of parameters may be monitored in a
variety of settings. In the following, we present three types of miniature
borehole observatories, which on the one hand have evolved back to more simple
systems when compared to ODP/IODP CORKs, but which on the other hand provide
a wide range of possible in situ measurements. In addition to the technological
concept, we report on the first installation of such MeBo observatories in
the Nankai Trough area off the shore of Japan, therefore providing a
proof of concept.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>State of the art: seafloor drills</title>
      <p>Seafloor robotic drills bridge the gap between conventional seabed sampling
techniques from multi-purpose research vessels (like gravity coring or
dredging) and dedicated drilling vessels. Working from a stable platform at
the seabed, which is not affected by ship movements due to wave heave or
currents, ensures optimised control on the drilling process. As a consequence
of the increased demand of core drillings in the range of 10–200 m for
geotechnical site investigation or mineral ore exploration, a variety of
seabed drill rigs have been developed within the last decade (McGinnis,
2009). They are, however, more or less all in the prototype stage, with the
MARUM-MeBo being one of the most developed systems (see review in Freudenthal
and Wefer, 2013).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>The MeBo seafloor drill rig</title>
      <p>MeBo is a robotic drill that is deployed on the seabed
and remotely controlled from a sea vessel. The complete MeBo system, including
drill, winch, launch and recovery system, control unit, as well as workshop
and spare drill tools, is shipped within six 20 ft. containers (one of which
carries the MeBo drill itself;  Fig. 2). A steel armoured umbilical
with a diameter of 32 mm is used to lower the 10-ton heavy device to the
seabed where four legs are then extended in order to increase the stability
of the rig. Copper wires and fibre optic cables within the umbilical are
used for energy supply from the vessel and for communication between the
MeBo70 and the control unit on the deck of the vessel. The maximum
deployment depth in the current configuration is 2000 m.</p>
      <p>The mast with the feeding system forms the central part of the drill rig.
The drill head provides the required torque and rotary speed for rock
drilling and is mounted on a guide carriage that moves up and down the mast
with a maximum push force of 4 tons. A water pump provides sea water for
flushing the drill string for cooling of the drill bit and for removing the
drill cuttings. Core barrels and rods are stored on two magazines on the
drill rig. Wireline core barrels (HQ – hole and core diameter) and hard metal drill bits with a 55 mm
core diameter (push coring) are usually used in soft marine deposits. The
stroke length is 2.35 m each. With complete loading of the magazines, a
maximum coring depth of more than 70 m can be reached. Station time can
reach more than 24 h per deployment. For a more detailed description of
the MeBo70 see Freudenthal and Wefer (2009, 2013).</p>
      <p>In 2014, a refined, taller MeBo drill rig with larger terminal borehole
depth (200 m b.s.f.) and operational water depth (3000 m) was developed and
successfully tested during trials in the North Sea. Details can be found at
<uri>http://www.marum.de/en/MeBo200.html</uri> on the MARUM website. A next step will
be the implementation of the observatories introduced in this paper once the
drilling system is fully operational in deep water.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>MARUM-MeBo70 drill rig during launch on the aft deck of RV <italic>Sonne</italic>.
For details regarding the individual components of the system as well as
specifications, refer to Freudenthal and Wefer (2013).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Methodological objectives</title>
      <p>Among the tasks we try to achieve with the MeBo borehole observatories,
there are four that are fundamental:
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>seal the borehole;</p></list-item><list-item><p>collect data over long periods of time;</p></list-item><list-item><p>transfer data to the scientist/end user;</p></list-item><list-item><p>increase capability by adding payload.</p></list-item></list>
Our concept is very generic. Tasks 1 and 2 are mandatory and realised in all
three MeBo observatory systems, whereas tasks 3 and 4 provide a suite of
options that can be tailored to the needs of an individual campaign.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Borehole seal</title>
      <p>The MeBo seafloor drill uses H-size HQ wireline coring tools. The outer
diameter of the drill rods is 98 mm. During routine drilling operations,
these pipes are used to extend the drill string downhole, and are recovered
once terminal depth of a given hole is reached (Freudenthal and Wefer,
2013). Each HQ rod has a male end with a conical thread at the base and a
female conical thread at the top end.</p>
      <p>If an observatory is to be set with MeBo, procedures change in the sense
that some drill pipes (i.e. several of the 2.35 m long rods) remain in the
ground and serve as casing to stabilise the upper portion of the hole where
the soft sediments would otherwise close in. The final, uppermost drill rod
is then prepared to provide the borehole seal. In addition, this rod has a
widened outer diameter so that it will facilitate a seal at the seafloor where
the drilling operation may have excavated the ground. Note that the eventual
sealing of the system occurs via sediment infilling around the outside of
the drill rods left in place, in addition to the widened upper part and the
seals inside the drill rod string. This is different from the traditional
CORK seals where concrete, packers, and o-ring seals are utilised (see Becker
and Davis, 2005), but cementing is impossible for MeBo and packer systems
for MeBo rods are not even in the prototype stage today.</p>
      <p>The two main principles to have a sealed upper rod are to screw in an
instrumented plug having the shape of the conical thread and additional
o-ring seals, or to prepare an entirely new instrumented rod of up to 2.35 m
length with a hot-stab seal in the middle. These two principles have been
used in designs of the so-called MeBoPLUG and the MeBoCORK (<bold>C</bold>irculation
<bold>O</bold>bviation <bold>R</bold>etrofit <bold>K</bold>it)-A (A stands for <bold>a</bold>utonomous) and MeBoCORK-B (B stands for <bold>b</bold>ottom)
(see Sect. 3.2 below).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Data mining</title>
      <p>In addition to the borehole seal, data mining in the borehole and/or
formation is a prerequisite for the instrumented drilling rods. If the
inner volume of the “casing” (i.e. MeBo drill pipes in the ground) is the
target, a simple plug with a data logger and transducers is sufficient to
monitor, e.g. the equilibration of the hole and ambient values thereafter. If
coupling to the formation is desired, a mechanism is needed that couples the
transducers to the open-hole formation. For this purpose, we designed a
small device at the base of the instrumented uppermost drill rod that has a
small coil with PVC tubing (1 mm inner diameter) which can be unrolled via
an electrical motor upon command (acoustic signal or timer with preset
date/time for lowering). At the tip of the tubing there is a stainless steel
conical drop weight with a boring that will then provide access to the
sediment at the base of the hole. The tubing may then be used to get ambient
pore pressure readings, or extract porewater samples (in case an
osmo-sampler is hooked to it at the seafloor). We have realised designs of
both in the MeBoPLUG and the MeBoCORK-A and MeBoCORK-B (see Sect. 3.2 below).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Data transfer</title>
      <p>Retrieval of CORK data has always been a crucial issue in the past, with the
majority of ODP-CORKs and IODP-CORKs relying on a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) visits during regular
third party cruises in the years after deployment. This is a costly
endeavour and further bears the difficulty of vagueness in planning because
of dependency on weather, ship time providers, etc. Only very few CORK
systems were connected to seafloor cabled networks (e.g. ODP Hole 1026B to
NEPTUNE, or ODP Site C0002 to DONET), so the requirement for ROV visits is
reduced to instances of maintenance, not data transfer. In any case, one of
the key requirements in developing MeBo observatories was hence to start
with a simple instrument to be recovered by a ROV and then evolve into systems
which make ROV visits or even visits of a vessel obsolete.</p>
      <p>As a consequence, the MeBoCORK systems aimed at including acoustic modems so
that the successful deployment and health of the system after the MeBo took
off can be attested. Data transfer is moderately fast, so that practically
only limited data sets are to be downloaded that way, while a final visit to
recover the instruments by a ROV seems still advisable. In case the
deployments take place in an area where a return cruise is not anticipated
for longer periods of time, it may be better to release a pop-up unit with a
mirror data set of the main data logger as well as an iridium telemetry to
transfer the data without the necessity of retrieving the instrument. If the
latter is sufficiently cheap, net cost may be saved since ship time is also
precious. We have realised designs of both in the MeBoCORK-A and MeBoCORK-B and the
MeBoPUPPI (<bold>P</bold>op-<bold>U</bold>p
<bold>P</bold>ore <bold>P</bold>ressure <bold>I</bold>nstrument) (see Sect. 3.2 below).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Increased payload</title>
      <p>Given the wealth of critical parameters that govern seafloor processes,
scientist want to deploy multi-sensor instruments that often consume
considerable energy. One main objective in MeBoCORK installation was hence
to have a modular seafloor unit where space for additional devices and
batteries play a minor role. Such a unit has to exchange the initial
MeBoCORK instrument (with a limited lifetime) without affecting the borehole
seal. This was achieved by a hot-stab connector that can transport fluids,
power, or both. At the seafloor end, capabilities may be increased by not only adding
osmo-samplers with long tubing coils for fluid sampling over 24 months and
longer but also providing power for energy-demanding systems, e.g.
geophones. We have realised this by inventing the MeBoCORK-B (see Sect. 3.2
below).</p>
      <p>In the next section we will introduce three general instruments of the MeBo
observatory family: the PLUGs, CORKs, and PUPPIs. Each of them is employing
several (if not all) of the tasks listed above. In addition to those
observatory instruments realised, many other combinations of transducers and
data transfer principles, but also implementation of new transducers. This
could be either in the instrumented drill pipe (if sufficiently slim) or
inside the seafloor unit. With its generic and modular design MeBo
observatories may become a versatile and affordable way to monitor
hydrogeochemical and geological processes in the shallow sub-seafloor
(&lt; 200 m).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Implementation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>MeBoPLUG borehole observatories</title>
      <p>In regular-size industry boreholes, the casing of the upper portion on the
well is a couple of decimetres, and re-entry into the hole is facilitated by
a conical seafloor structure, often complemented by a platform to land a
ROV. For the seafloor drill holes, all of this is miniaturised and in the case of
MeBo a diameter of only 98–110 mm is available. Hence, space is most
seriously governed the design of the MeBo observatories, and re-entry is
not feasible in such narrow drill pipes. In essence, the entire hole
completion was initially designed as a stand-alone instrument, which does
not differ from the geometry of a standard MeBo drill pipe (approx. 235 cm long
and 10 cm in diameter).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The name of the instrument is extended from the SmartPlug and GeniusPlug
observatories, which also represent simple types of CORKs designed as
an extension to mechanical bridge plugs, but with IODP drill hole-sized (Kopf et al.,
2001b). Instead of a bridge plug or CORK seal, we make use of the conical
threads of the MeBo drill pipes and seal the pipe with a pair of additional
o-rings (Fig. 3). The pressure housing is machined from a
thermoplastic synthetic polymer, polyoxymethylene (POM), which tolerates
moderate pressure and temperature and has successfully been used to 25 MPa
confining pressure. At the top, a handle designed to specification of the
ROV MARUM-Quest manipulator was added. In the borehole-facing section, a thermistor as
well as the downward-looking P port are situated (Fig. 3, inset on right).</p>
      <p>Inside the housing we hosted standard “RBR Duo” data loggers (see
<uri>www.rbr-global.com</uri> for detailed specifications) with Keller
PD10 differential pressure transducers (500 kPa differential P range) for
monitoring pressure transients in the boreholes (as a proxy for strain;
Davis et al., 2006) relative to the seafloor pressure signal. With this
approach we omit de-tiding of our data because all signals, e.g. wave action,
occur more or less simultaneously at the seafloor and in the shallow
sub-seafloor formation. Given that only one thermistor was fitted into the
so-called MeBoPLUGs, we are lacking a temperature record from the seafloor
(i.e. upward-looking side of the MeBoPlug; see Fig. 3). In order to
overcome this shortcoming, a simple self-contained device for sea bottom
temperature monitoring, a so-called MTL (Miniature Temperature Logger by
Antares; Pfender and Villinger, 2002) was deployed by a ROV next to the
MeBoPLUG (see next section). The sampling rate of the MeBoPLUGs was set to
10 s on the RBR data loggers, which is providing them with an estimated
lifespan of about 4 years (anticipated end of recording is February 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>MeBoPLUG prior to being screwed into a MeBo drill pipe
(left); photograph to the right shows bottom view into the borehole with ports
for P (hole at left) and T (little pin at
right) monitoring. See text.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Schematic diagram of <bold>(a)</bold> MeBoCORK-A and <bold>(b)</bold> MeBoCORK-B.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f04.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>MeBoCORK A (i.e. autonomous) as well as MeBoPLUG for
comparison. The MeBoPLUG is the white POM-made system screwed into the
yellow rod, while the MeBoCORK-A is taken apart and has the actual
monitoring and data unit with male hot-stab adapter taken out of its female
counterpart. See text.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>MeBoCORK borehole observatories</title>
      <p>The two versions of the MeBoCORK, as seen in Figs. 4, 5, 6, and 7,
are both self-contained with power, data logging, data transmission, and
transducers. They are recoverable at all times and hence minimise the risk
of losing the investment. In the following paragraphs, the deployment
mechanism is explained in some detail. First, the MeBo hole has to be
prepared for long-term instrumentation after coring is completed. This is
achieved by leaving several pieces of MeBo outer drilling rods in the ground
after wireline core retrieval. These rods, approx. 30–40 m in total length,
act as a casing and stabilise the upper sub-seafloor portion where the
deposits are poorly consolidated and otherwise may close in. Only the
lowermost part of the hole is free of “casing” and provides direct access
to the formation. The first prerequisite to keep the MeBoCORK simple follows
the first hydrological observatory in ODP: only hydraulic tubing is lowered
into the hole to access fluid pressure (or fluids) at depth (Wheat et al.,
2011), and all electronics remain at the wellhead. For MeBo, a string of two
armoured PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) tubes is coiled up in the lower part of the MeBo set
observatory unit (termed MeBoCORK-A, where A stands for “autonomous”, i.e.
MeBo by itself is capable of placing a stand-alone observatory), namely in
the lower portion of the “adapter” hosting the receptacle for the hot stab.
Once the drilling device has set this piece, the coil of tubing is unlocked
and a dead weight favours the tubing's descent towards terminal depth where
the hole is open. The upper end of the individual tubing connects to
the borings of the hot-stab receptacle. The lower unit also hosts battery packs.
For the installations during cruise SO222, we pre-installed 45 m long tubes
because we never aimed to exploit the full depth of MeBo in the mud
volcanoes with fairly homogeneous mud breccia, although space would allow for up to
70 m of tubing.</p>
      <p>The upper portion of the MeBoCORK-A hosts the data transmission unit, data
logger, and transducers, the latter of which are connected to the borings of
the male hot-stab end (Figs. 4a, 5). The hot stab is mated with its
female counterpart, and the two halves of CORK-A are further secured by a
bayonet connector that allows coupling of the MeBo70 top drive and hence
torque being transmitted (in clockwise direction only). During installation
MeBo fully screws in the entire CORK instrument, which in total is the exact
length of a regular MeBo drill rod and which sits on the magazine with the
other rods. Once this piece is properly set, MeBo pushes the unit to a depth
so that only the titanium part (ca. 70 cm long) sticks out of the seafloor
and then disconnects. In the initial design, this simple, MeBo set CORK
monitors pressure and temperature, which are both indicators for deep-seated
fluid flow; pore pressure is additionally valuable as a strain proxy (see
above). Depending on the sampling rate, the batteries will allow monitoring
for many months to a few years (in case of the system deployed during leg
SO222A, this was 7 months at a sampling rate of 1 Hz; see below).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>MeBoCORK B (i.e. bottom) unit containing a pressure housing,
acoustic modem, attached osmo-sampler, and the hot-stab connector to couple
to the drill pipe. Upper photo shows overall unit, lower photo contains
detail with layout of tubing. See text.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>If monitoring as well as parameters other than pressure and temperature is desired,
the instrumented MeBo70 rod (CORK-A) is too small and a ROV dive is
required to recover the CORK-A and deploy an external, more sophisticated
observatory unit (Figs. 4b, 6). Since the ROV dives to the seafloor
and connects a seafloor (0 sea bottom) unit to the MeBo rod with a hot-stab
receptacle, this system was termed MeBoCORK-B (i.e. bottom). The ROV is able
to unlatch the bayonet connector in an anticlockwise direction and can
transport the MeBo set CORK back to the ship, because its weight is low and
the diameter is suitable for the manipulator claw. Before this, a seafloor
unit will be placed next to the MeBo drill site (Fig. 6). This system
consists of a pressure housing with an attached hood in which a male hot-stab
adapter plus the umbilical of armoured tubing strings is coiled up. The ROV
takes the hot stab and places it into the lower portion of the MeBoCORK,
which remains connected to the outer drill string at all times. Hot-stab
operations are also common in IODP CORKs to enhance the capabilities for
hydrogeological testing (e.g. Kopf et al., 2011a). The pressure housing at
the seafloor can be equipped to the mission's/scientists' specifications,
and in the case of this proposal will host the pressure and temperature
transducers (same as in the instrumented rod) plus an osmo-sampler (Fig. 7; see also Jannasch et al., 2003).</p>
      <p>Both MeBoCORK instruments are programmed to measure the pressure at 1 Hz for
a period of 30 s and then record the average pressure value. Seafloor
reference and borehole pressure are offset by 15 s, so that the data are
written to the disk alternately.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Osmo-sampler (tubing coil [top] and pumps [below]) that are
hosted in a PVC tube attached to MeBoCORK-B.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f07.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>MeBoPUPPI borehole observatories</title>
      <p>In a recent effort, we have taken the MeBo long-term borehole observatory
science to the next level and built pop-up borehole instruments that can be
released from the casing string after a predefined period. An underwater
connector, which is Capable of being mated, further enables the user to also “manually”
release the unit with a ROV. Once the unit has ascended to sea level, the pop-up
units (Fig. 8) send their data via satellite link, rendering a second
visit and additional ship time unnecessary. Such instruments would in a first
iteration monitor pressure and temperature, but could be equipped with
geophones, seismometers, and other components depending on the scientific
demands of a given mission, the duration of monitoring, the amount of time
series data, etc.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Schematic diagram (bottom) and photograph (top) of MeBoPUPPI
observatory.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In contrast to the MeBoCORK systems, the MeBoPUPPIs do not rely on a hot-stab
connector and tubing that is lowered towards the terminal depth of the borehole
where direct access to the formation exists. Instead, the monitoring is
restricted to pressure and temperature inside and outside of the borehole as
well as tilt using a triaxial array of accelerometers. If desired, an
additional unit that samples simultaneously one hydrophone and three
geophone channels (type SM6, with 4.5 Hz lower frequency band, but no
mechanical gimbaling system) can be mounted. Either sensing package has to
remain in the borehole string for reasons of limited space and weight of the
pop-up unit. This may be equally the case for part of the battery packs when
very long monitoring periods are desired. In these cases, almost all of the
total of 235 cm length of a MeBo70 drill rod segment, excluding a 53 cm long
adapter to protect the glass dome (Fig. 8, righthand side drawing), are
available.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>During cruise SO222 on RV <italic>Sonne</italic>, the MeBo70 was deployed 6 times in water depth
between 1900  and 2050 m. The main objective of this cruise was to install
borehole observatories with the MeBo70; therefore, holes were only drilled down to
35 m b.s.f. or shallower. As explained before, the
drilling procedure in observatory installations encompasses that only a few
drill pipes are recovered to create open-hole conditions at the base, and
that a drill pipe that already included either a MeBoPLUG or a MeBoCORK-A is
added to terminate the hole near the seafloor. Once that final rod was set
the MeBo70 took off vertically while being assisted by the winch, and was
then recovered on deck.</p>
      <p>As explained in more detail in Kopf et al. (2013), a total of four
observatories were set with MeBo70 during cruise SO222 with RV <italic>Sonne</italic>, and in case
of MeBoCORK-B assisted by a ROV. In general, operations went according to
plan, in particular for MeBoPLUG no. 1 and MeBoCORK-A. Both systems were
pre-installed on the uppermost, final drill rod, which was pushed down into
the seafloor so that only approx. 70–80 cm stuck out into the water column.
Figure 9a and b illustrate how the situation looked like before
MeBo70 took off.</p>
      <p>When installing MeBoPLUG no. 2 in the Kumano Basin, we encountered some
problems with drilling progress when hitting several indurated sand layers
at approx. 17 m b.s.f. Despite efforts to clean the hole with pressurised fluid,
the string did not progress any deeper, so that the only option to install
MeBoPLUG no. 2 was to screw on the drill pipe section that hosted the
MeBoPLUG and leave it sticking out of the seafloor by approx. 2.5 m.
Despite this fragile pipe representing an obstacle, the MeBo70 take-off went
well and the pipe was not bent or damaged.</p>
      <p>The majority of the other installations were also successful, e.g. for the
autonomous CORK-A (Fig. 9c) and the CORK-B downhole assembly with end cap
protecting the female hot-stab end (Fig. 9b), as sighted later on by
a ROV. In particular the latter example demonstrates that the black end cap on
the female hot-stab connector (Fig. 9b) can be easily replaced with a
hot stab on an umbilical that is connected to P transducers and
osmo-samplers (Fig. 7), which are hosted in a pressure housing
together with the data logger, acoustic data transmission, and other
electronics (Fig. 9d).</p>
      <p>During the installation of MeBoCORK-A at the crest of Kumano Basin mud
volcano no. 4 (Kopf et al., 2013), we encountered no problems, and once the
MeBo70 had taken off, we sent an acoustic signal to unlatch the drop weight
and lower the coiled pore pressure tubing into the open-bottom end of the
otherwise cased drill hole. This process is controlled by an electrical
motor which operates in either “command-mode” (triggered acoustically) or
“timer-mode” (veering of tubing starts at a pre-programmed date and time).
As can be seen from one of the first data sets downloaded from the CORK-A
via acoustic communication system HAM.BASE by develogic GmbH, the borehole pressure shows
approx. 18 m higher pressure values than its seafloor counterpart (Fig. 10),
which is in good agreement with the terminal depth of approx. 19 m b.s.f. at
this drill site. It can further be observed that the borehole temperature is
approx. 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C warmer than the bottom water temperature (blue
vs. turquoise data in Fig. 10).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> MeBoPLUG and <bold>(b)</bold> MeBoCORK-B top hole assembly with
black end cap after installation with MeBo70. Photos were taken immediately
before the seafloor drill rig lifts off the ground. <bold>(c)</bold> MeBoCORK-A and
<bold>(d)</bold> MeBoCORK-B with seafloor unit. Photos were taken during subsequent
ROV visits. See text.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>First data sets from MeBoCORK-A as recovered by acoustic
data transmission. Pressure curves are blue/turquoise colours, T curves are
red/brown colours (seafloor/borehole in either case). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents
the time over 60 min, in which data are integrated over 30 s each. Note
the offset in borehole vs. reference pressure, which attests the successful
deployment of the drop weight and coiled tubing and access to the open-hole
formation.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f10.png"/>

        <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{1mm}}?>
      </fig>

      <p>At a neighbouring mud volcano, MV no. 3, we had at first no problem
untangling the hot stab of the seafloor unit of MeBoCORK-B, taking it to the
MeBo70 drill rod, and plugging the hot stab into its female counterpart (Fig. 9d).
However, there was some uncertainty that the tubing got caught
and pinched during this operation, so that we unplugged the hot stab again
and pushed it back in more safely a second time. The records of seafloor
reference and downward-looking (i.e. borehole) pressure are shown in Fig. 11.
It can be seen that the differential pressures do not change
much over the time of installation, which is unexpected given that the
borehole terminates 33 m b.s.f. and the drop weight should sit near terminal
depth of this hole. The only explanation for the P record measured is a leak
somewhere inside the upper end of the female hot-stab end of the drill
string; all other sources of error, including the entire bottom unit,
umbilical with tubes to hot stab and osmo-sampler, as well as the hot-stab
connector itself, are flawless.</p>
      <p>Note that more details regarding the station work, but also regional geology
and other in situ measurements in the Kumano Basin mud volcanoes can be
found in the detailed cruise report by Kopf et al. (2013).</p>
      <p>From a geological point of view, the few data sets we downloaded from the
Kumano Basin mud volcanoes agree with other in situ measurements carried out during
the same cruise. Both CPTu (cone penetration testing with pore pressure) and
heat flow measurements indicate anomalies of pressure and temperature in the
active features MV no. 3 and no. 4 (Kopf et al., 2013). Pore pressure in CPTu
profiles reaches values of 30–70 kPa in excess of hydrostatic, suggesting
hampered drainage and capture of deep-seated porewater in the ascending
mud. This finding is supported by elevated heat flow, with geothermal
gradients found to be around 0.064–0.122 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas
background levels ranged from 0.03 to 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For details
refer to Kopf et al. (2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Data set covering the connection of MeBoCORK-B with
the ROV Quest. For reasons to be explored, the borehole pressure is not any higher
than the seafloor reference although the borehole is 33 m deep (i.e. the
reading of the P sensor P1 in the lower plot's <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis should have increased
accordingly), suggesting a problem with the hot-stab connection. Note that
the vertical scale is in metres <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and that the horizontal unit is
minutes.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://gi.copernicus.org/articles/4/99/2015/gi-4-99-2015-f11.png"/>

        <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{1mm}}?>
      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion, conclusions, and outlook</title>
      <p>In summary, the “MeBoCORK concept” with its three versions (MeBoPLUG,
MeBoCORK and MeBoPUPPI) aimed at a smart approach where an observatory can either
be set by MeBo alone, or in combination with MeBo70 and a ROV. The designs
represented a compromise scientifically since a limited set of parameters is
monitored, however, this has not been any different when the first full-size
ODP-CORKs were deployed (Becker and Davis, 2005). However, the three
approaches taken appear extremely valuable at this stage and the future will
likely provide opportunities for payload being added onto either observatory
unit.</p>
      <p>In the pilot study off the coast of Japan, we demonstrated that one MeBoCORK-A and one
MeBoCORK-B as well as two MeBoPLUGs were successfully deployed. This meant
that four out of a total of six MeBo holes drilled during a 2-week expedition got
instrumented. For the MeBoPUPPIs, we are currently in the phase of long-term
performance tests in the pool before taking them into the natural
environment.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Of course, the MARUM-MeBo borehole observatories are limited and high
performance seismometers or strainmeters may turn out impossible to be
installed because of both their size and energy consumption. However, it
appears that future scientific ocean drilling may have to cope with such a
mission-specific approach from ships of opportunity. In addition to it being
most affordable, there are associated advantages such as the absence of heave on the
system during installation (i.e. no danger of destroying the instruments).
Future avenues to increase the payload of the MeBoPLUGs and MeBoCORKs are
miniaturisation of transducers and optimisation of power consumption by the
components, potentially combined with new ocean bottom fuel-cell
technologies.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank the captain, Oliver Meyer, and crew of RV <italic>Sonne</italic> for the superb
support when operating MeBo and the ROV during cruise SO222. The German Ministry
for Education and Research (BMBF) is acknowledged for financially supporting
the expedition (grant 03G0222 to A. Kopf). The MeBoCORKs and MeBoPUPPIs were
funded via the German Science Foundation (DFG) through grants to A. Kopf (grant
KO2108/16-1) and MARUM (via Excellence Initiative). The European Commission
supported the work via FP7 projects MIDAS and ASTARTE. The design and
development benefited from the expertise of Markus Motz and his team at
develogic GmbH (Hamburg). The manuscript benefited from the detailed and thoughtful
suggestions by Beth Orcutt and an anonymous referee. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by the University of Bremen.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: L. Eppelbaum</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Becker, K. and Davis, E. E.: A review of CORK designs and operations
during the Ocean Drilling Program, in: Proc. IODP, 301: College Station TX,
edited by: Fisher, A. T., Urabe, T., Klaus, A., and the Expedition 310 Scientists,
Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.301.104.2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2204/iodp.proc.301.104.2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, K. M., Tryon, M. D., DeShon, H. R., Dorman, L. M., and Schwartz, S. Y.:
Correlated transient fluid pulsing and seismic tremor in the Costa Rica subduction
zone, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 238, 189–203, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Davis, E. E. and  Becker, K.: Using ODP boreholes for studying subseafloor
hydrogeology: Results from the first decade of CORK observations, Geosci. Can., 28,
171–178, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Davis, E. E. and  Villinger, H.: Transient formation fluid pressures and
temperatures in the Costa Rica forearc prism and subducting oceanic
basement: CORK monitoring at ODP Sites 1253 and 1255, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett., 245, 232–244, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Davis, E. E., Becker, K., Wang, K., Obara, K., Ito, Y., and Kinoshita, M.:
A discrete episode of seismic and aseismic deformation of the Nankai trough
subduction zone accretionary prism and incoming Philippine Sea plate, Earth
Planet. Sc. Lett., 242, 73–84, 2006.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Freudenthal, T. and Wefer, G.: Shallow drilling in the deep sea: The sea
floor drill rig MeBo. Oceans '09 IEEE Bremen, IEEE Catalog Nr: CFP09OCF-CDR,
ISBN:978-1-4244-2523-5, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Freudenthal, T. and Wefer, G.: Drilling cores on the sea floor with the
remote-controlled sea floor drilling rig MeBo, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data
Syst., 2, 329–337, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gi-2-329-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gi-2-329-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Jannasch, H. W., Davis, E. E., Kastner, M., Morris, J. D., Pettigrew, T. L.,
Plant, J. N., Solomon, E. A., Villinger, H. W., and Wheat, C. G.: CORK II: Long-Term monitoring of fluid
chemistry, fluxes, and hydrology in instrumented boreholes at the Costa Rica
subduction zone, in: ODP, Init. Repts, edited by: Morris, J. D., Villinger, H. W.,
Klaus, A. et al., 205, 1–36, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, H. P., Hutnak, M. Dziak, R. P., Fox, C. G., Urcuyo, I., Cowen, J. P.,
Nabelekk, J., and Fisher, C.: Earthquake-induced changes in a hydrothermal
system on the Juan de Fuca mid-ocean ridge, Nature, 407, 174–177, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Kopf, A., Araki, E., Toczko, S., and Expedition 332 Scientists: Proc.
IODP, Initial Reports 332: Washington, DC (Integrated Ocean Drilling Program
Management International, Inc.), 190 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.332.2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2204/iodp.proc.332.2011</ext-link>,
2001a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Kopf, A., Hammerschmidt, S., Saffer, D.M., Lauer, R., Davis, E. E., LaBonte,
A., Meldrum, R., Heesemann, M., Macdonald, R., Toczko, S., Wheat, C. G.,
Jannasch, H., Edwards, K., Haddad, A., Orcutt, B., Villinger, H., Araki, E.,
Kitada, K., Kimura, T., and Kido, Y.: The SmartPlug and GeniusPlug:
Simple retrievable observatory systems for NanTroSEIZE borehole monitoring,
Proc. IODP, Vol. 332,  21pp., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.332.105.2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2204/iodp.proc.332.105.2011</ext-link>, 2001b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Kopf, A., Asshoff, K., Belke-Brea, M., Bergenthal, M., Bohrmann, G.,
Bräunig, A., Düssmann, R., Feseker, T., Fleischmann, T., Franke,
P.D., Geprägs, P., Hammerschmidt, S., Heesemann, B., Herschelmann, O.,
Hüpers, A., Ikari, M. J., Kaszemaik, K. M., Kaul, N., Kimura, T., Kitada,
K., Klar, S., Lange, M., Madison, M., Mai, A. H., Noorlander, C., Pape, T.,
Rehage, R., Reuter, C., Reuter, M., Rosiak, U. D., Schmidt, W., Seiter, C.,
Spiesecke, U., Stachowski, A., Steiner, A., Takanori, O., Tryon, M.,
Vahlenkamp, M., Wei, J., Wintersteller, P., and Zarrouk, M. K.: REPORT AND
PRELIMINARY RESULTS of RV <italic>Sonne</italic> CRUISE SO222: MEMO – MeBo drilling and in situ
Long-term Monitoring in the Nankai Trough accretionary complex, Japan.
Berichte aus dem MARUM und dem Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Univ. Bremen,
297, 123 pp., 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
McGinnis, T.: Seafloor Drilling, in: Drilling in extreme environments,
edited by: Bar-Cohen, Y. and Zacny, K., Wiley, 309–345, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Orcutt, B., Wheat, C. G., and Edwards, K. J.: Subseafloor ocean crust microbial
observatories: development of FLOCS (FLow-through Osmo Colonization System)
and evaluation of borehole construction materials, Geomicrobiol. J., 27, 143–157, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Pfender, M. and Villinger, H.: Miniaturized data loggers for deep sea
sediment temperature gradient measurements, Mar. Geol., 186, 557–570, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, E., Kastner, M., Wheat, C. G., Jannasch, H. W., Robertson, G., Davis, E. E.,
and Morris, J. E.: Long-term hydrogeochemical records in the oceanic basement
and forearc prism at the Costa Rica subduction zone, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 282, 240–251, 2009.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Wang, K. and Davis, E. E.: Theory for the propagation of tidally induced pore
pressure variations in layered subseafloor formations, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Ea.,
101, 11483–11495, 1996.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Wheat, C. G., Jannasch, H. W., Kastner, M., Hulme, S., Cowen, J., Edwards, K. J.,
Orcutt, B. N., and Glazer, B.: Fluid sampling from oceanoc borehole
observatories: Design and methods for CORK activities (1990–2010), in: Proc.
IODP, edited by: Fischer, A. T., Tsuji, T., Petronotis, K. et al.,
327, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2204/iodp.proc.327.109.2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2204/iodp.proc.327.109.2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
