Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
GI
Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-435-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-435-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
Research article
 | 
08 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 08 Dec 2022

Drone-towed controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) system for near-surface geophysical prospecting: on instrument noise, temperature drift, transmission frequency, and survey set-up

Tobias Bjerg Vilhelmsen and Arne Døssing

Viewed

Total article views: 3,503 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,685 730 88 3,503 97 116
  • HTML: 2,685
  • PDF: 730
  • XML: 88
  • Total: 3,503
  • BibTeX: 97
  • EndNote: 116
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,503 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,384 with geography defined and 119 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Electromagnetic sensors in a drone set-up allow a lot of movability and downscale the cost and risk typically associated with an airborne system. This paper discusses the pros and cons of our newly developed drone-towed sensor system, where we use the controlled-source electromagnetic sensor GEM-2. We conduct six different tests dealing with altitude dependency, temperature drift, transmission frequencies, T and P mode, and drone noise. Additionally, we show a data set collected with the system.
Read more
Share