Articles | Volume 7, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-7-151-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-7-151-2018
Research article
 | 
07 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 07 Jun 2018

Evaluating four gap-filling methods for eddy covariance measurements of evapotranspiration over hilly crop fields

Nissaf Boudhina, Rim Zitouna-Chebbi, Insaf Mekki, Frédéric Jacob, Nétij Ben Mechlia, Moncef Masmoudi, and Laurent Prévot

Viewed

Total article views: 2,551 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,452 941 158 2,551 411 106 122
  • HTML: 1,452
  • PDF: 941
  • XML: 158
  • Total: 2,551
  • Supplement: 411
  • BibTeX: 106
  • EndNote: 122
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,551 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,439 with geography defined and 112 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
To provide reliable time series of evapotranspiration, we evaluated the performances of four different gap-filling methods when tailored to conditions of hilly crop fields. The tailoring consisted of splitting the time series beforehand on the basis of upslope and downslope winds. The obtained accuracies on evapotranspiration after gap filling were comparable to those previously reported over flat and mountainous terrains, and they were better with the most widely used gap-filling method.