MOLISENS: MObile LIdar SENsor System to exploit the potential of small industrial lidar devices for geoscientific applications
- 1Department of Geography and Regional Sciences, University of Graz, Heinrichstraße 36, 8010 Graz, Austria
- 2Virtual Vehicle Research GmbH, Inffeldgasse 21a, 8010 Graz, Austria
- 3Institute of Automation and Control, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 21b, 8010 Graz, Austria
- 4Arctic Geology Department, University Centre in Svalbard, P.O. Box 156, 9171 Longyearbyen, Norway
- These authors contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence: Thomas Goelles (firstname.lastname@example.org), Tobias Hammer (email@example.com), Stefan Muckenhuber (firstname.lastname@example.org), and Birgit Schlager (email@example.com)
We propose a newly developed modular MObile LIdar SENsor System (MOLISENS) to enable new applications for small industrial lidar (light detection and ranging) sensors. The stand-alone modular setup supports both monitoring of dynamic processes and mobile mapping applications based on SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) algorithms. The main objective of MOLISENS is to exploit newly emerging perception sensor technologies developed for the automotive industry for geoscientific applications. However, MOLISENS can also be used for other application areas, such as 3D mapping of buildings or vehicle-independent data collection for sensor performance assessment and sensor modeling. Compared to TLSs, small industrial lidar sensors provide advantages in terms of size (on the order of 10 cm), weight (on the order of 1 kg or less), price (typically between EUR 5000 and 10 000), robustness (typical protection class of IP68), frame rates (typically 10–20 Hz), and eye safety class (typically 1). For these reasons, small industrial lidar systems can provide a very useful complement to currently used TLS (terrestrial laser scanner) systems that have their strengths in range and accuracy performance. The MOLISENS hardware setup consists of a sensor unit, a data logger, and a battery pack to support stand-alone and mobile applications. The sensor unit includes the small industrial lidar Ouster OS1-64 Gen1, a ublox multi-band active GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) with the possibility for RTK (real-time kinematic), and a nine-axis Xsens IMU (inertial measurement unit). Special emphasis was put on the robustness of the individual components of MOLISENS to support operations in rough field and adverse weather conditions. The sensor unit has a standard tripod thread for easy mounting on various platforms. The current setup of MOLISENS has a horizontal field of view of 360∘, a vertical field of view with a 45∘ opening angle, a range of 120 m, a spatial resolution of a few centimeters, and a temporal resolution of 10–20 Hz. To evaluate the performance of MOLISENS, we present a comparison between the integrated small industrial lidar Ouster OS1-64 and the state-of-the-art high-accuracy and high-precision TLS Riegl VZ-6000 in a set of controlled experimental setups. We then apply the small industrial lidar Ouster OS1-64 in several real-world settings. The mobile mapping application of MOLISENS has been tested under various conditions, and results are shown from two surveys in the Lurgrotte cave system in Austria and a glacier cave in Longyearbreen on Svalbard.
Developing new, reliable measurement and monitoring techniques requires emerging cutting-edge technology. This paper introduces a stand-alone modular MObile LIdar SENsor System (MOLISENS) that builds on recent lidar, radar, and camera innovations from the automotive industry. Originally, these sensors were developed for high-resolution environment perception of automated vehicles. MOLISENS currently includes a lidar, a DGNSS (Differential Global Navigation Satellite System), and an IMU (inertial measurement unit) for georeferenced positioning and orientation. The modular design also permits the use of radar and camera sensors (including traffic monitoring sensors). Furthermore, the setup works without the necessity of a complete vehicle setup. This shall allow measuring geoscientific processes reliably, at any remote location, with very high spatial and temporal resolution and at relatively low costs.
Non-industrial TLS (terrestrial laser scanner) units have been used in many geoscientific applications such as spectral and structural geology, seismology, natural hazards, geomorphology, and glaciology as listed in the review Telling et al. (2017). Data products based on TLS are widely used and range from controlled outdoor studies (e.g., Rapstine et al., 2020; Rengers et al., 2021; Prokop et al., 2008) to natural observations (e.g., Rengers et al., 2021) and damage assessments (e.g., Olsen and Kayen, 2012). Typically, multi-temporal lidar studies deal with repeated measurements over years (e.g., O'Neal and Pizzuto, 2011; Neugirg et al., 2016) or months (e.g., Rabatel et al., 2008; Rengers and Tucker, 2015) in order to investigate deforming surfaces. Recently, permanently mounted TLSs have been used to monitor rockfall at intervals of an hour (Williams et al., 2018, 2019) or to monitor a high mountain environment at daily or hourly intervals (Voordendag et al., 2021). Rengers et al. (2021) recorded a mass flow with speeds greater than 1 m s−1 for the first time. They used a modified VZ-400 TLS at a narrow field of view of , which allowed a sampling rate of 60 Hz.
SfM (structure from motion) especially from UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) is another tool to derive 3D point clouds for geoscientific applications. For example, Lague (2020) compared SfM to TLS for fluvial geomorphology, and Wilkinson et al. (2016) did the same for digital outcrop acquisition. Its main advantages are low-cost, uniform point density, high-resolution RGB information with the limitations of no penetration through vegetation, requirement of good GNSS signal, and UAV flight regulations. In addition, SfM is problematic for surfaces with homogenous textures like snow and is limited to well-lit environments. In caves SfM has been used with digital close-range photogrammetry by a digital single-lens reflex camera mounted on a tripod in the study of Pukanská et al. (2020), where they also compared it to TLS data. Their conclusion was that both methods have their specific requirements, advantages, and disadvantages. Therefore, they recommended a combination of both methods for mapping complex cave spaces.
The goal of MOLISENS is to provide an additional tool to SfM and TLS with a unique set of requirements and advantages. It should be cheaper than a TLS (a new Riegl VZ-6000 TLS costs approximately EUR 160 000 in 2022), has a high sampling frequency, and is independent of natural or artificial light, while also being small and light enough to carry into tight spaces like caves. It needs to be suitable for static applications on a tripod as well as for mobile mapping. Furthermore, the mobile mapping approach should reduce the shadow effects from static TLS uses, all while keeping accuracy and precision high.
Today, the automotive industry is a leading technology driver for small industrial lidar, radar, and camera sensors, because the largest challenge for achieving the next level of vehicle automation is to improve the reliability of the vehicle's perception system (Watzenig and Horn, 2017). Lidar, radar, and camera play essential roles in the perception system of automated vehicles (Marti et al., 2019). The presented work will focus on lidar sensors. However, since MOLISENS is designed as a modular system, integration of radar and camera is possible with little effort.
Small industrial lidar sensors record high-resolution point clouds with high acquisition frequencies (around 10–20 Hz frame rate) to support applications in fast-moving environment such as freeways. High costs of mechanically spinning lidars (currently around EUR 5000 to 10 000) are still a limiting factor for many applications, but prices for small industrial lidar have already dropped significantly during the last decade and are expected to drop by another order of magnitude in the upcoming years caused by newly emerging technologies like MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) mirrors, optical phased array, SPAD (single-photon avalanche diode) detectors, and VCSEL (vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser) sources (Hecht, 2018; Druml et al., 2018; Thakur, 2016). Examples for state-of-the-art small industrial lidar types are Ouster OS0 (Ouster Inc., 2021a), Ouster OS1 (Ouster Inc., 2021b), Ouster OS2 (Ouster Inc., 2021c), Velodyne Alpha Prime (Velodyne Lidar Inc., 2021), and Ibeo Lux 4L/8L/HD (Ibeo Automotive Systems GmbH, 2021). In addition to range information, several new lidar types, e.g., Ouster OS (Ouster Inc., 2021a, b, c), provide intensity information for each received point, which allows us to also take the reflectance of the illuminated materials for new applications into account. Most state-of-the-art small industrial lidars provide a single return or dual returns, while some have up to five returns (Ocular Robotics Limited, 2018) and one which offers full-waveform information (LeddarTech Inc., 2021). Therefore, this limits the application of small industrial lidar where multiple returns are needed, as for example for vegetation removal.
Due to the above-listed advantages, small industrial lidar sensors can complement non-industrial TLS systems that are nowadays used for geoscientific applications. Examples for state-of-the-art TLS used in geosciences are Leica P30/P40 (Leica Geosystems AG, 2021a), Leica P50 (Leica Geosystems AG, 2021b), or the Riegl VZ series (Riegl Laser Measurement Systems GmbH, 2020). High-end TLSs typically provide very detailed and highly accurate point clouds but are more expensive (on the order of EUR 100 000), heavier (on the order of 5 to 10 kg), less robust (typically IP64), and in certain field scenarios more difficult to handle than small and lightweight industrial lidar sensors.
To support mobile mapping applications, MOLISENS includes a DGNSS and an IMU for georeferenced positioning and orientation. For registration of subsequently recorded point clouds into a cumulative point cloud, i.e., for creating a 3D map, the SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) algorithm (Bălaşa et al., 2021; Zhang and Singh, 2017) LIO-SAM (Shan et al., 2020) is used. Lidar-based mobile mapping systems have already been tested in various disciplines such as indoor mapping applications (Tucci et al., 2018), urban mapping applications (Moosmann and Stiller, 2011; Zhang and Singh, 2017; Behley and Stachniss, 2018), and for geoscientific surveys (Bosse et al., 2012; Kukko et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013). A major advantage of MOLISENS compared to previous systems is the modular setup focused on small industrial sensors that allows us to easily exchange and update existing components and extend the system with additional small industrial sensors, such as radar and cameras.
Apart from newly emerging perception sensor technology, MOLISENS also benefits from recent developments in the GNSS sector. Typically, DGNSS technology for positioning requires extensive additional gear that must be transported into the field, i.e., rover and base station. New GNSS platforms integrate multi-band GNSS and RTK (real-time kinematic) technology to yield accuracies on the order of centimeters with a single device and internet connection. Such GNSS platforms are designed primarily for industrial tracking and wearable applications, so they are optimized in size, weight, update rate, and power consumption (Janos and Przemysław, 2021).
To estimate the quality of small industrial lidar point clouds, a Riegl VZ-6000 3D high-accuracy and high-precision TLS (Riegl Laser Measurement Systems GmbH, 2020) was used for ground-truth acquisition. A test setup was designed to compare the accuracy of the VZ-6000 to small industrial lidar sensors (Hammer, 2021). In addition, the MOLISENS system has been tested under various conditions, and results are shown from two mapping surveys in the Lurgrotte cave system in Austria and a glacier cave in Longyearbreen on Svalbard.
Other potential use cases in physical geography are
underground measurements: cave/mine mapping,
monitoring glacier caves and calving glaciers,
monitoring of snow and avalanches,
monitoring of mass movements,
monitoring of fluvial systems,
monitoring of erosion and deposition processes,
sea ice detection and mapping,
archeology and historical and cultural preservation, and
Potential use cases in urban environments are
roadside inventory projects,
power line corridor surveys,
3D city modeling, and
3D indoor modeling.
This article is organized as follows: Sect. 2 gives an overview on the hard- and software components of MOLISENS. In Sect. 3, the integrated small industrial lidar OS1-64 is described and compared to the state-of-the-art TLS VZ-6000. In Sect. 4, the point cloud processing package pointcloudset and the used mapping algorithm are described. The results of two mapping campaigns are shown in Sect. 5. The discussion of the measurement campaigns and an outlook on future applications are given in Sect. 6. The conclusion is presented in Sect. 7.
MOLISENS provides a stand-alone modular framework that is capable of integrating various small industrial lidar, radar, and camera sensors that support ROS (robot operating system) functionality, with low adjustment effort. The hardware setup follows IP (International Protection) standards of small industrial sensors, e.g., the OS1-64 has an IP class of 69 K with the cable attached (Ouster Inc., 2020b), which makes it suitable for fieldwork in rough environments. Figure 1 depicts the hardware components of MOLISENS. The data logger and the sensor unit are connected via a self-developed wire harness which avoids the need of multiple cables. The setup can be powered either by batteries or by a AC/DC (alternating current/direct current) mains adapter. The environment is scanned by the sensor unit, and the transmitted sensor data are recorded by the data logger. The data can be downloaded via a LAN (local area network) interface for further post-processing on a computer.
2.1 Sensor unit
The sensor unit consists of the OS1-64 Gen1, which is a small industrial rotating lidar sensor, a ublox active multi-band GNSS antenna of the ANN-MB series, and the nine-axis Xsens MTi 630 IMU. Between the OS1-64 and the IMU is a space where heat produced by the OS1-64 can be dissipated. The sensor unit has a 0.25 in. thread, which is a standard camera thread, mountable on handles, tripods, or other standardized setups.
2.2 Data logger
The data logger consists of two DC/DC converters, one 24 V 24 V converter, and one 24 V 5 V converter for internal power supply, a RaspberryPi 4 as processing unit, a RaspberryPi HAT for the real-time clock, a RaspberryPi HAT (hardware attached on top) with a 1TB SSD (solid state drive) for data storage, a RaspberryPi HAT for GNSS data, a LTE (long-term evolution) stick to retrieve RTK data, and the Ouster interface board that is responsible for powering the OS1-64 and for data transmission. Interfaces provided by the data logger are a connector for power supply of the whole setup, a 24-pin connector for Ouster data and power supply, the IMU USB (universal serial bus) interface, a SMA (sub-miniature A) connector for the GNSS antenna, a RJ45 (registered jack 45) connector for Ethernet, and a USB connector. Furthermore, the data logger's interface includes one on/off button, two red buttons for selecting the measurement program, one green button for start and stop measurements, and an OLED (organic light-emitting diode) display, which shows the measurement programs, the state of the LTE connection, and the filename of the current measurement. The aluminum housing of the data logger includes an aluminum plate to the integrated circuits on the RaspberryPi which allows appropriate cooling of the hardware. The OLED display can be seen through a transparent plastic window in the aluminum housing.
The software stack of the data logger is shown in Fig. 2. Although the official operating system for RaspberryPi is Raspbian (https://www.raspbian.org/, last access: 30 July 2022), and the Ubuntu Server 20.04 LTS (long-term support) (https://ubuntu.com/download/raspberry-pi, last access: 30 July 2022) was installed as the operating system for MOLISENS, since the integration with ROS (https://www.ros.org, last access: 30 July 2022) works best on Ubuntu. ROS is an open-source middleware widely used for robotic applications. A major advantage of ROS is the extensive list of open-source third-party packages and tools for different domains, e.g., Autoware (https://www.autoware.org/, last access: 30 July 2022) for the automotive domain.
In ROS, a master called roscore controls and registers all nodes running in the system. Each node, which can be defined as an entity that performs a task, can exchange data with other nodes by publishing or subscribing messages through topics. Topics are communication channels, which are defined by a unique name and a specified type of message that is transported. ROS officially supports C++, Python, and Lisp, but other programming languages are also possible through unofficial channels.
The specific software packages used in MOLISENS are as follows.
Data recording package. We developed a ROS package in Python that provides an easy interface to start and stop the data recording as well as a flexible configuration for the specific requirements of the use case. Both the sampling rate of either 10 Hz or 20 Hz of the OS1-64 and the number of points in the horizontal direction of either 1024 or 2048, can be selected by the user just before the measurements by using the red and green buttons on the data logger. The IMU data are recorded with 200 Hz and the GNSS data with 1 Hz. The ROS package records all messages from the specified topics and creates a time-synchronous ROS bag file including the data from all sensors. Later, this ROS bag file can be used as input to a SLAM algorithm to generate a 3D map of the measurement area.
Lidar sensor package. The ROS package provided by the sensor manufacturing company was implemented (Ouster Inc., 2020a). It provides transformation of the raw data from the sensor into point cloud messages and also includes visualization tools to prove that the lidar sensor is correctly mapping the scenario and to check the light intensity of the points. Due to the computational limitations of the RaspberryPi, only raw data are recorded. The recorded raw data are converted into point cloud messages in a post-processing step.
IMU sensor package. Similar to the lidar sensor, the ROS driver provided by the manufacturer is used (Xsens, 2021). Only the configuration and topic selection were adopted to meet the requirements of our use case. Most of the topics were omitted to increase the performance of the system.
GNSS sensor package. Another self-developed Python package was used to retrieve the NMEA (National Marine Electronics Association) messages from the ublox GNSS module. This driver is also able to receive correction data from RTCM (Radio Technical Commission for Maritime) messages through the integrated NTRIP (Networked Transport of RTCM via Internet Protocol) client. By using this NTRIP client, correction data from the external services are included in the GNSS module to improve the accuracy of the measurements. The usage of this correction data is called GNSS RTK. The precision is below 2.5 cm with fixed RTK when the signal from the satellites is clear, and also the base station from the correction data service is not far away, i.e., less than 10 km, from the GNSS module (Dunning, 2018). When the situation is not optimal, the module is still able to reach a precision between 10 and 45 cm with RTK float (Dunning, 2018).
2.3 Power supply
MOLISENS can be powered either with batteries (e.g., LiFePO4 (lithium iron phosphate), Li ion (lithium ion)) or with an AC/DC mains adapter that provides a nominal voltage of 24 V. The battery supply supports mobile measurements whereas the mains adapter may be used when recorded data are transferred to the post-processing computer. The described setup including the data logger and the sensor unit draws a current of about 1 A when data of all three sensors are recorded. We used either a Li-ion battery with 10.4 Ah for 10.4 h of measuring or two parallel LiFePO4 batteries with 3.6 Ah each, so 7.2 Ah in total, for 7.2 h of measuring. The operating temperature for discharging is limited between −20 and +60 ∘C for both types of batteries. We used batteries from AccuPower (AccuPower Research, Development and Distribution Company (Ltd.), 2022).
3.1 OS1-64 Gen1 specifications
The Ouster OS1-64 is a mechanical spinning lidar scanner that costs about EUR 10 000. The ingress protection level is IP69K with an I/O (input/output) cable attached, so it offers complete protection against contact; i.e., it is dust-tight and waterproof. It is classified as a mid-range lidar sensor and can detect objects up to a distance of 150 m. The minimum range is 0.8 m. The laser operates with eye safety class 1 per IEC 60825-1:2014, which makes it possible to operate the lidar without any restrictions regarding the eye safety of the operator or other persons within the measurement range. The wavelength of the laser is 855 nm. The range resolution is 0.3 cm, so it is able detect individual objects when the distance between those objects in the scanning direction is 0.3 cm or greater. The range accuracy is stated as ±5 cm for Lambertian targets and ±10 cm for retroreflectors (Ouster Inc., 2020b). The precision depends on the range and is between ±1 and ±5 cm. The vertical resolution of the OS1-64 is given by the 64 channels which are evenly distributed within the 33.2∘ vertical field of view. The horizontal resolution is configurable and can be 512, 1,024, or 2,048 scanning points in the horizontal direction for the 360∘ field of view. The angular sampling accuracy vertically and horizontally is ±0.01∘. The sampling frequency can be configured with 10 Hz or 20 Hz. At 10 Hz, the scanner rotates and scans 10 times per second and produces up to 64×2048 points per rotation. Therefore, the OS1-64 is able to detect over 1.3 million points per second at the 10 Hz rotation rate.
A computer with ROS installed can read and record the data, which are forwarded by the Ouster interface box. In our case, the necessary components are integrated in MOLISENS. We decided to record only raw lidar data to be able to store more data at about 1.3 million points per second, IMU measurements with 200 Hz, and GNSS measurements with 1 Hz. The raw lidar data do not comprise the actual 3D points with x, y, and zcoordinates, but information such as timestamp, measurement ID, and range for each measurement. These data are used in a post-processing step for the derivation of 3D points. Recording the raw data instead of the point cloud data reduces the total data rate, i.e., lidar, IMU, and GNSS data, from 77 to 15.14 MB s−1, a factor of more than 5. Up to 18 h of recording is possible with 1 TB of data storage that we use in MOLISENS.
3.2 OS1-64 performance assessment
We assessed the performance of the OS1-64 against the VZ-6000 in a standardized test setup which is based on Boehler et al. (2003). The first frame of each OS1-64 measurement was used for the test. Specifically, the following attributes were analyzed: systematic and surface-induced range errors and angular errors.
We tested the systematic noise in the range measurements of the lidar. For that purpose, a plane target was scanned. We used a wall perpendicular to the observation direction as the plane target. The wall was modeled as a plane and the normal distance between every point in the point cloud, and this plane can be calculated. The standard deviation of the distribution of these normal distances, which represent the range errors, was derived (Fig. 3). We investigated two different materials: retroreflective foil and cardboard with dull black spray paint. Those surfaces need to be in the same plane perpendicular to the observation direction to quantify the deviations of surfaces with high and low reflectivity. This was realized by attaching the materials to a wooden board which was mounted on the wall. We analyzed the reflectance of the materials based on the comparison to Lambertian targets. From a perpendicular angle the reflectivity of the retroreflector was 200 % relative to a 100 % Lambertian target. The black dull spray paint had a reflectivity of 10 % relative to a 100 % Lambertian target (Muckenhuber et al., 2020; Birkebak et al., 2018). The scanned wall in the background was used to model a reference plane. The normal distances between points and reference plane can be calculated by subtracting the thickness of the wooden board and the target thickness. A threshold in the reflectance value was used to select the points representing the target in the point cloud.
We used scanned circles to determine the vertical and horizontal distances for quantifying the angular accuracy. We attached four circles, representing a rectangle, with dimensions of 4.5 m × 2 m, to a wall. This rectangle was scanned from three different positions, which yields six independent vertical and six independent horizontal distances.
The results of the tests on systematic range errors showed that the OS1-64 has a higher standard deviation in the range error distribution compared to a TLS such as the VZ-6000 (Fig. 3a). The most significant range errors of up to 25 cm occurred when scanning retroreflective targets with the OS1-64 (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, the range errors in this case are not only larger but are also spread out over a large range of values with a standard deviation of 6.9 cm. According to the manufacturer, the errors occurring with retroreflectors result from the time walk error. This error is caused by clock errors and is an internal error source of lidar systems. This means that the light returns so strongly that it deforms the shape of the received signal, which leads to an error in the estimation of the peak, i.e., the distance measured (Nahler et al., 2020).
Figure 4 shows parts of point clouds with observed artifacts. Areas without data appear near highly reflective objects (Fig. 4a and b). The results also show that the OS1-64 performed better at detecting low-reflectance targets in close proximity than the VZ-6000 (Fig. 4c and d).
The found performance issues comprise the following artifacts: range errors at highly reflective targets for the OS1-64, areas without data around highly reflective targets for the OS1-64, corner artifacts for the VZ-6000, and multipath artifacts for the VZ-6000. The systematic range errors, which can be considered noise, can have a great impact on mapping micro-scale features. According to the manufacturer, the effect of areas without data is caused by an integrated blooming filter in the OS1-64. This filter removes bloomed, i.e., overly saturated, points. The range errors of the OS1-64 have a big impact on current point cloud georeferencing methods where retroreflectors of known position are used as distinguishable objects in a point cloud. Other georeferencing methods, like the matching with georeferenced point clouds, must be considered.
4.1 Data processing of point cloud time series
Small industrial lidar sensors record point clouds on the order of a million points per second at acquisition rates ranging from 10 to 20 Hz. In addition to the x,y, and z coordinates, range, intensity, reflectivity, ambient near-infrared, azimuth angle, and timestamp for each point are stored (Ouster Inc., 2020b). This leads to datasets on the order of gigabytes in the form of 3D point clouds recorded over time. Most software deals with single point clouds, and the tools provided by ROS are not designed for post-processing and data analytics. Therefore, a Python package called pointcloudset (Goelles et al., 2021b) was developed along with the sensor hardware. The package is available on the PyPI (Python Package Index) for easy installation with pip. This package organizes the data in the following way: the point cloud data stored in a ROS bag file (.bag) are read into a pointcloudset dataset. This dataset object consists of multiple PointCloud objects, timestamps, and metadata.
The package is optimized for analytics on the whole dataset to answer questions like “at which point and when was the highest returned intensity of the whole dataset?” or “how many clusters of points in a 0.5 m radius exist between 5 and 10 m in x direction in the 124 s frame?”. Several queries like this can be chained together to form complex pipelines. The computation is only executed at the very last step when the answer is required by so-called “lazy evaluation”. The computation is performed on multiple central processing unit (CPU) in parallel. The package is not limited to built-in functions and additional arbitrary functions can be implemented and applied. Furthermore, the package provides tools for visualization, import, and export of widely used point cloud formats. Also, a direct interface to the powerful open3D and pandas libraries (Zhou et al., 2018; The pandas development team, 2020) is implemented for additional applications. For more details see the documentation on https://virtual-vehicle.github.io/pointcloudset/ (last access: 30 July 2022).
4.2 SLAM algorithm
In robotics, SLAM algorithms are a fundamental prerequisite for feedback control, obstacle avoidance, and planning since SLAM allows a robot's 6 DOF (degrees of freedom) state estimation (Bălaşa et al., 2021). Here, we use a SLAM algorithm to generate one cumulative point cloud from a time series of point clouds. MOLISENS is either mounted on a moving platform or carried along by a person while recording data. The data recording unit uses ROS as middleware, and all data are recorded in a ROS bag file, which includes IMU, lidar, and GNSS data. Each recorded data type in the ROS bag file has a timestamp. The recorded data are the input for the mapping algorithm LIO-SAM (Shan et al., 2020), which is applied offline in a post-processing step.
LIO-SAM uses the lidar odometry data to estimate the six DOF trajectory of the mapping sensor. The state estimation problem is solved by a factor graph. This incorporates IMU pre-integration, lidar odometry, GNSS data, and loop closure. The system does not depend on continuous GNSS data. Therefore, the GNSS factor is only added when the estimated position covariance is larger than the received GNSS position covariance. The loop closure factor is responsible for detecting whether a new node has a small Euclidean distance to a prior state. If this is detected, the algorithm tries to match the new state to the near, past state. This is especially useful to correct for potential drift in altitude when GNSS is the only absolute sensor available. These advantages compared to methods such as LOAM (lidar odometry and mapping) (Zhang and Singh, 2017) and other previous state-of-the-art algorithms made it well suited for our use cases.
To test the MOLISENS setup in challenging field conditions, two mapping surveys in the Lurgrotte cave system in Austria and in a glacier cave in Longyearbreen on Svalbard have been conducted. The following section presents the results of these two measurement campaigns.
5.1 Application in speleology
The Lurgrotte, a partially water-bearing cave 15 km north of Graz in Styria, Austria, was chosen as a study area for MOLISENS. The approximately 6 km long cave passes through the Tanneben massif between the localities of Semriach and Peggau. Parts of the cave are accessible to tourists. The cave is characterized by an abundance of speleothems, water-bearing passages, and a heterogeneous cave geometry in which narrow passages alternate with large chambers, such as the Great Dome. With an area of approximately 5100 m2, the Great Dome is one of the 10 largest cave chambers in Austria (Plan and Oberender, 2016). Due to these heterogeneous characteristics, the Lurgrotte Semriach is well suited for testing the application of MOLISENS in speleology.
Scanning a cave system, such as the Lurgrotte Semriach, with a TLS would demand tens to hundreds of scan positions, i.e., a significant effort in terms of time and costs. Using MOLISENS, we were able to produce a point cloud without the necessity of time-consuming scans at individual positions. The mapping campaign demonstrated that MOLISENS can provide a cumulative point cloud even without the use of GNSS measurements. Also, the LIO-SAM algorithm was tested on whether it is able to co-register point clouds that were recorded partly outdoor and indoor. More than 300 m of complex cave geometry could be scanned with MOLISENS in less than 12 min (Fig. 5d). Measurement (1) includes the switch from an outdoor environment to an indoor environment in a single measurement. Measurement (2) was conducted only inside the cave. An overview of the recorded data is given in Table 1.
It has to be noted that a final validation of the point cloud data was not possible at this stage. A validation of the data quality and accuracy requires a geodetic reference. A marked closed traverse and local reference points were measured from the cave entrance to the Great Dome after our fieldwork at the Lurgrotte. The drilled mountings of these marks could be used again for further tests with our system. A valid assessment of the accuracy of the produced map can then be accomplished with this reference.
5.2 Application in glaciology
To test MOLISENS for cryospheric applications, a glacier cave was mapped in the glacier Longyearbreen on the Svalbard archipelago, Norway. The morphological changes of glacier caves give information about the englacial water routing. Ice volume changes in caves are common throughout the year, and the inter-seasonal comparison of ice dynamics can indicate a change in the hydro-climatic regime of the glacier (Perşoiu and Lauritzen, 2017). Previous work on cold glacier caves in the study area involved geomorphological mapping and seasonal temperature monitoring (Alexander et al., 2020; Guđmundsdóttir, 2011), but detailed 3D measurements of a glacier cave system are typically not available.
Our aim was to create a 3D point cloud which represents the shape of the glacier cave and the surrounding surface of the glacier. The results are shown in Fig. 7. The measurement campaign showed that it is possible to create a cumulative point cloud from the predominant surfaces in and around glacier caves. These surfaces are composed of ice, snow, sediments, and moraine material. Measurements were recorded by walking through the caves bidirectionally with MOLISENS. The resulting recorded data were then processed with the LIO-SAM algorithm to create a cumulative point cloud of the glacier cave and the surrounding surface of the glacier.
Figure 7c represents a segment of the processed point cloud showing the glacier cave and the glacier surface from below. The cross sections shown in Fig. 7d are 1 m long segments along the cave direction. Some outlier points are visible that might be a result of the scanners' range errors and the torso of the person holding the scanner. In general, the Ouster OS1-64 should perform well for glaciological applications due to the wavelength of 855 nm where absorption in ice is lower (Warren and Brandt, 2008) than at the wavelength of the VZ-6000 at 1064 nm or other TLSs that have a wavelength of typically 1550 nm (Deems et al., 2013). Further investigations of the errors are needed in the future.
6.1 Small industrial lidar as part of MOLISENS
Our comparison shows that small industrial lidar sensors such as the OS1-64 can offer advantages for certain applications compared to conventional TLS such as the VZ-6000. These advantages are the lower price, smaller size, lower weight, and increased robustness but also the ability to acquire data in narrow spaces and while moving. We found that the VZ-6000 shows larger errors when scans are conducted in indoor environments and at low ranges between 5 and 15 m.
The accuracy of the data depends on the target properties. A black target had errors of up to 5 cm, while a retroreflective material had errors up to 22 cm. Nevertheless, for numerous applications the data can be the foundation for many kinds of analysis. We recommend refraining from analyzing features smaller than 10 cm in the processed point clouds. The given accuracy of up to 5 cm for ranges greater than 50 m leads to an increase in noise when the SLAM algorithm is used. Applying smoothing filters to the cumulative point cloud is recommended. The frequency and magnitude of the distance error when scanning retroreflective surfaces are expected to be reduced with the upcoming firmware version. However, this must be considered if retroreflective targets are used during geo-referencing. Better yet would be to use the non-retroreflective target for geo-referencing, e.g., white paper with black markings. Another challenging surface is water, which absorbs typical wavelengths of small industrial lidar in the near-infrared range (e.g., Lague, 2020).
In our fieldwork, MOLISENS has proven to record data in complex environments even without a GNSS signal. However, the drift in the SLAM-processed point clouds has yet to be quantified, and workflows for georeferencing have to be tested. With the data from our fieldwork, the mapping algorithm LIO-SAM was able to map the environment and the trajectory of the mapping sensor into a point cloud. This shows that results are possible under the following conditions:
snow and ice surfaces,
arctic weather conditions (−20 ∘C),
very narrow spaces (<1 m), and/or
rough sensor handling due to rough terrain or narrow spaces.
The lack of GNSS data for cave measurements caused drifts induced by small propagating errors in the IMU data. These drifts are yet to be quantified.
6.2 Other small industrial sensors
In addition to lidar, other small industrial perception sensors such as radar systems can be integrated into MOLISENS. Modern automotive and traffic-monitoring radar sensors typically operate at 24 GHz, e.g., Smartmicro TRUGRD Stream (smart microwave sensors GmbH, 2021), or 77 GHz (Ramasubramanian and Ramaiah, 2018), e.g., Continental ARS540 (Continental AG, 2016, 2017), have a range up to 300 m and apply frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) technologies for relative distance and velocity estimation (Patole et al., 2017) and digital beam-forming to control the direction of the emitted wave (Hasch, 2015). In addition to data on the object level (i.e., list of detected traffic participants), radar data are typically also provided as radar clusters. Clusters represent radar detections with information like position, velocity, and signal strength. This raw data format allows us to develop and apply new algorithms for detecting changes in the backscatter behavior of the environment caused by various geoscientific processes.
6.3 Potential applications
We envision MOLISENS as a useful tool in geosciences. The IP level of the OS1-64 allows us to conduct measurements under adverse conditions and rough sensor handling. This opens a wide range of applications ranging from cave mapping to glacier surface analysis to meltwater channel monitoring with the potential to increase our understanding of the drainage systems of glaciers. A 3D model of a glacier cave can be used to parameterize volumetric properties of the cave with the aim of analyzing cave morphology (Gallay et al., 2015; Šupinský et al., 2019). In addition, different surface types can be distinguished if they show a significant difference in intensity. For example, the recorded intensity values for ice surfaces are significantly lower than for surfaces covered with, e.g., moraine material or sediments. This allows us to distinguish bare ice from gravel-based surface covers.
The portable nature, low cost, and robustness of MOLISENS make new applications well beyond cave mapping possible. Mobile high-resolution 3D mapping of glacier fronts using snowmobiles on sea ice is another possible application and could be conducted at relatively high velocities (up to 60–80 km h−1). Similarly, regular mapping of coastal bluffs susceptible to coastal erosion (e.g., Guégan and Christiansen, 2017) can be undertaken throughout the polar night season that hinders SfM photogrammetry for large parts of the year in polar regions.
Besides mobile measurements, static measurements can be conducted with MOLISENS to record rapid processes in 3D over time with up to 20 Hz. The scanner can be placed permanently in an area of interest, and in case of an event, the scanning process could be initiated automatically or remotely. Vice versa constant scanning could detect a process happening which would trigger further process chains.
MOLISENS is also a handy teaching tool since it rapidly acquires data at a fraction of the cost of a conventional TLS. In addition, it can be taken along on excursions more easily, and safety concerns are minimal even in large groups due to the laser class 1 rating. At the University of Graz and the University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) it is planned to use MOLISENS for excursions and practicals focusing on cryospheric topics, mapping methods, integrated geological methods, and digital geological techniques (Senger et al., 2021).
This list can be further extended since the system can be attached to a wide range of platforms. Tests have been conducted with platforms like cars, agricultural machines, and boats with promising results. Further optimizing weight and power consumption of the system can also enable small UAVs as potential platforms. Apart from geoscientific applications, MOLISENS provides an easy-to-use setup for testing automotive perception sensors for, e.g., sensor modeling and sensor FDIR (fault detection, identification, and recovery) method development.
In this work, we present a newly developed mobile lidar sensor system called MOLISENS. The system combines a small industrial lidar with IMU and GNSS. It provides the opportunity to collect 3D data for a wide range of use cases and applications. Besides the hardware, we introduced the post-processing tools provided by the two open-source packages LIO-SAM and pointcloudset. LIO-SAM is a SLAM algorithm for cumulative point cloud generation, and pointcloudset is a Python package for analysis and post-processing of static measurements.
The integration of the small industrial lidar OS1-64 and the mobile mapping approach was tested in measurement campaigns in the Lurgrotte cave, Austria, and in glacier caves on Longyearbreen, Svalbard. The system offers a flexible, easy-to-use, and time-efficient way to acquire 3D point cloud, GNSS, and IMU data. The offline SLAM processing resulted in point clouds which can be the basis to investigate numerous geoscientific problems. The robustness of the sensors and the data logger as well as the battery and storage capacities are well suited to demanding fieldwork situations.
In the near future, additional sensors, such as radar and cameras, shall be integrated into MOLISENS and further broaden the range of applications. This is possible due to the modular design structure of MOLISENS.
TG, TH, SM, BiS, JA, and CB contributed to the conceptualization. TG, TH, SM, BiS, CB, MS, and BeS contributed to the data curation. TG, TH, SM, BiS, CB, and MS contributed to the formal analysis. TG, TH, SM, BiS, WS, and KS contributed to the funding acquisition. TG, TH, SM, BiS, CB, BeS, and KS contributed to the investigation. TG, TH, SM, BiS, CB, and BeS contributed to the methodology. TG, TH, SM, BiS, and WS contributed to the project administration. TG, TH, SM, BiS, VEJ, MS, BeS, and KS contributed to the resources. TG, TH, SM, BiS, VEJ, MS, and BeS contributed to the software. TG, SM, BiS, JA, CB, WS, MS, and BeS contributed to the supervision. TG, TH, SM, BiS, and CB contributed to the validation. TG, TH, SM, BiS, and CB contributed to the visualization. TG, TH, SM, BiS, and CB contributed to the writing of the original draft preparation. TG, TH, SM, BiS, JA, CB, and KS contributed to the writing with review and editing.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The publication was written at the University of Graz and at Virtual Vehicle Research GmbH. A special thanks to Oliver Mariani from Virtual Vehicle Research GmbH for supporting the construction of several hardware parts of MOLISENS. The authors would like to acknowledge Andreas Schinnerl for providing access to Lurgrotte Semriach and supporting the measurements. A special thanks to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for valuable input that improved our paper.
The authors received financial support within the COMET K2 Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies from the Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action (BMK), the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW), the Province of Styria (Dept. 12), and the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG). The Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) has been authorized for the program management. The fieldwork in Svalbard was in part funded by the Svalbard Science Forum Arctic Field Grant. The authors received financial support from the University of Graz.
This paper was edited by Andrew Wickert and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
AccuPower Research, Development and Distribution Company (Ltd.): AccuPower AkkuPacks, https://www.accupower.at/produkt-kategorie/akkus/lithium/akkupacks/ (last access: 1 February 2022), 2022. a
Alexander, A., Obu, J., Schuler, T. V., Kääb, A., and Christiansen, H. H.: Subglacial permafrost dynamics and erosion inside subglacial channels driven by surface events in Svalbard, The Cryosphere, 14, 4217–4231, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4217-2020, 2020. a
Bălaşa, R. I., Olaru, G., Constantin, D., Ștefan, A., Bîlu, C. M., and Bălăceanu, M. B.: LIDAR based distance estimation for emergency use terrestrial autonomous robot, 14th International Conference on Electronics, Comp. Artif. Intell., 13, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI52376.2021.9515047, 2021. a, b
Behley, J. and Stachniss, C.: Efficient Surfel-Based SLAM using 3D Laser Range Data in Urban Environments, in: Conference: Robotics: Science and Systems 2018, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2018.XIV.016, 2018. a
Birkebak, M., Stearns, J., Durell, C., and Scharpf, D.: Radiometry 101 Calibrating with diffuse reflecting targets, https://www.photonicsonline.com/doc/radiometry-calibrating-with-diffuse-reflecting-targets-0001 (last access: 28 July 2022), 2018. a
Bock, H. and Dolischka, A.: Plan der Lurgrotte Peggau – Semriach, Tech. rep., Graz, m = 1:2.500, 1953. a
Boehler, W., Vicent, M., and Marbs, A.: Investigating laser scanner accuracy, in: Proc. Proceedings of the XIXth International Symposium, CIPA 2003, 34, 2003. a
Bosse, M., Zlot, R., and Flick, P.: Zebedee: Design of a Spring-Mounted 3-D Range Sensor with Application to Mobile Mapping, IEEE T. Robot., 28, 1104–1119, https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2012.2200990, 2012. a
Continental AG: Technical Documentation ARS 404-21 (Entry) and ARS 408-21 (Premium), Version 1.0, Tech. rep., Continental Engineering Services GmbH, https://www.continental-automotive.com/getattachment/8e4678e1-9358-48e1-8d5b-a0c2de942edb/ARS408-21_Datenblatt_de_170707_V07.pdf.pdf (last access: 1 August 2022), 2016. a
Continental AG: ARS 408-21 Premium Long Range Radar Sensor 77 GHz, ARS 408-21 datasheet, Tech. rep., Continental Engineering Services GmbH, 2017. a
Druml, N., Maksymova, I., Thurner, T., van Lierop, D., Hennecke, M., and A., F.: 1d Mems Micro-Scanning LiDAR, Conference on Sensor Device Technologies and Applications (SENSORDEVICES), Venice, Italy, 9, 2018. a
Dunning, D.: What Is Difference Between RTK Fix and RTK Float?, https://sciencing.com/difference-between-rtk-fix-rtk-float-12245568.html (last access: 4 February 2022), 2018. a, b
Gallay, M., Kaňuk, J., Hochmuth, Z., Meneely, J., Hofierka, J., and Sedlák, V.: Large-scale and high-resolution 3-d cave mapping by terrestrial laser scanning: A case study of the Domica cave, Slovakia, Int. J. Speleol., 44, 277–291, https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.44.3.6, 2015. a
Goelles, T., Hammer, T., Muckenhuber, S., and Schlager, B.: Pointcloud of Longyearbreen glacier surface and glacer cave, Graz University of Technology [data set], https://doi.org/10.3217/182j2-hdn17, 2021a. a
Goelles, T., Schlager, B., Muckenhuber, S., Haas, S., and Hammer, T.: pointcloudset: Efficient Analysis of Large Datasets of Point Clouds Recorded Over Time, Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3471, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03471, 2021b. a
Guđmundsdóttir, A. S.: Morphology and Development of the Longyearbreen Ice Cave, Central Spitsbergen, Svalbard, Bachelor Thesis BS, ritgerð, Jarðvísin-dadeild, Háskóli Íslands, 2011. a
Hammer, T.: New applications of automotive lidar sensors in geosciences, Master's Thesis, Graz University of Technology, 2021. a
Hasch, J.: Driving Towards Automotive Radar Technology Trends, IEEE MTT-S International Conference on Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility, Heidelberg, Germany, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIM.2015.7117956, 2015. a
Hecht, J.: Lidar for self-driving cars, Optics and Photonics News, 29, 26–33, 2018. a
Ibeo Automotive Systems GmbH: ibeo LUX 4L/ibeo LUX 8L/ibeo LUX HD Datasheet, https://hexagondownloads.blob.core.windows.net/public/AutonomouStuff/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ibeo_LUX_datasheet_whitelabel.pdf (last access: 4 October 2021), 2021. a
Kukko, A., Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., and Chen, Y.: Multiplatform mobile laser scanning: Usability and performance, Sensors, 12, 11712–11733, 2012. a
Lague, D.: Chapter 8 – Terrestrial laser scanner applied to fluvial geomorphology, in: Developments in Earth Surface Processes, Elsevier, 23, 231–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64177-9.00008-4, 2020. a, b
LeddarTech Inc.: LeddarTech Launches PixSet, the Industry's First Full-Waveform Flash LiDAR Dataset, https://leddartech.com/leddartech-launches-pixset-industrys-first-full-waveform-flash-lidar-dataset/ (last access: 28 July 2022), 2021. a
Leica Geosystems AG: Leica ScanStation P30/P40: Leica P30/P40 data sheet, https://leica-geosystems.com/-/media/files/leicageosystems/products/datasheets/scan/leica scanstation p50 ds 869145 0119 en lr.ashx?la=de-at&hash=9ABF78CC529268400306349359BE769A (last access: 4 October 2021), 2021a. a
Leica Geosystems AG: Leica ScanStation P50: Leica P50 data sheet, https://leica-geosystems.com/-/media/files/leicageosystems/products/datasheets/scan/leica scanstation p50 ds 869145 0119 en lr.ashx?la=de-at&hash=9ABF78CC529268400306349359BE769A (last access: 4 October 2021), 2021b. a
Marti, E., Perez, J., Miguel, M. A., and Garcia, F.: A Review of Sensor Technologies for Perception in Automated Driving, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 11, 94–108, https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2019.2907630, 2019. a
Nahler, C., Steger, C., and Druml, N.: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods of automotive time of flight based sensors, in: Proceedings – Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, DSD 2020, Kranj, Slovenia, 651–659, https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD51259.2020.00106, 2020. a
Neugirg, F., Stark, M., Kaiser, A., Vlacilova, M., Della Seta, M., Vergari, F., Schmidt, J., Becht, M., and Haas, F.: Erosion processes in calanchi in the Upper Orcia Valley, Southern Tuscany, Italy based on multitemporal high-resolution terrestrial LiDAR and UAV surveys, Geomorphology, 269, 8–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.06.027, 2016. a
Ocular Robotics Limited: RobotEye RE08 3D LIDAR, https://www.ocularrobotics.com/products/lidar/re08/ (last access: 1 August 2022), 2018. a
O'Neal, M. A. and Pizzuto, J. E.: The rates and spatial patterns of annual riverbank erosion revealed through terrestrial laser-scanner surveys of the South River, Virginia, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 36, 695–701, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2098, 2011. a
Ouster Inc.: Ouster Example Code, Github [code], https://github.com/ouster-lidar/ouster_example/tree/20201209, 2020a. a
Ouster Inc.: OS1 Mid-Range High resolution Imaging Lidar, Ouster OS-1 Gen1 data sheet, https://data.ouster.io/downloads/datasheets/datasheet-gen1-v2p0-os1.pdf, (last access: 13 December 2021), 2020b. a, b, c
Ouster Inc.: OS0 Ultra-Wide View High-Resolution Imaging Lidar, Ouster OS-0 data sheet, https://data.ouster.io/downloads/datasheets/datasheet-revd-v2p1-os0.pdf (last access: 4 October 2021), 2021a. a, b
Ouster Inc.: OS1 Mid-Range High resolution Imaging Lidar, Ouster OS-1 data sheet, https://data.ouster.io/downloads/datasheets/datasheet-revd-v2p1-os1.pdf (last access: 4 October 2021), 2021b. a, b
Ouster Inc.: OS2 Long-Range High-Resolution Imaging Lidar, Ouster OS-2 data sheet, https://data.ouster.io/downloads/datasheets/datasheet-revd-v2p1-os2.pdf (last access: 4 October 2021), 2021c. a, b
Patole, S. M., Torlak, M., Wang, D., and Murtaza, A.: Automotive radars: A review of signal processing techniques, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34, 22–35, https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.2628914, 2017. a
Plan, L. and Oberender, P.: Höhlen und Karst in Österreich, chap. Höhlen in Österreich, 11–22, Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum, 2016. a
Prokop, A., Schirmer, M., Rub, M., Lehning, M., and Stocker, M.: A comparison of measurement methods: terrestrial laser scanning, tachymetry and snow probing for the determination of the spatial snow-depth distribution on slopes, Ann. Glaciol., 49, 210–216, https://doi.org/10.3189/172756408787814726, 2008. a
Pukanská, K., Bartoš, K., Bella, P., Gašinec, J., Blistan, P., and Kovanič, v.: Surveying and High-Resolution Topography of the Ochtiná Aragonite Cave Based on TLS and Digital Photogrammetry, Appl. Sci., 10, 4633, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134633, 2020. a
Rabatel, A., Deline, P., Jaillet, S., and Ravanel, L.: Rock falls in high-alpine rock walls quantified by terrestrial lidar measurements: A case study in the Mont Blanc area, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L10502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033424, 2008. a
Rapstine, T. D., Rengers, F. K., Allstadt, K. E., Iverson, R. M., Smith, J. B., Obryk, M., Logan, M., and Olsen, M. J.: Reconstructing the velocity and deformation of a rapid landslide using multiview video, J. Geophys. Res.-Ea. Surf., 125, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005348, 2020. a
Rengers, F. K. and Tucker, G. E.: The evolution of gully headcut morphology: a case study using terrestrial laser scanning and hydrological monitoring, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 40, 1304–1317, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3721, 2015. a
Rengers, F. K., Rapstine, T. D., Olsen, M., Allstadt, K. E., Iverson, R. M., Leshchinsky, B., Obryk, M., and Smith, J. B.: Using High Sample Rate Lidar to Measure Debris-Flow Velocity and Surface Geometry, Environ. Eng. Geosci., 27, 113–126, https://doi.org/10.2113/EEG-D-20-00045, 2021. a, b, c
Riegl Laser Measurement Systems GmbH: 3D Ultra Long Range Terrestrial Laser Scanner with Online Waveform Processing Riegl VZ-6000, http://www.riegl.com/uploads/tx_pxpriegldownloads/RIEGL_VZ-6000_Datasheet_2020-09-14.pdf (last access: 4 October 2021), 2020. a, b
Senger, K., Betlem, P., Grundvåg, S.-A., Horota, R. K., Buckley, S. J., Smyrak-Sikora, A., Jochmann, M. M., Birchall, T., Janocha, J., Ogata, K., Kuckero, L., Johannessen, R. M., Lecomte, I., Cohen, S. M., and Olaussen, S.: Teaching with digital geology in the high Arctic: opportunities and challenges, Geosci. Commun., 4, 399–420, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-399-2021, 2021. a
Shan, T., Englot, B., Meyers, D., Wang, W., Ratti, C., and Daniela, R.: Lio-sam: Tightly-coupled lidar inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 5135–5142, 2020. a, b
s.m.s, smart microwave sensors GmbH: SmartMicro Product information, traffic management sensor, TRUGRD Stream, https://www.smartmicro.com/fileadmin/media/Downloads/Traffic_Radar/Sensor_Data_Sheets__24_GHz_/Datasheet_TRUGRD_Stream.pdf (last access: 4 October 2021), 2021. a
Šupinský, J., Kaňuk, J., Hochmuth, Z., and Gallay, M.: Detecting dynamics of cave floor ice with selective cloud-to-cloud approach, The Cryosphere, 13, 2835–2851, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2835-2019, 2019. a
Telling, J., Lyda, A., Hartzell, P., and Glennie, C.: Review of Earth science research using terrestrial laser scanning, Earth-Sci. Rev., 169, 35–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.007, 2017. a
Thakur, R.: Scanning LIDAR in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Beyond: Building a road map for next-generation LIDAR technology, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5, 48–54, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2556878, 2016. a
Tucci, G., Visintini, D., Bonora, V., and Parisi, E. I.: Examination of Indoor Mobile Mapping Systems in a Diversified Internal/External Test Field, Appl. Sci., 8, 401, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8030401, 2018. a
Voordendag, A. B., Goger, B., Klug, C., Prinz, R., Rutzinger, M., and Kaser, G.: AUTOMATED AND PERMANENT LONG-RANGE TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN A HIGH MOUNTAIN ENVIRONMENT: SETUP AND FIRST RESULTS, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2021, 153–160, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2021-153-2021, 2021. a
Wang, Y., Liang, X., Flener, C., Kukko, A., Kaartinen, H., Kurkela, M., Vaaja, M., Hyyppä, H., and Alho, P.: 3d modeling of coarse fluvial sediments based on mobile laser scanning data, Remote Sens., 5, 4571–4592, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5094571, 2013. a
Warren, S. G. and Brandt, R. E.: Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave: A revised compilation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D14220, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009744, 2008. a
Wilkinson, M., Jones, R., Woods, C., Gilment, S., McCaffrey, K., Kokkalas, S., and Long, J.: A comparison of terrestrial laser scanning and structure-from-motion photogrammetry as methods for digital outcrop acquisition, Geosphere, 12, 1865–1880, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01342.1, 2016. a
Williams, J. G., Rosser, N. J., Hardy, R. J., Brain, M. J., and Afana, A. A.: Optimising 4-D surface change detection: an approach for capturing rockfall magnitude–frequency, Earth Surf. Dynam., 6, 101–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-101-2018, 2018. a
Williams, J. G., Rosser, N. J., Hardy, R. J., and Brain, M. J.: The Importance of Monitoring Interval for Rockfall Magnitude-Frequency Estimation, J. Geophys. Res.-Ea. Surf., 124, 2841–2853, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005225, 2019. a
Xsens: Download MT Software Suite 2021.4, https://content.xsens.com/mt-software-suite-download (last access: 1 February 2022), 2021. a