Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-15-273-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-15-273-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Oct 2026
Research article |
| 12 Oct 2026
| 12 Oct 2026
THEMIS: spin axis magnetic field reconstruction
Adrian Pöppelwerth
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Hans-Ulrich Auster
Institute of Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Vassilis Angelopoulos
Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
James M. McTiernan
Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
James W. Lewis
Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Ferdinand Plaschke
Institute of Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Related authors
Lars Klingenstein, Niklas Grimmich, Yuri Y. Shprits, Adrian Pöppelwerth, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Ann. Geophys., 43, 835–854, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-835-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-835-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We applied machine learning to investigate how the solar wind and Earth's geomagnetic activity control the position of the magnetopause, the boundary layer of Earth's magnetic field. Our results demonstrate that geomagnetic activity strongly influences this boundary and should be incorporated in predictive models. Using data from multiple spacecraft, we developed a simple mathematical description of the magnetopause distance that improves understanding of solar wind–magnetosphere interactions.
Niklas Grimmich, Adrian Pöppelwerth, Martin Owain Archer, David Gary Sibeck, Ferdinand Plaschke, Wenli Mo, Vicki Toy-Edens, Drew Lawson Turner, Hyangpyo Kim, and Rumi Nakamura
Ann. Geophys., 43, 151–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-151-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-151-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The boundary of Earth's magnetic field, the magnetopause, deflects and reacts to the solar wind, the energetic particles emanating from the Sun. We find that certain types of solar wind favour the occurrence of deviations between the magnetopause locations observed by spacecraft and those predicted by models. In addition, the turbulent region in front of the magnetopause, the foreshock, has a large influence on the location of the magnetopause and thus on the accuracy of the model predictions.
Adrian Pöppelwerth, Georg Glebe, Johannes Z. D. Mieth, Florian Koller, Tomas Karlsson, Zoltán Vörös, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Ann. Geophys., 42, 271–284, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-271-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-271-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In the magnetosheath, a near-Earth region of space, we observe increases in plasma velocity and density, so-called jets. As they propagate towards Earth, jets interact with the ambient plasma. We study this interaction with three spacecraft simultaneously to infer their sizes. While previous studies have investigated their size almost exclusively statistically, we demonstrate a new method of determining the sizes of individual jets.
Adrian T. LaMoury, Leonard Schulz, Alexander Betzler, David Hercik, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Patrick Brown, Werner Magnes, Christoph Amtmann, Richard Baughen, Hao Cao, Irmgard Jernej, Roland Lammegger, Adam Masters, Ferdinand Plaschke, Xun Yu, Taylor Pomfret, Alex Strickland, Vaibhav Garg, and Michele K. Dougherty
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2054, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The ESA Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (Juice) mission flew past Earth and the Moon in August 2024, and this provided an opportunity to test the scientific instruments onboard the spacecraft. Here we show the measurements made by the Juice magnetometer, J-MAG, which measures the magnetic field in space. By comparing J-MAG observations with data from other spacecraft, we find that all parts of the instrument are working extremely well at this early stage in the mission.
Lars Klingenstein, Niklas Grimmich, Yuri Y. Shprits, Adrian Pöppelwerth, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Ann. Geophys., 43, 835–854, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-835-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-835-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We applied machine learning to investigate how the solar wind and Earth's geomagnetic activity control the position of the magnetopause, the boundary layer of Earth's magnetic field. Our results demonstrate that geomagnetic activity strongly influences this boundary and should be incorporated in predictive models. Using data from multiple spacecraft, we developed a simple mathematical description of the magnetopause distance that improves understanding of solar wind–magnetosphere interactions.
Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 14, 447–458, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We've compared the amplitude spectral densities of a fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) and an anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) magnetometer during ground testing with the amplitude spectral densities obtained in different regions of near-Earth space. The FGM can measure the fields in the different space regions and their fluctuations within a frequency range of 1 mHz to 2.5 Hz. The AMR magnetometer is only suitable for more turbulent regions such as the magnetosheath due to its higher noise levels.
Tomotaka M. Tanaka, Yasunobu Ogawa, Yuto Katoh, Mizuki Fukizawa, Anton Artemyev, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Xiao-Jia Zhang, Yoshimasa Tanaka, and Akira Kadokura
Ann. Geophys., 43, 621–631, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-621-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-621-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The magnetic mirror force bends the orbits of electrons precipitating into the atmosphere. It has been suggested that relativistic electrons make much less ionization due to the force than if it did not exist, but the actual effectivity in the atmospheric electron density has not been revealed. We used conjugated observational data from the ELFIN (Electron Losses and Fields INvestigation) satellite and the EISCAT (European Incoherent SCATter scientific radar system) Tromsø radar to find that the electron density decreased by about 40 % at 80 km altitude because of the force.
Niklas Grimmich, Adrian Pöppelwerth, Martin Owain Archer, David Gary Sibeck, Ferdinand Plaschke, Wenli Mo, Vicki Toy-Edens, Drew Lawson Turner, Hyangpyo Kim, and Rumi Nakamura
Ann. Geophys., 43, 151–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-151-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-151-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The boundary of Earth's magnetic field, the magnetopause, deflects and reacts to the solar wind, the energetic particles emanating from the Sun. We find that certain types of solar wind favour the occurrence of deviations between the magnetopause locations observed by spacecraft and those predicted by models. In addition, the turbulent region in front of the magnetopause, the foreshock, has a large influence on the location of the magnetopause and thus on the accuracy of the model predictions.
Niklas Grimmich, Ferdinand Plaschke, Benjamin Grison, Fabio Prencipe, Christophe Philippe Escoubet, Martin Owain Archer, Ovidiu Dragos Constantinescu, Stein Haaland, Rumi Nakamura, David Gary Sibeck, Fabien Darrouzet, Mykhaylo Hayosh, and Romain Maggiolo
Ann. Geophys., 42, 371–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-371-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-371-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we looked at the boundary between the Earth's magnetic field and the interplanetary magnetic field emitted by the Sun, called the magnetopause. While other studies focus on the magnetopause motion near Earth's Equator, we have studied it in polar regions. The motion of the magnetopause is faster towards the Earth than towards the Sun. We also found that the occurrence of unusual magnetopause locations is due to similar solar influences in the equatorial and polar regions.
Adrian Pöppelwerth, Georg Glebe, Johannes Z. D. Mieth, Florian Koller, Tomas Karlsson, Zoltán Vörös, and Ferdinand Plaschke
Ann. Geophys., 42, 271–284, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-271-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-271-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In the magnetosheath, a near-Earth region of space, we observe increases in plasma velocity and density, so-called jets. As they propagate towards Earth, jets interact with the ambient plasma. We study this interaction with three spacecraft simultaneously to infer their sizes. While previous studies have investigated their size almost exclusively statistically, we demonstrate a new method of determining the sizes of individual jets.
Tomas Karlsson, Ferdinand Plaschke, Austin N. Glass, and Jim M. Raines
Ann. Geophys., 42, 117–130, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-117-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The solar wind interacts with the planets in the solar system and creates a supersonic shock in front of them. The upstream region of this shock contains many complicated phenomena. One such phenomenon is small-scale structures of strong magnetic fields (SLAMS). These SLAMS have been observed at Earth and are important in determining the properties of space around the planet. Until now, SLAMS have not been observed at Mercury, but we show for the first time that SLAMS also exist there.
Leonard Schulz, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, Ferdinand Plaschke, Simon Toepfer, and Uwe Motschmann
Ann. Geophys., 41, 449–463, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-449-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The upper detection limit in reciprocal space, the spatial Nyquist limit, is derived for arbitrary spatial dimensions for the wave telescope analysis technique. This is important as future space plasma missions will incorporate larger numbers of spacecraft (>4). Our findings are a key element in planning the spatial distribution of future multi-point spacecraft missions. The wave telescope is a multi-dimensional power spectrum estimator; hence, this can be applied to other fields of research.
Homayon Aryan, Jacob Bortnik, Jinxing Li, James Michael Weygand, Xiangning Chu, and Vassilis Angelopoulos
Ann. Geophys., 40, 531–544, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-531-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we use a multipoint analysis of conjugate magnetospheric and ionospheric observations to investigate the magnetospheric and ionospheric responses to fast flow bursts that are associated with different space weather conditions. The results show that ionospheric currents are connected to the magnetospheric flows for different space weather conditions. The connection is more apparent and global for flows that are associated with a geomagnetically active condition.
Cited articles
Alken, P., Thébault, E., Beggan, C. D., et al.: International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation, Earth Planets Space, 73, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01288-x, 2021. a
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5–34, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1, 2008. a
Angelopoulos, V., Cruce, P., Drozdov, A., et al.: The Space Physics Environment Data Analysis System (SPEDAS), Space Sci. Rev., 215, 9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0576-4, 2019. a
Angelopoulos, V., Lewis, J., McTiernan, J., Grimes, E., Russell, C., Drozdov, A., Cruce, P., Hatzigeorgiu, N., Wu, J., Larson, D., McFadden, J., and Flores, A.: SPEDAS (Space Physics Environment Data Analysis System), Version 6.1, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15023025, 2024. a
Auster, H., Glassmeier, K., Magnes, W., andW. Baumjohann, O. A., Constantinescu, D., Fischer, D., Fornacon, K., Georgescu, E., Harvey, P., Hillenmaier, O., Kroth, R., Ludlam, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, R., Okrafka, K., Plaschke, F., Richter, I., Schwarzl, H., Stoll, B., Valavanoglou, A., and Wiedemann, M.: The THEMIS Fluxgate Magnetometer, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 235–264, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9365-9, 2008. a, b, c, d, e
Balogh, A.: Planetary Magnetic Field Measurements: Missions and Instrumentation, Space Sci. Rev., 152, 23–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9643-1, 2010. a
Bendat, J. S. and Piersol, A. G.: Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032428, 2010. a
Edmond, J., Raeder, J., Ferdousi, B., Argall, M., and Innocenti, M. E.: Clustering of Global Magnetospheric Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Machine Learning and Computation, 1, e2024JH000221, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JH000221, 2024. a, b
Frühauff, D., Plaschke, F., and Glassmeier, K.-H.: Spin axis offset calibration on THEMIS using mirror modes, Ann. Geophys., 35, 117–121, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-35-117-2017, 2017. a
Grimes, E. W., Lewis, J. W., Angelopoulos, V., McTiernan, J. M., Hatzigeorgiu, N., Drozdov, A., and Russell, C.: Pyspedas, a Python Implementation of SPEDAS, Abstract IN11B-0629, in: 2018 Fall Meeting, AGU, Washington, D.C., 10–14 December 2018. a
Grimmich, N., Plaschke, F., Archer, M. O., Heyner, D., Mieth, J. Z. D., Nakamura, R., and Sibeck, D. G.: Study of Extreme Magnetopause Distortions Under Varying Solar Wind Conditions, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 128, e2023JA031603, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031603, 2023. a
Gustafsson, F. K.: Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 44, 988–992, https://doi.org/10.1109/78.492552, 1996. a
Hedgecock, P. C.: A correlation technique for magnetometer zero level determination, Space Science Instrumentation, 1, 83–90, 1975. a
Kepko, E., Khurana, K., Kivelson, M., Elphic, R., and Russell, C.: Accurate determination of magnetic field gradients from four point vector measurements. I. Use of natural constraints on vector data obtained from a single spinning spacecraft, IEEE T. Magn., 32, 377–385, https://doi.org/10.1109/20.486522, 1996. a
Lucek, E. A., Constantinescu, D., Goldstein, M. L., Pickett, J., Pinçon, J. L., Sahraoui, F., Treumann, R. A., and Walker, S. N.: The Magnetosheath, Space Sci. Rev., 118, 95–152, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-3825-2, 2005. a
Matzka, J., Stolle, C., Yamazaki, Y., Bronkalla, O., and Morschhauser, A.: The Geomagnetic Kp Index and Derived Indices of Geomagnetic Activity, Space Weather, 19, e2020SW002641, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002641, 2021. a
McFadden, J., Carlson, C., Larson, D., Ludlam, M., Abiad, R., Elliott, B., Turin, P., Marckwordt, M., and Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS ESA Plasma Instrument and In-flight Calibration, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 277–302, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9440-2, 2008. a
Plaschke, F., Auster, H.-U., Fischer, D., Fornaçon, K.-H., Magnes, W., Richter, I., Constantinescu, D., and Narita, Y.: Advanced calibration of magnetometers on spin-stabilized spacecraft based on parameter decoupling, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 8, 63–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-63-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f
Pöppelwerth, A.: THEMIS Spin Axis Magnetic Field Reconstruction, Zenodo [software], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18594247, 2026. a
THEMIS: THEMIS mission including level 2 FGM and ESA data, http://themis.ssl.berkeley.edu/data/themis (last access: 29 July 2026), 2026. a
Thompson, M. T.: Chapter 14 – Analog Low-Pass Filters, in: Intuitive Analog Circuit Design (Second Edition), Newnes, Boston, 531–583, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405866-8.00014-0, 2014. a
Tsyganenko, N.: A magnetospheric magnetic field model with a warped tail current sheet, Planet. Space Sci., 37, 5–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(89)90066-4, 1989. a
Short summary
The Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms mission studies how the solar wind interacts with Earth’s magnetic field using five rotating spacecraft. After one spacecraft lost its measurements along its rotation axis, we used the two remaining magnetometer components with the spacecraft's spin to reconstruct the missing component with lower time resolution. A comparison with earlier data, when all components were available, shows that reconstruction is possible.
The Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms mission studies how the...
