Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
GI
Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-53-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-53-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
Research article
 | 
23 Mar 2016
Research article |  | 23 Mar 2016

Comparison between manual scaling and Autoscala automatic scaling applied to Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory ionograms

Carl-Fredrik Enell, Alexander Kozlovsky, Tauno Turunen, Thomas Ulich, Sirkku Välitalo, Carlo Scotto, and Michael Pezzopane

Viewed

Total article views: 3,089 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,661 1,252 176 3,089 177 200
  • HTML: 1,661
  • PDF: 1,252
  • XML: 176
  • Total: 3,089
  • BibTeX: 177
  • EndNote: 200
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2015)
Latest update: 17 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Ionograms from the Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory ionosonde (station SO166) were scaled automatically with the Autoscala software during a test period. The results were compared with manually scaled ionospheric parameters. In general, the F-layer parameters were found to agree well, whereas high-latitude phenomena like auroral E layers were often misidentified.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Multi-disciplinary research and integrated monitoring at the...