Dear authors,

Thank you for your revised manuscript. Based on the reviewer reports, I have recommended to reconsider your manuscript after major revisions. This will include a new review round. Please also find the following comments from my side:

- In your reply you refer to an analysis of wind speed and direction against difference in flux. I do encourage to include such analyses as supplementary materials.

- Please include a data availability statement in the manuscript.

- I support including a photograph of the open-field system, either in the main text or as appendix/supplementary materials.

Best,

Tim van Emmerik

Dear authors,

Thank you for submitted your revised manuscript. Supported by the positive reviewer report, I am happy to accept the manuscript.

I do insist on revising the Data Availability statement. Please consult GI's policy here: https://www.geoscientific-instrumentation-methods-and-data-systems.net/policies/data_policy.html. Note the specific requirement in case data are not publicly available: "If the data are not publicly accessible, a detailed explanation of why this is the case is required."

Best,

Tim van Emmerik