Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-483-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-483-2020
Research article
 | 
18 Dec 2020
Research article |  | 18 Dec 2020

Using near-surface atmospheric measurements as a proxy for quantifying field-scale soil gas flux

Andrew Barkwith, Stan E. Beaubien, Thomas Barlow, Karen Kirk, Thomas R. Lister, Maria C. Tartarello, and Helen Taylor-Curran

Related authors

Thresholds for estuarine compound flooding using a combined hydrodynamic–statistical modelling approach
Charlotte Lyddon, Nguyen Chien, Grigorios Vasilopoulos, Michael Ridgill, Sogol Moradian, Agnieszka Olbert, Thomas Coulthard, Andrew Barkwith, and Peter Robins
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 973–997, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-973-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-973-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Coastline Evolution Model 2D (CEM2D) V1.1
Chloe Leach, Tom Coulthard, Andrew Barkwith, Daniel R. Parsons, and Susan Manson
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5507–5523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5507-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5507-2021, 2021
Short summary
Development of an automatic delineation of cliff top and toe on very irregular planform coastlines (CliffMetrics v1.0)
Andres Payo, Bismarck Jigena Antelo, Martin Hurst, Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy, Chris Williams, Gareth Jenkins, Kathryn Lee, David Favis-Mortlock, Andrew Barkwith, and Michael A. Ellis
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4317–4337, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4317-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4317-2018, 2018
Short summary
Complex coastlines responding to climate change: do shoreline shapes reflect present forcing or “remember” the distant past?
Christopher W. Thomas, A. Brad Murray, Andrew D. Ashton, Martin D. Hurst, Andrew K. A. P. Barkwith, and Michael A. Ellis
Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 871–884, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-871-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-871-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Sensing
3D-printed Ag–AgCl electrodes for laboratory measurements of self-potential
Thomas S. L. Rowan, Vilelmini A. Karantoni, Adrian P. Butler, and Matthew D. Jackson
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 259–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-259-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-259-2023, 2023
Short summary
Response time correction of slow-response sensor data by deconvolution of the growth-law equation
Knut Ola Dølven, Juha Vierinen, Roberto Grilli, Jack Triest, and Bénédicte Ferré
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 293–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-293-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-293-2022, 2022
Short summary
Magnetic interference mapping of four types of unmanned aircraft systems intended for aeromagnetic surveying
Loughlin E. Tuck, Claire Samson, Jeremy Laliberté, and Michael Cunningham
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 10, 101–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-101-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-101-2021, 2021
Short summary
A novel permanent gauge-cam station for surface-flow observations on the Tiber River
Flavia Tauro, Andrea Petroselli, Maurizio Porfiri, Lorenzo Giandomenico, Guido Bernardi, Francesco Mele, Domenico Spina, and Salvatore Grimaldi
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 241–251, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-241-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-241-2016, 2016
Short summary
Practical considerations for enhanced-resolution coil-wrapped distributed temperature sensing
Koen Hilgersom, Tim van Emmerik, Anna Solcerova, Wouter Berghuijs, John Selker, and Nick van de Giesen
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 151–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-151-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-151-2016, 2016
Short summary

Cited articles

Ascione, A., Ciotoli, G., Bigi, S., Buscher, J., Mazzoli, S., Ruggiero, L., Sciarra, A., Tartarello, M. C., and Valente, E.: Assessing mantle versus crustal sources for non-volcanic degassing along fault zones in the actively extending southern Apennines mountain belt (Italy), GSA Bull., 130, 1697–1722, https://doi.org/10.1130/B31869.1, 2018. 
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance – A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York, p. 449, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1, 2012. 
Baldocchi, D. D. and Meyers, T.: On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: A perspective, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 90, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00072-5, 1998. 
Beaubien, S. E., Jones, D. G., Gal, F., Barkwith, A., Braibant, G., Baubron, J.-C., Ciotoli, G., Graziani, S., Lister, T. R., Lombardi, S., Michel, K., Quattrocchi, F., and Strutt, M. H.: Monitoring of near-surface gas geochemistry at the Weyburn, Canada, CO2-EOR site, 2001–2011, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 16, S236–S262, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.013, 2013. 
Billesbach, D. P., Fischer, M. L., Torn, M. S., and Berry, J. A.: A portable eddy covariance system for the measurement of ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of CO2, water vapor, and energy, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 639–650, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0639:APECSF>2.0.CO;2, 2004. 
Download
Short summary
Soil gas flux describes the movement of various gases either to or from the ground. Identifying changes in soil gas flux can lead to a better understanding and detection of leakage from carbon capture and storage (CCS) schemes, diffuse degassing in volcanic and geothermal areas, and greenhouse gas emissions. Traditional chamber-based techniques may require weeks of fieldwork to assess a site. We present a new method to speed up the assessment of diffuse leakage.