Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
GI
Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
Research article
 | 
08 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 08 Jul 2024

Comparing triple and single Doppler lidar wind measurements with sonic anemometer data based on a new filter strategy for virtual tower measurements

Kevin Wolz, Christopher Holst, Frank Beyrich, Eileen Päschke, and Matthias Mauder

Viewed

Total article views: 1,056 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
781 226 49 1,056 59 41
  • HTML: 781
  • PDF: 226
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 1,056
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 41
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Aug 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Aug 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,056 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,040 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 19 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We compared wind measurements using different lidar setups at various heights. The triple Doppler lidar, sonic anemometer, and two single Doppler lidars were tested. Overall, the lidar methods showed good agreement with the sonic anemometer. The triple Doppler lidar performed better than single Doppler lidars, especially at higher altitudes. We also developed a new filtering approach for virtual tower scanning strategies. Single Doppler lidars provide reliable wind data over flat terrain.
Read more