A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and  survey and its differences from satellite InSAR

Wolff, Charlotte; Derron, Marc-Henri; Rivolta, Carlo; Jaboyedoff, Michel

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024

Articles | Volume 13, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024

© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024

© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 13, issue 2

Research article

|

29 Jul 2024

Research article |

| 29 Jul 2024

A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and survey and its differences from satellite InSAR

Charlotte Wolff, Marc-Henri Derron, Carlo Rivolta, and Michel Jaboyedoff

Model code and software

charlottewolff/GB-PAR: first (first) Charlotte Wolff https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12820384

Short summary

The remote-sensing InSAR technique is vital for monitoring slope instabilities but requires understanding. This paper delves into differences between satellite and GB-InSAR. It offers a tool to determine the optimal GB-InSAR installation site, considering various technical, meteorological, and topographical factors. By generating detailed maps and simulating radar image characteristics, the tool eases the setup of monitoring campaigns for effective and accurate ground movement tracking.