Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024
Research article
 | 
29 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 29 Jul 2024

A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and survey and its differences from satellite InSAR

Charlotte Wolff, Marc-Henri Derron, Carlo Rivolta, and Michel Jaboyedoff

Related authors

Machine learning prediction of the mass and the velocity of controlled single-block rockfalls from the seismic waves they generate
Clément Hibert, François Noël, David Toe, Miloud Talib, Mathilde Desrues, Emmanuel Wyser, Ombeline Brenguier, Franck Bourrier, Renaud Toussaint, Jean-Philippe Malet, and Michel Jaboyedoff
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 641–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-641-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-641-2024, 2024
Short summary
Rockfall trajectory reconstruction: a flexible method utilizing video footage and high-resolution terrain models
François Noël, Michel Jaboyedoff, Andrin Caviezel, Clément Hibert, Franck Bourrier, and Jean-Philippe Malet
Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 1141–1164, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1141-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-1141-2022, 2022
Short summary
An explicit GPU-based material point method solver for elastoplastic problems (ep2-3De v1.0)
Emmanuel Wyser, Yury Alkhimenkov, Michel Jaboyedoff, and Yury Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7749–7774, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7749-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7749-2021, 2021
Short summary
An efficient two-layer landslide-tsunami numerical model: effects of momentum transfer validated with physical experiments of waves generated by granular landslides
Martin Franz, Michel Jaboyedoff, Ryan P. Mulligan, Yury Podladchikov, and W. Andy Take
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1229–1245, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1229-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1229-2021, 2021
Short summary
A fast and efficient MATLAB-based MPM solver: fMPMM-solver v1.1
Emmanuel Wyser, Yury Alkhimenkov, Michel Jaboyedoff, and Yury Y. Podladchikov
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 6265–6284, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6265-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6265-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Ground-based instruments
An underground drip water monitoring network to characterize rainfall recharge of groundwater at different geologies, environments, and climates across Australia
Andy Baker, Margaret Shanafield, Wendy Timms, Martin Sogaard Andersen, Stacey Priestley, and Marilu Melo Zurita
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 117–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Research and application of a flexible measuring array for deep displacement of landslides
Yang Li, Zhong Li, Qifeng Guo, Yimin Liu, and Daji Zhang
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 97–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-97-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-97-2024, 2024
Short summary
A hydrate reservoir renovation device and its application in nitrogen bubble fracturing
Jingsheng Lu, Yuanxin Yao, Dongliang Li, Jinhai Yang, Deqing Liang, Yiqun Zhang, Decai Lin, and Kunlin Ma
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 75–83, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-75-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-75-2024, 2024
Short summary
Gas equilibrium membrane inlet mass spectrometry (GE-MIMS) for water at high pressure
Matthias S. Brennwald, Antonio P. Rinaldi, Jocelyn Gisiger, Alba Zappone, and Rolf Kipfer
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-1-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a power station unit in a distributed hybrid acquisition system of seismic and electrical methods based on the narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT)
Feng Guo, Qisheng Zhang, and Shenghui Liu
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 111–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-111-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-111-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abellán, A., Oppikofer, T., Jaboyedoff, M., Rosser, N. J., Lim, M., and Lato, M. J.: Terrestrial laser scanning of rock slope instabilities: State-Of-Science (Terrestrial Lidar Vs. Rock Slope Instabilities), Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 39, 80–97, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3493, 2014. 
Addie, G.: A new true thickness formula based on the apparent dip, Econ. Geol., 63, 188–189, https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.63.2.188, 1968. 
Anon: ETSI EN 300 440 v2.1.1, https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300440/02.01.01_60/en_300440v020101p.pdf (last access: 25 April 2024), 2017. 
Antonello, G., Casagli, N., Farina, P., Fortuny, J., Leva, D., Nico, G., Sieber, A. J., and Tarchi, D.: A ground-based interferometer for the safety monitoring of landslides and structural deformations, in: IGARSS 2003, 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 21–25 July 2003, Toulouse, France, 218–220, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2003.1293729, 2003. 
Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R., and Sansosti, E.: A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 40, 2375–2383, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.803792, 2002. 
Download
Short summary
The remote-sensing InSAR technique is vital for monitoring slope instabilities but requires understanding. This paper delves into differences between satellite and GB-InSAR. It offers a tool to determine the optimal GB-InSAR installation site, considering various technical, meteorological, and topographical factors. By generating detailed maps and simulating radar image characteristics, the tool eases the setup of monitoring campaigns for effective and accurate ground movement tracking.