Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
GI
Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
Research article
 | 
29 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 29 Jul 2024

A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and survey and its differences from satellite InSAR

Charlotte Wolff, Marc-Henri Derron, Carlo Rivolta, and Michel Jaboyedoff

Viewed

Total article views: 932 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
674 218 40 932 36 36
  • HTML: 674
  • PDF: 218
  • XML: 40
  • Total: 932
  • BibTeX: 36
  • EndNote: 36
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 932 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 926 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
The remote-sensing InSAR technique is vital for monitoring slope instabilities but requires understanding. This paper delves into differences between satellite and GB-InSAR. It offers a tool to determine the optimal GB-InSAR installation site, considering various technical, meteorological, and topographical factors. By generating detailed maps and simulating radar image characteristics, the tool eases the setup of monitoring campaigns for effective and accurate ground movement tracking.
Read more