Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
GI
Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-447-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 2
Research article
 | 
08 Dec 2025
Research article |  | 08 Dec 2025

Comparison of noise levels of two magnetometer types and their suitability for different space environments

Gerlinde Timmermann, David Fischer, Hans-Ulrich Auster, Ingo Richter, Benjamin Grison, and Ferdinand Plaschke

Viewed

Total article views: 4,520 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,308 1,094 118 4,520 140 172
  • HTML: 3,308
  • PDF: 1,094
  • XML: 118
  • Total: 4,520
  • BibTeX: 140
  • EndNote: 172
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,520 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,518 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
We've compared the amplitude spectral densities of a fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) and an anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) magnetometer during ground testing with the amplitude spectral densities obtained in different regions of near-Earth space. The FGM can measure the fields in the different space regions and their fluctuations within a frequency range of 1 mHz to 2.5 Hz. The AMR magnetometer is only suitable for more turbulent regions such as the magnetosheath due to its higher noise levels.
Read more
Share