- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer review
- For authors
- For reviewers
- EGU publications

Journal cover
Journal topic
**Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems**
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal topic

- About
- Editorial board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer review
- For authors
- For reviewers
- EGU publications

- Abstract
- Introduction
- Description of the tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system
- Tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system: control and data acquisition
- Calibration of the fluxgate magnetometers using the open-loop tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system
- Conclusions
- Data availability
- Competing interests
- Acknowledgements
- References

**Research article**
12 Apr 2018

**Research article** | 12 Apr 2018

Tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system at the Alibag Magnetic Observatory: upgraded to a magnetic sensor calibration facility

- Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Dept. of Science & Technology, Govt. of India, Navi Mumbai 410218, India

- Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Dept. of Science & Technology, Govt. of India, Navi Mumbai 410218, India

**Correspondence**: Prasanna Mahavarkar (mahavarkarprasanna@gmail.com)

**Correspondence**: Prasanna Mahavarkar (mahavarkarprasanna@gmail.com)

Abstract

Back to toptop
A tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system for the study of palaeomagnetic studies, manufactured by GEOFYZIKA (former Czechoslovakia), was successfully commissioned at the Alibag Magnetic Observatory (IAGA code: ABG) in the year 1985. This system was used for a few years, after which the system encountered technical problems with the control unit. Rectification of the unit could not be undertaken, as the information document related to this system was not available, and as a result the system had been lying in an unused state for a long time, until 2015, when the system was recommissioned and upgraded to a test facility for calibrating the magnetometer sensors. We have upgraded the system with a constant current source and a data-logging unit. Both of these units have been designed and developed in the institute laboratory. Also, re-measurements of the existing system have been made thoroughly. The upgraded system is semi-automatic, enabling non-specialists to operate it after a brief period of instruction. This facility is now widely used at the parent institute and external institutions to calibrate magnetometers and it also serves as a national facility. Here the design of this system with the calibration results for the space-borne fluxgate magnetometers is presented.

Download & links

How to cite

Back to top
top
How to cite.

Mahavarkar, P., John, J., Dhapre, V., Dongre, V., and Labde, S.: Tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system at the Alibag Magnetic Observatory: upgraded to a magnetic sensor calibration facility, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 7, 143–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-7-143-2018, 2018.

1 Introduction

Back to toptop
The Helmholtz coil system, which is a useful in laboratory techniques, is normally used to generate magnetic field levels of specified volume and uniformity. These coils provide accurate means to perform numerous experiments and testing functions that require a known ambient magnetic field. The field generation can be either static, time-varying direct current or alternating current depending on the applications requirements. Typical applications include magnetometer calibration, magnetic compass calibration, satellite characterization and biomagnetic studies (Herceg et al., 2009). Square Helmholtz coils can be utilized instead of circular Helmholtz coils in the design, as they provide a wider uniform field of ≈ 5 L parallel to the coils compared to circular coils. The governing equation for the magnetic field B at the centre point of a square coil pair is

$$\begin{array}{}\text{(1)}& {\displaystyle}B={\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{2}{\mathit{\mu}}_{\mathrm{0}}NI}{\mathit{\pi}a}}{\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{2}}{(\mathrm{1}+{\mathit{\gamma}}^{\mathrm{2}})\sqrt{\mathrm{2}+{\mathit{\gamma}}^{\mathrm{2}}}}},\end{array}$$

where *μ*_{0} is the permeability of the vacuum, $\mathrm{4}\mathit{\pi}\times {\mathrm{10}}^{-\mathrm{7}}$ N A^{−2}; *N* is the number of wrappings; *I* is the current
passing through the coils; *a* is half the length of a side of the coil; and
*γ* is the ratio of the distance between the two coils 2*b* and the
length of the side of a coil 2*a* as shown in Fig. 1. In order to
achieve a homogeneous field at the mid-point of the square Helmholtz coil
pair, *γ* is 0.5445, which is a Helmholtz spacing ratio.
Equation (1) relies on the coils being orthogonal, centred and
properly spaced. “If the coils are not properly spaced, a profile similar to
that of Fig. 2 is achieved” (Brewer, 2012).

The square Helmholtz coil utilizes two pairs of square Helmholtz coils or three orthogonal pairs of Helmholtz coils which permit 3-axis control of a magnetic field within the coils. This configuration of three orthogonal square coil pairs is often referred to as a “Helmholtz cage”. Commercial cages are manufactured by Bartington Instruments Limited (Bartington), Serviciencia and Macintyre Electronic Design Associates, Inc. (MEDA). Several universities have built Helmholtz cages to develop and test sensors for space applications. Also, the Naval Post Graduate School (NPS) in Monterrey, CA, the University of Michigan (U-M) in Ann Arbor, MI (Klesh et al., 2010) and the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands (Poppenk et al., 2006, 2007) have all built Helmholtz cages (Brewer, 2012).

One such Helmholtz cage for the study of palaeomagnetic studies was
commissioned at the Alibag Magnetic Observatory in the year 1985. After a few
years of operation this system encountered technical problems associated with
the feedback mechanism of the closed-loop system and had to be abandoned.
This being a square Helmholtz coil system, we realized its importance for
calibrating ground and space based magnetometer sensors, and with this purpose
the system was redesigned by introducing a constant current source
(CCS) and a data logger. Also, all the technical parameters of the system were
recalculated (Table 1). This compact unit is now referred to as the
tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system. This system generates uniform,
accurate and precise magnetic fields in a volume of ≈ 5 L
(considering a cubic sensor of 17 cm^{3}), which is accurate to 1 nT about
the centre of the coil system and serves as a calibration facility for
both space- and ground-borne magnetometer sensors. The schematic of the system
is shown in Fig. 3.

2 Description of the tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system

Back to toptop
The tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system (cage) is a three-component device that uses three pairs of square field coils to produce a homogeneous magnetic field in the working space at the centre of the system. The individual coil pairs are spaced to fulfil the familiar Helmholtz condition that the second-order derivative of the field produced along the axis of the coil pairs is zero at the pair centre.

$$\begin{array}{ll}{\displaystyle}& {\displaystyle \frac{{d}^{\mathrm{2}}\mathrm{B}}{\mathrm{d}{x}^{\mathrm{2}}}}={\displaystyle \frac{N{\mathit{\mu}}_{\mathrm{o}}i{R}^{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{2}}}\left[-{\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{3}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{x}^{\mathrm{2}}\right)}^{\mathrm{5}/\mathrm{2}}}}+{\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{15}{x}^{\mathrm{2}}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{x}^{\mathrm{2}}\right)}^{\mathrm{7}/\mathrm{2}}}}\right.\\ {\displaystyle}& {\displaystyle}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\left.-{\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{3}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{x}^{\mathrm{2}}-\mathrm{2}sx+{s}^{\mathrm{2}}\right)}^{\mathrm{5}/\mathrm{2}}}}+{\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{15}(x-s{)}^{\mathrm{2}}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{x}^{\mathrm{2}}-\mathrm{2}sx+{s}^{\mathrm{2}}\right)}^{\mathrm{7}/\mathrm{2}}}}\right]\end{array}$$

At $x=s/\mathrm{2}$

$$\begin{array}{ll}{\displaystyle}& {\displaystyle \frac{{d}^{\mathrm{2}}\mathrm{B}}{\mathrm{d}{x}^{\mathrm{2}}}}{\mathrm{|}}_{s/\mathrm{2}}={\displaystyle \frac{N{\mathit{\mu}}_{\mathrm{o}}i{R}^{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{2}}}\left[-{\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{6}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{s}^{\mathrm{2}}/\mathrm{4}\right)}^{\mathrm{5}/\mathrm{2}}}}+{\displaystyle \frac{\mathrm{30}{s}^{\mathrm{2}}/\mathrm{4}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{s}^{\mathrm{2}}/\mathrm{4}\right)}^{\mathrm{7}/\mathrm{2}}}}\right]\\ {\displaystyle}& {\displaystyle}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}={\displaystyle \frac{N{\mathit{\mu}}_{\mathrm{o}}i{R}^{\mathrm{2}}}{\mathrm{2}}}\left[{\displaystyle \frac{-\mathrm{6}\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{s}^{\mathrm{2}}/\mathrm{4}\right)+\mathrm{30}{s}^{\mathrm{2}}/\mathrm{4}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{s}^{\mathrm{2}}/\mathrm{4}\right)}^{\mathrm{7}/\mathrm{2}}}}\right]\\ {\displaystyle}& {\displaystyle}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}=\mathrm{3}N{\mathit{\mu}}_{\mathrm{o}}i{R}^{\mathrm{2}}{\displaystyle \frac{{s}^{\mathrm{2}}-{R}^{\mathrm{2}}}{{\left({R}^{\mathrm{2}}+{s}^{\mathrm{2}}/\mathrm{4}\right)}^{\mathrm{7}/\mathrm{2}}}}\end{array}$$

Clearly, this is zero if *s*=*R*.

This appropriate spacing of the square field coils is 0.5445 at the side of
the square. These dimensions provide optimal uniformity over a region. This
system yields a working-space volume of approx. 5 L (considering a cubic
sensor of 17 cm^{3}) with a maximum of ±2 nT of the added field
homogeneity deviation and is realized by using the square-shaped coils of
2–2.5 m in size. The coils are supported by a borosilicate glass piping
construction to electrically isolate the coils from the support structure
(Fig. 7). The primary glass support structure at the end corners is
joined using a female square-design six-way cross aluminium connector, to
which a Bakelite bracket is fixed using a nut and bolt. Borosilicate glass is
selectively chosen as it possess outstanding corrosion resistance and low
coefficients of thermal expansion. The piping appears clear and colourless as
borosilicate glass shows no appreciable absorption in the visible region of
the spectrum. The
coefficient of thermal expansion of aluminium (Hidnert, 2018) is greater than
that of borosilicate glass. As a result the corners remain intact for years.
The Bakelite bracket is a rounded triangle quarter and the radii of the
quarters are 149.86 and 124 mm. This bracket is used for rolling the coil at
the edges and ensures additional stiffness. Additional strength is provided
to the primary glass assembly by implementing a triangular-structure design
where the apex of the triangle joins the corners and the three corners of the
base meet the adjacent sides of the primary glass frame (Fig. 4).
Also, thin Bakelite blocks have been fixed to the support frame using a
strong adhesive to hold the coils (Fig. 6). These serve as an
intermediary between the coil and the support frame and are uniformly spaced
all along the length of the frame. This construction design yields a cage
that ensures stability of the system geometry independent of the
environmental parameters and time. The diameter of the primary glass tube is
172 mm and for the glass tube implemented in the triangular structure it is
146 mm. The surface area of the aluminium connector is 2053.5 cm^{2}.
Bakelite is used for its electrical non-conductive and heat-resistant
properties.

The coils consist of 12 AWG copper wires wound to attain the shape of a
cuboid. The wind is parallel to the length of the cuboid. The thickness of
the wire is 127 mm. The wires are laid in neat rows so that the magnetic
field is completely perpendicular to the flow of the current. There are two
electrically isolated wires in each coil. However the number of turns was not
known. The final coil is wrapped with insulation of 0.7 mm thickness. The
outermost coil is a pair of wires and is a perfect square
with an area 62 500 cm^{2} (*a*=250 cm). The spacing between the pair
is 136 cm. The inner pair is also a square with an area of 40 000 cm^{2}
(*a*=200 cm) and nests within the outer coil. The spacing between the pair
is 110 cm. The innermost pair is again a perfect square of 50 625 cm^{2}
(*a*=225 cm) with 123 cm spacing between the pair and is nested within
the other two coils. The wrapped coils were installed into the cage in a
certain orientation based on several factors. First and foremost was the
consideration of the ambient magnetic field at the proposed cage location.
The geomagnetic field is commonly defined with +*x* pointing north, +*y*
pointing east and +*z* pointing down. The cage axes were selected to match
this definition (Brewer, 2012). The coils controlling the *z* axis are the
largest coils. The next consideration involved the *x* or north component of
the ambient magnetic field, which is larger than the *y* or east component.
If the direction of the *x* component needed to be reversed, a higher
magnitude magnetic field would be required than that required to flip the *y*
direction magnetic field. Larger magnetic fields are generated by smaller
coils which have the same current and number of coils, but it also has a
smaller uniform volume, so a large field will give a higher deviation; thus
the smallest coil was selected to control the *x* direction. Therefore, the
remaining middle-sized coil controls the *y* direction (Brewer, 2012). The
final cage is shown in Fig. 5.

3 Tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system: control and data acquisition

Back to toptop
The system includes a CCS and a data logger. The CCS, which has been
developed in-house, is an electronic unit which feeds an ultra-stable and
accurate current into the coil, by which a known and stable magnetic field is
generated. This magnetic field is then sensed by the magnetometer and logged
into the data logger. The CCS is designed to provide a stable constant
current of 1 mA to 1 A with steps of 20 µA. The coil constants
and current resolution provide a magnetic field of at least
≈ 1.5 nT [20 µA × coil constant
nT mA^{−1}]. It can supply a maximum of 1A current to the coil which can
produce enough magnetic field to calibrate any magnetometer (fluxgate, proton
precession magnetometer, Overhauser etc.) within the range of nT to mT. The
CCS mainly consists of three components of which DAC LTC1657 is the key
component, providing an ultra-stable current. LTC1657 is a parallel 16 bit
rail-to-rail micropower DAC and provides an ultra-stable analogue voltage
output for the given 16 bit digital inputs. The output of DAC is amplified
by a gain of 3 with the op-amp; thus the minimum output voltage resolution
achieved by the DAC is 187.5 µV. Current feeding to the coil from
the CCS is referenced to a high-precision power resister of 10 Ω and
hence the minimum current resolution achieved is 18.75 µA.
Considering the noise performance of the DAC and the PCB board we have
achieved up to 20 µA stable output current step to the coil. The
CCS can feed a stable current in the range of 1 mA to 1 A to the coil
system, which corresponds to (1 mA × 68.44 nT mA^{−1})
68.44 nT minimum and (1 A × 68.44 nT mA^{−1}) 68 440 nT
maximum magnetic field with the steps of ≈ 1.5 nT. LTC1657 is
chosen because of its very low deglitched voltage output of 8 nV max and
differential non-linearity (DNL) of ±1 LSB max (refer data sheet of
LTC1657). The other useful feature of LTC1657 is the stable internal
reference voltage and internally buffered output voltage that makes this IC
very appropriate for our application. The second key component is the op-amp
LT1014 and 2N3055 power transistor. These deliver a constant current to the
coil system. The 2N3055 power transistor is NPN silicon which has a high
power rating and a very low temperature drift. The op-amp and transistor
configuration make a very accurate constant current source whose input is fed
by the DAC. The third component is the digital inputs feeding to the DAC. It
comprises of 5-digit rotatory BCD switches for human input to set the current
value, CD4510 presetable up/down counters and CD4040 ripple binary counters.
The CCS circuit operates on a stable ±12 V DC supply, although a few of
the integrated circuits (ICs) work on +5 V DC which is provided by the
main +12 V supply through a +5 V voltage regulator. It is very
important to have a high-quality ground for this circuit to work efficiently.
Here ground noise is kept below 1 mVpp. There are three electronic boards
for each coil of the Helmholtz coil system and all three are identical in
design. Provision is made to reverse the current in all the three coils by
using a two-pole two-way toggle switch. This enables the CCS to generate
a magnetic field in every possible direction in the
coil, and thus calibration accuracy improves.

4 Calibration of the fluxgate magnetometers using the open-loop tri-axial square Helmholtz coil system

Back to toptop
Very precise Earth magnetic field measurements have been made in space using
fluxgate magnetometers in combination with scalar magnetometers (Musmann and
Afanassiev, 2010), but only a few detailed descriptions about the theory and
how to design and calibrate space fluxgate magnetometers have been published.
The goal of this experiment was to determine whether or not the fluxgate can be
calibrated using this system. The tested fluxgate sensor, referred
to as the EUT (equipment under test) (Fig. 8), is a tri-axial fluxgate
magnetometer procured from Watson Industries Inc., 3035 Melby St., Eau
Claire, WI 54703, USA (Watson Industries, 2015). The sensor is mounted on a
non-magnetic table, referred to as the test stand, which is placed at the
centre of the Helmholtz cage. The test stand is made out of non-magnetic
material and can be adjusted to various heights using a spirit level of 6 s
sensitivity. The sensor is mounted so that sensor axes are aligned along the *h*,
*d* and *z* directions. When using a CCS the magnetic
fields along the three directions can vary. A set of measurements is
tabulated by passing currents ranging from 50 to 500 mA through one of the
coils in the forward and reverse directions. The input field in nT is
calculated using the following formula. Similarly, the other two components can be
calibrated.

$$}\mathrm{\text{Inputfield}}=\text{initialfield}+\left(\text{inputcurrent}\times \text{coilconstant}\right)$$

The fluxgate provides all three axes of magnetic field data as analogue voltages in the range of ±10 V output, which corresponds to ±60 000 nT (since 1 V ⇒ 6000 nT). This output is fed to a data logger, referred to as the nTLOGGER. ADAM-4017, which is a part of the nTLOGGER, which is a 16 bit commercially available A-D converter, converts inputs from three fluxgate sensors to digital form. It gives a resolution of ±4 nT. The nTLOGGER is a dual-core Intel-Atom-processor-based small data acquisition computer equipped with a GPS timing module developed in-house. It runs on a Windows operating system, containing the LabVIEW-based nTLOG data acquisition programme. Since the output of ADAM-4017 is in RS-485 format it is converted to RS-232 format by using ADAM-4520.

Figures 9, 10 and 11 show the comparison plots of input field and the measured field obtained for the three different coils and for one particular sensor. These results confirm that the field measured by the sensor is in agreement with the input current (input field) with a difference of a few nT at small currents and increasing to ≤ 1000 nT at higher inputs. This behaviour is attributed to the sensor alignment at the centre of the cage. For repeat experiments conducted on any random day and for three more sensors, the repeatability of the results is observed and hence we conclude that the system (mechanical hardware and the electronics) is stable against thermal changes. The curves for one more sensor is shown in Figs. 12, 13 and 14.

5 Conclusions

Back to toptop
The measured fields in the cage volume are influenced by the natural variations due to the geomagnetic field. This system, being an open-loop system, has no feedback mechanism for the cancellation of these variations. To negate the effects of these geomagnetic fields a closed-loop system has to be implemented. We are in the process of designing such a mechanism. Further, the mechanical structure of a tri-axial system necessarily becomes rather complicated, and the systems described so far have a tendency to be heavy and bulky. This problem is believed to be overcome by a compact spherical coil system. We are also in the design stage of the circular Helmholtz coil system.

Data availability

Back to toptop
Data availability.

These data are not publicly accessible as they are generated from the fluxgate magnetometers, which are the property of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Dept. of Space, Govt. of India. These magnetometers were calibrated with the square Helmholtz coil system in the Alibag Magnetic Observatory.

Competing interests

Back to toptop
Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Back to toptop
Acknowledgements.

The authors would like to thank the technical staff of the Alibag Magnetic
Observatory for providing all the necessary technical assistance during the
re-measurement of all the system parameters. This development activity was
funded by the institute.

Edited by: Marina Díaz-Michelena

Reviewed by: Lars W. Pedersen and one anonymous referee

References

Back to toptop
Bartington Instruments Limited: http://www.bartington.com/catalogs/helmholtz-coil-systems, last access: 3 April 2018.

Brewer, M. R.: CubeSat Attitude Determination and Helmholtz Cage Design, Master thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Air University, US, available at: https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA557488.xhtml (last access: 3 April 2018), 2012.

Herceg, D., Juhas, A., and Milutinov, M.: A Design of a Four Square Coil System for a Biomagnetic Experiment, Facta Universitatis, Series: Electronics and Energetics, 22, 285–292, 2009.

Hidnert, P.: Thermal Expansion of Aluminum and various important Aluminum Alloys, available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ScientificPapers/nbsscientificpaper497vol19_A2b.pdf, last access: 3 April 2018

Klesh, A., Seagraves, S., Bennett, M., Boone, D., Cutler, J., and Bahcivank, H.: Dynamically Driven Helmholtz Cage for Experimental Magnetic Attitude Determination, in: Astrodynamics 2009 – Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 135, 147–160, 2010.

Macintyre Electronic Design Associates, Inc.: http://www.meda.com, last access: 3 April 2018.

Musmann, G. and Afanassiev, Y.: Fluxgate Magnetometers for Space Research, BoD – Books on Demand, 2010.

Poppenk, F. M. and Amini, R.: Delfi-C3 Control System Development and Verification, in: Proc. 57th International Astronautical Congress, Valencia, Spain, 2–6 October 2006, 9 pp., 2006.

Poppenk, F. M., Amini, R., and Brouwer, G. F.: Design and Application of a Helmholtz Cage for Testing Nano-Satellites, in: Proc. 6th International Symposium on Environmental Testing for Space Programmes, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 12–14 June 2007, 9 pp., 2007.

Rudd, M. E. and Craig, J. R.: Optimum Spacing of Square and Circular Coil Pairs, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 39, 1372, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1683678, 1968.

Watson Industries, Inc.: Precision Triaxial Fluxgate Magnetometer FGM-301, available at: http://watson-gyro.com/wp-content/uploads/delightful-downloads/2015/06/fluxgatemagnetometer-FGM-301-spec.pdf, last access: 3 April 2018.

Short summary

The authors have successfully recommissioned an unused tri-axial Helmholtz coil system. The system now serves as a national facility for calibrating magnetometers.

The authors have successfully recommissioned an unused tri-axial Helmholtz coil system. The...

Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems

An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union