Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-267-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-267-2020
Research article
 | 
09 Jul 2020
Research article |  | 09 Jul 2020

Auroral classification ergonomics and the implications for machine learning

Derek McKay and Andreas Kvammen

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Derek McKay on behalf of the Authors (07 May 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (12 May 2020) by Flavia Tauro
RR by Anonymous Reviewer #1 (15 May 2020)
RR by Anonymous Reviewer #2 (26 May 2020)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (28 May 2020) by Flavia Tauro
AR by Derek McKay on behalf of the Authors (06 Jun 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (16 Jun 2020) by Flavia Tauro
AR by Derek McKay on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2020)
Download
Short summary
Researchers are making increasing use of machine learning to improve accuracy, efficiency and consistency. During such a study of the aurora, it was noted that biases or distortions had crept into the data because of the conditions (or ergonomics) of the human trainers. As using machine-learning techniques in auroral research is relatively new, it is critical that such biases are brought to the attention of the academic and citizen science communities.