Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-471-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-471-2020
Research article
 | 
16 Dec 2020
Research article |  | 16 Dec 2020

Mathematical foundation of Capon's method for planetary magnetic field analysis

Simon Toepfer, Yasuhito Narita, Daniel Heyner, Patrick Kolhey, and Uwe Motschmann

Related authors

Scalar-potential mapping of the steady-state magnetosheath model
Yasuhito Narita, Daniel Schmid, and Simon Toepfer
Ann. Geophys., 42, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024, 2024
Short summary
The m-dimensional spatial Nyquist limit using the wave telescope for larger numbers of spacecraft
Leonard Schulz, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, Ferdinand Plaschke, Simon Toepfer, and Uwe Motschmann
Ann. Geophys., 41, 449–463, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-449-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-449-2023, 2023
Short summary
Concerning the detection of electromagnetic knot structures in space plasmas using the wave telescope technique
Simon Toepfer, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, and Uwe Motschmann
Ann. Geophys., 41, 253–267, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-253-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-253-2023, 2023
Short summary
Magnetopause as conformal mapping
Yasuhito Narita, Simon Toepfer, and Daniel Schmid
Ann. Geophys., 41, 87–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023, 2023
Short summary
Reconstruction of Mercury's internal magnetic field beyond the octupole
Simon Toepfer, Ida Oertel, Vanita Schiron, Yasuhito Narita, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, Daniel Heyner, Patrick Kolhey, and Uwe Motschmann
Ann. Geophys., 40, 91–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-91-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-91-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, B. J., Johnson, C. L., Korth, H., Purucker, M. E., Winslow, R. M., Slavin, J. A., Solomon, S. C., McNutt Jr., R. L., Raines, J. M., and Zurbuchen, T. H.: The global magnetic field of Mercury from MESSENGER orbital observations, Science, 333, 1859–1862, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211001, 2011. a
Anderson, B. J., Johnson, C., L., Korth, H., Winslow, R. M., Borovsky, J. E., Purucker, M. E., Slavin, J. A., Solomon, S. C., Zuber, M. T., and McNutt Jr., R. L.: Low-degree structure in Mercury's planetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 117, E00L12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JE004159, 2012. a
Benkhoff, J., van Casteren, J., Hayakawa, H., Fujimoto, M., Laakso, H., Novara, M., Ferri, P., Middleton, H. R., and Ziethe, R.: BepiColombo – Comprehensive exploration of Mercury: Mission overview and science goals, Planet. Space Sci., 85, 2–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2009.09.020, 2010. a
Capon, J.: High resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis, Proc. IEEE, 57, 1408–1418, https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1969.7278, 1969. a, b
Carlson, B. D.: Covariance matrix estimation errors and diagonal loading in adaptive arrays, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 24, 397–401, https://doi.org/10.1109/7.7181, 1988. a
Download
Short summary
The Capon method serves as a powerful and robust data analysis tool when working on various kinds of ill-posed inverse problems. Besides the analysis of waves, the method can be used in a generalized way to compare actual measurements with theoretical models, such as Mercury's magnetic field analysis. In view to the BepiColombo mission this work establishes a mathematical basis for the application of Capon's method to analyze Mercury's internal magnetic field in a robust and manageable way.
Share