Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-335-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-335-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Accuracies of field CO2–H2O data from open-path eddy-covariance flux systems: assessment based on atmospheric physics and biological environment
Xinhua Zhou
Ker Research and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and
Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110016, China
Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT 84321, USA
Ker Research and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and
Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110016, China
Qingyuan Forest CERN, National Observation and Research Station,
Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110016, China
Ker Research and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and
Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110016, China
Beijing Servirst Technology Limited, Beijing 100085, China
Bai Yang
Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT 84321, USA
Yanlei Li
Ker Research and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and
Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110016, China
Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT 84321, USA
Fengyuan Yu
Ker Research and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and
Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110016, China
Qingyuan Forest CERN, National Observation and Research Station,
Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110016, China
Tala Awada
School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
68583, USA
Jiaojun Zhu
Ker Research and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and
Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110016, China
Qingyuan Forest CERN, National Observation and Research Station,
Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110016, China
Related authors
Xinhua Zhou, Zhi Chen, Ryan Campbell, Atefeh Hosseini, Tian Gao, Xiufen Li, Jianmin Chu, Sen Wu, Ning Zheng, and Jiaojun Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4576, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4576, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
To help environmental researchers better understand the sources of greenhouse gas measurements, we developed a practical method for field instruments to calculate the footprints. By using simplified math and efficient computing, our approach allows real-time analysis of measurement zones, which was previously too complex for on-site processing. This enables more accurate data collection worldwide, helping improve climate change monitoring and ecosystem studies.
Dexiong Teng, Jiaojun Zhu, Tian Gao, Fengyuan Yu, Yuan Zhu, Xinhua Zhou, and Bai Yang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5581–5599, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5581-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5581-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Dense canopy weakens turbulent mixing, leading to significant CO2 storage (Fs), a key part of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measured using eddy covariance. Gust-biased Fs measurements complicate NEE estimation in forests with complex terrain. We analyzed gust-induced CO2 fluctuations and their impact on Fs. Fs and its contribution to NEE can be explained by terrain complexity and turbulent mixing. This work highlights how gusts over complex terrain affect the Fs and NEE measurements.
Xinhua Zhou, Tian Gao, Eugene S. Takle, Xiaojie Zhen, Andrew E. Suyker, Tala Awada, Jane Okalebo, and Jiaojun Zhu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 95–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-95-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-95-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Air temperature from sonic temperature and air moisture has been used without an exact equation. We present an exact equation of such air temperature for closed-path eddy-covariance flux measurements. Air temperature from this equation is equivalent to sonic temperature in its accuracy and frequency response. It is a choice for advanced flux topics because, with it, thermodynamic variables in the flux measurements can be temporally synchronized and spatially matched at measurement scales.
Xinhua Zhou, Zhi Chen, Ryan Campbell, Atefeh Hosseini, Tian Gao, Xiufen Li, Jianmin Chu, Sen Wu, Ning Zheng, and Jiaojun Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4576, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4576, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
To help environmental researchers better understand the sources of greenhouse gas measurements, we developed a practical method for field instruments to calculate the footprints. By using simplified math and efficient computing, our approach allows real-time analysis of measurement zones, which was previously too complex for on-site processing. This enables more accurate data collection worldwide, helping improve climate change monitoring and ecosystem studies.
Dexiong Teng, Jiaojun Zhu, Tian Gao, Fengyuan Yu, Yuan Zhu, Xinhua Zhou, and Bai Yang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5581–5599, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5581-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5581-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Dense canopy weakens turbulent mixing, leading to significant CO2 storage (Fs), a key part of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measured using eddy covariance. Gust-biased Fs measurements complicate NEE estimation in forests with complex terrain. We analyzed gust-induced CO2 fluctuations and their impact on Fs. Fs and its contribution to NEE can be explained by terrain complexity and turbulent mixing. This work highlights how gusts over complex terrain affect the Fs and NEE measurements.
Xinhua Zhou, Tian Gao, Eugene S. Takle, Xiaojie Zhen, Andrew E. Suyker, Tala Awada, Jane Okalebo, and Jiaojun Zhu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 95–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-95-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-95-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Air temperature from sonic temperature and air moisture has been used without an exact equation. We present an exact equation of such air temperature for closed-path eddy-covariance flux measurements. Air temperature from this equation is equivalent to sonic temperature in its accuracy and frequency response. It is a choice for advanced flux topics because, with it, thermodynamic variables in the flux measurements can be temporally synchronized and spatially matched at measurement scales.
Cited articles
AmeriFlux: Data Variables, 1–12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
http://ameriflux.lbl.gov/data/aboutdata/data-variables/ (last access: 11 October 2022), 2018.
Andreas, E. L.: The effects of volume averaging on spectra measured with a
Lyman-Alpha hygrometer, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 20, 467–475, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<0467:TEOVAO>2.0.CO;2, 1981.
Anthoni, P. M., Law, B. E., and Unworth, M. H.: Carbon and water vapor
exchange of an open-canopied ponderosa pine ecosystem, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 95, 151–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00029-5, 1999.
Anthoni, P. M., Freibauer, A., Kolle, O., and Schulze, E. D.: Winter wheat
carbon exchange in Thurngia, Germany, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 121,
55–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00162-X, 2004.
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds.): Eddy Covariance: A Practical
Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, New York, 438 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1, 2012.
Buck, A. L.: New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement
factor, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1527–1532,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<1527:NEFCVP>2.0.CO;2, 1981.
Burba, G., McDermitt, D. K., Grelle, A., Anderson, D. J., and Xu, L. K.: Addressing the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements of CO2
flux from open-path gas analyzers, Glob. Change Biol., 14, 1854–1876, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01606.x, 2008.
Burden, R. L., Faires, J. D., and Burden, A. M: Numerical Analysis, 10th Edn.,
Gengage Learning, Boston, 896 pp., https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4830.2406, 2016.
Campbell Scientific Inc.: CPEC300/306/310 Closed-Path Eddy-Covariance
Systems, Revision 08/21, Logan, UT, USA, 92 pp., 2021a.
Campbell Scientific Inc.: EC150 Open-Path Gas Analyzer,
Revision 09/21, Logan, UT, USA, 41 pp., 2021b.
Csavina, J., Roberti, J. A., Taylor, J. R., and Loescher, H. W.: Traceable
measurements and calibration: A primer on uncertainty analysis, Ecosphere,
8, e01683, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1683, 2017.
Finnigan, J.: An introduction to flux measurements in difficult conditions,
Ecol. Appl., 18, 1340–1350, https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2105.1, 2008.
Flanagan L. B. and Johnson, B. G.: Interacting effects of temperature, soil
moisture, and plant biomass production on ecosystem respiration in a north
temperate grassland, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 130, 237–253,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.04.002, 2005.
Foken, T.: The energy ballance closure problem: An overview, Ecol.
Appl., 18, 1351–1367, https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0922.1, 2008.
Foken, T., Göckede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B. D., and Munger,
J. W.: Post-field data quality control, in: Handbook of Micrometeorology: A
Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis, edited by: Lee, X., Massman,
W., and Law, B., 181–208, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2265-4_9, 2004.
Foken, T., Leuning, R., Onley, S. R., Mauder, M., and Aubinet, M.: Correction
and data quality control, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practice Guide to
Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale,
D., 85–131, Springer, New York,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_4, 2012.
Fratini, G., McDermitt, D. K., and Papale, D.: Eddy-covariance flux errors due to biases in gas concentration measurements: origins, quantification and correction, Biogeosciences, 11, 1037–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-1037-2014, 2014.
Global Monitoring Laboratory: Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide, https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/weekly.html, last access: 31 August 2022.
Goulden, M. L., Munger, J. W., Fan, S. M., Daube, B. C., and Wofsy, S. C.:
Measurements of carbon sequstration by long-term eddy covariance: Method and
a critical evaluation of accuracy, Glob. Change Biol., 2, 169–181,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1996.tb00070.x, 1996.
Hill, T., Chocholek, M., and Clement, R.: The case for increasing the
statistical power of eddy covariance ecosystem studies: Why, where and how,
Glob. Change Biol., 23, 2154–2165, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13547,
2017.
Hoel, P. G.: Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 5th Edn., John Wiley
& Son, New York, 435 pp., https://www.wiley.com/en-us/9780471890454 (last access: 12 October 2022), 1984.
Horst, T. W.: On frequency response corrections for eddy covariance flux
measurements: Research note, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 94, 517–520,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002427517744, 2000.
Ibrom, A., Dellwik, E., Flyvbjerg, H., Jensen, N. O., and Pilegaard, K.:
Strong low-pass filtering effects on water vapour flux measurements with
closed-path eddy correlation systems, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 147, 140–156,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.07.007, 2007.
ISO: Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results
– Part 1: General principles and definitions, ISO 5725-1, 1994, reviewed
in 2012, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva,
Switzerland, 17 pp., 2012.
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology: Evaluation of measurement data:
Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 1st Edn., Research
Triangle Park, NC, USA, JCGM Member Organization, ISO/IEC Guide 98-3, 2008.
Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows:
Their Structure and Measurement, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 289 pp., https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195062397.001.0001,
1994.
Kaimal, J. C. and Haugen, D. J.: Some errors in the measurement of Reynold
stress, J. Appl. Meteorol., 8, 460–462, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26174564 (last access: 11 October 2022), 1969.
Katul, G., Gava, D., Poggi, D., Albertson, J., and Mahrt, L.: Stationary,
homogeneity, and ergodicity in canopy turbulence, in: Handbook of
Micrometeology: A Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis, edited by:
Lee, X., Massman, W., and Law, B., 161–180, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2265-4_8, 2004.
Laubach, J. and McNaughton, K. G.: A spectrum-independent procedure for
correcting eddy fluxes measured with separated sensors, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 89, 445–467, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001759903058, 1998.
Lee, X. and Massman, W. J.: A perspective on thirty years of the Webb,
Pearman and Leuning density corrections, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 139,
37–59, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9575-z, 2011.
Lee, X., Fuentes, J. D., Staebler, R. M., and Neumann, H. H.: Long-term
observation of the atmospheric exchange of CO2 with a temperate
deciduous forest in southern Ontario, Canada, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 104, 15975–15984, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900227, 1999.
Lenschow, D. H., Mann, J., and Kristensen, L.: How long is long enough when
measuring flues and other turbulence statistics?, J. Atmos.
Ocean. Technol., 11, 661–673, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<0661:HLILEW>2.0.CO;2,
1994.
LI–COR Biosciences: LI–7500 Analyzer: Instruction
Manual, 2-1–2-16, Lincoln, NE, USA, 2001.
LI–COR Biosciences: LI–610 Portable Dew Point Generator: Operating and Service
Manual, 3-1–3-13, Lincoln, NE, USA, 2004.
LI–COR Biosciences: EddyPro® Software
Instruction, Version 7, 1-1–6-74, Lincoln, NE, USA,
2021a.
LI–COR Biosciences: LI–7200RS Enclosed Gas Analyzer:
Instruction Manual, 11-1–11-7, Lincoln, NE, USA, 2021b.
LI–COR Biosciences: Using the LI–7500DS Open Path Gas
Analyzer and the SmartFlux 3 System, 11-1–11-8, Lincoln, NE, USA, 2021c.
Massman, W. J.: A simple method for estimating frequency response
corrections for eddy covariance systems, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 104, 185–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00164-7, 2000.
McDermitt, D. K., Welles, J. M., and Eckles, R. D.: Effects of temperature,
pressure and water vapor on gas phase infrared absorption by CO2,
LI–COR Application Note #116, 5 pp., 1993.
Moncrieff, J. B., Massheder, J. M., de Bruin, H., Elbers, J., Friborg, T.,
Heusinkveld, B., Kabat, P., Scott, S., Soegaard, H., and Verhoef, A.: A
system to measure surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, water vapour
and carbon dioxide, J. Hydrol., 188–189, 589–611,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03194-0, 1997.
Moore, C. J.: Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 17–35, https//doi.org/10.1007/BF00122754,
1986.
Munger, W. J., Loescher, H. W., and Luo, H.: Measurement, tower, and site
design considerations, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practice Guide to Measurement
and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., 21–58,
Springer, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_2, 2012.
National Weather Service: Fast Facts, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, https://www.weather.gov, last access: 31 August 2022.
Ohkubo, S., Kosugi, Y., Takanashi, S., Matsuo, N., Tani, M., and Nik, A. R.:
Vertical profiles and storage fluxes of CO2, heat and water in a
tropical rainforest at Pasoh, Peninsular Malaysia, Tellus B, 60, 569–582,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00367.x, 2008.
Rannik, Ü. and Vesala, T.: Autoregressive filtering versus linear
detrending in estimation of fluxes by the eddy covariance method,
Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 91, 259–280, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001840416858, 1999.
Richardson, A. D. and Hollinger, D. Y.: A method to estimate the additional
uncerttainty in gap-filled NEE resulting from long gaps in the CO2 flux
record, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 147, 199–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.06.004, 2007.
Richardson, A. D., Aubinet, M., Barr, A. G., Hollinger, D. Y., Ibrom, A.,
Lasslop, G., and Reichstein, M.: Uncetryaity quantification, in: Eddy
Covariance: A Practice Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by:
Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., 173–209, Springer, New York,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1_7, 2012.
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.: Statistical Methods, 8th Edn.,
Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA, 502 pp., 1989.
Sonntag, D.: Important new values of the physical constants of 1986, vapor
pressure formulation based on the ITS-90, and psychrometer formulae,
Z. Meteorol., 40, 340–344, 1990.
Swiatek, E.: Derivation of Temperature (Tc) from the Sonic Virtual
Temperature (Ts), Vapor Density (ρv)/Vapor Pressure (e) and
Pressure (P), Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT, USA, 1–5, 2018.
Tanner, C. B. and Thurtell, G. W.: Anemoclinometer measurements of Reynolds
stress and heat transport in the atmospheric surface layer, US
Army Electronics Command, Atmospheric Sciences Laboratory, Fort Huachua, AZ, USA, TR ECOM 66-G22-F, R1–R10, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0689487 (last access: 11 October 2022), 1969.
Vaisala: Vaisala BAROCAP® Barometer PTB100 Series
(User's Guide), M210839EN-A, 1–4, Helsinki, Finland, 2020.
van Dijk, A.: Extension to 3D of “the effect of line averaging on scalar
flux measurements with a sonic anemometer near the surface” by Kristensen
and Fitzjarrald, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 80–82,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0080:ETOTEO>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Wallace, J. M. and Hobbs, P. V.: Atmospheric Science: An Introductory
Survey, 2nd Edn., Academic Press, Amsterdam, 350 pp., https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-00034-8, 2006.
Wang, X., Wang, C., Guo, Q., and Wang, J.: Improving the CO2 storage
measurements with a single profile system in a tall-dense-canopy temperate
forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 228–229, 327–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.020, 2016.
Webb, E. K., Pearman, G. I., and Leuning, R.: Correction of flux
measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer,
Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 106, 85–100,
https//doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644707, 1980.
Wilczak, J. M., Oncley, S. P., and Stage, S. A.: Sonic Anemometer tilt
correction algorithm, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 99, 127–150, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018966204465, 2001.
WMO: Guide to Instruments and Methods of Observation, WMO-No. 8, Vol. I
– Measurement of Meteorological Variables, World Meteorological
Organization, Geneva, 548 pp., https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-690, 2018.
Wright, J. D., Johnson, A. N., and Moldover, M. R.: Design and uncertainty
for a PVTt gas flow standard, J. Res. Natl. Inst.
Stan., 108, 21–47,
https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.108.004, 2003.
Wyngaard, J. C.: Spatial resolution of a resistance wire temperature sensor, Phys. Fluids, 14, 2052–2054, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1693718, 1971.
Yang, B., Hanson, P. J., Riggs, J. S., Pallardy, S. G., Heuer, M. H.,
Hosman, K. P., Meyers, T. P., Wullschleger, S. D., and Gu, L. H.: Biases of
CO2 storage in eddy flux measurements in a forest pertinent to vertical
configurations of a profile system and CO2 density averaging, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D20123, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008243,
2007.
Zheng, N. and Gao, T.: Figure data files, Dryad [data set], https://datadryad.org/stash/share/7MEws8AfBuGla8Bhcrji4zNGVFw1uEWeZRAlPtOiSTs, last access: 13 October 2022.
Zhou, X., Yang, Q., Zhen, X., Li, Y., Hao, G., Shen, H., Gao, T., Sun, Y., and Zheng, N.: Recovery of the three-dimensional wind and sonic temperature data from a physically deformed sonic anemometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5981–6002, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5981-2018, 2018.
Zhou, X., Gao, T., Pang, Y., Manhan, H., Li, X., Zheng, N., Suyker, A. E.,
Awada, T., and Zhu, J.: Based on atmospheric physics and ecological
principle to assess the accuracies of field measurements
from infrared gas analyzers in closed-path eddy-covariance systems, Earth
Space Sci., 8, e2021EA001763, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001763,
2021.
Short summary
Overall accuracy of CO2/H2O data from open-path eddy-covariance systems is modeled for data analysis. The model is further formulated into CO2 and H2O accuracy equations for uses. Based on atmospheric physics and bio-environment, both equations are used to evaluate accuracy of ecosystem CO2/H2O data and, as rationales, to assess field CO2/H2O zero and span procedures for the systems. The procedures are assessed for measurement improvement. An impractical H2O span while cold is found unnecessary.
Overall accuracy of CO2/H2O data from open-path eddy-covariance systems is modeled for data...