Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-279-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-279-2017
Review article
 | 
25 Jul 2017
Review article |  | 25 Jul 2017

Measurement experiences with FluxSet digital D/I station

László Hegymegi, János Szöllősy, Csaba Hegymegi, and Ádám Domján

Related subject area

Magnetometers
Enabling in situ validation of mitigation algorithms for magnetic interference via a laboratory-generated dataset
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 263–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
First in situ measurements of the prototype Tesseract fluxgate magnetometer on the ACES-II-Low sounding rocket
Kenton Greene, Scott R. Bounds, Robert M. Broadfoot, Connor Feltman, Samuel J. Hisel, Ryan M. Kraus, Amanda Lasko, Antonio Washington, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 249–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Accuracy of the scalar magnetometer aboard ESA's JUICE mission
Christoph Amtmann, Andreas Pollinger, Michaela Ellmeier, Michele Dougherty, Patrick Brown, Roland Lammegger, Alexander Betzler, Martín Agú, Christian Hagen, Irmgard Jernej, Josef Wilfinger, Richard Baughen, Alex Strickland, and Werner Magnes
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-177-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-177-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of Orientation Errors in Triaxial Fluxgate Sensors and Research on Their Calibration Methods
Xiujuan Hu, Shaopeng He, Qin Tian, Alimjan Mamatemin, Pengkun Guo, and Guoping Chang
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-5,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-5, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GI
Short summary
Copper permalloys for fluxgate magnetometer sensors
B. Barry Narod and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 131–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-131-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-131-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Brunke, H.-P. and Matzka, J.: Numerical Evaluation of magnetic absolute Measurements with arbitrary distributed DI-Fluxgate Theodolite Positions, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2017-3, in review, 2017.
Clarke, E., Baillie, O., Reay, J. S., and Turbitt, C. W.: A method for the near real-time production of quasi-definitive magnetic observatory data, Earth Planets Space, 65, 1363–1374, https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2013.10.001, 2013.
Gilbert, D. and Rasson, J. L.: Effect on DIflux Measuring Accuracy due to a Magnet located on it, Scientific Technical Report STR98/21, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, 1998.
ISO 17123-3:2001: Optics and optical instruments – Field procedures for testing geodetic and surveying instruments – Part 3: Theodolites, Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:17123:-3:ed-1:v1:en (last access: 19 July 2017), 2001.
Download
Short summary
The authors developed and built a digital non-magnetic declination–inclination magnetometer which gives all measurement data in digital form. Use of this instrument significantly decreases the possibility of observation errors and minimises handwork. We showed that this device is suitable for absolute magnetic control measurements, and it is more convenient, user friendly and effective than the traditional ones.