Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-377-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-377-2017
Research article
 | 
11 Oct 2017
Research article |  | 11 Oct 2017

The effect of winding and core support material on the thermal gain dependence of a fluxgate magnetometer sensor

David M. Miles, Ian R. Mann, Andy Kale, David K. Milling, Barry B. Narod, John R. Bennest, David Barona, and Martyn J. Unsworth

Related authors

Enabling in situ validation of mitigation algorithms for magnetic interference via a laboratory-generated dataset
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 263–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
First in situ measurements of the prototype Tesseract fluxgate magnetometer on the ACES-II-Low sounding rocket
Kenton Greene, Scott R. Bounds, Robert M. Broadfoot, Connor Feltman, Samuel J. Hisel, Ryan M. Kraus, Amanda Lasko, Antonio Washington, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 249–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Copper permalloys for fluxgate magnetometer sensors
B. Barry Narod and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 131–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-131-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-131-2024, 2024
Short summary
Automated static magnetic cleanliness screening for the TRACERS small-satellite mission
Cole J. Dorman, Chris Piker, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 43–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-43-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-43-2024, 2024
Short summary
In situ calibration of the Swarm-Echo magnetometers
Robert M. Broadfoot, David M. Miles, Warren Holley, and Andrew D. Howarth
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 323–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-323-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-323-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Magnetometers
Enabling in situ validation of mitigation algorithms for magnetic interference via a laboratory-generated dataset
Matthew G. Finley, Allison M. Flores, Katherine J. Morris, Robert M. Broadfoot, Sam Hisel, Jason Homann, Chris Piker, Ananya Sen Gupta, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 263–275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-263-2024, 2024
Short summary
First in situ measurements of the prototype Tesseract fluxgate magnetometer on the ACES-II-Low sounding rocket
Kenton Greene, Scott R. Bounds, Robert M. Broadfoot, Connor Feltman, Samuel J. Hisel, Ryan M. Kraus, Amanda Lasko, Antonio Washington, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 249–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Accuracy of the scalar magnetometer aboard ESA's JUICE mission
Christoph Amtmann, Andreas Pollinger, Michaela Ellmeier, Michele Dougherty, Patrick Brown, Roland Lammegger, Alexander Betzler, Martín Agú, Christian Hagen, Irmgard Jernej, Josef Wilfinger, Richard Baughen, Alex Strickland, and Werner Magnes
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 177–191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-177-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-177-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of Orientation Errors in Triaxial Fluxgate Sensors and Research on Their Calibration Methods
Xiujuan Hu, Shaopeng He, Qin Tian, Alimjan Mamatemin, Pengkun Guo, and Guoping Chang
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-5,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-5, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GI
Short summary
Copper permalloys for fluxgate magnetometer sensors
B. Barry Narod and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 131–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-131-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-131-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Acuña, M. H., Scearce, C. S., Seek, J., and Scheifele, J.: The MAGSAT vector magnetometer: a precision fluxgate magnetometer for the measurement of the geomagnetic field, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, available at: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19790010349 (last access: 20 September 2016), 1978.
Afanas'ev, I. V.: Ferrozondovye pribory, Energoatomizdat, Leningradskoe otd-nie, Leningrad, 1986.
Butvin, P., Janošek, M., Ripka, P., Butvinová, B., Švec, P., Kuzminski, M., Janičkovič, D., and Vlasák, G.: Field annealed closed-path fluxgate sensors made of metallic-glass ribbons, Sensor Actuat. A-Phys., 184, 72–77, 2012.
Forslund, Å., Belyayev, S., Ivchenko, N., Olsson, G., Edberg, T., and Marusenkov, A.: Miniaturized digital fluxgate magnetometer for small spacecraft applications, Meas. Sci. Technol., 19, 015202, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/1/015202, 2007.
Geyger, A. W.: The ring-core magnetometer – a new type of second-harmonic flux-gate magnetometer, Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. Part Commun. Electron., 81, 65–73, https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.1962.6373206, 1962.
Download
Short summary
Fluxgate magnetometers are an important geophysical tool but are typically sensitive to changes in sensor temperature. We used a novel, low-cost calibration procedure to compare six matched sensors in which the material used as the mechanical support is varied and found that 30 % glass-filled PEEK engineering plastic is a good candidate for sensors. It is more economical, easier to machine, lighter, and more robust than historically used machinable ceramic.