Articles | Volume 8, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-21-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-21-2019
Research article
 | 
30 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 30 Jan 2019

The operator difference in absolute geomagnetic measurements

Yufei He, Xudong Zhao, Jianjun Wang, Fuxi Yang, Xijing Li, Changjiang Xin, Wansheng Yan, and Wentong Tian

Related authors

Analysis of the Geomagnetic Component Z Daily Variation Amplitude Based on the China Geomagnetic Network
Xudong Zhao, Yufei He, Qi Li, and Xiaocan Liu
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2020-48,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2020-48, 2020
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Related subject area

Data quality
Airborne electromagnetic data levelling based on the structured variational method
Qiong Zhang, Xin Chen, Zhonghang Ji, Fei Yan, Zhengkun Jin, and Yunqing Liu
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 193–203, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-193-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-193-2024, 2024
Short summary
Upgrade of LSA-SAF Meteosat Second Generation daily surface albedo (MDAL) retrieval algorithm incorporating aerosol correction and other improvements
Daniel Juncu, Xavier Ceamanos, Isabel F. Trigo, Sandra Gomes, and Sandra C. Freitas
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 389–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-389-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-389-2022, 2022
Short summary
Swarm Langmuir probes' data quality validation and future improvements
Filomena Catapano, Stephan Buchert, Enkelejda Qamili, Thomas Nilsson, Jerome Bouffard, Christian Siemes, Igino Coco, Raffaella D'Amicis, Lars Tøffner-Clausen, Lorenzo Trenchi, Poul Erik Holmdahl Olsen, and Anja Stromme
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 149–162, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-149-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-149-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluating methods for reconstructing large gaps in historic snow depth time series
Johannes Aschauer and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 10, 297–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-297-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-297-2021, 2021
Short summary
Production of definitive data from Indonesian geomagnetic observatories
Relly Margiono, Christopher W. Turbitt, Ciarán D. Beggan, and Kathryn A. Whaler
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 10, 169–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-169-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-169-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Auster, H. U. and Auster, V.: A new method for performing an absolute measurement of the geomagnetic field, Meas. Sci. Technol., 14, 1013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/14/7/315, 2003. 
Bitterly, J. J., Cantin, M., Schlich, R., Folques, J., and Gilbert D.: Portable magnetometer theodolite with fluxgate sensor for earth's magnetic field component measurements, Geophys. Surv., 6, 233–239, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/14/7/315, 1984.  
Brunke, H.-P. and Matzka, J.: Numerical evaluation of magnetic absolute measurements with arbitrarily distributed DI-fluxgate theodolite orientations, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 7, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-7-1-2018, 2018. 
Deng, N., Yang, D. M., Yang, Y. F., and Chen, J.: On problems of absolute measurement in geomagnetic observatory, J. Geodesy, 30, 129–134, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5942.2010.z1.029, 2010. 
Gonsette, A., Rasson, J., and Humbled, F.: In situ vector calibration of magnetic observatories, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 361–366, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-361-2017, 2017a.