First evaluation of an absolute quantum gravimeter (AQG#B01) for future field experiments

Cooke, Anne-Karin; Champollion, Cédric; Le Moigne, Nicolas

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-65-2021

Articles | Volume 10, issue 1

https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-65-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-65-2021

© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 10, issue 1

Research article

|

24 Mar 2021

Research article |

| 24 Mar 2021

First evaluation of an absolute quantum gravimeter (AQG#B01) for future field experiments

Anne-Karin Cooke, Cédric Champollion, and Nicolas Le Moigne

Download

Final revised paper (published on 24 Mar 2021)
Preprint (discussion started on 21 Aug 2020)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Manuscript review', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Oct 2020
RC2: 'Review of the paper Evaluation of the capacities of a field absolute quantum gravimeter (AQG#B01) by Anne-Karin Cooke , Cédric Champollion, and Nicolas Le Moigne', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Oct 2020
AC1: 'Reply to both reviewers. Information on additional measurements', Anne-Karin Cooke, 15 Oct 2020
- EC1: 'Associate Editor comment', Ciro Apollonio, 20 Nov 2020

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Anne-Karin Cooke on behalf of the Authors (19 Nov 2020) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (20 Nov 2020) by Ciro Apollonio

RR by Hans-Georg Scherneck (13 Dec 2020)

RR by Anonymous Reviewer #4 (07 Jan 2021)

Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection

The changes in the title of the manuscript are partially satisfactory with respect to some concerns raised by previous reviewers. The work now right presents itself as a "first evaluation" of an experiment whose validity must be deeply verified. However, the Abstract should be rewritten in a clearer, more concise way and without repetition.

The various additions made partially fill the gaps in the initial version of the manuscript. However, some steps are treated rather roughly. I am referring in particular to the experimentation done in a semi-terrain environment (garage) and to the problems relating to the various physical variables (wind, humidity, temperatures, vibrations, ...) that may critically affect the experiment itself. I believe that the work made by the authors deserves to be published but after further revisions and technical corrections, and as a "Technical Report". However, the authors are advised to define the next steps for the full validation of the experiment.

I point out that the additional sentence "without significant variations in the measured gravity by the AGQ" (as response to a comment of the reviewer 1) does not appear in the revised text (cf. p. 19, line 2), and this is not the only case. In the amended text, I did not find even the sentence: "In future experiments, the potential influence of strong winds needs to be assessed. Due to the very recent delivery of the instrument, displacements between observatory locations and system mounting and unmounting cycles have not been as frequent and need to be repeated". Note that the last sentence is part of the response to a comment from the first reviewer and should fill some serious experimental gaps.

Hide

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (08 Jan 2021) by Ciro Apollonio

AR by Anne-Karin Cooke on behalf of the Authors (16 Jan 2021) Author's response Author's tracked changes Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (21 Jan 2021) by Ciro Apollonio

AR by Anne-Karin Cooke on behalf of the Authors (03 Feb 2021) Manuscript

Short summary

Gravimetry studies the variations of the Earth’s gravity field which can be linked to mass...