Clagett, C., Santos, L., Azimi, B., Cudmore, A., Marshall, J., Starin, S., Sheikh, S., Zesta, E., Paschalidis, N., Johnson, M., Kepko, L., Berry, D., Bonalsky, T., Chai, D., Colvin, M., Evans, A., Hesh, S., Jones, S., Peterson, Z., Rodriquez, J., and Rodriquez, M.: Dellingr: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center's First 6U Spacecraft, in: The Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, Proceedings of the AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Next on the Pad, SSC17-III-06,
http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/smallsat/2017/all2017/83/ (last access: 15 August 2024), 5–10 August 2017.
Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J., Lawton, P., Murphy, S., Odom, J., Oliversen, R., and Sheppard, D.: The MAVEN Magnetic Field Investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 195, 257–291, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0169-4, 2015.
Connerney, J. E. P., Benn, M., Bjarno, J. B., Denver, T., Espley, J., Jorgensen, J. L., Jorgensen, P. S., Lawton, P., Malinnikova, A., Merayo, J. M., Murphy, S., Odom, J., Oliversen, R., Schnurr, R., Sheppard, D., and Smith, E. J.: The Juno Magnetic Field Investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 213, 39–138, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0334-z, 2017.
Constantinescu, O. D., Auster, H.-U., Delva, M., Hillenmaier, O., Magnes, W., and Plaschke, F.: Maximum-variance gradiometer technique for removal of spacecraft-generated disturbances from magnetic field data, Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst., 9, 451–469, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-451-2020, 2020.
Finley, M. G., Broadfoot, R. M., Shekhar, S., and Miles, D. M.: Identification and Removal of Reaction Wheel Interference From In-Situ Magnetic Field Data Using Multichannel Singular Spectrum Analysis, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 128, e2022JA031020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031020, 2023a.
Finley, M. G., Bowen, T. A., Pulupa, M., Koval, A., and Miles, D. M.: Statistical Decomposition and Machine Learning to Clean In Situ Spaceflight Magnetic Field Measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103626, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103626, 2023b.
Finley, M. G., Flores, A. M., Morris, K. J., Broadfoot, R. M., Hisel, S., Homann, J., Piker, C., Gupta, A. S., and Miles, D. M.: Code and Data for Enabling In-Situ Magnetic Interference Mitigation Algorithm Validation via a Laboratory-Generated Dataset, Iowa Research Online [data set], https://doi.org/10.25820/data.007168, 2024.
Gordon, D. and Brown, R.: Recent advances in fluxgate magnetometry, IEEE Trans. Magn., 8, 76–82, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1972.1067268, 1972.
Greene, K., Hansen, C., Narod, B. B., Dvorsky, R., and Miles, D. M.: Tesseract – a high-stability, low-noise fluxgate sensor designed for constellation applications, Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst., 11, 307–321, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-307-2022, 2022.
Hoffmann, A. P. and Moldwin, M. B.: Separation of Spacecraft Noise From Geomagnetic Field Observations Through Density-Based Cluster Analysis and Compressive Sensing, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e2022JA030757, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030757, 2022.
Imajo, S., Nosé, M., Aida, M., Matsumoto, H., Higashio, N., Tokunaga, T., and Matsuoka, A.: Signal and Noise Separation From Satellite Magnetic Field Data Through Independent Component Analysis: Prospect of Magnetic Measurements Without Boom and Noise Source Information, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e2020JA028790, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028790, 2021.
Kaub, L., Keller, G., Bouligand, C., and Glen, J. M. G.: Magnetic Surveys With Unmanned Aerial Systems: Software for Assessing and Comparing the Accuracy of Different Sensor Systems, Suspension Designs and Compensation Methods, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 22, e2021GC009745, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC009745, 2021.
Langel, R., Ousley, G., Berbert, J., Murphy, J., and Settle, M.: The MAGSAT mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 243–245, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL009i004p00243, 1982.
Lee, H., Lee, C., Jeon, H., Son, J. J., Son, Y., and Han, S.: Interference-Compensating Magnetometer Calibration With Estimated Measurement Noise Covariance for Application to Small-Sized UAVs, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 67, 8829–8840, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2950841, 2020.
Merritt, R., Purcell, C., and Stroink, G.: Uniform magnetic field produced by three, four, and five square coils, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 54, 879–882, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1137480, 1983.
Miles, D. M., Mann, I. R., Ciurzynski, M., Barona, D., Narod, B. B., Bennest, J. R., Pakhotin, I. P., Kale, A., Bruner, B., Nokes, C. D. A., Cupido, C., Haluza-DeLay, T., Elliott, D. G., and Milling, D. K.: A miniature, low-power scientific fluxgate magnetometer: A stepping-stone to cube-satellite constellation missions, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 11839–11860, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023147, 2016.
Miles, D. M., Ciurzynski, M., Barona, D., Narod, B. B., Bennest, J. R., Kale, A., Lessard, M., Milling, D. K., Larson, J., and Mann, I. R.: Low-noise permalloy ring cores for fluxgate magnetometers, Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst., 8, 227–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-8-227-2019, 2019.
Miller, D. C.: The Voyager magnetometer boom, Jet Propulsion Lab, California Inst. of Tech. NTRS Document ID: 19790013187, NTRS Research Center: Legacy CDMS, 12th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium NASA, Cal-Tech, Lockheed. SP-2080, 245 pp., NASA, Washington, D.C., 1979, p.51, 1979.
Ness, N. F., Behannon, K. W., Lepping, R. P., and Schatten, K. H.: Use of two magnetometers for magnetic field measurements on a spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 3564–3573, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA076i016p03564, 1971.
Paterson, W. R., Gershman, D. J., Kanekal, S. G., Livi, R., Moldwin, M. B., Zesta, E., Randol, B., and Samara, M.: Heliospheric Science From Gateway With HERMES, in: EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 April 2023, EGU23-8425, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8425, 2023.
Sen Gupta, A. and Miles, D.: Autonomous Reaction Wheel Magnetic Signature Detection Against Background Noise in Spacecraft, IEEE Sens. Lett., 7, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2023.3308124, 2023.
Slavin, J. A., Le, G., Strangeway, R. J., Wang, Y., Boardsen, S. A., Moldwin, M. B., and Spence, H. E.: Space Technology 5 multi-point measurements of near-Earth magnetic fields: Initial results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031728, 2008.
Stolle, C., Michaelis, I., Xiong, C., Rother, M., Usbeck, T., Yamazaki, Y., Rauberg, J., and Styp-Rekowski, K.: Observing Earth's magnetic environment with the GRACE-FO mission, Earth Planets Space, 73, 51, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01364-w, 2021.
Styp-Rekowski, K., Michaelis, I., Stolle, C., Baerenzung, J., Korte, M., and Kao, O.: Machine learning-based calibration of the GOCE satellite platform magnetometers, Earth Planets Space, 74, 138, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01695-2, 2022.
Teng, S., Tao, X., and Li, W.: Typical Characteristics of Whistler Mode Waves Categorized by Their Spectral Properties Using Van Allen Probes Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 3607–3614, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082161, 2019.
Tuck, L. E., Samson, C., Laliberté, J., and Cunningham, M.: Magnetic interference mapping of four types of unmanned aircraft systems intended for aeromagnetic surveying, Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst., 10, 101–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-101-2021, 2021.
Wallis, D. D., Miles, D. M., Narod, B. B., Bennest, J. R., Murphy, K. R., Mann, I. R., and Yau, A. W.: The CASSIOPE/e-POP Magnetic Field Instrument (MGF), Space Sci. Rev., 189, 27–39, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0105-z, 2015.
Zheng, Y., Li, S., Xing, K., and Zhang, X.: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Magnetic Surveys: A Review on Platform Selection and Interference Suppression, Drones, 5, 93, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5030093, 2021.
