Articles | Volume 15, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-15-127-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-15-127-2026
Research article
 | 
06 May 2026
Research article |  | 06 May 2026

Improving the Magic constant – data-based calibration of phased array radars

Theresa Rexer, Björn Gustavsson, Juha Vierinen, Andres Spicher, Devin Ray Huyghebaert, Andreas Kvammen, Robert Gillies, and Asti Bhatt

Related authors

Non-Maxwellian electron distributions in the D region during artificial heating (Paper II): Electron cooling rates
Margaretha Myrvang and Björn Johan Gustavsson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1118,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1118, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Non-Maxwellian electron distributions in the D region during artificial heating (Paper I): Model development and electron temperature
Margaretha Myrvang and Björn Gustavsson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1117,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1117, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Short summary
Effect of Ionospheric Variability on the Electron Energy Spectrum estimated from Incoherent Scatter Radar Measurements
Oliver Stalder, Björn Gustavsson, and Ilkka Virtanen
Ann. Geophys., 44, 123–135, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-123-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-123-2026, 2026
Short summary
Plasma density estimation from ionograms and geophysical parameters with deep learning
Kian Sartipzadeh, Andreas Kvammen, Björn Gustavsson, Njål Gulbrandsen, Magnar G. Johnsen, Devin Huyghebaert, and Juha Vierinen
Ann. Geophys., 44, 85–107, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-85-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-85-2026, 2026
Short summary
How well can we forecast local magnetic ground perturbations with existing space weather monitoring resources?
Stephen Omondi, Spencer Mark Hatch, Andreas Kvammen, Magnar Gullikstad Johnsen, Mathew J. Owens, Kristian Solheim Thinn, and Rodrigo López
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6298,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6298, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Alsatkin, S., Medvedev, A., and Ratovsky, K.: Features of Ne recovery at the Irkutsk Incoherent Scatter Radar, Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 6, 77–88, 2020. a
Bahcivan, H., Tsunoda, R., Nicolls, M., and Heinselman, C.: Initial ionospheric observations made by the new Resolute incoherent scatter radar and comparison to solar wind IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043632, 2010. a, b
Baumjohann, W. and Treumann, R.: Basic Space Plasma Physics, revised edn., Imperial College Press, https://doi.org/10.1142/p850, 2012. a
Bibl, K.: Evolution of the Ionosonde, Ann. Geofis., 41, https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3810, 1998. a
Burke, M. W.: Image Acquisition, Springer Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0069-1, 1996. a, b, c, d
Download
Short summary
We present a second-level calibration method for electron density measurements from multi-beam incoherent scatter radars. It is based on the well-known Flat field correction method used in imaging and photography. The method improves data quality and useability as it accounts for unaccounted and unpredictable variations in the radar system. This is valuable for studies where inter-beam calibration is important such as studies of polar cap patches, plasma irregularities and turbulence.
Share