Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-65-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-65-2015
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
03 Mar 2015
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 03 Mar 2015

Does temperature affect the accuracy of vented pressure transducer in fine-scale water level measurement?

Z. Liu and C. W. Higgins

Related authors

A new instrument to measure plot-scale runoff
R. D. Stewart, Z. Liu, D. E. Rupp, C. W. Higgins, and J. S. Selker
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 4, 57–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-57-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-57-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Sensor
Calibrating low-cost rain gauge sensors for their applications in Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructures to densify environmental monitoring networks
Robert Krüger, Pierre Karrasch, and Anette Eltner
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 163–176, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-163-2024, 2024
Short summary
A distributed-temperature-sensing-based soil temperature profiler
Bart Schilperoort, César Jiménez Rodríguez, Bas van de Wiel, and Miriam Coenders-Gerrits
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 85–95, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-85-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-85-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ultra-low-cost manual soil respiration chamber
Bartosz M. Zawilski and Vincent Bustillo
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 51–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-51-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-51-2024, 2024
Short summary
Testing a novel sensor design to jointly measure cosmic-ray neutrons, muons and gamma rays for non-invasive soil moisture estimation
Stefano Gianessi, Matteo Polo, Luca Stevanato, Marcello Lunardon, Till Francke, Sascha E. Oswald, Hami Said Ahmed, Arsenio Toloza, Georg Weltin, Gerd Dercon, Emil Fulajtar, Lee Heng, and Gabriele Baroni
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 9–25, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-9-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-9-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of an expendable current profiler based on modulation and demodulation
Keyu Zhou, Qisheng Zhang, Guangyuan Chen, Zucan Lin, Yunliang Liu, and Pengyu Li
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 57–69, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-57-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-57-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Cain III, S. F., Davis, G. A., Loheide II, S. P., and Bulter Jr., J. J.: Noise in pressure transducer readings produced by variations in solar radiation, Ground. Water., 42, 939–944, 2004.
Cappa, P., De Rita, G., McConnell, K. G., and Zachary, L. W.: Using strain gages to measure both strain and temperature, Exp. Mech., 32, 230–233, 1992.
Freeman, L. A., Carpenter, M. C., Rosenberry, D. O., Rousseau, J. P., Unger, R., and McLean, J. S.: Use of submersible pressure transducers in water-resources investigations, USGS, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations 8-A3, USGS, Reston, Virginia, 65 pp. 2004.
Grant, D. M. and Dawson, B. D.: Isco Open Channel Flow Measurement Handbook, 5th Edn., Isco, Lincoln, Nebr., 501 pp., 2001.
Gribovszki, Z., Kalicz, P., and Szilágyi, J.: Does the accuracy of fine-scale water level measurements by vented pressure transducers permit for diurnal evapotranspiration estimation?, J. Hydrol., 488, 166–169, 2013.
Download
Short summary
This paper discussed the effect of temperature on the accuracy of submersible strain gauge pressure transducers. The results show that rapid change of temperature introduces errors in the water level reading while the absolute temperature is also related to the sensor errors. The former is attributed to venting and the latter is attributed to temperature compensation effects in the strain gauges. Performance tests are necessary before field deployment to ensure the data quality.