Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-181-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-181-2016
Review article
 | 
06 Jun 2016
Review article |  | 06 Jun 2016

Magnetic airborne survey – geophysical flight

Erick de Barros Camara and Suze Nei Pereira Guimarães

Related subject area

Airborne instruments
Towards affordable 3D physics-based river flow rating: application over the Luangwa River basin
Hubert T. Samboko, Sten Schurer, Hubert H. G. Savenije, Hodson Makurira, Kawawa Banda, and Hessel Winsemius
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 155–169, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-155-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-155-2023, 2023
Short summary
Drone-towed controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) system for near-surface geophysical prospecting: on instrument noise, temperature drift, transmission frequency, and survey set-up
Tobias Bjerg Vilhelmsen and Arne Døssing
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 435–450, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-435-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-435-2022, 2022
Short summary
Measuring electrical properties of the lower troposphere using enhanced meteorological radiosondes
R. Giles Harrison
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 37–57, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-37-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-37-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluating low-cost topographic surveys for computations of conveyance
Hubert T. Samboko, Sten Schurer, Hubert H. G. Savenije, Hodson Makurira, Kawawa Banda, and Hessel Winsemius
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-1-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Experiments on magnetic interference for a portable airborne magnetometry system using a hybrid unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)
Jirigalatu, Vamsi Krishna, Eduardo Lima Simões da Silva, and Arne Døssing
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 10, 25–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-25-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-25-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Airo, M. L.: Aeromagnetic and petrophysical investigations applied to tectonic analisys in the northern Fennoscandian shield, Geol. Survey of Finland Report of Investigations 145, Geol. Survey of Finland, Finland, p. 51, 1999.
Backus, G., Parker, R. L., and Constable, C.: Foundations of Geomagnetism, Cambridge University Press, 369 pp., 1996.
Bouligand, C., Glen, J. M., and Blakely, R. J.: Distribution of buried hydrothermal alteration deduced from high resolution magnetic surveys in Yellowstone National Park, J. Geophy. Res.-Solid Ea., 119, 2595–2630, 2014.
Boyd, D.: The contribuition of airborne magnetic survey to geological mapping, in: Minig and Groundwater Geophysics, 1967, Economic Geology Report 26, edited by: Morley, F., Geological survey of Canada, Ottawa, 213–227, 1970.
Brozena, J. M., Childers, V. A., Lawver, L. A., Forsberg, R., Faleide, J., and Eldholm, O.: A New Aerogeophysical Study of the Eurasia Basin and Lomonosov Ridge: Implications for Basin Development, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 1, p. 01, 2002.
Download
Short summary
This paper provides a technical review process in the area of airborne acquisition of geophysical data, with emphasis for magnetometry. In summary, it addresses the calibration processes of geophysical equipment as well as the aircraft to minimize possible errors in measurements. The corrections used in data processing and filtering are demonstrated with the same results as well as the evolution of these techniques in Brazil and worldwide.