Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-13-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-13-2021
Research article
 | 
27 Jan 2021
Research article |  | 27 Jan 2021

Error estimate for fluxgate magnetometer in-flight calibration on a spinning spacecraft

Yasuhito Narita, Ferdinand Plaschke, Werner Magnes, David Fischer, and Daniel Schmid

Related authors

High temporal resolution photos of SAR arc rays lead to a new interpretation of the physical causes: Wave-particle interactions and energetic electron precipitation
Bruce T. Tsurutani, Gurbax S. Lakhina, Rajkumar Hajra, Richard B. Horne, Masatomi Iizawa, Yasuhito Narita, Ingo von Borstel, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, Volker Bothmer, Klaus Reinsch, Philipp Schulz, and Sami Solanki
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5536,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5536, 2025
Short summary
Ion beam instability model for Mercury's upstream waves
Yasuhito Narita, Daniel Schmid, and Uwe Motschmann
Ann. Geophys., 43, 417–425, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-417-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-43-417-2025, 2025
Short summary
Scalar-potential mapping of the steady-state magnetosheath model
Yasuhito Narita, Daniel Schmid, and Simon Toepfer
Ann. Geophys., 42, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024, 2024
Short summary
Magnetopause as conformal mapping
Yasuhito Narita, Simon Toepfer, and Daniel Schmid
Ann. Geophys., 41, 87–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023, 2023
Short summary
Bow shock characteristics from magnetic field observations
Daniel Schmid and Yasuhito Narita
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-30,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-30, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Cited articles

Acuña, M. H.: The MAGSAT precision vector magnetometer, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 1, 210–213, 1980. a
Acuña, M. H.: Space-based magnetometers, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 73, 3717, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1510570, 2002. a
Alconcel, L. N. S., Fox, P., Brown, P., Oddy, T. M., Lucek, E. L., and Carr, C. M.: An initial investigation of the long-term trends in the fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) calibration parameters on the four Cluster spacecraft, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 3, 95–109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-3-95-2014, 2014. a, b, c
Anderson, B. J., Acuña, M. H., Lohr, D. A., Scheifele, J., Raval, A., Korth, H., and Slavin, J. A.: The magnetometer instrument on MESSENGER, Space Sci. Rev., 131, 417–450, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-007-9246-7, 2007. a
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1, 2008. a
Download
Short summary
The systematic error of calibrated fluxgate magnetometer data is studied for a spinning spacecraft. The major error comes from the offset uncertainty when the ambient magnetic field is low, while the error represents the combination of non-orthogonality, misalignment to spacecraft reference direction, and gain when the ambient field is high. The results are useful in developing future high-precision magnetometers and an error estimate in scientific studies using magnetometer data.
Share