Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-13-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-13-2021
Research article
 | 
27 Jan 2021
Research article |  | 27 Jan 2021

Error estimate for fluxgate magnetometer in-flight calibration on a spinning spacecraft

Yasuhito Narita, Ferdinand Plaschke, Werner Magnes, David Fischer, and Daniel Schmid

Related authors

Scalar-potential mapping of the steady-state magnetosheath model
Yasuhito Narita, Daniel Schmid, and Simon Toepfer
Ann. Geophys., 42, 79–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-42-79-2024, 2024
Short summary
Magnetopause as conformal mapping
Yasuhito Narita, Simon Toepfer, and Daniel Schmid
Ann. Geophys., 41, 87–91, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-87-2023, 2023
Short summary
Bow shock characteristics from magnetic field observations
Daniel Schmid and Yasuhito Narita
Ann. Geophys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-30,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-30, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Reconstruction of Mercury's internal magnetic field beyond the octupole
Simon Toepfer, Ida Oertel, Vanita Schiron, Yasuhito Narita, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, Daniel Heyner, Patrick Kolhey, and Uwe Motschmann
Ann. Geophys., 40, 91–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-91-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-91-2022, 2022
Short summary
Electromotive force in the solar wind
Yasuhito Narita
Ann. Geophys., 39, 759–768, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-759-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-759-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Magnetometers
Automated static magnetic cleanliness screening for the TRACERS small-satellite mission
Cole J. Dorman, Chris Piker, and David M. Miles
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 43–50, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-43-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-43-2024, 2024
Short summary
Accuracy of the Scalar Magnetometer aboard ESA's JUICE Mission
Christoph Amtmann, Andreas Pollinger, Michaela Ellmeier, Michele Dougherty, Patrick Brown, Roland Lammegger, Alexander Betzler, Martín Agú, Christian Hagen, Irmgard Jernej, Josef Wilfinger, Richard Baughen, Alex Strickland, and Werner Magnes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3073,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3073, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of geomagnetic observatory data and detection of geomagnetic jerks with the MOSFiT software package
Marcos Vinicius da Silva, Katia J. Pinheiro, Achim Ohlert, and Jürgen Matzka
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 271–283, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-271-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-271-2023, 2023
Short summary
Copper permalloys for fluxgate magnetometer sensors
B. Barry Narod and David M. Miles
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2191,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2191, 2023
Short summary
Verification and calibration of a commercial anisotropic magnetoresistive magnetometer by multivariate non-linear regression
Nicholas Belsten, Mary Knapp, Rebecca Masterson, Cadence Payne, Kristen Ammons, Frank D. Lind, and Kerri Cahoy
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 201–213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-201-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-201-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Acuña, M. H.: The MAGSAT precision vector magnetometer, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 1, 210–213, 1980. a
Acuña, M. H.: Space-based magnetometers, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 73, 3717, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1510570, 2002. a
Alconcel, L. N. S., Fox, P., Brown, P., Oddy, T. M., Lucek, E. L., and Carr, C. M.: An initial investigation of the long-term trends in the fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) calibration parameters on the four Cluster spacecraft, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 3, 95–109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-3-95-2014, 2014. a, b, c
Anderson, B. J., Acuña, M. H., Lohr, D. A., Scheifele, J., Raval, A., Korth, H., and Slavin, J. A.: The magnetometer instrument on MESSENGER, Space Sci. Rev., 131, 417–450, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-007-9246-7, 2007. a
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1, 2008. a
Download
Short summary
The systematic error of calibrated fluxgate magnetometer data is studied for a spinning spacecraft. The major error comes from the offset uncertainty when the ambient magnetic field is low, while the error represents the combination of non-orthogonality, misalignment to spacecraft reference direction, and gain when the ambient field is high. The results are useful in developing future high-precision magnetometers and an error estimate in scientific studies using magnetometer data.