Articles | Volume 5, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-109-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-109-2016
Research article
 | 
29 Apr 2016
Research article |  | 29 Apr 2016

Soil moisture sensor calibration for organic soil surface layers

Simone Bircher, Mie Andreasen, Johanna Vuollet, Juho Vehviläinen, Kimmo Rautiainen, François Jonard, Lutz Weihermüller, Elena Zakharova, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, and Yann H. Kerr

Related authors

Assessing soil fertilization effects using time-lapse electromagnetic induction
Manuela S. Kaufmann, Anja Klotzsche, Jan van der Kruk, Anke Langen, Harry Vereecken, and Lutz Weihermüller
SOIL, 11, 267–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-267-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-267-2025, 2025
Short summary
Aboveground biomass dataset from SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth and reference maps
Simon Boitard, Arnaud Mialon, Stéphane Mermoz, Nemesio J. Rodríguez-Fernández, Philippe Richaume, Julio César Salazar-Neira, Stéphane Tarot, and Yann H. Kerr
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1101–1119, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1101-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1101-2025, 2025
Short summary
Environmental drivers constraining the seasonal variability of satellite-observed methane at Northern high latitudes
Ella Kivimäki, Tuula Aalto, Michael Buchwitz, Kari Luojus, Jouni Pulliainen, Kimmo Rautiainen, Oliver Schneising, Anu-Maija Sundström, Johanna Tamminen, Aki Tsuruta, and Hannakaisa Lindqvist
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-249,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-249, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Benchmarking passive-microwave-satellite-derived freeze–thaw datasets
Annett Bartsch, Xaver Muri, Markus Hetzenecker, Kimmo Rautiainen, Helena Bergstedt, Jan Wuite, Thomas Nagler, and Dmitry Nicolsky
The Cryosphere, 19, 459–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-459-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-459-2025, 2025
Short summary
Retrieving frozen ground surface temperature under the snowpack in Arctic permafrost area from SMOS observations
Juliette Ortet, Arnaud Mialon, Alain Royer, Mike Schwank, Manu Holmberg, Kimmo Rautiainen, Simone Bircher-Adrot, Andreas Colliander, Yann Kerr, and Alexandre Roy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3963,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3963, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Ground-based instruments
A steerable system for the RECoverable Autonomous Sonde (RECAS) to access and study subglacial lakes
Mikhail A. Sysoev, Pavel G. Talalay, Xiaopeng Fan, Nan Zhang, Da Gong, Yang Yang, Ting Wang, and Zhipeng Deng
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 14, 29–43, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-29-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-29-2025, 2025
Short summary
Distance of flight of cosmic-ray muons to study dynamics of the upper muosphere
Hiroyuki K. M. Tanaka
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 14, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-1-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-14-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
The Harwell TCCON observatory
Damien Weidmann, Richard Brownsword, and Stamatia Doniki
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-14,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-14, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GI
Short summary
Development of an internet-of-things-based controlled-source ultrasonic audio frequency electromagnetic receiver
Zucan Lin, Qisheng Zhang, Keyu Zhou, Xiyuan Zhang, Xinchang Wang, Hui Zhang, and Feng Liu
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 325–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-325-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-325-2024, 2024
Short summary
A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and survey and its differences from satellite InSAR
Charlotte Wolff, Marc-Henri Derron, Carlo Rivolta, and Michel Jaboyedoff
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 225–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Albergel, C., de Rosnay, P., Gruhier, C., Muñoz Sabater, J., Hasenauer, S., Isaksen, L., Kerr, Y., and Wagner, W.: Evaluation of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in-situ observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 118, 215–226, 2012.
Andreasen, M., Jensen, K. H., Zreda, M., Desilets, D., Bogena, H., and Looms, M. C.: A method to obtain comparable measured and modeled cosmic-ray neutron intensities, Water Resour. Res., in revision, 2016.
Assouline, S., Narkis, K., Tyler, S. W., Lunati, I., Parlange, M. B., and Selker, J. S.: On the Diurnal Soil Water Content Dynamics during Evaporation using Dielectric Methods, Vadose Zone J., 9, 709–718, 2010.
Baggaley, N., Mayr, T., and Bellamy, P.: Identification of key soil and terrain properties that influence the spatial variability of soil moisture throughout the growing season, Soil Use Manage., 25, 262–273, 2009.
Bircher, S., Skou, N., Jensen, K. H., Walker, J. P., and Rasmussen, L.: A soil moisture and temperature network for SMOS validation in Western Denmark, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1445–1463, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1445-2012, 2012a.
Download
Short summary
At the Finnish Meteorological Institute in Sodankylä and the Danish Center for Hydrology, calibration functions for organic surface layers were derived for two in situ soil moisture sensors to be used in the validation of coarse-resolution soil moisture from satellites and land surface models. There was no clear difference in the data from a variety of humus types, strengthening confidence that these calibrations are applicable over a wide range of conditions as encountered in the large areas.
Share