Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-57-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-57-2015
Research article
 | 
02 Mar 2015
Research article |  | 02 Mar 2015

A new instrument to measure plot-scale runoff

R. D. Stewart, Z. Liu, D. E. Rupp, C. W. Higgins, and J. S. Selker

Related authors

Recession discharge from compartmentalized bedrock hillslopes
Clément Roques, David E. Rupp, Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy, Laurent Longuevergne, Elizabeth R. Jachens, Gordon Grant, Luc Aquilina, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4391–4405, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4391-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4391-2022, 2022
Short summary
The motion of trees in the wind: a data synthesis
Toby D. Jackson, Sarab Sethi, Ebba Dellwik, Nikolas Angelou, Amanda Bunce, Tim van Emmerik, Marine Duperat, Jean-Claude Ruel, Axel Wellpott, Skip Van Bloem, Alexis Achim, Brian Kane, Dominick M. Ciruzzi, Steven P. Loheide II, Ken James, Daniel Burcham, John Moore, Dirk Schindler, Sven Kolbe, Kilian Wiegmann, Mark Rudnicki, Victor J. Lieffers, John Selker, Andrew V. Gougherty, Tim Newson, Andrew Koeser, Jason Miesbauer, Roger Samelson, Jim Wagner, Anthony R. Ambrose, Andreas Detter, Steffen Rust, David Coomes, and Barry Gardiner
Biogeosciences, 18, 4059–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021, 2021
Short summary
Revisiting wind speed measurements using actively heated fiber optics: a wind tunnel study
Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Bart Schilperoort, Bas J. H. van de Wiel, Jonathan G. Izett, John S. Selker, Chad W. Higgins, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Nick C. van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5423–5439, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5423-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5423-2020, 2020
Short summary
Distributed observations of wind direction using microstructures attached to actively heated fiber-optic cables
Karl Lapo, Anita Freundorfer, Lena Pfister, Johann Schneider, John Selker, and Christoph Thomas
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1563–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1563-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1563-2020, 2020
Short summary
Recession analysis revisited: impacts of climate on parameter estimation
Elizabeth R. Jachens, David E. Rupp, Clément Roques, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Ground-based instruments
Calculation of soil water content using dielectric-permittivity-based sensors – benefits of soil-specific calibration
Bartosz M. Zawilski, Franck Granouillac, Nicole Claverie, Baptiste Lemaire, Aurore Brut, and Tiphaine Tallec
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 45–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-45-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-45-2023, 2023
Short summary
The land–atmosphere feedback observatory: a new observational approach for characterizing land–atmosphere feedback
Florian Späth, Verena Rajtschan, Tobias K. D. Weber, Shehan Morandage, Diego Lange, Syed Saqlain Abbas, Andreas Behrendt, Joachim Ingwersen, Thilo Streck, and Volker Wulfmeyer
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 25–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-25-2023, 2023
Short summary
Design and construction of an automated and programmable resistivity meter for shallow subsurface investigation
Antenor Oliveira Cruz Júnior, Cosme Ferreira da Ponte-Neto, and André Wiermann
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 15–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-15-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-15-2023, 2023
Short summary
Feasibility of irrigation monitoring with cosmic-ray neutron sensors
Cosimo Brogi, Heye Reemt Bogena, Markus Köhli, Johan Alexander Huisman, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Olga Dombrowski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 451–469, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-451-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Design and operation of a long-term monitoring system for spectral electrical impedance tomography (sEIT)
Maximilian Weigand, Egon Zimmermann, Valentin Michels, Johan Alexander Huisman, and Andreas Kemna
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 413–433, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-413-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-413-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aksoy, H. and Kavvas, M. L.: A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models, Catena, 64, 247–271, 2005.
Ali, G., Oswald, C. J., Spence, C., Cammeraat, E. L., McGuire, K. J., Meixner, T., and Reaney, S. M.: Towards a unified threshold-based hydrological theory: necessary components and recurring challenges, Hydrol. Process., 27, 313–318, 2013.
Betson, R. P.: What is watershed runoff?, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 1541–1552, 1964.
Blair, A., Sanger, D., White, D., Holland, A. F., Vandiver, L., Bowker, C., and White, S.: Quantifying and simulating stormwater runoff in watersheds, Hydrol. Process., 28, 559–569, 2014.
Blume, T., Zehe, E., Reusser, D. E., Iroumé, A., and Bronstert, A.: Investigation of runoff generation in a pristine, poorly gauged catchment in the Chilean Andes I: A multi-method experimental study, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3661–3675, 2008.
Download
Short summary
We present a new instrument for measuring surface runoff rates ranging from very low (~0.05L min-1) to high (300L min-1, with much higher rates possible depending on the device configuration). The device is economical, simple, rugged, accurate and requires little maintenance (the system is self-emptying and contains no moving parts). We have successfully used this instrument in long-term monitoring studies and expect that it will appeal to other scientists studying runoff processes.