Articles | Volume 4, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-57-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-4-57-2015
Research article
 | 
02 Mar 2015
Research article |  | 02 Mar 2015

A new instrument to measure plot-scale runoff

R. D. Stewart, Z. Liu, D. E. Rupp, C. W. Higgins, and J. S. Selker

Related authors

Recession discharge from compartmentalized bedrock hillslopes
Clément Roques, David E. Rupp, Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy, Laurent Longuevergne, Elizabeth R. Jachens, Gordon Grant, Luc Aquilina, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4391–4405, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4391-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4391-2022, 2022
Short summary
The motion of trees in the wind: a data synthesis
Toby D. Jackson, Sarab Sethi, Ebba Dellwik, Nikolas Angelou, Amanda Bunce, Tim van Emmerik, Marine Duperat, Jean-Claude Ruel, Axel Wellpott, Skip Van Bloem, Alexis Achim, Brian Kane, Dominick M. Ciruzzi, Steven P. Loheide II, Ken James, Daniel Burcham, John Moore, Dirk Schindler, Sven Kolbe, Kilian Wiegmann, Mark Rudnicki, Victor J. Lieffers, John Selker, Andrew V. Gougherty, Tim Newson, Andrew Koeser, Jason Miesbauer, Roger Samelson, Jim Wagner, Anthony R. Ambrose, Andreas Detter, Steffen Rust, David Coomes, and Barry Gardiner
Biogeosciences, 18, 4059–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4059-2021, 2021
Short summary
Revisiting wind speed measurements using actively heated fiber optics: a wind tunnel study
Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Bart Schilperoort, Bas J. H. van de Wiel, Jonathan G. Izett, John S. Selker, Chad W. Higgins, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Nick C. van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5423–5439, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5423-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5423-2020, 2020
Short summary
Distributed observations of wind direction using microstructures attached to actively heated fiber-optic cables
Karl Lapo, Anita Freundorfer, Lena Pfister, Johann Schneider, John Selker, and Christoph Thomas
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1563–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1563-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1563-2020, 2020
Short summary
Recession analysis revisited: impacts of climate on parameter estimation
Elizabeth R. Jachens, David E. Rupp, Clément Roques, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Ground-based instruments
A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and survey and its differences from satellite InSAR
Charlotte Wolff, Marc-Henri Derron, Carlo Rivolta, and Michel Jaboyedoff
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 225–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024, 2024
Short summary
An underground drip water monitoring network to characterize rainfall recharge of groundwater at different geologies, environments, and climates across Australia
Andy Baker, Margaret Shanafield, Wendy Timms, Martin Sogaard Andersen, Stacey Priestley, and Marilu Melo Zurita
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 117–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Research and application of a flexible measuring array for deep displacement of landslides
Yang Li, Zhong Li, Qifeng Guo, Yimin Liu, and Daji Zhang
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 97–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-97-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-97-2024, 2024
Short summary
A hydrate reservoir renovation device and its application in nitrogen bubble fracturing
Jingsheng Lu, Yuanxin Yao, Dongliang Li, Jinhai Yang, Deqing Liang, Yiqun Zhang, Decai Lin, and Kunlin Ma
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 75–83, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-75-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-75-2024, 2024
Short summary
Gas equilibrium membrane inlet mass spectrometry (GE-MIMS) for water at high pressure
Matthias S. Brennwald, Antonio P. Rinaldi, Jocelyn Gisiger, Alba Zappone, and Rolf Kipfer
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-1-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-1-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aksoy, H. and Kavvas, M. L.: A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models, Catena, 64, 247–271, 2005.
Ali, G., Oswald, C. J., Spence, C., Cammeraat, E. L., McGuire, K. J., Meixner, T., and Reaney, S. M.: Towards a unified threshold-based hydrological theory: necessary components and recurring challenges, Hydrol. Process., 27, 313–318, 2013.
Betson, R. P.: What is watershed runoff?, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 1541–1552, 1964.
Blair, A., Sanger, D., White, D., Holland, A. F., Vandiver, L., Bowker, C., and White, S.: Quantifying and simulating stormwater runoff in watersheds, Hydrol. Process., 28, 559–569, 2014.
Blume, T., Zehe, E., Reusser, D. E., Iroumé, A., and Bronstert, A.: Investigation of runoff generation in a pristine, poorly gauged catchment in the Chilean Andes I: A multi-method experimental study, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3661–3675, 2008.
Download
Short summary
We present a new instrument for measuring surface runoff rates ranging from very low (~0.05L min-1) to high (300L min-1, with much higher rates possible depending on the device configuration). The device is economical, simple, rugged, accurate and requires little maintenance (the system is self-emptying and contains no moving parts). We have successfully used this instrument in long-term monitoring studies and expect that it will appeal to other scientists studying runoff processes.