Articles | Volume 6, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-419-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-419-2017
Research article
 | 
17 Oct 2017
Research article |  | 17 Oct 2017

U.S. Geological Survey experience with the residual absolutes method

E. William Worthington and Jürgen Matzka

Related authors

Macapá, a Brazilian equatorial magnetometer station: installation, data availability, and methods for temperature correction
Cristiano Mendel Martins, Katia Jasbinschek Pinheiro, Achim Ohlert, Jürgen Matzka, Marcos Vinicius da Silva, and Reynerth Pereira da Costa
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 289–299, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-289-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-289-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of geomagnetic observatory data and detection of geomagnetic jerks with the MOSFiT software package
Marcos Vinicius da Silva, Katia J. Pinheiro, Achim Ohlert, and Jürgen Matzka
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 12, 271–283, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-271-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-271-2023, 2023
Short summary
Numerical evaluation of magnetic absolute measurements with arbitrarily distributed DI-fluxgate theodolite orientations
Heinz-Peter Brunke and Jürgen Matzka
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 7, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-7-1-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-7-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
The magnetic observatory on Tatuoca, Belém, Brazil: history and recent developments
Achim Morschhauser, Gabriel Brando Soares, Jürgen Haseloff, Oliver Bronkalla, José Protásio, Katia Pinheiro, and Jürgen Matzka
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 367–376, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-367-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-367-2017, 2017
Short summary
A low-power data acquisition system for geomagnetic observatories and variometer stations
Achim Morschhauser, Jürgen Haseloff, Oliver Bronkalla, Carsten Müller-Brettschneider, and Jürgen Matzka
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 345–352, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-345-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-345-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Ground-based instruments
A tool for estimating ground-based InSAR acquisition characteristics prior to monitoring installation and survey and its differences from satellite InSAR
Charlotte Wolff, Marc-Henri Derron, Carlo Rivolta, and Michel Jaboyedoff
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 225–248, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-225-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of Internet-of-Things-Based Controlled-Source Ultra-Audio Frequency Electromagnetic Receiver
Zucan Lin, Qisheng Zhang, Keyu Zhou, Xiyuan Zhang, Xinchang Wang, Hui Zhang, and Feng Liu
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-2,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-2024-2, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GI
Short summary
An underground drip water monitoring network to characterize rainfall recharge of groundwater at different geologies, environments, and climates across Australia
Andy Baker, Margaret Shanafield, Wendy Timms, Martin Sogaard Andersen, Stacey Priestley, and Marilu Melo Zurita
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 117–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-117-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Research and application of a flexible measuring array for deep displacement of landslides
Yang Li, Zhong Li, Qifeng Guo, Yimin Liu, and Daji Zhang
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 97–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-97-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-97-2024, 2024
Short summary
A hydrate reservoir renovation device and its application in nitrogen bubble fracturing
Jingsheng Lu, Yuanxin Yao, Dongliang Li, Jinhai Yang, Deqing Liang, Yiqun Zhang, Decai Lin, and Kunlin Ma
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 75–83, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-75-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-75-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Chulliat, A., Matzka, J., Masson, A., and Milan, S. E.: Key Ground-Based and Space-Based Assets to Disentangle Magnetic Field Sources in the Earth's Environment, Space Sci. Rev., 206, 123–156, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0291-y, 2017.
Jankowski, J. and Sucksdorff, C.: Guide for magnetic measurements and observatory practice, IAGA, Warsaw, p. 235, 1996.
Kring Lauridsen, E:, Experiences with the DI-Fluxgate magnetometer inclusive theory of the instrument and comparison with other methods, Danish Meteorological Institute Geophysical Paper R-71, Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, 1985.
Love, J. J. and Chulliat, A.: An international network of geomagnetic observatories EOS, 94, 373–374, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO420001, 2013.
Malin, S.: Historical Introduction to Geomagnetism, in: Geomagnetism, Vol. 1, edited by: Jacobs, J. A., Academic Press, London, 1987.
Download
Short summary
We have compared two methods of performing Absolute observations of the Earth's magnetic field. The newer, Residual method was evaluated for use at USGS geomagnetic observatories and compared with measurements using the traditional Null method. A mathematical outline of the Residual method is presented, including more precise conversions of the Declination angles to nanoTeslas (nT). Results show that the Residual method is better than the Null method, especially at high latitude.