Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-45-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-12-45-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Calculation of soil water content using dielectric-permittivity-based sensors – benefits of soil-specific calibration
Bartosz M. Zawilski
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Observation systems group, CESBIO Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, INRA, IRD, UPS, Toulouse, 31000 France
Franck Granouillac
Observation systems group, CESBIO Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, INRA, IRD, UPS, Toulouse, 31000 France
Nicole Claverie
Observation systems group, CESBIO Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, INRA, IRD, UPS, Toulouse, 31000 France
Baptiste Lemaire
Observation systems group, CESBIO Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, INRA, IRD, UPS, Toulouse, 31000 France
Aurore Brut
Observation systems group, CESBIO Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, INRA, IRD, UPS, Toulouse, 31000 France
Tiphaine Tallec
Observation systems group, CESBIO Université de Toulouse, CNES, CNRS, INRA, IRD, UPS, Toulouse, 31000 France
Related authors
Bartosz M. Zawilski and Vincent Bustillo
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 51–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-51-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-51-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Manual chambers for soil respiration monitoring can be cost-effective yet rather accurate devices. The described chamber is relatively low in cost and entirely built from commercial parts, which makes it very accessible for almost everybody. Our chamber is robust, simple to operate, and very suitable for a large-scale punctual campaign and for educational purposes. Oxygen sensors bring some more insights into our soil respiration understanding.
Bartosz M. Zawilski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 223–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Surface energy balance (SEB) closure check and important environmental variable monitoring require soil heat flux measurement. On the one hand every experimental technique has its possible errors and needs to be checked and corrected. On the other hand, SEB equation should include all sensed energy sources and sinks.
Bartosz M. Zawilski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 163–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-163-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-163-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil evaporation is one of the most important water vapor sources on the Earth with multiple and severe consequences; however, there is a relative lack of instruments to measure it. This study describes a simple apparatus making the soil evaporation measurement accessible. The soil evaporation complexity is overcome by measuring the evaporation dynamic under different measurement conditions. A relatively simple measurement correction is then performed depending on the wind speed.
Syam Chintala, Lionel Jarlan, Vincent Rivalland, Aaron Boone, Oluwakemi Dare-Idowu, Valerie Le Dantec, Gilles Boulet, BVN P. Kambhammettu, and Aurore Brut
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3119, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3119, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how maize crops use water and absorb carbon under contrasting climates using a land surface model coupled with a photosynthesis scheme. The model successfully reproduced ecosystem-scale crop productivity, water loss, and water use efficiency, a key indicator linking carbon uptake and water use. Our results show that the model can reliably capture crop responses to climate and irrigation practices, helping improve predictions of agricultural water use and crop productivity.
Bartosz M. Zawilski and Vincent Bustillo
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 51–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-51-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-51-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Manual chambers for soil respiration monitoring can be cost-effective yet rather accurate devices. The described chamber is relatively low in cost and entirely built from commercial parts, which makes it very accessible for almost everybody. Our chamber is robust, simple to operate, and very suitable for a large-scale punctual campaign and for educational purposes. Oxygen sensors bring some more insights into our soil respiration understanding.
Bartosz M. Zawilski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 223–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-223-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Surface energy balance (SEB) closure check and important environmental variable monitoring require soil heat flux measurement. On the one hand every experimental technique has its possible errors and needs to be checked and corrected. On the other hand, SEB equation should include all sensed energy sources and sinks.
Bartosz M. Zawilski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 163–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-163-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-163-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil evaporation is one of the most important water vapor sources on the Earth with multiple and severe consequences; however, there is a relative lack of instruments to measure it. This study describes a simple apparatus making the soil evaporation measurement accessible. The soil evaporation complexity is overcome by measuring the evaporation dynamic under different measurement conditions. A relatively simple measurement correction is then performed depending on the wind speed.
Cited articles
Behari, J.: Dielectric Constant of Soil, in: Microwave Dielectric Behavior
of Wet Soils. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, 8, Springer,
Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3288-9_5, 2005.
Bittelli, M.: Measuring Soil Water Content: A Review, HortTechnology, 21,
8, https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.21.3.293, 2011.
Campbell, J. E.: Dielectric Properties and Influence of Conductivity in
Soils at One-to-Fifty-Megahertz, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54, 332–341,
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400020006x, 1990.
Cihlor, J. and Ulaby, F. T.: NASA-CR-141868 Dielectric Properties Of Soils As A
Function Of Moisture Content, Remote Sensing Laboratory (RSL) Technical
Report, 177-4,
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19750018483/downloads/19750018483.pdf (last access: 25 January 2023),
1974.
Davis, J. L. and Annan, A. P.: Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution
mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy, Geophys. Prospect., 37, 531–552,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02221.x, 1989.
De Vos, B., Cools, N., Verstraeten, A., and Neirynck, J.: Accurate Measurements
of Forest Soil Water Content Using FDR Sensors Require Empirical In Situ
(Re)Calibration, Appl. Sci., 11, 11620, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411620, 2021.
Dong, Y., Miller, S., and Kelley, L.: Performance Evaluation of Soil Moisture
Sensors in Coarse- and Fine-Textured Michigan Agricultural Soils,
Agriculture, 10, 598, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10120598, 2020
Grimnes, S. and Martinsen, Ø. G.: Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics, 3rd edn., edited by: Grimnes, S. and Martinsen Ø. G, Academic
Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411470-8.00011-8, 2015.
Hoekstra, P., Delaney, A.: Dielectric properties of soils at UHF and
microwave frequencies, J. Geophys. Res. 10, 1896–1977,
doi/10.1029/JB079i011p01699, 1974.
Jackisch, C., Germer, K., Graeff, T., Andrä, I., Schulz, K., Schiedung, M., Haller-Jans, J., Schneider, J., Jaquemotte, J., Helmer, P., Lotz, L., Bauer, A., Hahn, I., Šanda, M., Kumpan, M., Dorner, J., de Rooij, G., Wessel-Bothe, S., Kottmann, L., Schittenhelm, S., and Durner, W.: Soil moisture and matric potential – an open field comparison of sensor systems, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 683–697, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-683-2020, 2020.
Ledieu, J., De Ridder, P., De Clerck, P., Dautrebande, S.: A method of
measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry, J. Hydrol.,
88, 319–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(86)90097-1, 1986.
Lukanu, G. and Savage, M. J.: Calibration of a frequency-domain
reflectometer for determining soil-water content in a clay loam soil, Water
SA, 32, 37–42, https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v32i1.5237, 2006.
Malterre, H. and Alabert, M.: Nouvelles observations au sujet d'un mode
rationnel de classement des textures des sols et des roches meubles –
pratique de l'interprétation des analyses physiques, Bulletin de l'AFES
2, 76–84, 1963.
Malmberg, C. G. and Maryott, A. A.: Dielectric Constant of Water from
0∘ to 100∘ C, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., 56, 2641, 1956.
Mishra P. N., Zhang, Y., Bhuyan, M. H., and Scheuermann, A.: Anisotropy in
volume change behaviour of soils during shrinkage, Acta Geotech., 15,
3399–3414, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01015-6, 2020.
Namdar-Khojasteh, D., Shorafa, M., and Omid, M.: Evaluation of dielectric
constant by clay mineral and soil physico-chemical properties,
Afr. J. Agr. Res., 7, 170–176, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR10.346,
2012.
Op de Beeck, M., Gielen, B., Merbold, L., Ayres, E., Serrano-Ortiz, P.,
Acosta, M., Pavelka, M., Montagnani, L., Nilsson, M., Klemedtsson, L.,
Vincke, C., De Ligne, A., Moureaux, C., Marañon-Jimenez, S., Saunders,
M., Mereu, S., and Hörtnagl, L.: Soil-meteorological measurements
at ICOS monitoring stations in terrestrial ecosystems. Int. Agrophys., 32,
619–631, https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0041, 2018.
Perdoc, U. D., Kroesbergen, B., and Hilhorst, M. A.: Influence of
gravimetric water content and bulk density on the dielectric properties of
soil, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 47, 367–371, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01410.x, 1996.
Skierucha W. and Wilczek, A.: A FDR Sensor for Measuring Complex Soil
Dielectric Permittivity in the 10–500 MHz Frequency Range, Sensors,
10, 3314–3329, https://doi.org/10.3390/s100403314, 2010.
Sreenivas, K., Venkataratnam, L., and Narasimha Rao, P. V.: Dielectric
properties of salt-affected soils, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
16, 641–649, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954431, 1995.
Szypłowska A., Szerement, J., Lewandowski, A., Kafarski, M., Wilczek, A.,
and Skierucha, W.: Impact of Soil Salinity on the Relation Between Soil
Moisture and Dielectric Permittivity, 2018 12th International Conference on
Electromagnetic Wave Interaction with Water and Moist Substances (ISEMA), 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMA.2018.8442298, 4–7 June 2018.
Szypłowska A., Lewandowski, A., Yagihara, S., Saito, H., Furuhata, K.,
Szerement, J., Kafarski, M., Wilczek, A., Majcher, J., Woszczyk, A., and
Skierucha, W.: Dielectric models for moisture determination of soils with
variable organic matter content, Geoderma, 401, 115288,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115288, 2021.
Varble, J. L. and Chávez, J. L.: Performance evaluation and calibration of
soil water content and potential sensors for agricultural soils in eastern
Colorado, Agr. Water Manage., 101, 93–106,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.09.007, 2011.
Wang, J. R. and Schmugge, T. J.: An Empirical Model for the Complex Dielectric Permittivity of Soils as a Function of Water Content, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, GE-18-4, 288–295, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1980.350304, 1980.
Wang-Erlandsson, L., Tobian, A., van der Ent, R. J., Fetzer, I., te Wierik,
S., Porkka, M., Staal, A., Jaramillo, F., Dahlmann, H., Singh, C., Greve,
P., Gerten, D., Keys, P. W., Gleeson, T., Cornell, S. E., Steffen, W., Bai,
X., and Rockström, J.: A planetary boundary for green water, Nature
Reviews Earth & Environment, 3, 380–392, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00287-8, 2022.
Zawilski, B.: Wind speed influences corrected Autocalibrated Soil
Evapo-respiration Chamber (ASERC) evaporation measures, Geosci. Instrum.
Method. Data Syst., 11, 163–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-163-2022, 2022.
Short summary
In most cases, the soil water content (SWC) measurement is carried out using commercially available dielectric-permittivity-based probes such as time domain reflectometers or frequency domain reflectometers (FDR). However, these probes use transfer functions which may be inadequate in the soil concerned. Raw SWC measurement in clayey soil shows an important relative error. A simple protocol is presented, allowing for the recovery of an acceptable accuracy of the FDR SWC measurements.
In most cases, the soil water content (SWC) measurement is carried out using commercially...